Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: General Motors Cans Cadillac Ultraluxury Sedan

    William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    June 29, 2013

    Last night, Automotive News broke some big news concerning Cadillac. Sources say that executives have put on ice a new super luxury sedan that would have competed with the likes of Bentley and Rolls-Royce. The reason is due to the investment not being justifiable.

    A brief refresher: Back in 2011, we began hearing rumors of a new RWD platform with the codename of Omega. Omega was to spawn two new Cadillac flagships; one that would take on the likes of the BMW 7-Series and Mercedes-Benz S-Class; and a super luxury sedan.

    Now, development of Omega and the S-Class competitor is still on and is expected to come out sometime in 2016 or 2017.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Makes sense. The wording on the other forum made this look like a seriously discounted 7-Series, etc. fighter would be offered, while I think the wording here hints at a proper 7-Series, etc. fighter the same way the 2014 CTS is aimed more precisely against the 5-Series, etc.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Exactly.

    and besides, it's always been my opinion that the topper on Cadillac's lineup that would garner the most buzz would always be a well styled big Coupe (potentialy a convertible option too) like an Eldorado or something that would go against the Mercedes CL. Certainly from someone who would prefer to see some variety in the lineup at least, two big sedans doesn't make an awful lot of sense at this point in time.

    It's pretty crazy that they were seriously thinking about building a RR competitor in the first place, and who knows? Maybe it will happen someday. One thing is for certain, in order to sell a car like that and be taken seriously, perhaps even to sell a CL competitor or an S-Class competitor, there are other things they need to do first. We are just now seeing how much traction they have gained with the ATS, and the sales of the CTS will really be anybody's guess at this point. Additionally, Cadillac's dealer and customer experience are just not at the level they need to be. If there isn't an internal goal to offer the same level of service that Lexus does within five years, then people need to be fired. You can't sell a $200k + sedan out of dealerships that look like this:

    5743798.JPG

    Or this:

    0415B_L8CADILLAC.jpg

    Come on.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Exactly.

    and besides, it's always been my opinion that the topper on Cadillac's lineup that would garner the most buzz would always be a well styled big Coupe (potentialy a convertible option too) like an Eldorado or something that would go against the Mercedes CL. Certainly from someone who would prefer to see some variety in the lineup at least, two big sedans doesn't make an awful lot of sense at this point in time.

    Funny you should mention that.. From the Automotive News story,

    The person said that Cadillac executives are weighing a number of other niche vehicles to push the boundaries of Cadillac's revitalized lineup.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not sure if I buy this. Too often things are on, off, on, off etc.

    I suspect that there may have been some timing changes as Cadillac has work to do before they pop a large big buck car out. I expected a $75K-120K car from the start and it is doable. The S should be the target here for now. Later on once they have established themselves as the choice car to be seen in and drive then offer the over the top car.

    The real key here is what can they also use the Omega for to cover the development cost on this platform. One car will not do it and there are few other large cars GM will ever offer again.

    Anyways we have heard so many times the ATS coupe was canned and yet it just appeared not long ago in cammo.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac has yet to succeed above $60k, so no sense going after Rolls or Bentley. They need a $50-65k CTS to succeed, then to go after the XJ, A8, S-class and 7-series. But even the A8 which is a well reviewed car struggles to sell. Cadillac could build an all-star car and still only sell 6,000 a year, that gamble makes me wonder how committed they are to a big luxury sedan.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    how much longer will cars be seen as luxury props.......

    As long as people have the disposable income they will use them to enhance their image. That is the point of most purchases in this range.

    I know many who hide their income and worth and you would never know their worth while others display it or try to show they have more than they have.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    how much longer will cars be seen as luxury props.......

    Always. There will always be people who want to flaunt their (apparent) wealth with a large luxury car. The Genesis sedan and the Equus are simply ballin' on a budget. Cadillac should aim for S-Class/7 series territory, if only to show the automotive world they are truly serious. Besides, have you been near or inside a 7 series or an S-Class? Both cars are flagships for a reason. Cadillac needs a true flagship. Caddy does NOT need to beat RR/Bently because they have not been anywhere near that since the 1930s. A 21st century Duesenberg could handle that role, not Cadillac.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The real key here is what can they also use the Omega for to cover the development cost on this platform. One car will not do it and there are few other large cars GM will ever offer again.

    Agreed. China/Australia could perhaps get a Buick Park-Avenue / Holden Caprice built on Omega... For Cadillac, I'd say a large coupe is perhaps the more logical way to go, but... To be honest it seems kind of foggy, unless Omega ends up sharing a lot with Alpha and being a reworked/reinforced Alpha in the sense than it can accommodate 200in-plus cars...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I suspect that the Omega would share some things and be a reworked Alpha. As the Volume would be low enough that it would be difficult to spread this model out too much even with Buick in China and Opel in Europe.

    I always considered the LTS a S fighter and a flag ship. Once they connect with this car then they could move to other aspirations of higher models. I would love to see them do a Bentley GT coupe/convertible first and not another sedan and or 2 seat sports car. I think they could pull this one off and build on to a sedan later.

    Bentley is a obtainable goal but they have work to do first and a lot of other needed product to do before they jump in the deep end. You must be considered and seen as a true contender before you can compete in these higher classes. Image in these classes are just as important as anything else.


    But Cadillac needs to learn to walk the walk here before they try to dance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    how much longer will cars be seen as luxury props.......

    Always. There will always be people who want to flaunt their (apparent) wealth with a large luxury car. The Genesis sedan and the Equus are simply ballin' on a budget. Cadillac should aim for S-Class/7 series territory, if only to show the automotive world they are truly serious. Besides, have you been near or inside a 7 series or an S-Class? Both cars are flagships for a reason. Cadillac needs a true flagship. Caddy does NOT need to beat RR/Bently because they have not been anywhere near that since the 1930s. A 21st century Duesenberg could handle that role, not Cadillac.

    well.. 1950s... but otherwise I agree.

    cadillac-eldorado-brougham-1957-737ad.jp

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The V16 cars of the 30's were seen of high value to people with money. They could compete with Dusey, Packard and even Rolls back then.

    Today If given time to improve their image to being a class leader in all segments they could tackle this if they chose. Just it can not just be a larger LTS and it has to be something special.

    Bentley today is high end but a much more common car today as I see them often even here in Ohio and even in the middle of winter. They and Maserati have become the choice of those who want to be seen differently then the traditional BMW and Benz crowd.

    Rolls is not as common for two reasons they are even more expensive and for the most part they are ugly. One of the few new Rolls I see here in Akron is Lebron James Rolls but even he does not drive it often as he spends more time in his other toys from Ferrari or even the family truckster they use to take the family out shopping or out to eat. .

    Cadillac needs to focus on the ATS, LTS and the CTS to make them the best in class. Then we can revisit this.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was never a fan for going the Super Luxury route yet... I feel it's a waste. I'd love to see Cadillac successfully fight a 7-series, A8, S-class. I don't think they have it in them just yet, but they're close. I feel that's where they should focus their attentions right now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Rolls" has enjoyed some true longevity in the cache of the name, but the factual matter is that the brand slipped far behind being any sort of class leader sometime in the 1920s. Rolls didn't get an 8-cylinder until 1959 IIRC, or FORTY-FIVE YEARS after Cadillac introduce theirs. A/C didn't appear until sometime circa the mid '50s, or around 15 years after Cadillac. By the mid '60s, a Rolls had circa a whopping 215 HP and couldn't lumber out of it's own way. Most of the styling was a full decade behind the industry and there was no engineering department... at all. It was a well built car; well built but boring, archaic and spartanly-equipped with poor performance in every metric.

    The only buzz up to that point was the short-lived appearance of the ungainly Camargue in the late '70s. Google up a pic of the interior and gape at that black rubber school bus steering wheel (finish/design, not diameter). Whew.

    To state it accurately, Rolls first ceased to be competitive with Cadillac about 85 years ago.

    But, as with the case with Rolls today, a proper product can turn things around 180 degrees. I actually like the current Rolls (via pics; I've yet to see one in person). A proper Cadillac could absolutely compete in the ultra-lux / Rolls level... but whether now is the time, is another matter. Agree that the s-class level is much more important, now & long-term.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not true as while Cadillac on the option sheet could beat the flying lady in image and prestige Cadillac has not competed since the custom body V16 cars.

    Rolls was never really that great of a technical car but they have built heritage and image on styling and hand craftsman's ship. Also for a long time as one of the most expensive cars you can buy. Today they are just a large over priced ugly BMW.

    Until Cadillac has gotten the rest of their products in line they will not have the image to produce such a car. Even for Benz the Maybach failed as it never had the styling and was seen as many as just a over priced Benz.

    Lets get the rest of the new lines out and see where the market is and go from there. Lets face it if the LTS is not class leading then why bother with a even more expensive model. Right now the money is in the mid priced expensive cars in the 100K-175K range and they can look into that at some point but being there is not going to make or break Cadillac. The ATS and CTS being better than all other is where Cadillac's future image lies.

    BMW's present image was built with the 3 series not with buying Rolls Royce. If anything I think they have hurt Rolls more then helped them with their styling.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ You are incorrect and ignore the Eldorado Brougham Drew posted, leaps & bounds over any Rolls that decade or the following TWO. World's better car with a better image to boot.

    In the '30s Cadillac had V8s, V12s and V16s while all Rolls offered was a 6. "Competed" then? More like 'blew out of the water'. Rolls existed sheerly on quality of craftsmanship, but that's hardly enough to be 'competitive'. Which it wasn't.

    Image is made on the back of product. Build the product and the image always follows, not the other way around. You know Pontiac & their image circa 1954, and what occurred over the next 10 years, right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Get the ATS and CTS right; that's 80% of the pie. They can worry about the S-class segment later. Besides, it doesn't really have to be a brang new platform. It can be a double-stretched Alpha with widened sills.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seems to me that Cadillac ought to find diversity in variants of its existing models first, before it tackles a Rolls beater.

    Pretty much: Cadillac's game right now is to build a solid product structure by covering the key bases (core models and variants of those) and if successful, then take the high-end gamble with a fully dedicated model. Platform sharing (Omega), yes, but no commonality in visible parts other than the Cadillac badge.

    @ dwightlooi - Maybe that's exactly what Omega is? An adaptation of Alpha to larger vehicles?

    Edited by ZL-1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ You are incorrect and ignore the Eldorado Brougham Drew posted, leaps & bounds over any Rolls that decade or the following TWO. World's better car with a better image to boot.

    In the '30s Cadillac had V8s, V12s and V16s while all Rolls offered was a 6. "Competed" then? More like 'blew out of the water'. Rolls existed sheerly on quality of craftsmanship, but that's hardly enough to be 'competitive'. Which it wasn't.

    Image is made on the back of product. Build the product and the image always follows, not the other way around. You know Pontiac & their image circa 1954, and what occurred over the next 10 years, right?

    Image Is part product but much of it is Marketing! Lets face it some of the most popular cars today have great public Images and many are just ok cars.

    With Pontiac and I am a Pontiac fan the keys to their changes were in styling risks and with good solid marketing. Wanger was and is yet today full of hot air but he marketed the Pontiac image. While he talks a lot about the GTO today his marketing affected every Pontiac.

    Look at the imagery of the Fitzpatrick and Kaufman illustrations. Today they are considered art work and back then it sold a image and perception of these cars.

    While Pontiac did many things to change them they still started with the same damn platform Chevy was given as well as Buick and Olds in most of their cars. They learned to get the look down, how to market it and used performance and racing to present it.

    Pontiac in the last few years was not really getting the look down on some cars and they were a performance division that really had no performance out side two cars.

    Cadillac has the look and they are damn close on the performance. They only lack a few minor things that I expect them to fix. I only wish they would take the advertising to the next level. The S class is needed as this is a three model class of cars. The XTS is ok but it not what they really need in a flag ship. Having a FWD car is ok but it should not be your flag ship even with AWD.

    Cadillac can move up but they first need to earn the right to do so. The direction they are going shows they can do it but the fact is they still have to do it and it takes time to redeem an image from where they placed it. They will earn the customers trust but lets let the ATS and CTS have some time to do their work. In the mean time GM needs to address any and all issues asap and make these cars best in class with no reservations.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cadillac is no where near being ready to go after Rolls or Bentley, they probably never will be. Rolls-Royce can charge $400,000+ for a Phantom, that is rarefied air. You could argue that the Hyundai Equus is closer to an top end luxury sedan than anything Cadillac as. GM let Cadillac's image weaken in the 1970s, then dragged it through the mud in the 80s, 90s, and it wasn't until around 2003 when they starting to pump some life back into it.

    They have yet to prove they can challenge the 5-series and E-class, let along climbing up the ladder. The ATS and CTS are where to start, if those cars succeed, then it is time for an S-class level car, but you have to go all in, or it will flop. It would probably be the biggest R&D budget GM has ever put into a car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    mercedes is also no where near ready to go after rolls/bentley- they tried & failed. mercedes cannot even get sticker on the s-class.

    5-series/e-class 'challenge' has already been met & matched with the 3rd gen CTS; 3-series has been eclipsed by the ATS. Volume should follow, but the german twins have already reached mainstream volume levels- they have whored out exclusivity for profits. Cadillac should keep their volume contained, avoid the gab-ass minivans/ econoboxes/ cargo trucks and build on exclusivity. Lower volume, higher profit should be the goal.

    Image is made on the back of product. Build the product and the image always follows, not the other way around. You know Pontiac & their image circa 1954, and what occurred over the next 10 years, right?

    While Pontiac did many things to change them they still started with the same damn platform Chevy was given as well as Buick and Olds in most of their cars. They learned to get the look down, how to market it and used performance and racing to present it.

    If you are referring to the period I mentioned, they certainly were not "the same damn 'platforms'" (no 'platforms'; BOF cars). Each Division in this era (thru the early '60s) designed their own. Buick's was totally unique out of the five '59s. Only thing Pontiac & Chevy started out with was the same damned body shell mounting points & the same greenhouses... the rest was proprietary.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    mercedes is also no where near ready to go after rolls/bentley- they tried & failed. mercedes cannot even get sticker on the s-class.

    5-series/e-class 'challenge' has already been met & matched with the 3rd gen CTS; 3-series has been eclipsed by the ATS. Volume should follow, but the german twins have already reached mainstream volume levels- they have whored out exclusivity for profits. Cadillac should keep their volume contained, avoid the gab-ass minivans/ econoboxes/ cargo trucks and build on exclusivity. Lower volume, higher profit should be the goal.

    Image is made on the back of product. Build the product and the image always follows, not the other way around. You know Pontiac & their image circa 1954, and what occurred over the next 10 years, right?

    While Pontiac did many things to change them they still started with the same damn platform Chevy was given as well as Buick and Olds in most of their cars. They learned to get the look down, how to market it and used performance and racing to present it.

    If you are referring to the period I mentioned, they certainly were not "the same damn 'platforms'" (no 'platforms'; BOF cars). Each Division in this era (thru the early '60s) designed their own. Buick's was totally unique out of the five '59s. Only thing Pontiac & Chevy started out with was the same damned body shell mounting points & the same greenhouses... the rest was proprietary.

    Calm down I was speaking of the 60's as many of the platforms were melding together at that time. Not as bad as later as they each had their little tricks but they did share a lot more than many want to admit. But on the other hand it makes it easier to restore them today.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ "1954 & next 10 years" equals 1964- still different.
    Too many like to brush off Divisional engineering with an offhanded 'they've always been the same damn thing'. I've watched this with a focused eye occur on the internet over the last 15 years, but it needs to be corrected before we get to the point that 'the Cadillac V-12 was just 2 Chevy straight sixes welded together.' Slippery slope and all that. ;)

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ "1954 & next 10 years" equals 1964- still different.

    Too many like to brush off Divisional engineering with an offhanded 'they've always been the same damn thing'. I've watched this with a focused eye occur on the internet over the last 15 years, but it needs to be corrected before we get to the point that 'the Cadillac V-12 was just 2 Chevy straight sixes welded together.' Slippery slope and all that. ;)

    Again calm down. I am not nit picking. What I had in mind were the A bodies F bodies etc. While even they had their differences they also many things the same.

    I have pulled out 12 bolts from under Pontiac GTO's that were bolted in place from the factory and used fenders for a 68 Camaro that bolted in place of a 68 Firebird with no issues only to be capped and hidden by a Bird bumper etc. While no where near where it got later the basis for these cars were starting to be shared and got worse later.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As bad as the lack of an ultraluxury sedan is for Cadillac, for now they are heading in the right direction. I just hope GM's bad habits do not resurface again. Now if only we could get rid of the Wall Street mentality of short-term profits above all else.

    Here is why: http://www.autoextremist.com/current/2013/5/28/the-high-octane-truth-fourteen-years-later.html and http://www.autoextremist.com/current/2013/6/4/the-autoextremist-brand-image-meter-ii.html

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ "1954 & next 10 years" equals 1964- still different.

    Too many like to brush off Divisional engineering with an offhanded 'they've always been the same damn thing'. I've watched this with a focused eye occur on the internet over the last 15 years, but it needs to be corrected before we get to the point that 'the Cadillac V-12 was just 2 Chevy straight sixes welded together.' Slippery slope and all that. ;)

    Again calm down. I am not nit picking. What I had in mind were the A bodies F bodies etc. While even they had their differences they also many things the same.

    I have pulled out 12 bolts from under Pontiac GTO's that were bolted in place from the factory and used fenders for a 68 Camaro that bolted in place of a 68 Firebird with no issues only to be capped and hidden by a Bird bumper etc. While no where near where it got later the basis for these cars were starting to be shared and got worse later.

    Also, as far as the big cars go, AFAIK the '65-70, '71-76, and '77-xx generation B- and C- bodies within each generation were pretty similar as far as the chassis and other dirty bits (excluding division-specific drivetrains and wheelbases)...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    mercedes is also no where near ready to go after rolls/bentley- they tried & failed. mercedes cannot even get sticker on the s-class.

    5-series/e-class 'challenge' has already been met & matched with the 3rd gen CTS; 3-series has been eclipsed by the ATS. Volume should follow, but the german twins have already reached mainstream volume levels- they have whored out exclusivity for profits. Cadillac should keep their volume contained, avoid the gab-ass minivans/ econoboxes/ cargo trucks and build on exclusivity. Lower volume, higher profit should be the goal.

    Mercedes took 12,000 orders for the S-class in the past month, we'll see how the Pullman does. Mercedes isn't really going directly at Rolls and Bentley, but they will continue to offer cars in the $200,00 range because they have a loyal following and people that can and will pay that price for a special Mercedes.

    I don't think we can say the 3rd gen CTS has eclipsed the E-class and 5-series when it isn't on sale yet. The CTS is also prices $4,000 below the 528i and E350. The 5-series and E-class sell about 5,000 a month here, I don't think the new CTS can get that level.

    The 3-series outsold the ATS, CTS and XTS combined in June, 3-series sales were up 49% in May, up 62% in June, the ATS isn't hurting it, that car is hotter than ever.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Pretty sad when a dressed up Tahoe is your flagship. That needs to change.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Pretty sad when a dressed up Tahoe is your flagship. That needs to change.

    I am german and I would still take the dressed up Tahoe over anything BMW or MB put out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ol' man DeLorenzo is pining for an era that doesn't exist any more. Cadillac doesn't need an Ultra-Lux model when wealthy individuals are picking up 3's and E's. If Mercedes couldn't make a successful Bentley beater using an existing platform and engines from the S, I doubt Cadillac in its current condition would do any better.

    The focus should remain on the CTS and ATS, as well as keeping the SRX fresh. I'm a little upset that I'm not seeing more ads for the XTS, as I think that car should be heavily promoted towards the 'Phaeton crowd' who like luxury and technology, but with an understated sumptuousness.

    Edited by Señor Ding Dong
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Pretty sad when a dressed up Tahoe is your flagship. That needs to change.

    On the other hand, selling a dressed up Tahoe for 60 grand does generate a lot of profit... But yes, the Escalade needs to be set further apart form the Chevrolet and GMC, even if it keeps sharing a platform with them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Escalade is not that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    mercedes is also no where near ready to go after rolls/bentley- they tried & failed. mercedes cannot even get sticker on the s-class.

    5-series/e-class 'challenge' has already been met & matched with the 3rd gen CTS; 3-series has been eclipsed by the ATS. Volume should follow, but the german twins have already reached mainstream volume levels- they have whored out exclusivity for profits. Cadillac should keep their volume contained, avoid the gab-ass minivans/ econoboxes/ cargo trucks and build on exclusivity. Lower volume, higher profit should be the goal.

    Mercedes took 12,000 orders for the S-class in the past month, we'll see how the Pullman does. Mercedes isn't really going directly at Rolls and Bentley, but they will continue to offer cars in the $200,00 range because they have a loyal following and people that can and will pay that price for a special Mercedes.

    I don't think we can say the 3rd gen CTS has eclipsed the E-class and 5-series when it isn't on sale yet. The CTS is also prices $4,000 below the 528i and E350. The 5-series and E-class sell about 5,000 a month here, I don't think the new CTS can get that level.

    The 3-series outsold the ATS, CTS and XTS combined in June, 3-series sales were up 49% in May, up 62% in June, the ATS isn't hurting it, that car is hotter than ever.

    BMW inadvertently made it easier for the ATS to catch up to the 3-series in sales by splitting out the coupe into its own model line.

    Once the initial fanfare for the S-Class passes, the rest will go straight to the creame/beige paint line to be sprayed up as Taxis.

    15MercedesS-ClassTaxi.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Escalade isn't a statement... it's a leftover.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Haven't gone through the 2 links in detail, but... Could it be they decided not to do a uber-sedan above the LTS but will instead look into other alternatives? There's that concept drawing of a coupe, isn't there? New Eldorado as the flagship (i.e. 'halo') model, maybe? :AH-HA:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As I have said before a larger 2+2 open top would do well at Cadillac over another failed two seater sports car.

    Make it stylish, comfortable and a GT in the truest sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As I have said before a larger 2+2 open top would do well at Cadillac over another failed two seater sports car.

    Make it stylish, comfortable and a GT in the truest sense.

    :yes:

    EDIT - Wonder if it'd be easy to set up a 'specialty' assembly line, focused 100% on the highest levels of manual input and assembly quality, for such a model alongside the other Alpha+Omega models...

    Edited by ZL-1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As I have said before a larger 2+2 open top would do well at Cadillac over another failed two seater sports car.

    Make it stylish, comfortable and a GT in the truest sense.

    :yes:

    EDIT - Wonder if it'd be easy to set up a 'specialty' assembly line, focused 100% on the highest levels of manual input and assembly quality, for such a model alongside the other Alpha+Omega models...

    It could easily be done as this is how vehicles like the SSR and Viper were built. I think even the Reatta was done this way at the craft center if I recall. The more manual it is the more expense hence the higher the cost.

    The only issue is how much quality can they put in and still get a price to cover it. What is the model and price point that Cadillac can attain that people will be willing to pay. Also what you have to do to keep the car alive for more than 3 years.

    This is what Lincoln did with the Continental in the 50's and while it was a good car it lived a very short time and sold in too few of numbers. It was a case where the car was just not up to the image and different enough to make it desirable to most customers. Still a good car but not good enough in the right areas.

    For the longest time I always considered the LTS as the flag ship and anything higher a pipe dream for now. The things Cadillac needs to pull a car off like this is not anything they can install or do on the assembly line. The things they needs it what the car will mean to the customer and you can not build that or install that. Many have tired and failed with out earning their place like Lincoln.

    It is easy to fall from grace of in this case status but is takes much more time and work to gain it all back. Cadillac is not going to earn their way back in just 10 years and 3-4 models. It needs to do the work and earn its way back the right way with top quality product that with each new model takes it to the next level.

    I still think Cadillac needs to look at doing engines just for themselves at some point. Even if it is not one of their own it has to be one that is not shared in the same tune as the rest and they need make an effort to make it appear different.

    I often wonder the lack of the TTV6 in anything else at this point is to make that engine a Cadillac engine only. This could change but as for now if you want it the only way is through Cadillac vs. the ecoboost you can get it in a truck to a Lincoln.

    I just tire of GM doing cars like a XLR and Allante that just come up short and if even done right may still fail due to the price point. I just think they need to make what they have the best and then top it with each coming model.

    One large failure on the scale of a Maybach would set Cadillac back more than it did Benz. When you are there and fail no one says much but when you are trying to come back people talk.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This proposition is not unacceptable. In fact Cadillac should perfect the S Class competitor and then gun for the Bentleys. So may be another 7years or so when Omega is ready for an update engineering and design changes can be made to accmodate a bigger sedan.

    However, having a non-sedan (coupe/convertible) as a true flagship is more intriguing than the boring bodystyle if Cadillac wants to make a true statement.

    Well, Cadillac has made that statement already by having the Escalade as its pricier model...

    Escalade isn't a statement... it's a leftover.

    Escalade is NO LEFT OVER! :fryingpan:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All this focus on Rolls and for what? Until BMW took them over and they gained platform sharing ability with the BMW line, Rolls was predominantly unprofitable and notoriously unreliable. Maybach failed and Bentley was taken over by VW.

    Cadillac needs to tread lightly when entering this arena and make sure all of its other ducks are in a row first.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the real question is "What can Cadillac do that MB/BMW/Audi cannot or will not do"? While the ULS may well be dead, I would like to see Caddy do something the Germans (and Lexus/Jaguar) cannot possibly do or execute. The cars they have are very good in most respects, but much of this was needed two or three years ago.

    Cadillac needs a unique selling point and it needs one right now in order to consistently compete and win.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • GMC Hummer EV drivers can now charge their gargantuan EVs on Tesla Superchargers, according to an announcement on GMC's website. Enabling Supercharging requires an update to the myGMC app; however, users can use the Tesla app and register temporarily as a Rivian R1S until the app update completes. Drivers who expect to use the Tesla Superchargers network regularly may wish to sign up for a $12.99 subscription through the Tesla app, which grants a 10c/kWh discount.  With a 200 kWh battery, just two charges from 20% - 80% per month would cover the membership fee. The myGMC app will also allow owners to purchase an official NACS to CCS adaptor.  While third-party NACS to CCS adapters are available for purchase, they are not officially approved for use on Tesla's network. With this change, GMC says that Hummer EV drivers now have access to approximately 195,000 charge points across North America.  Most Tesla Superchargers are of the 250kw variety, and while not specified in GMC's announcement, we suspect that the Hummer EV is not eligible to charge on the 150kw chargers, much like the Ford EVs, which cite the same 15,000 number for eligible Superchargers.  Limited to 250kw charging speeds, Hummer EV drivers may wish to limit the use of Tesla stations to a last resort while traveling as they will not reach the full 350kw charging speeds their vehicle is capable of. GM has also partnered with Flying-J / Pilot to offer 350kw charging at truck stops nationwide and is a founding member of the new IONNA Network that will offer both CCS and NACS charging without an adaptor. There is no announcement yet on Tesla Supercharger Access for their other EVs.  Drivers can identify 250kw chargers by the black collar at the end of the charging cable. View full article
    • COST, Apartment owners are very stingy even here in Liberal PNW, there is city mandates now to get apartment owners to install chargers as renters are complaining. Yet up north by my area where I live around Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Edmonds and Mukilteo Apartment owners who have installed L2 chargers rarely have vacancy so yes, it is valuable I believe and of course the Tesla Supercharger stations are packed all the time. Workwise, Seattle has been very progressive in having building owners install chargers and I had at one time posted pictures of all the chargers at my work where 2 years ago, there were 4 and now there is 20 and still they are filled up, so demand is truly there, but resistance to change is still very hard among older folks. With GOP Trump having control of the Rural he has them sold on Toxic Diesel is the life and EVs need to die, so I doubt rural will get chargers without the Feds forcing the install and then we have to deal with the idiots cutting the cables or icing the chargers. I hope there is a future way to have the cables shock the idiots that attempt to cut the cables as it is just stupid.
    • That's hella ugly, but people will buy it because it says "off road"   Look at how it tackles that gravel road that a Nissan Sentra could easily navigate.
    • True, but some larger apartment complexes or parking garages could put in level 2 chargers, maybe even level 1 for places like an airport extended parking.  If people have their car sit 12 hours at their apartment, or 8 hours in a parking garage while at work, there is opportunity there also for charing without having to build out expensive super chargers. And really it is rural America that should be embracing EV's way more because there aren't many gas stations when you get into farm country, you might have to drive 30-40 minutes to find a gas station in some parts of rural America, but they have houses with electricity and can easily charge.  
    • Meh, just another forgettable appliance...styling very similar to the Polstar something something...
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search