Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ferrari Confirms Plan For Utility Vehicle, Expand Hybrid Offerings

      It's all about those sweet, sweet profits

    It was about a month ago that we reported on the rumor of Ferrari working on an SUV, a complete 180 from Ferrari Chairman (and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO) Sergio Marchionne's “you have to shoot me first” answer when asked about this last year. That rumor has been revealed to be true.

    During a conference call reporting second-quarter earnings, Marchionne confirmed that the Italian sports car builder is considering an expansion into utility vehicles and possibly reinvent the segment.

    "It will probably happen but it will happen in Ferrari’s style,” said Marchionne.

    "That space is too big and too inviting and we have a lot of our customers who will be more than willing to drive a Ferrari-branded vehicle that has that king of utilitarian objective."

    Marchionne also reiterated the “you have to shoot me first” comment is if Ferrari comes up with something similar to the models from Bentley or Porsche.

    Bloomberg learned from sources earlier in the week about Ferrari considering adding an SUV to their lineup in an effort to double profits by 2022. The model would be targeted at customers in Asia, particularly those in China. This could add an extra 2,000 sales for the company. But this could bring up a big problem for Ferrari. Currently, Ferrari produces under 10,000 vehicles a year to avoid various emission regulations. By possibly adding an SUV, Ferrari would now have to meet them. According to sources, Ferrari is planning on introducing more hybrid models beginning in 2019 to meet the various regulations.

    Next year, Marchionne will be presenting his final five-year business plan for FCA and their various brands. We'll likely find out then if Ferrari is going forward on the utility vehicle.

    Source: Bloomberg, (2)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Yawn, big deal, Over rated CEO saying that an over rated Italian sports car maker is going to build an SUV. 

    Late to the party as always!

    Talk about a serious lack of vision for the future and planning.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Of course, Sergio could just sell more Jeep Grand Cherokees in China.  Is China really that brand-obsessed?

    It's the Middle East for which they need the Ferrari SUV, I think....to get a piece of  the Range Rover, Benyaga, G-class market...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, riviera74 said:

    Of course, Sergio could just sell more Jeep Grand Cherokees in China.  Is China really that brand-obsessed?

    China is turning off the ICE / Diesel spigit to clean up their air. All about the EV baby! :P 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    China is turning off the ICE / Diesel spigit to clean up their air. All about the EV baby! :P 

    Pretty silly given their reliance on coal-fired power.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    $400k for a V12 SUV and they'll probably sell everyone they make.  Easy profit.  Not surprised they are doing this.  Why would Ferrari want their owners going to Mercedes or Range Rover for their SUV, when they can provide it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, frogger said:

    Pretty silly given their reliance on coal-fired power.

    Interesting part of this is that in 2014, China was producing as much coal as the rest of the world combined just about and using almost equal to the world combined.

    https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=16271

    ChinaCoalUseProduction.png

    A year later in 2015, China takes on an aggressive clean up effort. 66% of China power in 2013 was from coal, 2014 it actually dropped to 64% and down to 62% for 2015 leading to the coal price slump that caused in 2016 for all coal companies in the US to declare Bankruptcy. Production from Coal has already dropped to 53.7% now and will continue to drop as China pushes to go below 50% by 2020 and to reduce ICE auto's to 50% by 2030.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/china-coal-idUSL3N0WL32720150326

    Here is an updated story that was published in March 2016 showing China dropped another 3.7% in coal use and they are shutting down and cleaning up open pit mines in the country. The drive to improve health of their people and their country is a primary push as they move to alternative green forms of power production and consumption.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/03/world/asia/china-coal-consumption-down.html

    Over all, at least what is reported tends to show China aggressively changing how they do things. Nuclear, Wind and Solar for them is growing much faster, so I would say they are following the history of what the US has done.

    Based on this news:

    http://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/china-nuclear-power.aspx

    China has 37 Nuclear reactors producing power, 20 under construction and even more about to start construction.

    This covers the current state of Solar:

    http://www.powermag.com/growth-of-solar-power-in-china-offers-lessons-for-u-s-study-says/

    China produces 71% of the solar modules worldwide in comparison to 1.3% produced in the US. in 2010 China only had 800 MW (Mega Watts) of solar production and now at the end of 2015 43,500 MW of power production. 50 times increase.

    Under China's 5 yr plan, they will triple solar power production by 2020.

    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601093/china-is-on-an-epic-solar-power-binge/

    In regards to Wind this info is based on the Global Wind Energy Council:

    http://www.gwec.net/chinas-wind-power-see-steady-growth/

    China had 18 Gigawatts of wind power production in 2009. The capacity they are adding will have them at 300 gigawatts by 2020 and their long term goal is 400 Gigawatts by 2030. 

    This info was current as of 2012.

    Now this report is an update as of April 2017:

    http://www.ratingsalerts.com/2017/04/26/growth-of-wind-power-in-china/

    China is leading the world in wind power energy production and surpassed the earlier info by 65%. China had at the end of 2016 487 Gigawatts of Wind power production. They have stated in their 5 year plan that the country will produce 800 GW of power by 2021. China is working to close in on the largest producer of power via wind India.

    Over all, these green alternative forms of power production will help China reduce and possibly surpass the US in being green and clean by 2030.

    The US needs to WAKE up to the Green production movement and companies like Ferrari needs to look at Hybrid and EV CUV's.

    V12 powered ICE auto's are NOT needed when we have proof of how powerful a Tesla X is. Ferrari hopefully will focus on beating Tesla with a superior Luxury CUV!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given the current administration, the USA will not be leaders in renewable energy anytime soon.  Our current president digs coal, even though coal is an inefficient power source compared to natural gas, oil, and most renewable sources and nuclear energy.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    Given the current administration, the USA will not be leaders in renewable energy anytime soon.  Our current president digs coal, even though coal is an inefficient power source compared to natural gas, oil, and most renewable sources and nuclear energy.

    I'm not sure he cares about coal (or comprehends power sources), I think that talk is just marketing propaganda to appeal to his base.. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/5/2017 at 4:32 AM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I'm not sure he cares about coal (or comprehends power sources), I think that talk is just marketing propaganda to appeal to his base.. 

    ^^THIS!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I dont think its that.  The base Stingray is exactly that Corvette. The Z06, ZR1 and ZR1x are just engineering flexing on what Corvette engineering and racing has to offer at a price point lower than the Corvette's competition. Hence why they went to Nurburgring with their test drivers and engineers driver the cars to show case ANYBODY could drive these cars, relatively safely, relatively aggressive but not so aggressive as to lose control and crash and STILL come out with impressive times at the Nurburgring.  Its the every man's sports car persona that they hold on dearly to.  I could respect that.  And yes, the ZR1 and ZR1x are expensive. But 1969 Corvette ZL1s with aluminium block 427s were higher priced than the highest priced Cadillac of the time.  Speed and ultimate engineering comes at a cost.  Its not for the average joe.  But...American speed is the most democratized in the world.  Even at 200 000 plus dollars, The ZR1 twins  are still half as expensive as its Porsche and Ferrari competitors.     The Corvette has sold all it could. Remember, its a Corvette and not an SUV. Its a car that is 5 going on 6 years old.  The Z06, ZR1 twins remain coveted and will sell out.  The Stingray now can be bought pennies on the dollar in the used car market like all base Corvettes in the past.  That is why it was stupid for all the idiots that bought the Stingray with dealership mark-ups the first 3 years of C8 production...   The Corvette is not a dying breed. It still sells more units than its competitors.  
    • Cool car. All C8 variants are cool.  I like all variants of the C8 Corvette.  But...I am not super enthused by the C8 all that much with the latest variants.  Yeah yeah...the Z06 is a mid engine flat plane V8, Ferrari emulating experience.  Sure it is a bargain price for what it is.  And yeah, the ZR1 and ZR1x are ridiculous in their horsepower and torque numbers and the chassis handles all that power well and puts the performance numbers to prove it while all three variants offer a very luxury GT experience.  Great.  But Im tired of seeing the GT part of the Corvette always being front and center.  The E-Ray to me is where the luxury GT part of the C8 Corvette should be at.  The best of both worlds of supercar/hyper car performance and luxury. (Because of the battery weight and the battery performance part).   The C8 Stingray is the Stingray. The base Corvette. Where the midlife crisis geezers buy it and pretend that they own the most special breed of cars ever created.  And to others that want exotic speed without the exotic price tags of Porsches, Ferraris and the like.  Just as it is now.   The Z06 should exist as a GT car as it is now, but a more track focused beast that is stripped out and more hardcore version should also exist.   The ZR1 should also exist as a GT as it is now. The ZR1x should be called something else as it really is a different car than the ZR1.  BUT... I think the C8 Corvette needs ZR1 and Z06 GT luxury delete variations where SIGNIFICANT weight reduction (with or without full on carbon fibre bodies) , ACTIVE aero,  and all the GT creature comfort options are all gone from the options list.  Sound deadening included. Crappy trunks big enough for golf bags be gone.  The Corvette NEEDS to shed off some of the late C3 1970s GT persona and return to being a pure sports car again.   The C3 Vette didnt even have a trunk for phoque's sake.  Neither the C2.  The only reason why the C3 gained a GT persona was because emissions regs and the oil shortage made the Vette's engine choices anemic so it had to sell itself on luxury features.   But Im happy as a Corvette fan with the results of the C8 Corvette.  And I hear rumours there might be another mad variant of the C8 to come before the platform changes for a 9nth generation.  
    • I honestly think GM has forgotten the golden space that the Corvette was all about and they have gone after the final years of Boomers who have trillions and are trying to hold onto power, life, and an attempt at youth. End result is they CANNOT take it with them into the ground. Chevrolet really should be focused on the fun to drive Z06 Corvette that more people can afford, but are being shadowed by the 6 figure versions. Course most people have moved onto life style vehicles and so an extra sports car like Corvette is a Dying breed.  If Corvette brought out a Gas / EV version of a Vette SUV, it would take off and surpass Corvette car sales. Then the Corvette car would just be a decent Halo car, able to survive due to the Vette SUV sales.
    • Agree completely.  The Mustang GTD is a hundred grand more than that, apparently.  Interesting...
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search