Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Infiniti Believes Q Nomenclature Isn't A Problem, Just Need to Message It Better

    Sign in to follow this  

      It isn't the name, it's how we present it

    In 2013, Infiniti made a drastic change. The Japanese luxury automaker announced that it would be scrapping its current nomenclature and going with the Q (cars) and QX (crossovers and SUVs) naming system. The move received a lot of criticism at the time. Even now, the decision to move to Q and QX causes many to wonder why.

     

    But this system of Q and QX isn't going anywhere. Infiniti CEO Roland Krüger tells Car and Driver that the company needs to do a better job with communicating the naming system.

     

    “We need to build on our heritage and explain it a bit more. The first Infiniti was called Q45, that was the start of the brand, that’s where it comes from. After that a lot of cars were developed with different naming, but what’s important for a luxury brand is that you have an aspirational hierarchy within the brand setting. Hence Q for a limousine, a sporty sedan, and QX for a crossover, with a number that clearly indicates a place within the hierarchy. But let’s say we didn’t explain it quite enough, to be frank, we need to make sure it’s fully understood,” Krüger explained.

     

    The last line of Krüger's comment is important. Even though the Q and QX nomenclature system has been around for almost three years, we still have problems remembering which model is which.

     

    Source: Car and Driver

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I have come to the point that if they want Q for cars, fine, but QX is and always will be confusing. They have NO History with QX so why not go with a better way to clearly state CUV/SUV.

     

    Why not just go with X then to designate it as a CUV/SUV or maybe XO.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have come to the point that if they want Q for cars, fine, but QX is and always will be confusing. They have NO History with QX so why not go with a better way to clearly state CUV/SUV.

     

    Why not just go with X then to designate it as a CUV/SUV or maybe XO.

    I agree, well the QX doesn't confuse me but I think they could have saved the X for AWD models. Q# cars QX# awd cars and just choose a random letter to signify SUV/SUV and do the same thing. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I have come to the point that if they want Q for cars, fine, but QX is and always will be confusing. They have NO History with QX so why not go with a better way to clearly state CUV/SUV.

     

    Why not just go with X then to designate it as a CUV/SUV or maybe XO.

    I agree, well the QX doesn't confuse me but I think they could have saved the X for AWD models. Q# cars QX# awd cars and just choose a random letter to signify SUV/SUV and do the same thing. 

     

    Very True, BMW uses X for their awd auto's. This goes with the idiot who decided to drop AWD on the Escalade and go with 4WD which is also used on Suburbans. Yes as in another thread I learned that 4WD on the escalade allows you to go 2WD, 4WD High, 4WD LO and 4WD Auto which is pretty much the same as AWD. Just wish Cadillac had put some thought into this as it is a superior system to the old AWD system but does more than the 4x4 system on the suburban.

     

    Infiniti should have put more thought into their naming of Auto's.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I feel like I'm the oddball here but I love the alphanumeric naming that MB/BMW/Audi/Cadillac are using. It does take a little learning but once you do it makes more sense to me. I think MB is probably the most confusing of them all with how many letters/numbers they use when it could all be cut down but I like the CT system Cadillac is adapting, A/S/RS that Audi uses(easily the best naming if you ask me) and Q. Smaller number, smaller car. Bigger number, bigger car. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like Cadillac's current names: ATS, CTS, XTS. They're not perfect, but the scheme rolls off the tongue, and the cars have some level of recognition now. What nobody has really mentioned is how is Cadillac going to do their V-series nomenclature in the future? CT6-V, CT5-V, CT4-V sounds clumsy as hell. Will it be VT6, VT5, etc? Will they drop "V" all together?

     

    I digress, I'm derailing sh*t. I'm not into alpha numerics in general, but changing from one to another just seems asinine to me.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The naming scheme is stupid. But the bigger problem has been their peddling of outdated and/or subpar products for the better part of a decade. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wait; in 2016, an automaker has to do a "better job communicating" a naming scheme which starts off with a meaningless letter, then is followed sometimes by another letter, then by a pair of meaningless numbers? This mindless product naming approach is ubiquitous at this point; communicate what?? 

     

    And oh; how cute- infiniti believes it has a heritage worthy of paying homage to!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Meanwhile a brand no one has ever heard of gets to sneak in and use the G name in its 90, 80 and 70 products.

     

    Yeah, it's a heaping pile of confuzzler gas, made-for-you, and you and you and you and you and me and everyone else....

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Infiniti names were always a bit jumbled.  I can hardly keep straight what is what in their line up.  They don't market their products well, and basically every Infiniti gets miss-mashed together because they all have a similar name with no meaning. 

     

    And as far as some aspiration stepping stone, what a joke that is.  They think the Q50 buyer aspires to buy a Q60 the next time (which is a 2 door) then buy a Q70, a big four door, and then buy a Q80 that doesn't exist so they buy a Genesis G90 instead?

     

    I think that moving up thing is a myth anyway.  If you love the 3-series, you will probably keep buying 3-series because you like the nimble handling and sportiness.  I don't know if a 3-series buyer wants a 7-series that is 2 feet longer and weighs 5,000 lbs.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So the G90 is double the car of the Q45.

     

    Actually, I think the well versed reader will love to crack this whip in front of the Infinit Q70. 

     

    And in real dollars....you're probably paying less for more....

     

    That's actually a really funny turn of events. Nice - done did good there SMK!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    I think that moving up thing is a myth anyway.  If you love the 3-series, you will probably keep buying 3-series because you like the nimble handling and sportiness.  I don't know if a 3-series buyer wants a 7-series that is 2 feet longer and weighs 5,000 lbs.

     

     

    It aint a myth. Once upon a time ago, it was relevant and true.

     

    When all car brands had their own image and each individual model had style.  Whether it be Chryco. or FoMoCo or GM.

     

    Mercury and Lincoln were created just to follow that formula.

     

    GM bought all those brands: Oldsmobile, Pontiac and created Lasalle and eventually had a hierarchy as follows.

     

    Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, Lasalle, Cadillac.

     

    GM did it best. They perfected the formula.

     

    Now, including GM, is just a mish mash of overlapping models with names that just confuse people. Including BMW.

     

    A 2 Series might be lower in rank that a 4 Series, but a M2 is a beast machine. So...where does that leave the base 4 Series?

    I dont have specs, but I feel as if the M2 is a beastier machine than a M4.

    What about a 4 Series GC?

    THAT has 4 doors. I thought only odd numbers were 4 doored vehicles?

    And...why is a 3 Series a 4 door only model?

    Back in the day, when I was a young pup, a 3 Series was a 2 door...

    Then they made it 4 door. And there was a M3 4 door as well...

     

    Back in the day, a BMW 318 had a 1.8 liter 4 cylinder.

    A 325, had a 2.5 liter engine. We KNEW it was an inline 6...

    Today...what is going on?

     

    A 6 Series is a 2 door...but I saw a 4 door 6 Series the other day...

     

     

    With Cadillac owners...

    They seem to be confused what really is a CTS, an ATS...what model replaced what...

    Really, that is an anecdote that happens when I talk to my clients that own recent Cadillacs.

     

    Mercedes-Benz is not without confusion either.

    Same anecdote with my clients and their Mercedes cars.

    E class, C Class, S Class is easy enough for them.

    Its when M-B has added a 3rd letter that confuses them.

    Where in the puzzle does a CLA fit in?

    A CLS?

     

    They often ask me is a CLS a S Class type vehicle because that is how its marketed, as a very high end model or is it a C Class because of the letter C in the front of the "name."

    When I tell them the CLS is a car off the E Class platform, they look at me dazed and confused and almost call me a liar because there is no letter "E" in the name...

     

    Sure, they all know they drive a Cadillac, BMW or Mercedes.

    But I feel, this alphanumeric bullsyte does not tie them down to the brand at all. Because there is no connection with the model in the first place.  They are confused to what in the hell they are driving. So how can they fall in love with the brand if they just use the model and in a few years just dump the car for another one.  And often enough, they jump ship to the other luxury car maker next door. With leasing, its easy.

     

    Its like phoking a whore.

    You phoque her for an hour in the backseat of your car and dump her at the next block.  On to the next whore.

    She is faceless. Like the cars. Nameless.

    Its cold.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This naming $h! is out of control. Just admit that you're lazy and jumping on the bandwagon with everyone else. Nobody's model names mean $h! anymore, not even MB's and BMW's.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like Cadillac's current names: ATS, CTS, XTS. They're not perfect, but the scheme rolls off the tongue, and the cars have some level of recognition now. What nobody has really mentioned is how is Cadillac going to do their V-series nomenclature in the future? CT6-V, CT5-V, CT4-V sounds clumsy as hell. Will it be VT6, VT5, etc? Will they drop "V" all together?

     

    I digress, I'm derailing sh*t. I'm not into alpha numerics in general, but changing from one to another just seems asinine to me.

    Good point with the V Series. I think I like the VT6/VT5 style best because you nailed it, CT6-V does not flow very well at all. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This naming $h! is out of control. Just admit that you're lazy and jumping on the bandwagon with everyone else. Nobody's model names mean $h! anymore, not even MB's and BMW's.

    It's true but how do you do all sorts of variations(like the Germans do) with names? For instance, Instead of a 3/4 Series they use Continental(first "name" that came to my head). So you have a Continental, Continental Coupe, Countinental xDrive, Continental Coupe xDrive, Continental Wagon, Continental Wagon xDrive, Continental Gran Turismo, Continental Gran Turismo xDrive, aaaaaaaand that could all very well just be the base engine or the top of the line twin turbo 6(excluding M). See how wordy the German cars would be had they not just used a number. Also, the numbers actually hold equity in these cars. The numbers signify a larger engine, prestige, "better" car. Everybody that drives any BMW knows a 340i is a more expensive, faster, better equipped car than a 320i. The same exact thing can be said for MB. C300 vs C450. The numbers actually have some equity to them.

     

    Just my view on it though. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wait; in 2016, an automaker has to do a "better job communicating" a naming scheme which starts off with a meaningless letter, then is followed sometimes by another letter, then by a pair of meaningless numbers? This mindless product naming approach is ubiquitous at this point; communicate what?? 

     

    And oh; how cute- infiniti believes it has a heritage worthy of paying homage to!

     

    This! I tried to allude to this but your post made it clearer.

     

    Alphanumeric names are by definition MEANINGLESS. Their meaning is determined slowly over time by a model's success and therefore recognizability. To change from one alphanumeric scheme to another with the goal of consumer clarity?! That's complete insanity! You just reset recognizability to ZERO.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wait; in 2016, an automaker has to do a "better job communicating" a naming scheme which starts off with a meaningless letter, then is followed sometimes by another letter, then by a pair of meaningless numbers? This mindless product naming approach is ubiquitous at this point; communicate what?? 

     

    And oh; how cute- infiniti believes it has a heritage worthy of paying homage to!

     

    This! I tried to allude to this but your post made it clearer.

     

    Alphanumeric names are by definition MEANINGLESS. Their meaning is determined slowly over time by a model's success and therefore recognizability. To change from one alphanumeric scheme to another with the goal of consumer clarity?! That's complete insanity! You just reset recognizability to ZERO.

     

    What the difference between a "name" gaining respect over time and an alphanumeric? It isn't like a Ford "Fusion" actually has a damn thing to do with "fusion". Same thing can be said for any "named" car/truck. The only "names" that seem to have any meaning are the trucks, Tacoma, Sierra, Canyon, Colorado, Tundra, Ranger, Titan, Frontier. They're places as if saying they can go anywhere tough(not sure about the Tacoma one though). But when it comes to cars and SUVs the names are just a random word, for the most part. They all start with zero value and in a few years they ditch the name for something else anyway like the Cavalier, Cruze, whatever will be next.. Escort, Focus, then whatever will be next.. Honda and Toyota have kept their names around a long time to build some value to the names but for the most part a "name" has as much meaningless-ness as CT6 or S550. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Wait; in 2016, an automaker has to do a "better job communicating" a naming scheme which starts off with a meaningless letter, then is followed sometimes by another letter, then by a pair of meaningless numbers? This mindless product naming approach is ubiquitous at this point; communicate what?? 

     

    And oh; how cute- infiniti believes it has a heritage worthy of paying homage to!

     

    This! I tried to allude to this but your post made it clearer.

     

    Alphanumeric names are by definition MEANINGLESS. Their meaning is determined slowly over time by a model's success and therefore recognizability. To change from one alphanumeric scheme to another with the goal of consumer clarity?! That's complete insanity! You just reset recognizability to ZERO.

     

    What the difference between a "name" gaining respect over time and an alphanumeric? It isn't like a Ford "Fusion" actually has a damn thing to do with "fusion". Same thing can be said for any "named" car/truck. The only "names" that seem to have any meaning are the trucks, Tacoma, Sierra, Canyon, Colorado, Tundra, Ranger, Titan, Frontier. They're places as if saying they can go anywhere tough(not sure about the Tacoma one though). But when it comes to cars and SUVs the names are just a random word, for the most part. They all start with zero value and in a few years they ditch the name for something else anyway like the Cavalier, Cruze, whatever will be next.. Escort, Focus, then whatever will be next.. Honda and Toyota have kept their names around a long time to build some value to the names but for the most part a "name" has as much meaningless-ness as CT6 or S550. 

     

     

    A name can evoke a feeling or mental association without any experience with the car, where numbers are cold and numb. "Eldorado," "Imperial," "Galaxy," they all illicit some sort of mental stimulation without even trying, that stimulation can latch onto model association very rapidly. When a brain processes extraneous information, it's thrown out of short term memory, that's basic neuroscience.

     

    It's why you wouldn't remember half the phone number shouted to you by the hottest girl you've ever seen but you'd remember her name when you told your friends the story a month later.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    Wait; in 2016, an automaker has to do a "better job communicating" a naming scheme which starts off with a meaningless letter, then is followed sometimes by another letter, then by a pair of meaningless numbers? This mindless product naming approach is ubiquitous at this point; communicate what?? 

     

    And oh; how cute- infiniti believes it has a heritage worthy of paying homage to!

     

    This! I tried to allude to this but your post made it clearer.

     

    Alphanumeric names are by definition MEANINGLESS. Their meaning is determined slowly over time by a model's success and therefore recognizability. To change from one alphanumeric scheme to another with the goal of consumer clarity?! That's complete insanity! You just reset recognizability to ZERO.

     

    What the difference between a "name" gaining respect over time and an alphanumeric? It isn't like a Ford "Fusion" actually has a damn thing to do with "fusion". Same thing can be said for any "named" car/truck. The only "names" that seem to have any meaning are the trucks, Tacoma, Sierra, Canyon, Colorado, Tundra, Ranger, Titan, Frontier. They're places as if saying they can go anywhere tough(not sure about the Tacoma one though). But when it comes to cars and SUVs the names are just a random word, for the most part. They all start with zero value and in a few years they ditch the name for something else anyway like the Cavalier, Cruze, whatever will be next.. Escort, Focus, then whatever will be next.. Honda and Toyota have kept their names around a long time to build some value to the names but for the most part a "name" has as much meaningless-ness as CT6 or S550. 

     

     

    A name can evoke a feeling or mental association without any experience with the car, where numbers are cold and numb. "Eldorado," "Imperial," "Galaxy," they all illicit some sort of mental stimulation without even trying, that stimulation can latch onto model association very rapidly. When a brain processes extraneous information, it's thrown out of short term memory, that's basic neuroscience.

     

    It's why you wouldn't remember half the phone number shouted to you by the hottest girl you've ever seen but you'd remember her name when you told your friends the story a month later.

     

    Alright.. I see what you mean. Makes sense. I guess I just don't see ANY value in names for cars like Focus, Cruze, Fit.. They will change and mean nothing.Now for a flagship, it makes sense. But then if that is the case...where do you stop? You can't just have one name and the rest alphanumeric(lol - Cadillac). 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This naming $h! is out of control. Just admit that you're lazy and jumping on the bandwagon with everyone else. Nobody's model names mean $h! anymore, not even MB's and BMW's.

    It's true but how do you do all sorts of variations(like the Germans do) with names? For instance, Instead of a 3/4 Series they use Continental(first "name" that came to my head). So you have a Continental, Continental Coupe, Countinental xDrive, Continental Coupe xDrive, Continental Wagon, Continental Wagon xDrive, Continental Gran Turismo, Continental Gran Turismo xDrive, aaaaaaaand that could all very well just be the base engine or the top of the line twin turbo 6(excluding M). See how wordy the German cars would be had they not just used a number. Also, the numbers actually hold equity in these cars. The numbers signify a larger engine, prestige, "better" car. Everybody that drives any BMW knows a 340i is a more expensive, faster, better equipped car than a 320i. The same exact thing can be said for MB. C300 vs C450. The numbers actually have some equity to them.

     

    Just my view on it though. 

     

     

    Two things-

     

    First off, I see no problem with all the hypothetical Continental variants. You put the model name on one side of the deck lid, you put the variant on the other. 'Conti' on the left, 'Touring', 'Coupe', whatever on the right. Simple.

     

    As for the Germans, their names used to at least make sense for the most part. A 325i had a 2.5 liter engine. A 540i had a 4.0 engine. Now, they're a mess. They need to go back their ols naming scheme. Call a 320i a 320i, Call a 328i a 328is. Call the 335i a 330i. This $h! ain't hard. They're just making it convoluted.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    This naming $h! is out of control. Just admit that you're lazy and jumping on the bandwagon with everyone else. Nobody's model names mean $h! anymore, not even MB's and BMW's.

    It's true but how do you do all sorts of variations(like the Germans do) with names? For instance, Instead of a 3/4 Series they use Continental(first "name" that came to my head). So you have a Continental, Continental Coupe, Countinental xDrive, Continental Coupe xDrive, Continental Wagon, Continental Wagon xDrive, Continental Gran Turismo, Continental Gran Turismo xDrive, aaaaaaaand that could all very well just be the base engine or the top of the line twin turbo 6(excluding M). See how wordy the German cars would be had they not just used a number. Also, the numbers actually hold equity in these cars. The numbers signify a larger engine, prestige, "better" car. Everybody that drives any BMW knows a 340i is a more expensive, faster, better equipped car than a 320i. The same exact thing can be said for MB. C300 vs C450. The numbers actually have some equity to them.

     

    Just my view on it though. 

     

     

    Two things-

     

    First off, I see no problem with all the hypothetical Continental variants. You put the model name on one side of the deck lid, you put the variant on the other. 'Conti' on the left, 'Touring', 'Coupe', whatever on the right. Simple.

     

    As for the Germans, their names used to at least make sense for the most part. A 325i had a 2.5 liter engine. A 540i had a 4.0 engine. Now, they're a mess. They need to go back their ols naming scheme. Call a 320i a 320i, Call a 328i a 328is. Call the 335i a 330i. This $h! ain't hard. They're just making it convoluted.

     

    Alright, I see what you mean as well. And I do agree. MB was the same.. C350 was a 3.5 C32 AMG..3.2L C55 AMG...5.5L Now a C63 AMG is a 4.0L 

     

    Looking at it like this it it waaaaay more of a mess right now. It almost seems as if they are afraid to decrease the number as if signifying a downgrade in vehicle. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's exactly what it is. "We can't call the new 328i a 320i now just because it has a 2.0 engine, people will think it's not as good!" 

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's exactly what it is. "We can't call the new 328i a 320i now just because it has a 2.0 engine, people will think it's not as good!" 

    I call BS on this. Marketing has retold stories multiple different ways.

     

    So you change the power train for the 3 series and then redo ALL the 3 series at the same time to connect the numbers with the engines.

     

    I personally think both BMW and MB needs to do this as their numbering system is a mess now.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That's exactly what it is. "We can't call the new 328i a 320i now just because it has a 2.0 engine, people will think it's not as good!" 

    I call BS on this. Marketing has retold stories multiple different ways.

     

    So you change the power train for the 3 series and then redo ALL the 3 series at the same time to connect the numbers with the engines.

     

    I personally think both BMW and MB needs to do this as their numbering system is a mess now.

     

     

    I'm saying that is the mentality of BMW, not that it's the truth or what I think.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      January 3, 2020
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      Total December sales (units)
      104,781
      148,720
      -29.5
      Nissan Division sales
      93,538
      130,655
      -28.4
      INFINITI sales*
      11,243
      18,065
      -37.8
       
       
       
       
      Calendar Year Total Sales (units)
      1,345,681
      1,493,877
      -9.9
      Nissan Division sales
      1,227,973
      1,344,597
      -8.7
      INFINITI Sales*
      117,708
      149,280
      -21.1
      NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Nissan Group announced total U.S. sales for December 2019 of 104,781 units, a decrease of 29.5 percent versus the prior year. Nissan Group also announced total calendar year 2019 U.S. sales of 1,345,681 units, a decrease of 9.9 percent compared to the prior year.
      Nissan Division December highlights:
      Altima sales continue to rise with 19,132 units sold, up 12 percent. Sales of the Nissan Armada rose 3 percent in December to 2,967 units. Nissan Division calendar year highlights:
      Nissan Kicks showed strong gains during the full calendar year 2019, up 150 percent. Nissan set annual sales records with NV commercial van (+19 percent) and NV200 (+1 percent).   *INFINITI sales total included for reference. For more information on INFINITI's December sales performance, please visit INFINITINews.com.

      NOTE: To ensure consistency in global sales reporting, Nissan North America calculates monthly variances on a straight-percentage basis, unadjusted for the number of selling days. December 2019 had 25 days, while December 2018 had 26 selling days.
      NISSAN DIVISION
      DECEMBER
      DECEMBER
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Nissan Division Total
      93,538
      130,655
      -28.4
      1,227,973
      1,344,597
      -8.7
      Versa
      3,265
      6,735
      -51.5
      66,596
      75,809
      -12.2
      Sentra
      11,033
      17,567
      -37.2
      184,618
      213,046
      -13.3
      Altima
      19,132
      17,064
      12.1
      209,183
      209,146
      0.0
      Maxima
      3,387
      5,600
      -39.5
      35,076
      42,337
      -17.2
      LEAF
      1,227
      1,667
      -26.4
      12,365
      14,715
      -16.0
      Juke
      0
      5
      -100.0
      11
      731
      -98.5
      370Z
      158
      202
      -21.8
      2,384
      3,468
      -31.3
      GT-R
      17
      25
      -32.0
      331
      538
      -38.5
      Total Car
      38,219
      48,865
      -21.8
      510,564
      559,790
      -8.8
      Kicks
      4,123
      5,704
      -27.7
      58,193
      23,312
      149.6
      Frontier
      4,720
      7,492
      -37.0
      72,369
      79,646
      -9.1
      Titan
      1,916
      4,661
      -58.9
      31,514
      50,459
      -37.5
      Pathfinder
      5,894
      6,799
      -13.3
      65,691
      67,550
      -2.8
      Armada
      2,967
      2,874
      3.2
      32,044
      32,650
      -1.9
      Rogue
      27,331
      42,523
      -35.7
      350,447
      412,110
      -15.0
      Murano
      5,187
      8,033
      -35.4
      68,361
      83,547
      -18.2
      Quest
      0
      0
      n/a
      0
      3
      -100.0
      NV
      1,719
      2,013
      -14.6
      20,022
      16,902
      18.5
      NV200
      1,462
      1,691
      -13.5
      18,768
      18,628
      0.8
      Total Truck
      55,319
      81,790
      -32.4
      717,409
      784,807
      -8.6
      North American produced
      73,510
      96,695
      -24.0
      970,563
      1,022,140
      -5.0
      Car
      38,044
      48,633
      -21.8
      507,838
      555,053
      -8.5
      Truck
      35,466
      48,062
      -26.2
      462,725
      467,087
      -0.9
      Import
      20,028
      33,960
      -41.0
      257,410
      322,457
      -20.2
      Car
      175
      232
      -24.6
      2,726
      4,737
      -42.5
      Truck
      19,853
      33,728
      -41.1
      197,372
      317,720
      -37.9
       
      INFINITI
       
      Infiniti Total
      DECEMBER
      DECEMBER
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
      11,243
      18,065
      -37.8
      117,708
      149,280
      -21.1
      Infiniti Q50
      2,165
      3,690
      -41.3
      25,987
      34,763
      -25.2
      Infiniti Q60
      430
      662
      -35.0
      5,043
      9,017
      -44.1
      Infiniti Q70
      90
      329
      -72.6
      2,552
      4,479
      -43.0
      Infiniti QX30
      50
      647
      -92.3
      3,229
      8,101
      -60.1
      Infiniti QX50
      1,815
      3,329
      -45.5
      18,616
      25,389
      -26.7
      Infiniti QX60
      4,113
      7,032
      -41.5
      43,162
      47,370
      -8.9
      Infiniti QX70
      0
      4
      -100.0
      6
      954
      -99.4
      Infiniti QX80
      2,580
      2,372
      8.8
      19,113
      19,207
      -0.5
      Total Car
      2,685
      4,681
      -42.6
      33,582
      48,259
      -30.4
      Total Truck
      8,558
      13,384
      -36.1
      84,126
      101,021
      -16.7
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      NISSAN GROUP
       
      TOTAL VEHICLE
      DECEMBER
      DECEMBER
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
      104,781
      148,720
      -29.5
      1,345,681
      1,493,877
      -9.9
      Total Car
      40,904
      53,546
      -23.6
      544,146
      608,049
      -10.5
      Total Truck
      63,877
      95,174
      -32.9
      801,535
      885,828
      -9.5
      Selling days
      25
      26
       
      307
      307
       
       
      # # #
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Dec
      Dec
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      INFINITI Total
      11,243
      18,065
      -37.8
      117,708
      149,280
      -21.1
      Q50
      2,165
      3,690
      -41.3
      25,987
      34,763
      -25.2
      Q60
      430
      662
      -35.0
      5,043
      9,071
      -44.4
      Q70
      90
      329
      -72.6
      2,552
      4,479
      -43.0
      QX30
      50
      647
      -92.3
      3,229
      8,101
      -60.1
      QX50
      1,815
      3,329
      -45.5
      18,616
      25,389
      -26.7
      QX60
      4,113
      7,032
      -41.5
      43,162
      47,370
      -8.9
      QX80
      2,580
      2,372
      8.8
      19,113
      19,207
      -0.5
      Car
      2,685
      4,681
      -42.6
      33,582
      48,259
      -30.5
      CUV/SUV
      8,558
      13,384
      -36.1
      84,126
      101,021
      -16.7
    • By Drew Dowdell
      NISSAN DIVISION
      NOVEMBER
      NOVEMBER
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Nissan Division Total
      83,562
      96,427
      -13.3
      1,134,435
      1,213,942
      -6.5
      Versa
      2,825
      5,122
      -44.8
      63,331
      69,074
      -8.3
      Sentra
      11,546
      12,721
      -9.2
      173,585
      195,479
      -11.2
      Altima
      16,551
      12,077
      37.0
      190,051
      192,082
      -1.1
      Maxima
      2,273
      2,530
      -10.2
      31,689
      36,737
      -13.7
      LEAF
      1,140
      1,128
      1.1
      11,138
      13,048
      -14.6
      Juke
      0
      4
      -100.0
      11
      726
      -98.5
      370Z
      159
      271
      -41.3
      2,226
      3,266
      -31.8
      GT-R
      16
      23
      -30.4
      314
      513
      -38.8
      Total Car
      34,510
      33,876
      1.9
      472,345
      510,925
      -7.6
      Kicks
      3,634
      4,032
      -9.9
      54,070
      17,608
      207.1
      Frontier
      4,932
      6,278
      -21.4
      67,649
      72,154
      -6.2
      Titan
      2,052
      3,845
      -46.6
      29,598
      45,798
      -35.4
      Pathfinder
      4,819
      5,404
      -10.8
      59,797
      60,751
      -1.6
      Armada
      1,754
      2,044
      -14.2
      29,077
      29,776
      -2.3
      Rogue
      23,734
      31,860
      -25.5
      323,116
      369,587
      -12.6
      Murano
      5,349
      6,552
      -18.4
      63,174
      75,514
      -16.3
      Quest
      0
      0
      n/a
      0
      3
      -100.0
      NV
      1,315
      1,321
      -0.5
      18,303
      14,889
      22.9
      NV200
      1,463
      1,215
      20.4
      17,306
      16,937
      2.2
      Total Truck
      49,052
      62,551
      -21.6
      662,090
      703,017
      -5.8
       
      INFINITI
      NOVEMBER
      NOVEMBER
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Infiniti Total
      9,385
      14,086
      -33.4
      106,465
      131,215
      -18.9
      Infiniti Q50
      1,967
      2,819
      -30.2
      23,822
      31,073
      -23.3
      Infiniti Q60
      500
      590
      -15.3
      4,613
      8,355
      -44.8
      Infiniti Q70
      112
      372
      -69.9
      2,462
      4,150
      -40.7
      Infiniti QX30
      52
      416
      -87.5
      3,179
      7,454
      -57.4
      Infiniti QX50
      1,723
      3,009
      -42.7
      16,801
      22,060
      -23.8
      Infiniti QX60
      3,824
      5,151
      -25.8
      39,049
      40,338
      -3.2
      Infiniti QX70
      0
      8
      -100.0
      6
      950
      -99.4
      Infiniti QX80
      1,207
      1,721
      -29.9
      16,533
      16,835
      -1.8
      Total Car
      2,579
      3,781
      -31.8
      30,897
      43,578
      -29.1
      Total Truck
      6,806
      10,305
      -34.0
      75,568
      87,637
      -13.8
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      NISSAN GROUP
      NOVEMBER
      NOVEMBER
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
        2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      TOTAL VEHICLE
      92,947
      110,513
      -15.9
      1,240,900
      1,345,157
      -7.8
      Total Car
      37,089
      37,657
      -1.5
      503,242
      554,503
      -9.2
      Total Truck
      55,858
      72,856
      -23.3
      737,658
      790,654
      -6.7
      Selling days
      26
      25
       
      282
      281
       
       
      # # #
    • By Drew Dowdell
      2019
      2018
      % Change
      Nov Sales
      9,385
      14,086
      -33.4
      CYTD Sales
      106,465
      131,215
      -18.9
       
       
      Nov
      Nov
      Monthly
      CYTD
      CYTD
      CYTD
       
      2019
      2018
      % chg
      2019
      2018
      % chg
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      INFINITI Total
      9,385
      14,086
      -33.4
      106,465
      131,215
      -18.9
      Q50
      1,967
      2,819
      -30.2
      23,822
      31,073
      -23.3
      Q60
      500
      590
      -15.3
      4,613
      8,355
      -44.8
      Q70
      112
      372
      -69.9
      2,462
      4,150
      -40.7
      QX30
      52
      416
      -87.5
      3,179
      7,454
      -57.4
      QX50
      1,723
      3,009
      -42.7
      16,801
      22,060
      -23.8
      QX60
      3,824
      5,151
      -25.8
      39,049
      40,338
      -3.2
      QX80
      1,207
      1,721
      -29.9
      16,533
      16,835
      -1.8
      Car
      2,579
      3,781
      -31.8
      30,897
      43,578
      -29.1
      CUV/SUV
      6,806
      10,305
      -34.0
      75,568
      87,637
      -13.8
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Infiniti is planning on launching five new models over the next 3 years. The first will be the QX55 that we reported on the other day.  It is a crossover coupe version of their QX50 crossover and is expected to be powered by the same 2.0-liter variable compression engine.
      Next up is the redesigned QX60. Expect it to look much more SUV like than that of a crossover. Infiniti says the styling will be dramatically different than the QX60 on the lots today. They mention that the gas powered model will have a large grille, which implies there will be an electrified model coming as well.  They are also planning on offering two 12.3-inch touch screens and a two-tone roof.  The QX60 is Infiniti's best selling vehicle.
      After that, Infiniti will be launching three electrified vehicles, a crossover and two sedans.  The vehicle will be offered as fully electric or with serial hybrid technology which is similar to that in the Chevy Volt where a gasoline engine recharges the batteries which power the car. Styling is expected to take after the Q-Inspiration concept shown at the 2019 Detroit Auto Show.  The three vehicles are following a "three vehicles, one platform" concept and will all be related. 

      View full article
  • Posts

  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Ted Smith
      Ted Smith
      (40 years old)
    2. Tommy231
      Tommy231
      (61 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...