Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: A Grand Wagoneer Trackhawk?!

      Possibly hauling ass for 7 people

    The Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer has been talked about for the past few years, mostly in terms of delays and figuring out what platform will underpin it. But a new report from Road & Track reveals Jeep has something very special in store.

    An internal document from transmission supplier ZF lists the 2018 production and pre-production vehicles using a version of their 8HP eight-speed automatic transmission. Among the vehicles listed the Grand Wagoneer with the platform code ZS. What makes this more intriguing is the mention of a Grand Wagoneer Trackhawk. The listing says it has a 6.2L V8 and produces 729 PS - about 718 horsepower. Like the Grand Cherokee Trackhawk, the Wagoneer Trackhawk uses a beefed-up version of the eight-speed automatic - ZF-8HP95X.

    Could this mean that Jeep will be launching a mad Wagoneer in the coming years? Possibly not. Road & Track has some possible guesses as to why this is mentioned,

    • Someone goofed while working on this document
    • FCA has built some Wagoneer prototypes with the Hellcat engine, but hasn't made plans to put it into production

    Source: Road & Track



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    15 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Those can't all be for the US. We're not getting the Grand Commander for example 

    I was also wondering about that, but in searching FCA website you can find some interesting images but not much explaining it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I predict a 100% chance of a Hellcat Grand Wagoneer happening, I am shocked there isn't a Hellcat Ram pick up yet.   This is FCA's one trick and they'll keep playing it as long as they can.   This is the only way they know how to get profit margin on a car, but eventually this will run it's course and these Hellcat V8s that get 11 mpg will be getting smoked by every electric car on the market and no one will want them anymore.

    Once upon a time, GM thought the way to make profit margin was to drop Northstar V8s in Bonnevilles and Lucernes, and 5.3 V8s into Impalas and Monte Carlos and throw lots of SS badging on them.  No one wants those cars now, and the modern turbo 4 sedans outrun most of those beasts.  The same will happen with all these Hemi vehicles, some of which are 365 hp from a 5.7 liter V8, there are 2 liter engines making more than that now.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Those can't all be for the US. We're not getting the Grand Commander for example 

    Right...I also noticed when this first made the rounds a 'Low D 3 row' -- a 3 row version of the next Cherokee, and a 3 row midsize listed (E-segment 3 row).  Basically a 3 row GC...wonder if it will be branded as a GC and sort of be the Durango replacement..   Since Jeep has 0 3 rows now, I could see both of these here given how hot the CUV/SUV market is...

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    I predict a 100% chance of a Hellcat Grand Wagoneer happening, I am shocked there isn't a Hellcat Ram pick up yet.   This is FCA's one trick and they'll keep playing it as long as they can.   This is the only way they know how to get profit margin on a car, but eventually this will run it's course and these Hellcat V8s that get 11 mpg will be getting smoked by every electric car on the market and no one will want them anymore.

    Once upon a time, GM thought the way to make profit margin was to drop Northstar V8s in Bonnevilles and Lucernes, and 5.3 V8s into Impalas and Monte Carlos and throw lots of SS badging on them.  No one wants those cars now, and the modern turbo 4 sedans outrun most of those beasts.  The same will happen with all these Hemi vehicles, some of which are 365 hp from a 5.7 liter V8, there are 2 liter engines making more than that now.

    Sad but true.  No one wants to pay for these low-mileage woolly mammoths, especially when it comes to repair bills and $4 gasoline.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Again with the '$4/gallon gas' ?

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The same will happen with all these Hemi vehicles, some of which are 365 hp from a 5.7 liter V8, there are 2 liter engines making more than that now.

    Back to thinking there's only a single tune for the Hemi, eh?

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    18 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    but eventually this will run it's course and these Hellcat V8s that get 11 mpg will be getting smoked by every electric car on the market and no one will want them anymore.

    We will all be long dead before people stop wanting to hear a big-ole American V8. 

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Wagoneer/Grand Wagoneer ever does come out, I suspect it will have many trim levels, and a Trailhawk and Trackhawk would make sense..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    43 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    If the Wagoneer/Grand Wagoneer ever does come out, I suspect it will have many trim levels, and a Trailhawk and Trackhawk would make sense..

    I agree that when the Wagoneer / Grand Wagoneer comes out we will have many trim levels and I suspect the Trackhawk will be an EV at the glacial pace FCA seems to get things done. :P 

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    I agree that when the Wagoneer / Grand Wagoneer comes out we will have many trim levels and I suspect the Trackhawk will be an EV at the glacial pace FCA seems to get things done. :P 

    Electrohawk..

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    44 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Electrohawk..

    :metal: I like the sound of that, "Grand Wagoneer Electrohawk"

    Quick patent it before they steal it and then sell them the rights! :D 

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    24 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Quick patent it before they steal it and then sell them the rights! :D 

    That's a legitimately good idea. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    22 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The same will happen with all these Hemi vehicles, some of which are 365 hp from a 5.7 liter V8, there are 2 liter engines making more than that now.

    1

    Exactly zero of those 2-liters will make the torque of the Hemi... at full throttle... at part throttle... 

    A 365hp 5.7 liter is far more drivable than a 356hp 2.0 liter because ZERO LAG.

    I don't know why it never will sink into your brain.. any motor will make 365 hp if you spin it fast enough. .. that doesn't mean you'd want to drive it.  

    Spin your grandmother fast enough and she'll make 365hp too. Lets assume she can lift 5 pounds at 1 foot reach from her.  Do that at about 383,000 rpm and she's cooking up 365hp.

    365 horsepower.png

    This is an extreme example, of course, but would you want to drive a 365hp car with a torque spec like that?  That's barely a lawnmower engine.

    Before you bring up max torque at low RPM, you only get that at full boost which you also only get at full throttle.  A 5.7 has more torque available at part throttle than a 2.0T.

     

    • Haha 2
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The 5.7 Hemi is probably the worst V8 on the market.  If the super dated Nissan 5.6 liter V8 is still around throw that in there too.  Most V8s now are in the 450 hp range.  If you are going to put a V8 in a car and charge a price premium for it get V8 mileage then you shouldn’t get V6 horsepower.   The Corvette had a 400 hp V8 in 2006, the Hemi is still behind that. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well the thing is that it may be outdated yes, but Dodge makes it wildly available and it’s not an inexpensive option - they don’t force packages on top of packages with the 5.7 HEMI. It’s demerits are par for the course reliability and power similar to Chevy’s small block 5.3. But honestly I’m satisfied that in 4000 lbs plus vehicles that the Hemi V8 is featured in, the twin turbo V6s and now even four cyclinders would offer barely any real world FE advantage. 

     

    And it’s port-injected too, so no carbon build-up!

     

    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    18 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The 5.7 Hemi is probably the worst V8 on the market.  If the super dated Nissan 5.6 liter V8 is still around throw that in there too.  Most V8s now are in the 450 hp range.  If you are going to put a V8 in a car and charge a price premium for it get V8 mileage then you shouldn’t get V6 horsepower.   The Corvette had a 400 hp V8 in 2006, the Hemi is still behind that. 

    Just stop. You're wrong so many times in this post and I'm only at 83% battery left.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On ‎7‎/‎20‎/‎2018 at 11:46 PM, smk4565 said:

    The 5.7 Hemi is probably the worst V8 on the market.  If the super dated Nissan 5.6 liter V8 is still around throw that in there too.  Most V8s now are in the 450 hp range.  If you are going to put a V8 in a car and charge a price premium for it get V8 mileage then you shouldn’t get V6 horsepower.   The Corvette had a 400 hp V8 in 2006, the Hemi is still behind that. 

    It's smooth, inexpensive, reliable, delivers good torque, and is reasonably fuel efficient for a V8.  WTF is wrong with that?  It's also the only way to get a V8 in a sedan at $33k or 370hp in a sedan at $33k.  If you're looking for the most horsepower for dollar... Hemi is where its at. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      Your probably thinking, did I read the teaser right? Did it really say 2,581 lb-ft of torque or 3,500 NM from a 160 horsepower or 120 kW motor with torque vectoring?
      Yes, Yes you did! 
      GKN Automotive is proud to unveil the world's first battery electric vehicle (BEV) with a two-speed transmission and torque vectoring. GTD19 demonstrator vehicle is built from a Jeep Renegade and is currently in Arjeplog, Sweden undergoing winter testing. To prove the industry-leading standards of efficiency, safety and driving dynamics in this BEV model, GKN choose to go with a FWD version where torque vectoring can provide noticeable benefits than in a rear wheel drive or all-wheel drive platform. To Quote GKN:
      Why a two-speed gearbox? The setup in the GTD19 is engineered to ensure the shifts are seamless, with minimal loss of power and torque while providing faster acceleration and higher top speed with improved efficiency. What is the top speed you ask? The eTwinsterX allows a top speed of 155 mph or 250 kph.
      To quote Hannes Prenn, COO of GKN ePowertrain:
      The all new eTwinster powertrain can be easily adapted and integrated into existing vehicle platform for FWD, RWD or AWD configurations. Twinster torque vectoring delivers swift and smooth acceleration while providing greater lateral control and optimized driving dynamics. GKN has stated their eTwinster system is smaller than many equivalent systems from competitors allowing it to be easily integrated into existing vehicle plate forms as they did with the GTD19 replacing it's ICE powertrain. The small size allowed GKN to install in place of the ICE, the complete solution of electric motor, inverter controls, eAxle along with all required cabling leading to a very thin battery pack underneath the GTD19.
      GKN system integration allows them to offer the eTwinster powertrain as a readily adaptable solution for all types of auto's from all-wheel drive hypercars to plug-in hybrid luxury SUVs to entry-level city cars.
      If you have ever been in a Range Rover Evoque Hybrid, then you have already experienced the Twinster system as it can be added to the Hybrid solution with the Twinster unit in the back helping to improve the dynamics and calibration of the auto. This GKN solution will also show up in the Opel Insignia. To quote GKN:

      Where else will you see this amazing system that was the number one hybrid / electric vehicle system shown at the Geneva Auto show this year is in the BMW M3 Concept, Volvo XC90 demonstrator which will be paired with the T8 Twin Engine Plug-in Hybrids as well as Mercedes-Benz AMB GLA45 prototype.
       
       

      View full article
    • By dfelt
      Your probably thinking, did I read the teaser right? Did it really say 2,581 lb-ft of torque or 3,500 NM from a 160 horsepower or 120 kW motor with torque vectoring?
      Yes, Yes you did! 
      GKN Automotive is proud to unveil the world's first battery electric vehicle (BEV) with a two-speed transmission and torque vectoring. GTD19 demonstrator vehicle is built from a Jeep Renegade and is currently in Arjeplog, Sweden undergoing winter testing. To prove the industry-leading standards of efficiency, safety and driving dynamics in this BEV model, GKN choose to go with a FWD version where torque vectoring can provide noticeable benefits than in a rear wheel drive or all-wheel drive platform. To Quote GKN:
      Why a two-speed gearbox? The setup in the GTD19 is engineered to ensure the shifts are seamless, with minimal loss of power and torque while providing faster acceleration and higher top speed with improved efficiency. What is the top speed you ask? The eTwinsterX allows a top speed of 155 mph or 250 kph.
      To quote Hannes Prenn, COO of GKN ePowertrain:
      The all new eTwinster powertrain can be easily adapted and integrated into existing vehicle platform for FWD, RWD or AWD configurations. Twinster torque vectoring delivers swift and smooth acceleration while providing greater lateral control and optimized driving dynamics. GKN has stated their eTwinster system is smaller than many equivalent systems from competitors allowing it to be easily integrated into existing vehicle plate forms as they did with the GTD19 replacing it's ICE powertrain. The small size allowed GKN to install in place of the ICE, the complete solution of electric motor, inverter controls, eAxle along with all required cabling leading to a very thin battery pack underneath the GTD19.
      GKN system integration allows them to offer the eTwinster powertrain as a readily adaptable solution for all types of auto's from all-wheel drive hypercars to plug-in hybrid luxury SUVs to entry-level city cars.
      If you have ever been in a Range Rover Evoque Hybrid, then you have already experienced the Twinster system as it can be added to the Hybrid solution with the Twinster unit in the back helping to improve the dynamics and calibration of the auto. This GKN solution will also show up in the Opel Insignia. To quote GKN:

      Where else will you see this amazing system that was the number one hybrid / electric vehicle system shown at the Geneva Auto show this year is in the BMW M3 Concept, Volvo XC90 demonstrator which will be paired with the T8 Twin Engine Plug-in Hybrids as well as Mercedes-Benz AMB GLA45 prototype.
       
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      During an announcement that FCA will be building a new manufacturing plant in Detroit, FCA let it known that in addition to the forthcoming full-size Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer SUVs, another new 3-row SUV was in the works for Jeep.   Auto Express UK reports today that this new SUV will technically be a 3-row version of the Grand Cherokee, but Jeep President and FCA Boss Mike Manley thinks it will not wear the Grand Cherokee name, instead taking on an new moniker.  His reasoning for not re-using the name is that the Grand Cherokee is such an iconic name and image. It would be like if Jeep dramatically changed the Wrangler, he'd face a customer revolt. 
      The last 3-row SUV Jeep sold was the 2006 - 2010 Jeep Commander. Jeep currently uses the Commander name on the Grand Commander, based on the smaller Cherokee, as a China-Only model. 
      Manley says that the segment the Grand Cherokee plays in covers both 2-row and 3-row SUVs, so the Grand Cherokee has only been covering about 40% of the potential market. Moving into this segment would allow Jeep to compete more directly with the Ford Explorer, Toyota Highlander, and Honda Pilot.
      FCA already sells a vehicle in the 3-row segment with the Dodge Durango which also rides on the same platform as the Jeep Grand Cherokee.  No future plans have been announced for the Dodge Durango, so it could be that this Jeep will take over for the Durango in the FCA lineup.
      FCA hopes to break ground on it's new facility by the end of 2nd quarter 2019 and have the first of the new 3-row SUVs rolling off the line by the end of 2020 as 2021 models.
      Related:
      Quick Drive: 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT Trackhawk

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      During an announcement that FCA will be building a new manufacturing plant in Detroit, FCA let it known that in addition to the forthcoming full-size Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer SUVs, another new 3-row SUV was in the works for Jeep.   Auto Express UK reports today that this new SUV will technically be a 3-row version of the Grand Cherokee, but Jeep President and FCA Boss Mike Manley thinks it will not wear the Grand Cherokee name, instead taking on an new moniker.  His reasoning for not re-using the name is that the Grand Cherokee is such an iconic name and image. It would be like if Jeep dramatically changed the Wrangler, he'd face a customer revolt. 
      The last 3-row SUV Jeep sold was the 2006 - 2010 Jeep Commander. Jeep currently uses the Commander name on the Grand Commander, based on the smaller Cherokee, as a China-Only model. 
      Manley says that the segment the Grand Cherokee plays in covers both 2-row and 3-row SUVs, so the Grand Cherokee has only been covering about 40% of the potential market. Moving into this segment would allow Jeep to compete more directly with the Ford Explorer, Toyota Highlander, and Honda Pilot.
      FCA already sells a vehicle in the 3-row segment with the Dodge Durango which also rides on the same platform as the Jeep Grand Cherokee.  No future plans have been announced for the Dodge Durango, so it could be that this Jeep will take over for the Durango in the FCA lineup.
      FCA hopes to break ground on it's new facility by the end of 2nd quarter 2019 and have the first of the new 3-row SUVs rolling off the line by the end of 2020 as 2021 models.
      Related:
      Quick Drive: 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT Trackhawk
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. deftonesfan867
      deftonesfan867
      (39 years old)
    2. Melissa Riley
      Melissa Riley
      (45 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...