Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Rumorpile: Nissan To Buy A 30 Percent Stake Into Mitsubishi Motors - UPDATED

      From left field: Nissan is purported to take a controlling stake in Mitsubishi Motors

    We weren't expecting this: Nissan, the automaker who discovered the manipulation of fuel economy figures at Mitsubishi Motors, is currently in the final stages of buying a controlling stake into the company.

     

    According to reports from NHK and the Nikkei Asian Review, Nissan will spend roughly 200 billion Yen (about $1.8 billion) to acquire over 30 percent interest in Mitsubishi Motors. This would make Nissan the largest shareholder in the company, surpassing Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which currently has a 20 percent stake.

     

    This news comes after Mitsubishi announced that all of its models sold in Japan since 1991 may have inflated fuel economy numbers. Since the scandal came to light, shares in Mitsubishi Motors have dropped 43 percent. Sales of Mitsubishi vehicles in Japan have also taken a turn for the worse. Mitsubishi Motors says they have enough money to cover the scandal and will not seek help from Mitsubishi group companies.

     

    Why would Nissan want a controlling stake in Mitsubishi? A couple of reasons. One, Mitsubishi vehicles are very popular in markets such as Thailand and Indonesia. In fact, Asia makes 50 percent of the company's group operating profit. There is also talk about the two cooperating on electric vehicles.

     

    Both companies will hold board meetings tomorrow to discuss the capital tie-up and how the shares will be distributed.

     

    Source: Bloomberg, NHK, Nikkei Asian Review

     

    UPDATE: Both Mitsubishi and Nissan confirmed they are in talks this morning in Japan.

     

    "Nissan and Mitsubishi are discussing various matters including capital cooperation, but nothing has been decided," according to statements released by both companies.

     

    Reuters confirms that the board of both companies will be holding separate meetings today to discuss this issue.

     

    Source: Reuters

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Robert Hall

    Not sure what is left of Mitsubishi to be of value...their car platforms are dated and redundant w/ Nissan platforms.

     

    maybe their heavy trucks (is that included in this?)...though Nissan has it's own heavy truck division.   (Edit: the heavy truck company (Mitsubishi Fuso) is separate and majority owned by Daimler..so not part of this deal presumably).  

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell

    Not sure what is left of Mitsubishi to be of value...maybe their heavy trucks (is that included in this?)...though Nissan has it's own heavy truck division.  Their car platforms are dated and redundant w/ Nissan platforms.

     

    Access to markets that are currently limited for Nissan.  Platform sharing.

     

    I bet Mitsubishi pulls out of the US in the very near future to focus on Asian markets like Suzuki and Daihatsu did.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    William Maley

    Not sure what is left of Mitsubishi to be of value...maybe their heavy trucks (is that included in this?)...though Nissan has it's own heavy truck division.  Their car platforms are dated and redundant w/ Nissan platforms.

     

    I think so, but I'll double check.

     

    Edit: It looks like it is jointly owned by Diamler and Mitsubishi. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    surreal1272

    So Nissan busted mistubishi on their fuel issues and then buys thirty percent of them. Does that not sound fishy to anyone else, i.e. stock manipulation?

    Edited by surreal1272
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Cmicasa the Great

     

    Not sure what is left of Mitsubishi to be of value...maybe their heavy trucks (is that included in this?)...though Nissan has it's own heavy truck division.  Their car platforms are dated and redundant w/ Nissan platforms.

     

    Access to markets that are currently limited for Nissan.  Platform sharing.

     

    I bet Mitsubishi pulls out of the US in the very near future to focus on Asian markets like Suzuki and Daihatsu did.

     

     

     

     

    ^^^ This. The Mitsu name is all but $h! here in the U.S. with exception to the EVO lovers, but that car is done. Nissan just gained entry into a bunch of markets it has failed to penetrate even with the might of Renault/Nissan behind it. This would effectively.. if the numbers are all inclusive put Renault/Nissan in the 9-10 Million sales annual. My only question is whether Mitsu will be building cars for the revived Datsun?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    William Maley

    So Nissan busted mistubishi on their fuel issues and then buys thirty percent of them. Does that not sound fishy to anyone else, i.e. stock manipulation?

     

    No. This morning at a press conference, Mitsubishi Motors chairman Osamu Masuko said a takeover was going to happen sooner or later.

    Plus, Mitsubishi already had a connection with Nissan concerning kei cars in Japan and they were in talks about extending this partnership. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    surreal1272

     

    So Nissan busted mistubishi on their fuel issues and then buys thirty percent of them. Does that not sound fishy to anyone else, i.e. stock manipulation?

     

    No. This morning at a press conference, Mitsubishi Motors chairman Osamu Masuko said a takeover was going to happen sooner or later.

    Plus, Mitsubishi already had a connection with Nissan concerning kei cars in Japan and they were in talks about extending this partnership. 

     

    Whether they intended to sell or not is not my issue. I understand that completely. However, hat doesn't mean that Nissan wasn't looking to get a better deal. Letting the fuel controversy slip out prior to the buyout seems to lend some credence to it but maybe I'm just wearing my tinfoil hat a little too tight in regards to this.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Suaviloquent

    They way it happened apparently is that Nissan wanted to either provide more input or take over some of the design burden of the new vehicles that Mitsu built for them under the previous partnership. They could not get the same FE numbers....and then everything happened...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41

    So Nissan busted mistubishi on their fuel issues and then buys thirty percent of them. Does that not sound fishy to anyone else, i.e. stock manipulation?

    DUDE!

     

    That was the first thing that I thought of too! Release a story to make their stock plummet and then buy it up when it's dirt cheap.

     

     

    So Nissan busted mistubishi on their fuel issues and then buys thirty percent of them. Does that not sound fishy to anyone else, i.e. stock manipulation?

     

    No. This morning at a press conference, Mitsubishi Motors chairman Osamu Masuko said a takeover was going to happen sooner or later.

    Plus, Mitsubishi already had a connection with Nissan concerning kei cars in Japan and they were in talks about extending this partnership. 

     

    Whether they intended to sell or not is not my issue. I understand that completely. However, hat doesn't mean that Nissan wasn't looking to get a better deal. Letting the fuel controversy slip out prior to the buyout seems to lend some credence to it but maybe I'm just wearing my tinfoil hat a little too tight in regards to this.

     

    +111111111

     

    I just got fitted for a new tinfoil hat this week so I know mine is fitting perfect but I just can't seem to take it off..  :tinfoil:

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×



  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      Warren Buffer I believe owns a good bit of stock in BYD....interesting. Going to try to verify this.
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      Exactly why the myth of totally free markets is just that, a myth.
    • ccap41
      Tariff Tuesday - Big Trouble in Little Crossovers

      By ccap41 · Posted

      Honestly, that's probably around when I'd buy again, too. I'm in no rush. I'd love a large EV SUV or truck, but I don't have the monies for an R1S, Lightning, Sierra EV or whenever the Scouts show up. 
    • Drew Dowdell
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      That's every car company out there. Toyota and Honda only exist today because of the US government getting Japan back on its feet and then later the Japanese government supporting them with currency manipulation and socialized pensions and medicine. Subaru was originally Fiji Heavy Industries which built busses, trains, heavy construction machinery, and was a major supplier of airplanes. FHI is still a major aerospace company who supplies parts for the Airbus 380 and just about every model Boeing makes or has made that starts with a 7. They also make military helicopters and both military and commercial drones. Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and VW are all here today because of the Marshall Plan and later their countries' social medicine and pension programs. Mercedes makes a lot of military and construction equipment purchased by governments. BYD (and others) is where it is because the Chinese government spent loads on battery development and incentives to its citizens to by EVs. Prior to that, BYD built their industrial might on building busses and other heavy machinery for the Chinese government and local governments all over the world. GM and Ford had major defense contracts during WWII, the 2008 bailouts, the Biden EV tax credits, the Obama cash-for-clunkers incentives, and much more. However, they famously have always had to manage their own healthcare and pensions systems which are what put them at a competitive disadvantage throughout the 80's and 90's. Stellantis's ownership timeline is too convoluted to even tackle, but Chrysler was bailed out in 1979, then they bought AMC/Jeep which had been kept afloat by the military, then they were bailed out again in 2008 by both the US and Italian governments. Fiat is/was a major equipment and bus supplier in Europe. The French government has always supported Peugeot and Citroen... the list goes on.
    • A Horse With No Name
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By A Horse With No Name · Posted

      Nor would BYD. The Chinese government has dumped a metric crap ton of cash into auto development.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search