Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Porsche Reconsiders 911 Hybrid

      Will they or won't they?

    The idea of Porsche doing a 911 hybrid has come and gone, and it seems to be coming once again.

    Bloomberg has learned from sources at Porsche that they are considering a hybrid powertrain for their iconic sports car once again. If given the green light, it would appear a few years after the launch of the next-generation 911 (due sometime next year) and possibly offer up to 40 miles of electric-only range. A problem that engineers are working on is trying to cut down battery weight the handling characteristics the vehicle is known for.

    It should be noted the Porsche has been going back and forth on this idea since 2014. Back in May, Porsche's head of development for the 718 and 911 said plans for 911 plug-in hybrid were canceled last year due to weight concerns and not being able to make much a profit as they would with a standard 911.

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I think Tesla is making Porsche rethink everything about EV auto's and Plug in PHEV. What was new thinking and thrown out after doing various exercises is back as new due to competition starting to nibble at their main lunch table of customers.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tesla-Roadster-2-830x553.jpg

    HA!

    This little guy is making Porsche shyte bricks!!!

    Hybrid 911...bring it on is what I say! 'Bout phoquing time!

     I love it when arrogance from Germania gets humbled...

     

    What Im thinking about...is that if Porsche actually goes 100% EV for the 911 one day and does it like a Tesla...AWD with 2 motors, 1 in front and 1 in back, then 100% of the trickiness to drive a 911 will be  virtually eliminated. Negating 40-50 some odd years of engineering the 911 to death...which is good...I guess.

    But is it gonna be a "real" 911 though?

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No way no how will it be a Porsche 911.  It will be like every other plug-in, humming device except with a familiar shell plopped over it.  Just like NASCAR except they still use internal combustion... same boring chassis underneath them all.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The sound of a Chrysler starter motor... or a Ford 5.0 when it revs, the snap and crackle of the new ZR-1 as it acquits itself at the top of the food chain... these are the things that make me love cars.  Even my "Jeepiat" with its modest little 2.4 has a character of its own.  Why would I willingly choose to lose these things that give me joy, that elicit an emotional response?  There can be no joy in the hum of an electric motor, they all sound the same, they all produce the same result in their distance from emotion and thought and hope for a happy journey to a given destination.  The "convenience" of the rise of electrical devices of most ilks (phones that produce zombies are another thing) will kill the human spirit of adventure.  It has already contributed to the ruination of constructive social behaviour by isolating us.  We are all slaves.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

    No way no how will it be a Porsche 911.  It will be like every other plug-in, humming device except with a familiar shell plopped over it.  Just like NASCAR except they still use internal combustion... same boring chassis underneath them all.

    But..isnt that how MOST ICE cars are now?

    The interior bits are also shared...when a  C6 Vette has the EXACT same steering wheel as the same year Malibu...

    All steering wheels actually come from that one same supplier...

    Engines are no longer being built to a specific taste on a specific type of car. Very few engines have that specialness to them. But even then, they are shared across the corporate parent.

    About that...noises coming from those engines are muted greatly...(most of the time)

    All the "negative" driving characteristics have been nannied to death with computer controlled helpers. Oversteer, understeer, torquesteer...all neutered and negated.

    All the good stuff too, all have computer aided shyte on them. Oversteer, understeer, acceleration, rev  matching manual shifting, all done with computers...

    Therefore...the hate for EVs in that regard....maybe for nothing...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, ocnblu said:

    The sound of a Chrysler starter motor... or a Ford 5.0 when it revs, the snap and crackle of the new ZR-1 as it acquits itself at the top of the food chain... these are the things that make me love cars.  Even my "Jeepiat" with its modest little 2.4 has a character of its own.  Why would I willingly choose to lose these things that give me joy, that elicit an emotional response?  There can be no joy in the hum of an electric motor, they all sound the same, they all produce the same result in their distance from emotion and thought and hope for a happy journey to a given destination.  The "convenience" of the rise of electrical devices of most ilks (phones that produce zombies are another thing) will kill the human spirit of adventure.  It has already contributed to the ruination of constructive social behaviour by isolating us.  We are all slaves.

    I agree with you here...except for the Jeepiat engine part...

    If it "feels" like its unique...its a computer thing that makes you have that illusion.

    The same could be done to an electric motor, maybe...

    An EV will NEVER idle like a MOPAR V8...but its acceleration will always be like a rocket ship...

    But really, dont you think its sad that both Chevy and Dodge have to add LARGER superchargers to their already supercharged beast of  V8s to have a different, but same to a certain extent, of their Z06 and Hellcat engines to propel their ZR1 and Demon  cars?

    BTW...a supercharger was both added to the base engines to get the Z06 and Hellcat...

    OK...stronger internals, but basically same block as base engines...

     

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    I'm not talking about steering wheels.  Wow.

    Read CLOSER...

    YOU always do that when somebody challenges you...

    DONT dismiss by finding a little thing...LOOK at the BIGGER picture...

    But yeah...EVEN steering wheels...

    A 1966 Toronado steering wheel was special...so was a 1970 442 that was different to the Toronado's

    The 1966 Riviera was different to the Toronado's and so was the GSX's to the 442 which all were different to the GTO and the Corvette...

    So yeah...

    A  C6 steering wheel that is the same as a Malibu is EXACTLY how YOU want the EV argument to go down...but YOU dont want to admit to it because it puts a kink in your view of EVs as ICE  cars today have started that trend...and YOU dont want to admit it!

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

     Why would I willingly choose to lose these things that give me joy, that elicit an emotional response?  There can be no joy in the hum of an electric motor, they all sound the same, they all produce the same result in their distance from emotion and thought and hope for a happy journey to a given destination.  The "convenience" of the rise of electrical devices of most ilks (phones that produce zombies are another thing) will kill the human spirit of adventure.  It has already contributed to the ruination of constructive social behaviour by isolating us.  We are all slaves.

    You really are ignorant of EV motors, they DO NOT all sound the same, they DO NOT all drive the same, If you spent any time educating yourself to at least understand the EV auto, you would find that every EV maker has clearly built a motor with it's own distinct sound. Just as Harley Davidson's Live Wire electric Bike has it's own distinct sound from the other 20+ bike builders as well as the Chevy Bolt compared to a Tesla both have their own distinct sound.

    Quieter Yes, All sounding the same? NO Just a whole new world of sounds to enjoy and take in.

    Killing the Human Spirit, WOW you really are digging for every reason to resist change. This has expanded the human spirit and improved social behavior. Technology has allowed humans to communicate and work with each other in ways never before achieved.

    You complain about the Amish comments and yet you are not willing to expand your mind to understand the point being made of growing oneself to improve yourself and what you contribute to humanity over all.

    There is so much to learn and experience. It really amazes me why you fear them so much as you attempt to bring up every excuse to hate them when you clearly have not even done research to understand them.

    The ability to have time with other humans where you can have a conversation in your auto rather than be drowned out by the noise. Automation of driving will allow people to interact more while in transit, The ability to work, plus do things even I have not thought of yet is what is great about the evolution of the auto industry.

    I doubt very much that someone driving a ZR1 on a driving enjoyment road is really having much of a conversation and most of the time when I see Enthusiast out on a road driving trip much like bike riders, they are alone enjoying their aggressive driving, not socializing with others. That might come when they are stopped at a rest stop or place to eat. Socializing then, 

    I have seen more Tesla Clubs out socializing with families and kids than I have seen at the Porsche or Corvette clubs.

    So based on my own observations, the Destruction of Social Behavior by isolating us is what has become from the Corvette and Porsche clubs where you have individuals focused on themselves rather than others.

    Harley Davidson Livewire Sound.

     

    • Agree 2
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    the snap and crackle of the new ZR-1 as it acquits itself at the top of the food chain... these are the things that make me love cars. 

    You say that up above...

    But then you say this down below...

    4 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    It will be like every other plug-in, humming device

    yet IGNORE the fact that the ZR1 ALMOST has the same whining noises as you find in an EV as a supercharger whine is just that...NOT an ENGINE RUMBLING NOISE but a whiny afterthought of a noise DROWNING out the V8 rumble you cherish so dearly...

    How many naturally aspirated performance engines are still around?

    The base engines of those...sure!

    But the top dog ones are all force fed by devices that make crappy noises.

    A turbo aint better...

    PSSSSSS. PSSSSSS. blow valve sounds are just as annoying...

    The Voodoo is just about the only 500 naturally aspirated horses around...

    1 engine in an ICE car is not my idea of what YOU are trying to disprove of when it comes to EVs...

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    the irony in this...is that the Chrysler starter motor...and all starter motors for that matter...  are all ELECTRIC motors...

    Yes..it's too bad they didn't bring back that starter sound for the Challenger and Charger...would be a cool retro touch. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Read CLOSER...

    YOU always do that when somebody challenges you...

    DONT dismiss by finding a little thing...LOOK at the BIGGER picture...

    But yeah...EVEN steering wheels...

    A 1966 Toronado steering wheel was special...so was a 1970 442 that was different to the Toronado's

    The 1966 Riviera was different to the Toronado's and so was the GSX's to the 442 which all were different to the GTO and the Corvette...

    So yeah...

    A  C6 steering wheel that is the same as a Malibu is EXACTLY how YOU want the EV argument to go down...but YOU dont want to admit to it because it puts a kink in your view of EVs as ICE  cars today have started that trend...and YOU dont want to admit it!

    Links please

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, ocnblu said:

    Links please

    Make fun all you want...but here is proof!

    1966 Toronado steering wheel

    olds_steering_large.jpg

    259432.jpg.2b71485314fea5808ca785a8c24c6

    1970 442

    35250_0b86f63f00_low_res.jpg

    1970 GSX

    c79fd5592c1dd30c960cbf9e049e8a7f--dashbo

    1970 GTO

    1970_GTO-3.jpg

    1969 Corvette

    1968-Corvette-steering-wheel-16-inch-DSC

    ooops....it looks like a Vette does indeed have the same steering wheel as a Buick...

    Modern times

    0712_03z+2009_chevrolet_corvette_ZR1+ste

    Malibu

    chevy-malibu-steering-wheel.jpg

     

    You think you got me? On semantics?

    It just proves that homogenizing starting during the golden age of ICED muscle cars...

    You know...your other argument....

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • At 2.12 and 0.95 cu.ft for the Audi and Jag's frunk respectfully is a non-issue for the Lyriq not having a frunk. Maximizing the back trunk space as what the GM guys are saying for the Lyriq and the reason why they did it that way by-passing the need for a frunk sounds like marketing BS, until you realize that Audi and Jag's frunk space is nonexistent...   To which GM's words then kinda make sense as the Lyriq does in fact offer more room back there.   Frunk space is kinda expected though, for EVs, so there is that... Tesla Model X for a comparison as Tesla is the benchmark....   https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modelx/en_us/GUID-91E5877F-3CD2-4B3B-B2B8-B5DB4A6C0A05.html     Cargo Volume Table 1. 5-Seater Cargo Volumes Area Volume (liters) Volume (cubic ft) Front trunk 183 6.5 Behind first row, second row folded flat 2,410 85.1 Behind second row 1,050 37.1 Maximum total cargo volume with driver and front passenger 2,593 91.6 Maximum total cargo volume with 5 passengers 1,233 43.5 Table 2. 6-Seater Cargo Volumes Area Volume (liters) Volume (cubic ft) Front trunk 183 6.5 Behind first row, second row in max cargo position, third row folded flat 2,431 85.8 Behind second row, third row folded flat 935 33 Behind third row 425 15 Maximum total cargo volume with driver and front passenger 2,614 92.3 Maximum total cargo volume with 6 passengers 608 21.5 Table 3. 7-Seater Cargo Volumes Area Volume (liters) Volume (cubic ft) Front trunk 183 6.5 Behind first row, second row folded flat 2,314 81.7 Behind second row, third row folded flat 957 33.8 Behind third row 425 15 Maximum total cargo volume with driver and front passenger 2,497 88.2 Maximum total cargo volume with 7 passengers 608 21.5       The Lyriq's cargo space is plentiful and it would seem like an engineering choice to favour rear space over the use of a frunk.  Is it a sound engineering choice? Possibly yes as the powertrain bits need not be crammed.   Is it a sound MARKETING choice? Time will tell as many folk really dont understand engineering choices all to well...   Nor do they seem to care.  If they want a frunk, they WANT a phoquing frunk... 
    • Lyriq Chief Engineer, Jamie Brewer, recently explained to GM Authority that the team decided to prioritize rear cargo space over two separate cargo areas. Thus, the 2023 Cadillac Lyriq will have a larger traditional rear storage area. In fact, according to Brewer, that enables the Lyriq to boast the “largest cargo volume in its competitive set.” That made us wonder what, exactly, is the Lyriq’s competitive set. According to Cadillac spokesperson, Katie Minter, it consists of the Audi e-tron and Jaguar I-Pace. “Lyriq is aimed at customers that are looking for a luxury SUV with outstanding styling, ride and handling and seamlessly integrated technology. In this instance, we’re looking at vehicles such as the Audi e-tron and Jaguar I-Pace,” Minter told GM Authority in an emailed statement. So then, Lyriq has a maximum cargo volume of 60.8 cubic feet behind the first row seats and 28.0 cubic feet behind the second row. When compared to the Audi e-tron and the Jaguar I-Pace, the Lyriq does offer more space in the back. 2023 Cadillac Lyriq Cargo vs. e-tron I-Pace   Cadillac Lyriq Audi e-tron Jaguar I-Pace Rear cargo volume behind second row (cu. ft.) 28.0 28.5 25.3 Rear cargo volume behind first row (cu. ft.) 60.8 56.5 51.0 Frunk cargo volume (cu. ft.) N/A 2.12 0.95 Total front & rear cargo volume (cu. ft.)* 28.0 30.62 26.25 * With second row seats upright However, both the e-tron and the I-Pace feature frunks (2.12 cubic feet in the e-tron, 0.95 cubic feet in the I-Pace respectively), allowing the e-tron to have slightly more total cargo volume (combined frunk and rear cargo area). https://gmauthority.com/blog/2021/05/heres-why-the-2023-cadillac-lyriq-doesnt-have-a-frunk/  
    • That's probably a better worded way to put it. It's a missed opportunity.  They're all liquid cooled at this point and I can't imagine Ford and Tesla are having battery cooling issues, at least I haven't heard of any yet and I've watched a fair amount on the Mach-E and know somebody with a pair of Teslas in Nevada.  I don't believe lack of cooling has ever been a factor in an EV catching fire. It's always something shorting and sparking with poor connection(s) somewhere.  I'd also like to learn why. They have to have a good justification, I know they're not a bunch of idiots who "didn't think of it".  I just don't want the press release answer of "we needed the space for packaging". 
    • Hummer EV (and Silverado EV) are much bigger and truckular...so they have a lot more space underneath for the dirty bits.   The Lyriq isn't a high riding 4x4, so it has to use space for the electric motor(s), power brake system, HVAC, radiator, etc under the hood...
    • Ive read that the Lyriq has a 5 link suspension system front and back.  Maybe that suspension set-up limits the space for the Lyriq?
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bobo
      bobo
      (54 years old)
    2. loki
      loki
      (39 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...