William Maley

Chrysler News: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Will Not Build Any Passenger Cars In the U.S. Early Next Year

24 posts in this topic

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will produce no more passenger cars in the U.S. early next year. The Dodge Dart will end production in September, while production of the Chrysler 200 will cease in December. This is to make way for more production of SUVs and trucks - Jeep Cherokee at Belvidere, Illinois and Sterling Heights, MI for the next-gen Ram 1500.

 

"By the time we finish with this, hopefully, all of our production assets in the United States — if you exclude Canada and Mexico from the fold — all those U.S. plants will be producing either Jeeps or Ram," said FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne during a call with analysts yesterday.

 

Why would FCA end passenger car production in the U.S.? Profit margins. The Detroit Free Press reports this is part of Marchionne's multibillion-dollar plan to match the profit margins seen at Ford and General Motors. Part of the plan involves taking advantage of the popularity of crossovers, SUVs, and trucks in the U.S.; low gas prices, and the lower costs of producing passenger cars in Mexico.

 

"When you look at the economics of car manufacturing ...the margins that we were getting from our experience of both the Dart and the Chrysler 200 ...yielded returns that would not, on a competitive basis, match even anything close or remotely close to what we could derive from utilization of those assets in the Jeep or Ram world. So we have made that shift," Marchionne said.

 

Despite FCA ending production of both the Dart and 200, Marchionne said he is still looking for a partner to build these vehicles.

 

“I think we have made progress. We’re not in a position to announce anything."

 

But would any automaker be willing to take up FCA's offer?

 

"Who would want to commit to that capacity in their own plant when they didn't sell well when they were new?" said Dave Sullivan, an analyst with AutoPacific to Automotive News.

 

"No one wants to build sedans when their own capacity is at a premium and they can't build enough crossovers to satisfy demand."

 

Source: Detroit Free Press, Automotive News (Subscription Required)



Click here to view the article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The falsehood in his statement of profitability by building out of the US is that all other auto companies are able to produce and break even or make a profit on building cars in the US.

 

He is an idiot and incapable of really building an auto company.

 

MORON with a capital M! 

 

:nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweet Photo Balthazar! :metal:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Imported from Detroit"  can change to "Imported from Mexico"

 

As I have said on other threads, I don't really care so much what country the car is made in, or where the corporate office.  But for those that want the "buy American" run away from this company.  The product is made outside of the USA, the money goes to Italy, so Sergio can can live out some fantasy of Alfa Romeo competing with BMW and the Ferrari F1 team beating Mercedes.  More info on those stories at www.nevergoingtohappen.com

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just copy-repasta something I put on Facebook earlier today.

 


Marchionne is more Lynn Townsend than Lee Iacocca, as it turns out.

 

Can you smell 1976 in the air? Mmmmmm... Smells like green velour and rich Corinthian leather. And bankruptcy. Especially bankruptcy.

 

Mark my words, if something (hint: its name sort of sounds like Maraschino) doesn't change at FCA, they will be bankrupt and begging and pleading for another bailout in the near future.

 

If that's the case, this time I say let FCA eat cake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Imported from Detroit"  can change to "Imported from Mexico"

 

As I have said on other threads, I don't really care so much what country the car is made in, or where the corporate office.  But for those that want the "buy American" run away from this company.  The product is made outside of the USA, the money goes to Italy, so Sergio can can live out some fantasy of Alfa Romeo competing with BMW and the Ferrari F1 team beating Mercedes.  More info on those stories at www.nevergoingtohappen.com

Agree with you on this I say!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, since they were barely selling ( 200's home plant still has plenty extra setting in the lot!), it's stupid-but can't be any dumber than building them....thinking the workers would rather have the overtime building stuff than just staying at home.

 

The 200? Not a bad car.....but the darn thing still has issues that keeps a line line of them behind my local dealership waiting on repairs/recall stuff.  While bigger to me-it is actually a very sharp car in person...

 

Dart- Cute, but dated like just a few months after it came out. Still a bit more jellybean than I would like. Neighbors have them (two), and both like their Darts and had very few issues at all with them. But they never did anything with the Dart to go against the big boys...even when gas prices were higher.  What marketing.......

 

 

When you always play from behind like FCA does, you're going to lose a few bucks unless you have a goldmine like Jeep making you money. A better plan would have to have some great leases/buys on these cars-not to lose money (anyways) but get these cars into the hands of consumers and generate some positive buzz! Happy people will tell their friends....and they might not have to give them away....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is going to happen to the Dodge cars--- Charger Challenger?

Where will they be made?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be honest, it's better they kill off the unprofitable cars.

 

But placing all the eggs in the hopes of a partnership with bigger rivals were just plain dumb. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is going to happen to the Dodge cars--- Charger Challenger?

Where will they be made?

Those cars are made in Canada, in FCA's Brampton, Ontario plant. Thus, they are not American made and are exempt from Marchionne's stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be honest, it's better they kill off the unprofitable cars.

 

But placing all the eggs in the hopes of a partnership with bigger rivals were just plain dumb. 

 

 

Yep.....what better way to put it all on the line....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just feel for SHAP man. They put the same amount of money into that facility that Ford did to the dearborn plant. And it's ALL sitting there, idle right now.

 

The best thing they can do is sell all the IP of the 200 and Dart to some company like Mitsubishi or like some Chinese company that wants to sell cars here, and have some royalty clauses so they make some money off of those cars.

 

Like, the 200 would make a GREAT Mitsubishi Lancer or if they even wanted a midsize seller, a GALANT. Seriously, like Mitsu!!! LOOK NO FURTHER.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FCA needs to sell Jeep to someone else, Honda, Hyundai, Mazda, GM, anyone.  We'd have more reliable Jeeps with more modern powertrains, which is a win.  And then the rest of FCA can just close up shop and go away.  Come 2018 Chrysler will have the 300 and Pacifica, Dodge will have Charger/Challenger.  And 3 of those vehicles are dated already.  I don't see why they have those 2 brands around to sell 4 products total, half of which are going to Alamo and National.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Well, the above just BEGS to be answered the way you have answered charges in the past RE the G-wagon. IE: customers like the Jeeps the way they are, and customers buy hundreds of thousands of Jeeps and, customers find them to be 4x4 icons, etc etc. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Well, the above just BEGS to be answered the way you have answered charges in the past RE the G-wagon. IE: customers like the Jeeps the way they are, and customers buy hundreds of thousands of Jeeps and, customers find them to be 4x4 icons, etc etc. 

Well yes customers like Jeep how they are, I am saying keep the look of Jeep, but Jeep is often a bottom 5 brand in reliability and isn't really know for fit and finish or gas mileage.  Imagine how much better a Jeep would be with a Honda 3.5 V6 that never breaks and is buttery smooth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you build up a brand, and you have loyalty, there is sometimes no need for "improvements."

 

And the Pentastar by all accounts is fairly smooth, revved higher it is a bit more gruff than say i-VTEC aka Earth Dreams V6 but some might just call it character.

 

 

Jeep is a printing machine, the best thing they can do is keep it authentic, but also tack on all the new must have options as extra to print even more money. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

^ Well, the above just BEGS to be answered the way you have answered charges in the past RE the G-wagon. IE: customers like the Jeeps the way they are, and customers buy hundreds of thousands of Jeeps and, customers find them to be 4x4 icons, etc etc. 

Well yes customers like Jeep how they are, I am saying keep the look of Jeep, but Jeep is often a bottom 5 brand in reliability and isn't really know for fit and finish or gas mileage.  Imagine how much better a Jeep would be with a Honda 3.5 V6 that never breaks and is buttery smooth.

 

So SMK you just described your beloved G-Wagon. Remember, Drew posted pictures of the mismatch of screws, piss poor fit n finish. 

 

Jeep faithful love the ease of working on the Jeep on the trail not if but when something fails. That is hard to do with a limited production g-wagon which I doubt would ever be on the Rubicon or any other off road trail.

 

I agree with you about the need for better reliability, but this is a perfect example of watch throwing a stone in a glass house as you can easily apply your statement to many MB products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, the G-wagon would beat any production Jeep off road.  Secondly, I doubt a Pentastar V6 is any easier to work on than a Honda V6, GM V6 or anything else.    Then you have the Renegade with the Fiat 1.4 multi air turbo which I doubt it easy to work on or reliable.  And lastly, the G-wagen had the very reliable 5.5 liter V8 for years, now they have the new 4.0 V8, but that is detuned version of the AMG engine, and based off the 2.0T so the bugs should be worked out by now.

 

Mercedes is almost always in the top 10 in reliability, Jeep almost always in the bottom 10 going back 15-20 years.   And I don't even blame Jeep so much, it is the fact that Jeeps are made with Fiat, Dodge/Chrysler engines.  Their best vehicle is the Grand Cherokee that is based on the mid-2000s M-class platform.  Jeep has really strong brand image, good marketing and loyal fan base.  I am not against Jeep, they have a focused brand and do many things right.  But Jeep would be better off if it wasn't owned by the worst car conglomerate there is.  Jeep would build a better product if it was owned by GM, Ford, Hyundai, Honda, Toyota, Mazda, take your pick.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, the G-wagon would beat any production Jeep off road.  Secondly, I doubt a Pentastar V6 is any easier to work on than a Honda V6, GM V6 or anything else.    Then you have the Renegade with the Fiat 1.4 multi air turbo which I doubt it easy to work on or reliable.  And lastly, the G-wagen had the very reliable 5.5 liter V8 for years, now they have the new 4.0 V8, but that is detuned version of the AMG engine, and based off the 2.0T so the bugs should be worked out by now.

 

Mercedes is almost always in the top 10 in reliability, Jeep almost always in the bottom 10 going back 15-20 years.   And I don't even blame Jeep so much, it is the fact that Jeeps are made with Fiat, Dodge/Chrysler engines.  Their best vehicle is the Grand Cherokee that is based on the mid-2000s M-class platform.  Jeep has really strong brand image, good marketing and loyal fan base.  I am not against Jeep, they have a focused brand and do many things right.  But Jeep would be better off if it wasn't owned by the worst car conglomerate there is.  Jeep would build a better product if it was owned by GM, Ford, Hyundai, Honda, Toyota, Mazda, take your pick.

At one time, Daimler -- aka Mercedes -- basically owned Jeep.

Know what they chose to build?

This f@#king thing:

jeep-compass-2008-4.jpg

Your argument is invalid. Go home. You are drunk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Compass platform is based on a Chrysler/Mitsubishi chassis, there is no Daimler in the Compass, even though Daimler did own Chrysler during it's development.  The only Jeep that has Daimler in it is the Grand Cherokee ("the most awarded SUV ever"), as the 2011 Grand Cherokee and Mercedes ML had most of their development work done while they were still merged.  Mercedes has a new chassis coming for the GLE/GLS in a year, Jeep has nothing because FCA is at the helm now, in 2025 the Grand Cherokee will still be using that 2011 ML chassis.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chrysler will still build passenger cars in Canada. That's American enough, right? I mean it's definitely North, more North than the U.S.

 

Wanna know something interesting? Sergio graduated from York University with a bachelor degree, from a program that was the precursor to the now full-fledged faculty that has its own programs, EMBAs, everything, called Schulich School of Business, at York University, about 15 minutes from Markham, Ontario.

 

Another coincidence! You can guess why I know the the latter part of the above statement...and keep it to yourselves.

 

:canada:  :pbjtime: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      October has not been the best of months for Nissan. Earlier this month, Japan’s transport ministry revealed that at five of the company's six plants in the country had quality checks being certified by unauthorized workers. According to Reuters, vehicles destined for the domestic market have to go under a final check by certified technicians.
      “It’s extremely regrettable, causing anxiety for users and shaking the foundation of the certification system,” said Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Keiichi Ishii at a press conference earlier this month.
      Nissan announced that it would be recalling 1.2 million vehicles built within the past three years due to this issue.
      The news has only gotten worse as the Japanese automaker announced today that it would be suspending production at all of their Japan plants for at least two weeks to investigate and address this issue. Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa revealed at a briefing that this unauthorized approval continued a month after Nissan was told about this issue and said it strengthened the control of its inspection processes.
      “Our emergency measures were not enough. We were unable to change our bad habits,” said Saikawa
      There are numerous factors as to how this debacle developed including increasing the efficiency of the inspection process and plants transferring the checks to other lines.
      Nissan is planning on recalling an additional 34,000 vehicles for re-inspection.
      Production of export vehicles will continue as this issue is specific to Japanese-market models.
      Source: Reuters, 2, Bloomberg, Nissan
      Press Release is on Page 2


      Regarding recurrence of final vehicle inspection issue at Nissan’s vehicle plants in Japan
      YOKOHAMA, Japan – As previously announced, on September 18 the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation (MLIT) notified Nissan that in the final vehicle inspection process, certain checks were carried out by technicians not properly registered to perform those duties under Nissan’s own processes. Nissan took corrective measures at Japanese production plants by September 20 to address the issue. By October 18, the investigation team (led by a third party) discovered that at its Oppama, Tochigi and the Nissan Kyushu plants, certain parts of the final inspection process were still being carried out by technicians not properly registered to perform those duties for vehicles for the Japan market.
      Nissan decided today to suspend vehicle production for the Japan market at all Nissan and Nissan Shatai plants in Japan.
      Nissan regrets any inconvenience and concern this has caused to its valued customers and other stakeholders in Japan.
      Findings
      The plants transferred final vehicle inspection check items from the final vehicle inspection line to other lines, such as the “marketability inspection” and the “offline inspection”. As a result, employees who were not internally registered as final vehicle inspectors performed final vehicle inspections. Measures planned
      Nissan will take the following actions with regard to the production line and vehicles that did not meet Japanese market requirements for final inspection:
      Production line in the plants
      The final vehicle inspection line will be configured as originally submitted to MLIT, consolidating all final inspection processes. Final inspection process will be separated from other processes and only internally registered final vehicle inspectors will have access to the final inspection line. Unregistered and registered vehicles
      Nissan is considering re-inspecting the unregistered vehicles at certified Nissan dealership facilities throughout Japan. Nissan is considering submitting a noncompliance recall report for registered vehicles. Approximately 34,000 vehicles produced between September 20 – October 18, 2017 including those produced for other makers will be subject to re-inspection. Nissan regards the recurrence of this issue at domestic plants — despite the corrective measures taken — as critical. The investigation team will continue to thoroughly investigate the issue and determine measures to prevent recurrence. Details of the above will be included in the final report to be published on a later date.

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      October has not been the best of months for Nissan. Earlier this month, Japan’s transport ministry revealed that at five of the company's six plants in the country had quality checks being certified by unauthorized workers. According to Reuters, vehicles destined for the domestic market have to go under a final check by certified technicians.
      “It’s extremely regrettable, causing anxiety for users and shaking the foundation of the certification system,” said Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Keiichi Ishii at a press conference earlier this month.
      Nissan announced that it would be recalling 1.2 million vehicles built within the past three years due to this issue.
      The news has only gotten worse as the Japanese automaker announced today that it would be suspending production at all of their Japan plants for at least two weeks to investigate and address this issue. Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa revealed at a briefing that this unauthorized approval continued a month after Nissan was told about this issue and said it strengthened the control of its inspection processes.
      “Our emergency measures were not enough. We were unable to change our bad habits,” said Saikawa
      There are numerous factors as to how this debacle developed including increasing the efficiency of the inspection process and plants transferring the checks to other lines.
      Nissan is planning on recalling an additional 34,000 vehicles for re-inspection.
      Production of export vehicles will continue as this issue is specific to Japanese-market models.
      Source: Reuters, 2, Bloomberg, Nissan
      Press Release is on Page 2


      Regarding recurrence of final vehicle inspection issue at Nissan’s vehicle plants in Japan
      YOKOHAMA, Japan – As previously announced, on September 18 the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation (MLIT) notified Nissan that in the final vehicle inspection process, certain checks were carried out by technicians not properly registered to perform those duties under Nissan’s own processes. Nissan took corrective measures at Japanese production plants by September 20 to address the issue. By October 18, the investigation team (led by a third party) discovered that at its Oppama, Tochigi and the Nissan Kyushu plants, certain parts of the final inspection process were still being carried out by technicians not properly registered to perform those duties for vehicles for the Japan market.
      Nissan decided today to suspend vehicle production for the Japan market at all Nissan and Nissan Shatai plants in Japan.
      Nissan regrets any inconvenience and concern this has caused to its valued customers and other stakeholders in Japan.
      Findings
      The plants transferred final vehicle inspection check items from the final vehicle inspection line to other lines, such as the “marketability inspection” and the “offline inspection”. As a result, employees who were not internally registered as final vehicle inspectors performed final vehicle inspections. Measures planned
      Nissan will take the following actions with regard to the production line and vehicles that did not meet Japanese market requirements for final inspection:
      Production line in the plants
      The final vehicle inspection line will be configured as originally submitted to MLIT, consolidating all final inspection processes. Final inspection process will be separated from other processes and only internally registered final vehicle inspectors will have access to the final inspection line. Unregistered and registered vehicles
      Nissan is considering re-inspecting the unregistered vehicles at certified Nissan dealership facilities throughout Japan. Nissan is considering submitting a noncompliance recall report for registered vehicles. Approximately 34,000 vehicles produced between September 20 – October 18, 2017 including those produced for other makers will be subject to re-inspection. Nissan regards the recurrence of this issue at domestic plants — despite the corrective measures taken — as critical. The investigation team will continue to thoroughly investigate the issue and determine measures to prevent recurrence. Details of the above will be included in the final report to be published on a later date.
    • By William Maley
      The strike at General Motors' CAMI Assembly plant, home of the Chevrolet Equinox has come to an end. Today, 86 percent of Unifor Local 88 members voted yes on a new 4-year contract. With the approval, workers will resume work at the plant beginning at 7 PM tonight for early start-up, with production beginning at 11 PM.
      Here is what new 4-year contract include
      Stronger language around job security. Union said the new contract would make it more costly for GM to close down CAMI - $290 million vs. $190 million. If CAMI is shuttered, employees near retirement will still be able to get into a retirement program. Workers will get a 4 percent wage hike and $8,000 in lump-sum payments over the contract New hires on the production line will see an accelerated pace in terms of their wages increased to the max of $34.15 per hour A $6,000 performance bonus once the deal is ratified "The ratification of a new 4-year agreement between GM Canada and Unifor Local 88 at CAMI Assembly is welcome news for our company, employees and the community. We have an outstanding new product at CAMI with the Chevrolet Equinox and I am confident that we will quickly pull together to continue to demonstrate to the world the outstanding productivity, innovation and quality that is synonymous with the CAMI workforce," said Steve Carlisle, President of GM Canada in a statement.
      There is one thing missing from this contract, a written assurance that CAMI would be the lead producer of the Equinox. This was the major point of contention between the two during negoations.
      It is clear that Unifor officials are not happy with this contract.
      “The end result was not the result we were hoping for, it shows the true colors of GM,” Unifor Local 88 Chair Mike Van Boekel said in a statement to members.
      Given these actions, our demand to protect the Equinox was not only fair and reasonable, it simply made sense. Our members had every reason to make this [lead producer] demand, and did everything to demonstrate it was a demand that deserved to be met. However, at the highest levels of General Motors corporate in Detroit, they coldly refused. As a result and after much internal discussion, we decided that we could not, in good conscience, ask for more economic sacrifice from you in this fight,” said Unifor National President Jerry Dias.
      We have to wonder if GM's threat of ramping up Equinox production in Mexico issued last week was the turning point.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), CBC News, GM
      Press Release is on Page 2
      2017 CAMI / UNIFOR NEGOTIATIONS
      The ratification of a new 4-year agreement between GM Canada and Unifor Local 88 at CAMI Assembly is welcome news for our company, employees and the community. We have an outstanding new product at CAMI with the Chevrolet Equinox and I am confident that we will quickly pull together to continue to demonstrate to the world the outstanding productivity, innovation and quality that is synonymous with the CAMI workforce.
      I want to extend thanks to the local and national Unifor teams who have worked long hours together with the GM negotiating team these past many weeks. The negotiations process requires a great deal of straight talk, creative problem solving, and compromise to achieve a positive outcome for both the membership and the Company.  Success is also achieved by remembering that we are here to serve our customers proudly and deliver the very best product and services to them. 
      Having grown up in Southwestern Ontario, the CAMI plant and the Oxford County community mean a great deal to me.  The challenges of the past months have been hard on all of us but now it’s time to show the character of our region and our plant. With the recent $800 million investment at the CAMI plant and this agreement, it is up to each of us to demonstrate the unparalleled value we deliver as leaders within Canada’s auto sector. The employees at CAMI have created a culture of team involvement and continuous improvement resulting in numerous industry awards for vehicle quality and productivity.  I am confident that by working as one team, that will continue for years to come.
      Steve Carlisle
      President and Managing Director
      General Motors Canada 

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The strike at General Motors' CAMI Assembly plant, home of the Chevrolet Equinox has come to an end. Today, 86 percent of Unifor Local 88 members voted yes on a new 4-year contract. With the approval, workers will resume work at the plant beginning at 7 PM tonight for early start-up, with production beginning at 11 PM.
      Here is what new 4-year contract include
      Stronger language around job security. Union said the new contract would make it more costly for GM to close down CAMI - $290 million vs. $190 million. If CAMI is shuttered, employees near retirement will still be able to get into a retirement program. Workers will get a 4 percent wage hike and $8,000 in lump-sum payments over the contract New hires on the production line will see an accelerated pace in terms of their wages increased to the max of $34.15 per hour A $6,000 performance bonus once the deal is ratified "The ratification of a new 4-year agreement between GM Canada and Unifor Local 88 at CAMI Assembly is welcome news for our company, employees and the community. We have an outstanding new product at CAMI with the Chevrolet Equinox and I am confident that we will quickly pull together to continue to demonstrate to the world the outstanding productivity, innovation and quality that is synonymous with the CAMI workforce," said Steve Carlisle, President of GM Canada in a statement.
      There is one thing missing from this contract, a written assurance that CAMI would be the lead producer of the Equinox. This was the major point of contention between the two during negoations.
      It is clear that Unifor officials are not happy with this contract.
      “The end result was not the result we were hoping for, it shows the true colors of GM,” Unifor Local 88 Chair Mike Van Boekel said in a statement to members.
      Given these actions, our demand to protect the Equinox was not only fair and reasonable, it simply made sense. Our members had every reason to make this [lead producer] demand, and did everything to demonstrate it was a demand that deserved to be met. However, at the highest levels of General Motors corporate in Detroit, they coldly refused. As a result and after much internal discussion, we decided that we could not, in good conscience, ask for more economic sacrifice from you in this fight,” said Unifor National President Jerry Dias.
      We have to wonder if GM's threat of ramping up Equinox production in Mexico issued last week was the turning point.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), CBC News, GM
      Press Release is on Page 2
      2017 CAMI / UNIFOR NEGOTIATIONS
      The ratification of a new 4-year agreement between GM Canada and Unifor Local 88 at CAMI Assembly is welcome news for our company, employees and the community. We have an outstanding new product at CAMI with the Chevrolet Equinox and I am confident that we will quickly pull together to continue to demonstrate to the world the outstanding productivity, innovation and quality that is synonymous with the CAMI workforce.
      I want to extend thanks to the local and national Unifor teams who have worked long hours together with the GM negotiating team these past many weeks. The negotiations process requires a great deal of straight talk, creative problem solving, and compromise to achieve a positive outcome for both the membership and the Company.  Success is also achieved by remembering that we are here to serve our customers proudly and deliver the very best product and services to them. 
      Having grown up in Southwestern Ontario, the CAMI plant and the Oxford County community mean a great deal to me.  The challenges of the past months have been hard on all of us but now it’s time to show the character of our region and our plant. With the recent $800 million investment at the CAMI plant and this agreement, it is up to each of us to demonstrate the unparalleled value we deliver as leaders within Canada’s auto sector. The employees at CAMI have created a culture of team involvement and continuous improvement resulting in numerous industry awards for vehicle quality and productivity.  I am confident that by working as one team, that will continue for years to come.
      Steve Carlisle
      President and Managing Director
      General Motors Canada 
    • By William Maley
      We're now into the third week of the strike at GM's CAMI Assembly in Ontario and neither side appears to be budging. There are rising concerns that GM could be running out of the stockpile of the Chevrolet Equinox. GM's second-best selling nameplate.
      According to data from Automotive News, GM had 43,453 Equinoxes (about a 41-day supply) at the beginning of this month. Chevrolet dealers sold 27,512 Equinox models last month. If this trend continues, there could be some serious problems towards the end of the year.
      "That's going to be hard on Equinox to compete on such a limited quantity in such a hot segment. We would expect sales to pick up in the last quarter of the year," said Jessica Caldwell, senior analyst and director of pricing and industry analysis for Edmunds.com.
      GM has been downplaying this issue since the strike started.
      "We believe we have sufficient inventory and production to meet demand while negotiations continue and we continue to work closely with dealers to ensure customers continue to be well served," the company said in a statement.
      A small number of dealers that spoke with Automotive News said their inventory of the Equinox models hasn't been directly affected, but that could change if the strike continues.
      GM is ramping up Equinox production at two plants in Mexico - San Luis Potosi and Ramos Arizpe. The company declined to provide production capacity or change in plans due to the strike. But neither plant can compete with the output of CAMI. Through August, the two Mexican plants produced 40,017 Equinox models since production began in April. Compared to CAMI which produced an estimated 132,388 models in the same timeframe.
      "We don't know the ramp-up at the other production facilities in Mexico. That's the X factor," said Caldwell.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)