Jump to content
William Maley

Chrysler News: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Will Not Build Any Passenger Cars In the U.S. Early Next Year

Recommended Posts

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will produce no more passenger cars in the U.S. early next year. The Dodge Dart will end production in September, while production of the Chrysler 200 will cease in December. This is to make way for more production of SUVs and trucks - Jeep Cherokee at Belvidere, Illinois and Sterling Heights, MI for the next-gen Ram 1500.

 

"By the time we finish with this, hopefully, all of our production assets in the United States — if you exclude Canada and Mexico from the fold — all those U.S. plants will be producing either Jeeps or Ram," said FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne during a call with analysts yesterday.

 

Why would FCA end passenger car production in the U.S.? Profit margins. The Detroit Free Press reports this is part of Marchionne's multibillion-dollar plan to match the profit margins seen at Ford and General Motors. Part of the plan involves taking advantage of the popularity of crossovers, SUVs, and trucks in the U.S.; low gas prices, and the lower costs of producing passenger cars in Mexico.

 

"When you look at the economics of car manufacturing ...the margins that we were getting from our experience of both the Dart and the Chrysler 200 ...yielded returns that would not, on a competitive basis, match even anything close or remotely close to what we could derive from utilization of those assets in the Jeep or Ram world. So we have made that shift," Marchionne said.

 

Despite FCA ending production of both the Dart and 200, Marchionne said he is still looking for a partner to build these vehicles.

 

“I think we have made progress. We’re not in a position to announce anything."

 

But would any automaker be willing to take up FCA's offer?

 

"Who would want to commit to that capacity in their own plant when they didn't sell well when they were new?" said Dave Sullivan, an analyst with AutoPacific to Automotive News.

 

"No one wants to build sedans when their own capacity is at a premium and they can't build enough crossovers to satisfy demand."

 

Source: Detroit Free Press, Automotive News (Subscription Required)



Click here to view the article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The falsehood in his statement of profitability by building out of the US is that all other auto companies are able to produce and break even or make a profit on building cars in the US.

 

He is an idiot and incapable of really building an auto company.

 

MORON with a capital M! 

 

:nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:  :nono:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweet Photo Balthazar! :metal:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Imported from Detroit"  can change to "Imported from Mexico"

 

As I have said on other threads, I don't really care so much what country the car is made in, or where the corporate office.  But for those that want the "buy American" run away from this company.  The product is made outside of the USA, the money goes to Italy, so Sergio can can live out some fantasy of Alfa Romeo competing with BMW and the Ferrari F1 team beating Mercedes.  More info on those stories at www.nevergoingtohappen.com

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just copy-repasta something I put on Facebook earlier today.

 


Marchionne is more Lynn Townsend than Lee Iacocca, as it turns out.

 

Can you smell 1976 in the air? Mmmmmm... Smells like green velour and rich Corinthian leather. And bankruptcy. Especially bankruptcy.

 

Mark my words, if something (hint: its name sort of sounds like Maraschino) doesn't change at FCA, they will be bankrupt and begging and pleading for another bailout in the near future.

 

If that's the case, this time I say let FCA eat cake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Imported from Detroit"  can change to "Imported from Mexico"

 

As I have said on other threads, I don't really care so much what country the car is made in, or where the corporate office.  But for those that want the "buy American" run away from this company.  The product is made outside of the USA, the money goes to Italy, so Sergio can can live out some fantasy of Alfa Romeo competing with BMW and the Ferrari F1 team beating Mercedes.  More info on those stories at www.nevergoingtohappen.com

Agree with you on this I say!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, since they were barely selling ( 200's home plant still has plenty extra setting in the lot!), it's stupid-but can't be any dumber than building them....thinking the workers would rather have the overtime building stuff than just staying at home.

 

The 200? Not a bad car.....but the darn thing still has issues that keeps a line line of them behind my local dealership waiting on repairs/recall stuff.  While bigger to me-it is actually a very sharp car in person...

 

Dart- Cute, but dated like just a few months after it came out. Still a bit more jellybean than I would like. Neighbors have them (two), and both like their Darts and had very few issues at all with them. But they never did anything with the Dart to go against the big boys...even when gas prices were higher.  What marketing.......

 

 

When you always play from behind like FCA does, you're going to lose a few bucks unless you have a goldmine like Jeep making you money. A better plan would have to have some great leases/buys on these cars-not to lose money (anyways) but get these cars into the hands of consumers and generate some positive buzz! Happy people will tell their friends....and they might not have to give them away....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is going to happen to the Dodge cars--- Charger Challenger?

Where will they be made?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be honest, it's better they kill off the unprofitable cars.

 

But placing all the eggs in the hopes of a partnership with bigger rivals were just plain dumb. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is going to happen to the Dodge cars--- Charger Challenger?

Where will they be made?

Those cars are made in Canada, in FCA's Brampton, Ontario plant. Thus, they are not American made and are exempt from Marchionne's stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be honest, it's better they kill off the unprofitable cars.

 

But placing all the eggs in the hopes of a partnership with bigger rivals were just plain dumb. 

 

 

Yep.....what better way to put it all on the line....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just feel for SHAP man. They put the same amount of money into that facility that Ford did to the dearborn plant. And it's ALL sitting there, idle right now.

 

The best thing they can do is sell all the IP of the 200 and Dart to some company like Mitsubishi or like some Chinese company that wants to sell cars here, and have some royalty clauses so they make some money off of those cars.

 

Like, the 200 would make a GREAT Mitsubishi Lancer or if they even wanted a midsize seller, a GALANT. Seriously, like Mitsu!!! LOOK NO FURTHER.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FCA needs to sell Jeep to someone else, Honda, Hyundai, Mazda, GM, anyone.  We'd have more reliable Jeeps with more modern powertrains, which is a win.  And then the rest of FCA can just close up shop and go away.  Come 2018 Chrysler will have the 300 and Pacifica, Dodge will have Charger/Challenger.  And 3 of those vehicles are dated already.  I don't see why they have those 2 brands around to sell 4 products total, half of which are going to Alamo and National.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Well, the above just BEGS to be answered the way you have answered charges in the past RE the G-wagon. IE: customers like the Jeeps the way they are, and customers buy hundreds of thousands of Jeeps and, customers find them to be 4x4 icons, etc etc. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Well, the above just BEGS to be answered the way you have answered charges in the past RE the G-wagon. IE: customers like the Jeeps the way they are, and customers buy hundreds of thousands of Jeeps and, customers find them to be 4x4 icons, etc etc. 

Well yes customers like Jeep how they are, I am saying keep the look of Jeep, but Jeep is often a bottom 5 brand in reliability and isn't really know for fit and finish or gas mileage.  Imagine how much better a Jeep would be with a Honda 3.5 V6 that never breaks and is buttery smooth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you build up a brand, and you have loyalty, there is sometimes no need for "improvements."

 

And the Pentastar by all accounts is fairly smooth, revved higher it is a bit more gruff than say i-VTEC aka Earth Dreams V6 but some might just call it character.

 

 

Jeep is a printing machine, the best thing they can do is keep it authentic, but also tack on all the new must have options as extra to print even more money. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

^ Well, the above just BEGS to be answered the way you have answered charges in the past RE the G-wagon. IE: customers like the Jeeps the way they are, and customers buy hundreds of thousands of Jeeps and, customers find them to be 4x4 icons, etc etc. 

Well yes customers like Jeep how they are, I am saying keep the look of Jeep, but Jeep is often a bottom 5 brand in reliability and isn't really know for fit and finish or gas mileage.  Imagine how much better a Jeep would be with a Honda 3.5 V6 that never breaks and is buttery smooth.

 

So SMK you just described your beloved G-Wagon. Remember, Drew posted pictures of the mismatch of screws, piss poor fit n finish. 

 

Jeep faithful love the ease of working on the Jeep on the trail not if but when something fails. That is hard to do with a limited production g-wagon which I doubt would ever be on the Rubicon or any other off road trail.

 

I agree with you about the need for better reliability, but this is a perfect example of watch throwing a stone in a glass house as you can easily apply your statement to many MB products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, the G-wagon would beat any production Jeep off road.  Secondly, I doubt a Pentastar V6 is any easier to work on than a Honda V6, GM V6 or anything else.    Then you have the Renegade with the Fiat 1.4 multi air turbo which I doubt it easy to work on or reliable.  And lastly, the G-wagen had the very reliable 5.5 liter V8 for years, now they have the new 4.0 V8, but that is detuned version of the AMG engine, and based off the 2.0T so the bugs should be worked out by now.

 

Mercedes is almost always in the top 10 in reliability, Jeep almost always in the bottom 10 going back 15-20 years.   And I don't even blame Jeep so much, it is the fact that Jeeps are made with Fiat, Dodge/Chrysler engines.  Their best vehicle is the Grand Cherokee that is based on the mid-2000s M-class platform.  Jeep has really strong brand image, good marketing and loyal fan base.  I am not against Jeep, they have a focused brand and do many things right.  But Jeep would be better off if it wasn't owned by the worst car conglomerate there is.  Jeep would build a better product if it was owned by GM, Ford, Hyundai, Honda, Toyota, Mazda, take your pick.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, the G-wagon would beat any production Jeep off road.  Secondly, I doubt a Pentastar V6 is any easier to work on than a Honda V6, GM V6 or anything else.    Then you have the Renegade with the Fiat 1.4 multi air turbo which I doubt it easy to work on or reliable.  And lastly, the G-wagen had the very reliable 5.5 liter V8 for years, now they have the new 4.0 V8, but that is detuned version of the AMG engine, and based off the 2.0T so the bugs should be worked out by now.

 

Mercedes is almost always in the top 10 in reliability, Jeep almost always in the bottom 10 going back 15-20 years.   And I don't even blame Jeep so much, it is the fact that Jeeps are made with Fiat, Dodge/Chrysler engines.  Their best vehicle is the Grand Cherokee that is based on the mid-2000s M-class platform.  Jeep has really strong brand image, good marketing and loyal fan base.  I am not against Jeep, they have a focused brand and do many things right.  But Jeep would be better off if it wasn't owned by the worst car conglomerate there is.  Jeep would build a better product if it was owned by GM, Ford, Hyundai, Honda, Toyota, Mazda, take your pick.

At one time, Daimler -- aka Mercedes -- basically owned Jeep.

Know what they chose to build?

This f@#king thing:

jeep-compass-2008-4.jpg

Your argument is invalid. Go home. You are drunk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Compass platform is based on a Chrysler/Mitsubishi chassis, there is no Daimler in the Compass, even though Daimler did own Chrysler during it's development.  The only Jeep that has Daimler in it is the Grand Cherokee ("the most awarded SUV ever"), as the 2011 Grand Cherokee and Mercedes ML had most of their development work done while they were still merged.  Mercedes has a new chassis coming for the GLE/GLS in a year, Jeep has nothing because FCA is at the helm now, in 2025 the Grand Cherokee will still be using that 2011 ML chassis.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chrysler will still build passenger cars in Canada. That's American enough, right? I mean it's definitely North, more North than the U.S.

 

Wanna know something interesting? Sergio graduated from York University with a bachelor degree, from a program that was the precursor to the now full-fledged faculty that has its own programs, EMBAs, everything, called Schulich School of Business, at York University, about 15 minutes from Markham, Ontario.

 

Another coincidence! You can guess why I know the the latter part of the above statement...and keep it to yourselves.

 

:canada:  :pbjtime: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Today's Birthdays

    1. K.C.
      K.C.
      Age: 52
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      If you have been following auto sales for the past few years, then you know that SUVs and trucks currently dominate the sales charts partly due to the low gas prices. This is especially true when it comes to the luxury segment, where utility models are eating sedans. But a new report from The New York Times reveals that American automakers are eating the lunches of luxury car manufacturers. 
      According to data from Edmunds, the likes of Ford, Chevrolet, and GMC have seen their share of domestic sales of models with an average price of $60,000 steadily climbing, while luxury brands like Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, and Lexus have been declining. GMC, in particular, has shown the largest growth, accounting 11.3 percent of domestic sales of $60,000-plus models in 2017. Five years ago, the brand only made up 0.1 percent of those sales. A lot of this credit can be laid at the feet of GMC's Denali brands. At a recent investor conference, GM showed data that the Denali line had an average sale price of $56,000 - more than the average price of an Audi, BMW, or Mercedes-Benz.
      “This thing is a money machine,” said GM's president Dan Ammann about Denali.
      Over at Ford, more than half of F-150 sales are made up by the Lariat, King Ranch, Raptor models. Only a few years ago, those models made up a third.
      Why are American automakers seeing a massive increase in expensive SUVs and trucks? Part of it comes down to price, but there is also the image.
      “We’ve been taking in Lexuses on trade-ins, BMWs," said Gary Gilchrist, owner of a GMC dealer in Tacoma, Washington.
      “People used to want German cars for the image factor. Now, if you have a Denali, you get that. People turn their heads to look.”
      Source: New York Times

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      If you have been following auto sales for the past few years, then you know that SUVs and trucks currently dominate the sales charts partly due to the low gas prices. This is especially true when it comes to the luxury segment, where utility models are eating sedans. But a new report from The New York Times reveals that American automakers are eating the lunches of luxury car manufacturers. 
      According to data from Edmunds, the likes of Ford, Chevrolet, and GMC have seen their share of domestic sales of models with an average price of $60,000 steadily climbing, while luxury brands like Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, and Lexus have been declining. GMC, in particular, has shown the largest growth, accounting 11.3 percent of domestic sales of $60,000-plus models in 2017. Five years ago, the brand only made up 0.1 percent of those sales. A lot of this credit can be laid at the feet of GMC's Denali brands. At a recent investor conference, GM showed data that the Denali line had an average sale price of $56,000 - more than the average price of an Audi, BMW, or Mercedes-Benz.
      “This thing is a money machine,” said GM's president Dan Ammann about Denali.
      Over at Ford, more than half of F-150 sales are made up by the Lariat, King Ranch, Raptor models. Only a few years ago, those models made up a third.
      Why are American automakers seeing a massive increase in expensive SUVs and trucks? Part of it comes down to price, but there is also the image.
      “We’ve been taking in Lexuses on trade-ins, BMWs," said Gary Gilchrist, owner of a GMC dealer in Tacoma, Washington.
      “People used to want German cars for the image factor. Now, if you have a Denali, you get that. People turn their heads to look.”
      Source: New York Times
    • By William Maley
      The redesigned Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator have been moving quite rapidly off dealer lots. In January, sales of the Expedition rose 59 percent while the Navigator saw a jaw-dropping 132 percent increase. But this is proving to be a problem for Ford as their dealers can't get enough of either model to satisfy consumer demand. A source told Automotive News that CEO Jim Hackett has banned Ford employees from ordering Expeditions and Navigators to help get more out into the world. The source said restricting employees from ordering a mainstream vehicle is very rare. 
      "We could have sold a lot more in January if we had them," said Mark LaNeve, Ford's vice president for U.S. marketing, sales and service during Ford's monthly sales call earlier this month.
      Ford will be addressing this issue with a $25 million investment into their Kentucky Truck Plant today. The investment will allow the plant to produce 25 percent more Expedition and Navigator models.
      "It's important for this plant to produce more vehicles. In this segment, people will pay for a great product. The dealer feedback has been even stronger than we've hoped for," said Joe Hinrichs, Ford's president of global markets.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Ford
      Press Release is on Page 2


      FORD INCREASING PRODUCTION OF ALL-NEW LINCOLN NAVIGATOR, FORD EXPEDITION TO MEET GREATER-THAN-ANTICIPATED CUSTOMER DEMAND
      Ford is increasing production of two entirely new SUVs – the Lincoln Navigator and Ford Expedition – to meet surging customer demand A new $25 million investment brings Ford’s total investment at Kentucky Truck Plant to $925 million and allows the company to increase manufacturing line speed; company has boosted production targets for full-size SUVs approximately 25 percent since fall This additional investment and advanced manufacturing upgrades all help the company improve its operational fitness. Upgrades include 400 new robots, enhanced data analytics to help the plant operate more efficiently and a new 3D printer that enables workers to make parts and tools more quickly and cheaper LOUISVILLE, Ky., Feb. 12, 2018 – Ford is increasing production of two popular full-size SUVs to meet surging demand for both all-new models.
      The company is using advanced manufacturing technologies and an upskilled workforce to increase line speed at its Kentucky Truck Plant to build even more Lincoln Navigator and Ford Expedition SUVs, boosting production targets approximately 25 percent since last fall when the SUVs hit the market.
      “The response from customers regarding our new full-size SUVs has been exceptional,” said Joe Hinrichs, president, Global Operations. “Using a combination of Ford’s advanced manufacturing and American hard work and ingenuity, we’ll deliver more high-quality Lincoln Navigators and Ford Expeditions to customers than originally planned.”
      A new $25 million investment for additional manufacturing enhancements brings Ford’s total investment at Kentucky Truck Plant to $925 million and allows the company to increase manufacturing line speed.
      This investment and advanced manufacturing upgrades are examples of the company’s quest to improve its operational fitness. Upgrades include 400 new robots, a new 3D printer that enables workers to make parts and tools more quickly and cheaper as well as enhanced data analytics to keep the assembly line moving as efficiently as possible.
      Surging customer demand
      Lincoln dealers simply can’t keep the entirely new Navigator on dealer lots; the luxury SUVs are spending an average of just seven days at the dealership before they are sold.
      Customers are trading in Land Rover and Mercedes vehicles in exchange for a Navigator, and nearly 85 percent of all Navigator buyers are choosing high-end Black Label and Reserve models.
      Customer demand for the highly-equipped Black Label and Reserve series contributed to an average transaction price increase of more than $21,000 in January versus a year ago. Navigator retail sales were up triple digits in every region of the country last month. Navigator sales more than doubled last month, thanks to growth in key markets including Florida, Texas and California, a competitive conquest rate of 40 percent and new interest from younger consumers.
      Expedition also is off to a strong start, with the top-of-the-line Platinum trim models representing 29 percent of sales – pushing transaction price increases up $7,800 in January. Expedition retail sales were up nearly 57 percent last month and vehicles are spending just seven days on dealer lots.
      To ensure customers can get vehicles as quickly as possible, Kentucky Truck Plant assembly line workers are working overtime and voluntary weekend shifts.

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×