Jump to content
William Maley

GM News: GM To Cut Back On Production As Inventory Is At An 8-Year High

Recommended Posts

General Motors is dialing back on production as it currently has too many vehicles in inventory. The Detroit News reports that General Motors at the end of November had 874,000 vehicles sitting around - a number that hasn't been seen since the 2008 financial crisis. Compared to the same time last year, the number of vehicles has increased by 182,000 units. More worrying is that compared to October, the number of unsold vehicles rose by 40,000.

Despite strong sales, more consumers are going with crossovers, SUVs, and pickup trucks. GM even increased incentives on a number of models to help relieve this glut, all to no avail.

According to Autodata, this is amount of passenger vehicles GM had sitting,

  • 110 day-supply of the Cadillac CT6
  • 119 day-supply of the Cadillac ATS
  • 121 day-supply of the Chevrolet Cruze
  • 132 day-supply of the Cadillac CTS
  • 168 day supply of the Buick LaCrosse
  • 170 day-supply of the Chevrolet Corvette and Spark
  • 177 day-supply of the Chevrolet Camaro

Because of this, General Motors is cutting back on production at some of their plants. As we reported last month , GM is cutting a shift at their Lansing Grand River plant in Michigan (home to Cadillac ATS, CTS, and Chevrolet Camaro) and a shift at Lordstown, Ohio plant (home to the Chevrolet Cruze). General Motors will also be shutting down five plants according to Reuters in January. The plants include,

  • Detroit-Hamtramck (Three weeks)
  • Fairfax, KS (Three weeks)
  • Lansing Grand River (Two weeks)
  • Lordstown, OH (One week)
  • Bowling Green, KY (One week)

Source: The Detroit News, Reuters


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh, and I thought it was just FCA cars losing ground and having big incentives because they were on old platforms and nothing to do with the CUV boom.  Who knew..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Stew said:

Huh, and I thought it was just FCA cars losing ground and having big incentives because they were on old platforms and nothing to do with the CUV boom.  Who knew..........

Come on Stew. FCA is suffering from both issues and this is coming from an 8 year Magnum owner and an LX fan. They have problems that go beyond just CUVs or lack thereof. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

Come on Stew. FCA is suffering from both issues and this is coming from an 8 year Magnum owner and an LX fan. They have problems that go beyond just CUVs or lack thereof. 

Not really.  the cars made in the plants that GM is idling have all not been the sales successes expected, especially the Alpha cars and the Omega CT6 already having issues?  Not good.  And Jeep is the highest selling CUV/SUV brand bar none. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Stew said:

Not really.  the cars made in the plants that GM is idling have all not been the sales successes expected, especially the Alpha cars and the Omega CT6 already having issues?  Not good.  And Jeep is the highest selling CUV/SUV brand bar none. 

That does not take away from my original statement about FCA. For the record though, I do not disagree with the GM issues but it is easier to prove their losses are a result of the CUV craze than it is about the product itself. That is the difference between what is going on at GM and what is going on at FCA. The LX platform is two decades old and is in dire need of a shot in the arm but FCA seems content to hang it out to dry while making a bunch of empty promises about such. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well GM has a lot more options this time than back in 09. 

The union deals that made them pay are gone. 

Also many of the cars on the list have to be considered. The Enclave and Terrain are going into build out mode where they stock pile them as new models and lines are being made. This number is not suprising and the Terrain will move to classic mode with fleet sales taking care of the volume. 

The Cruze had to get caught up and GM has worked 2-3 shifts. they will just go back to one and most of the people will just come off over time. 

The Alpha has suffered mostly due to the changes at Cadillac and the Camaro price increase where people will wait it out for incentives. They have already done some and it helped. The real hurt is the declines in the coupe market. Even the Mustang has suffered greater sales declines. 

Corvette has several issues. one it is winter and many are waiting to see what the C8 will bring. It is not far off. 

But here is the real issue. The market is in decline for everyone. The companies that had prepared for it will survive pretty find. GM for the last few years has been working hard on SUV and CUV models as well as two truck lines to keep profits and volume up. They also have worked hard to increase ATP so even at lower volumes and with some incentives they will remain profitable. 

They need to get the new Buick lines in place and star better marketing the Lacrosse. It is a big unknown out there and a really good car for the money. Cadillac is a write off for the next couple years but they will remain profitable even at lower volumes. 

The key will be to see how they manage inventories from January to July. If they can work it well they will sell down with the auto shows coming but sales will decline but look for profits to remain in the black. 

Holding many new products and larger volume products give so much more flexibility to work the market. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a lot of newer GM product that is loitering around lots.  FCA has problems, but very little that new product can't solve.  GM's problems are scary.  

 

And wow, CT6 is at 110 days already.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's Too Much Cars!!!

 

They need to cut production way back, I imagine the discounts will hit most of those cars come the winter months when sales tend to slow down even more.  But look at that list, luxury sedans and sports coupes.  Coupe sales are dropping everywhere, full size sedans dropping every where, and the ATS never really hit it, the Infiniti and Lexus counterparts outsell it with ease, let alone what the German leaders do. 

GM also has to look at their brands, they are too car heavy.  Chevy has more sedans than crossovers, that makes no sense.  Cadillac has 1 crossover, they should have 4.  The market wants crossovers.  We enthusiasts like rear drive luxury sedans and sports cars, but the sheeple out there want tall wagons for their "active lifestyles" or some crap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Well what are most of the new coming vehicles that are coming in the next years. All trucks and SUV/CUV models for the most parts. 

Just the Equinox and Traverse will major impact the Chevy numbers alone. 

The future will have to still have cars to meet CAFE so you have to keep them up and GM is not going to be stupid and ax their car lines like Chrysler did as they will be needed in the future.  But with that said slow models like the Impala and others could be at risk.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think what is being missed here is GM can idle plants today where as in the past it was cheaper to keep them open and in production since they had to pay union members nearly full wage no matter if they worked or not. 

Think about it GM never used to close much down other than the change over in June and July. Now they can do as others have done for years in production. One card that was never permitted to play before the bail out due to poorly structured contracts. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

That's a lot of newer GM product that is loitering around lots.  FCA has problems, but very little that new product can't solve.  GM's problems are scary.  

 

And wow, CT6 is at 110 days already.  

Yeah, they should have moved thirty percent of their inventory to fleet like Ford did the first nine months of the year. Oh wait, Ford had to stop production on the F-150 and Mustang for a short time too not even two months ago. GM will be fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

813d5ec521149f91573e3c56ea86881c.jpg

 

First this is a stock manipulator, failing to have a real effect. Interesting enough if U were smart enough to buy back in June.. U are now $10 per share richer

 

Second... This does nothing in taking away from the greatness of any of the cars at any of the plants.. These are '17 models.. which will be the newest things out for the next 10 months before the '18s arrive. I'm tripping on how the usual suspects come into a thread claiming that suddenly a CAR is inferior because it has a supply abundance.. How about GM had a "I'm giving these workers some hours to help the economy and not lay-off during the Holidays" issue.

Me??? If I were running Ford... and this came about (which it did but I'll get to that in a sec) I'd find Wingnuts specifically and say "Wings!!! GET THE $#$@  OUT!!! And Don't let the Door hit your fat A$$!!!" :angry::P As I told other workers.. "hate that guy..."

Bottom line is that GM idle the CAR plants because lets face it.. cars are the secondary transportation units these days. Not including SUVS.. CUVs have accounted for 5.1 Mil while cars in the MID-SIZE sold 3 Mil, LARGE and Lux cars sold 900K  and Compacts sold 2.6 Mil. This means CUVs have dwarfed all three of the car categories individually 

 

Oh... Didn't Ford just, lil over a month ago idle its Wayne plant because of light demand for the Focus and Cmax.. then idle the Kentucky and Mexico plants that makes the Escape and MKC?? Also.. they idled Kansas City for overproducing the mighty F150!!!  Yes.. the did: THE YES THE DID LINK :lol: and another: The F150 on SOFT DEMAND LINK

Stew.. I won't even comment on anything going on over at FCA.. Its just too effin sad to speak about:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can pretty well guarantee you will see cars come back to Dodge dealerships.  I see no problem with them outsourcing for their midsize and compacts, as something GM did with Toyota and Ford with Mazda.  The fact is that right now it is more important for them to fill their portfolios with what sells and that is SUV/CUVs.  Let's be honest here.  The importance o the Dart was not sales or even longevity in the marketplace.  It was a tool that they used to get over the 40 MPG barrier that allowed Fiat to purchase more of Chrysler.  The 200 was actually a nice car, it just needed tweaked which could have happened with a nice MCE, but the plant space right now is better used for more profitable trucks (much as GM did when they killed the B-bodies in 96 and replaced them with fullsize trucks in the factory).  The problem here is like wins said, that is a lot of newer product on newer platforms to be stopping the factories on.  We will see the LX replacements because their usage of the new Alfa platform has to happen to make it financially viable, as much as the Camaro is the price leader for the Alpha range.  Honestly, with their more complete SUV/CUV ranges FCA, Ford, and Toota are in some of the best positions right now to give people what they want. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will say i become more convinced everyday that Cadillac needs to work on heir quality.  My brother's ATS at less than 10k miles has already had to have the entire CUE head-unit replace and some features such as the lighted entry, only work sometimes.  He has also had to have the PCM flashed for rough idling.  Add to that the fact that for courtesy cars he always gets Impala Limiteds where as the Audi dealership had A3s and Q5s as their loaners.   If Cadillac wants to be taken seriously they really need to work out the bugs and get WAY moe serious about their dealership experience. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Stew said:

Add to that the fact that for courtesy cars he always gets Impala Limiteds where as the Audi dealership had A3s and Q5s as their loaners. 

I think this is actually a huge issue. While it isn't such a huge deal.. it is at the same time. You don't loan somebody who's spent 40-100k on a Cadillac a Chevy Impala or Chevy anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

813d5ec521149f91573e3c56ea86881c.jpg

 

First this is a stock manipulator, failing to have a real effect. Interesting enough if U were smart enough to buy back in June.. U are now $10 per share richer

 

Second... This does nothing in taking away from the greatness of any of the cars at any of the plants.. These are '17 models.. which will be the newest things out for the next 10 months before the '18s arrive. I'm tripping on how the usual suspects come into a thread claiming that suddenly a CAR is inferior because it has a supply abundance.. How about GM had a "I'm giving these workers some hours to help the economy and not lay-off during the Holidays" issue.

Me??? If I were running Ford... and this came about (which it did but I'll get to that in a sec) I'd find Wingnuts specifically and say "Wings!!! GET THE $#$@  OUT!!! And Don't let the Door hit your fat A$$!!!" :angry::P As I told other workers.. "hate that guy..."

Bottom line is that GM idle the CAR plants because lets face it.. cars are the secondary transportation units these days. Not including SUVS.. CUVs have accounted for 5.1 Mil while cars in the MID-SIZE sold 3 Mil, LARGE and Lux cars sold 900K  and Compacts sold 2.6 Mil. This means CUVs have dwarfed all three of the car categories individually 

 

Oh... Didn't Ford just, lil over a month ago idle its Wayne plant because of light demand for the Focus and Cmax.. then idle the Kentucky and Mexico plants that makes the Escape and MKC?? Also.. they idled Kansas City for overproducing the mighty F150!!!  Yes.. the did: THE YES THE DID LINK :lol: and another: The F150 on SOFT DEMAND LINK

Stew.. I won't even comment on anything going on over at FCA.. Its just too effin sad to speak about:o

This thread is not about Ford, it's about GM's huge glut of product sitting on lots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

I think this is actually a huge issue. While it isn't such a huge deal.. it is at the same time. You don't loan somebody who's spent 40-100k on a Cadillac a Chevy Impala or Chevy anything.

Yes, with a luxury car the dealership experience is very important.  Even the showroom itself is important.  The Audi dealership was high class with wood floors and warm tones everywhere and at least one example of every model they offer in the interior showroom for you to browse (I am such a kid just sitting in a new R8 gave me a hue smile).  he Chevy/Cadillac dealership is all white, white walls, white floors, flimsy seats, in other words nothing special.  Cadillac needs their own showrooms period. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Stew said:

Yes, with a luxury car the dealership experience is very important.  Even the showroom itself is important.  The Audi dealership was high class with wood floors and warm tones everywhere and at least one example of every model they offer in the interior showroom for you to browse (I am such a kid just sitting in a new R8 gave me a hue smile).  he Chevy/Cadillac dealership is all white, white walls, white floors, flimsy seats, in other words nothing special.  Cadillac needs their own showrooms period. 

You do know that Cadillac is addressing that very issue with their dealerships right? They are pairing (closing) the smaller market dealerships down and updating and renovating the rest. This has been well addressed here before. 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Stew said:

I will say i become more convinced everyday that Cadillac needs to work on heir quality.  My brother's ATS at less than 10k miles has already had to have the entire CUE head-unit replace and some features such as the lighted entry, only work sometimes.  He has also had to have the PCM flashed for rough idling.  Add to that the fact that for courtesy cars he always gets Impala Limiteds where as the Audi dealership had A3s and Q5s as their loaners.   If Cadillac wants to be taken seriously they really need to work out the bugs and get WAY moe serious about their dealership experience. 

On the loaner service.. don't kno.. My dealerships ( I usually deal with one here in Balto.. but a different one when I'm at my Voorhees home) always.. and I mean always have a in stock Loaner. A few years ago they were using Enterprise tho, but that was before 2009. About a month ago I had to take my V in for an Oil change etc and they gave me '17 XTS4 with like 300 miles on her. It was a Premium Luxury VSport. I asked for a CT6 or even a Platinum VSport XTS, but they couldn't. Point is that it may be the dealership. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

On the loaner service.. don't kno.. My dealerships ( I usually deal with one here in Balto.. but a different one when I'm at my Voorhees home) always.. and I mean always have a in stock Loaner. A few years ago they were using Enterprise tho, but that was before 2009. About a month ago I had to take my V in for an Oil change etc and they gave me '17 XTS4 with like 300 miles on her. It was a Premium Luxury VSport. I asked for a CT6 or even a Platinum VSport XTS, but they couldn't. Point is that it may be the dealership. 

 

Which is another issue onto itself.  All dealerships should be offering a premium experience.

4 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

You do know that Cadillac is addressing that very issue with their dealerships right? They are pairing (closing) the smaller market dealerships down and updating and renovating the rest. This has been well addressed here before. 

Last i saw this was on hold because of push back from the dealerships?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

I think this is actually a huge issue. While it isn't such a huge deal.. it is at the same time. You don't loan somebody who's spent 40-100k on a Cadillac a Chevy Impala or Chevy anything.

Again.. its a dealership thing. Also.. realize that had they given me an Impala I would have had ZERO issue even after spending $100K on my Caddy. Quite frankly they didn't even have to offer a loaner as my issue wasn't an issue for them but an issue that I created when I booked the appointment with them.. but had double-booked an appoint with a client at the same time. The Impala is a pretty nice place to be these days.. Ironically the Chevy dealership give me a Camaro when I had to take my Stingray in for a recall. It was a V6 but that thing was SWEET:D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Stew said:

Which is another issue onto itself.  All dealerships should be offering a premium experience.

Last i saw this was on hold because of push back from the dealerships?

Of course there wil be some push back but its going to happen whether the weak dealerships like it or not. It also doesn't change my original point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cmicasa the Great said:

Again.. its a dealership thing. Also.. realize that had they given me an Impala I would have had ZERO issue even after spending $100K on my Caddy. Quite frankly they didn't even have to offer a loaner as my issue wasn't an issue for them but an issue that I created when I booked the appointment with them.. but had double-booked an appoint with a client at the same time. The Impala is a pretty nice place to be these days.. Ironically they give me a Camaro when I had to take my Stingray in for a recall. It was a V6 but that thing was SWEET:D 

But you only buy GM and have experience with Caddy dealerships.  If you are coming from an Audi, Benz, or even a Lexus the dealership experience is going to be a major downgrade and will certainly effect your opinion of owning the brand as a whole. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

Of course there wil be some push back but its going to happen whether the weak dealerships like it or not. It also doesn't change my original point. 

The longer it takes, the worse it will be.  this change should have been made decades ago. 

 

Edit:

Looks like the have actually delayed it 2 times already

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/cadillac-delays-controversial-dealership-plan-1479920782

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The elephant in the room is the fact that it is the cars that are not selling, because customers demand more CUV's, and GM is slow to adjust to customer demand.  Cadillac currently has 1 CUV, when they should have at lest 3, currently

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 23 Guests (See full list)



  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      It has been a tense couple of months at GM Korea. Back in February, the company announced a restructuring plan for the division which included the closure of the Gunsan plant (one of the four plants operating in South Korea), and voluntary redundancies for 2,600 workers to stem the hemorrhaging of cash. Recently, GM has been pushing its workers’ union for concessions that would total $80 million. This is part of an effort to get a $500 million injection from the South Korean government to pay suppliers and workers. The workers union weren't buying, threatening to strike and trashing company executive offices earlier this month. Then GM threw down the gauntlet, either agree to the concessions by April 20th or we begin bankruptcy proceedings.
      “Without concessions from the labor union and clear resolution from stakeholders, the company has no choice but to go ahead with rehabilitation proceedings,” said GM Korea executive Kaher Kazem in an email to employees.
      Unfortunately, the date passed with no agreement and it seemed bankruptcy was on the horizon. But both GM and union rep would continue to talk over the weekend to see if a deal could be reached. At the 11th hour, an agreement was reached.
      “Through the latest agreement, GM Korea will be a competitive manufacturing company,” said Kazem in a statement today.
      According to Reuters who got to see the deal, the union agreed to freeze base wages, skip bonuses for this year, and cut back on benefits.
      “The labor union made huge concessions to save the company,” said Hong Young-pyo, a lawmaker of the ruling Democratic Party who worked on the mediation between the two groups.
      A union spokesman declined to comment when contacted by Reuters, only saying that workers will vote on the agreement later this week.
      The deal now allows the Korean government to fund Korea Development Bank (KDB) - the second largest shareholder in GM Korea - to provide support. It also allows GM to allocate two new models for the region. But some analysts are still uncertain as to the future of GM Korea. Labor costs, poor sales, and expensive export costs have some wondering if GM is in it for the long run or are planning an exit strategy.
      “GM has extended the lifeline of GM Korea, but not sure how long it will last,” said Lee Hang-koo, a senior research fellow at Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade.
      Source: Reuters

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      In April of 2013, Ford and General Motors announced they would be working together on developing new nine and ten-speed automatic transmissions. The nine-speed automatic would be for front-wheel drive models, while rear-drive models got the ten-speed. Already, a number of Ford and GM vehicles are using the ten-speed. But GM will be the only one using the nine-speed.
      Automotive News reports that Ford is electing to use a new series of eight-speed automatic transmission on their vehicles. The company said the new nine-speed didn't provide enough of an improvement in fuel economy to justify the added cost and weight. According to a source, Ford made this decision before GM began to use this transmission on their production models.
      "Typically, if anyone gave me a transmission that didn't require much work, outside of tuning it for a specific vehicle, I would take it and run. It's a lot of design work after the fact to come up with their own flavor. It shows there might be some different schools of thought in terms of transmission efficiency," said Dave Sullivan, an analyst with AutoPacific Inc.
      While GM claims the nine-speed brings “smoother shifts” and a better driving experience, it hasn't brought any real gains to fuel economy. The 2017 Chevrolet Malibu 2.0T only saw an increase of one mpg on the highway when compared to the 2016 model with a six-speed automatic (33 vs. 32). The 2019 Buick Envision 2.0T saw its highway fuel economy drop by one when equipped with the nine-speed auto (25 vs. 26).
      It should be noted that one of the eight-speed transmissions Ford is using is based on the new nine-speed, minus a gear.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Cadillac's leadership is seeing a major change as current president Johan de Nysschen will be stepping down effective immediately. In his place will be Steve Carlisle who is currently president and managing director of GM Canada.
      “We appreciate Johan’s efforts over the last four years in setting a stronger foundation for Cadillac. Looking forward, the world is changing rapidly, and, beginning with the launch of the new XT4, it is paramount that we capitalize immediately on the opportunities that arise from this rate of change. This move will further accelerate our efforts in that regard,” said General Motors President Dan Ammann in a statement.
      No reason was given as to why de Nysschen is leaving after leading the brand for over three years. His tenure saw Cadillac make a number of dramatic changes including moving the brand's headquarters to New York City and introducing a new nomenclature system.
      Steve Carlisle has been part of GM since 1982 when he was an industrial engineering co-op student at the Oshawa assembly plant. He was named the president of GM Canada back in 2014 and helped the region get back on its feet. Last year, GM was number one in retail sales in Canada, with Buick, Cadillac, and GMC posting their best ever sales.
      “The potential for Cadillac across the globe is incredible and I’m honored to be chosen to be a part of mapping that future. I look forward to building on our current momentum as we continue on our mission to position Cadillac at the pinnacle of luxury,” said Carlisle.
      We'll be updating this story if any new information comes out.
      UPDATE: Automotive News and Wards Auto have learned some possible reasons as to why de Nysschen was shown the door. One is Cadillac's slumping sales. In 2017, sales in the U.S. dropped eight percent - the second straight year of a sales decline. Sales are doing slightly better in 2018 - up 8.1 percent - some of this is due to incentives being placed on slow-selling models.
      Project Pinnacle which was de Nysschen's ambitious incentive plan that would divide dealers into five tiers based on sales volume. Each tier would have different requirements in terms of showroom and service, along with perks. One contentious point that irked a number of dealers was smaller dealers setting up a "virtual showroom" where buyers could order vehicles. These dealers would not be able to stock Cadillac vehicles. Since then, Project Pinnacle has undergone a number of changes.
      Wards Auto says de Nysschen didn't move fast enough to join the fast-growing trend of crossovers. Cadillac has introduced the XT4 at the New York Auto Show last month are there plans to launch a couple more in the coming years, but this is only going to widen the gap between Cadillac and competitors.
      Both outlets report there has been growing tension between de Nysschen and GM. Such examples include him proclaiming that "Cadillac would be the technical leader at GM in the future," partly due to the launch of SuperCruise. Apparently, de Nysschen forgot about the Chevrolet Bolt and Volt. There was also the comment he made about Apple's CarPlay saying it was “extremely clunky”. (Mr. de Nysschen, have you even used CUE?! -WM)
      Source: General Motors
      GM Names Steve Carlisle Senior VP and President, Cadillac
      Johan de Nysschen leaves GM to pursue other interests; Travis Hester becomes president and managing director, GM Canada DETROIT — General Motors today announced the appointment of Steve Carlisle as General Motors senior vice president and president, Cadillac, replacing Johan de Nysschen, who is leaving the company effective immediately.
      Travis Hester, currently vice president, Global Product Programs, is named president and managing director, GM Canada, replacing Carlisle. The transition will begin immediately.
      “We appreciate Johan’s efforts over the last four years in setting a stronger foundation for Cadillac,” said General Motors President Dan Ammann. “Looking forward, the world is changing rapidly, and, beginning with the launch of the new XT4, it is paramount that we capitalize immediately on the opportunities that arise from this rate of change. This move will further accelerate our efforts in that regard.”
      Carlisle was most recently president and managing director of GM Canada, where he led a resurgence of the GM Canada franchise. In 2017, GM was number one in automotive retail sales in Canada, with Buick, GMC and Cadillac achieving their best ever sales years. Carlisle also reestablished key relationships in Canada with retailers, employees and government officials.
      “The potential for Cadillac across the globe is incredible and I’m honored to be chosen to be a part of mapping that future,” said Carlisle. “I look forward to building on our current momentum as we continue on our mission to position Cadillac at the pinnacle of luxury.”
      Carlisle will report to Dan Ammann.
      Carlisle began his GM career in 1982 as an industrial engineering co-op student at the Oshawa Truck Assembly Plant. Over the course of his career with General Motors, Carlisle has held several senior leadership positions that have taken him across the globe, including vice president, Global Product Planning (2010-2014); vice president, U.S. Sales Operations (2010); and president and managing director, Southeast Asia Operations (2007-2010).
      Hester brings extensive global leadership and global product development experience to his new role at GM Canada. Since 2016, he has led the team responsible for balancing all aspects of vehicle development, including quality, cost, appearance, purchasing, customer acceptance and performance targets.
      Hester will report to Alan Batey, president, GM North America.
      Hester began his GM career in 1995 in Australia as a technical support engineer for GM Holden. He held a variety of positions in Australia before moving to the U.S. in 2005. Since 2005, Hester has held engineering positions in both the U.S. and China, including chief engineer for several global premium luxury vehicles, the Buick Regal, Buick LaCrosse and the Chevrolet Sonic. Hester became vice president, Global Product Programs, in 2016.

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.