Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ccap41

New Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,600

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    83

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ccap41

  1. ccap41
    I always find that somewhat ironic because you do get both but you have to choose which at which instance. You can have boost if you want/need boost. You cna have f/e if you want/need f/e. FWIW, my EcoBoost got sh!t economy 70mph and above. It seemed to drop significantly once you get to 70mph.
  2. ccap41
    EcoSport or Edge?? C'mon! I'd love an ST Escape!
  3. ccap41
    I've never been in one but to think they're more spacious than a SCrew F150 is insane. I think those cabs are huge. lol 8 months later from BMW then another 10 months from Audi.
  4. ccap41
    They're different. They have 3 different cabs on Silverados and F150's. Ram has a 4th, Mega Cab. That's actually super cool looking but it doesn't look like what I would imagine a 4 door coupe truck would look like in 2018..which would be crap.
  5. ccap41
    It's easy to mix Crew Cab and Double Cab from Chevy and Ram because they have four doors opening up "regularly" where Ford's middle cab configuration doesn't have exposed door handles and are more of a "suicide door" style.
  6. ccap41
    I'd agree but I think the 80/20 would include both Crew Cab and Double Cab.
  7. ccap41
  8. ccap41
    A lot of enthusiasts hate it because it's a Kia but I think it is a damn good looking car and it's a sport sedan, what's really not to like about it?
  9. ccap41
    Why is this news?
  10. ccap41
    That's only cars...
  11. ccap41
    The hatch is part of the vehicle. Why wouldn't that be included? I'll give you this is the best looking "coupe" CUV but... no.
  12. ccap41
    I, too, have a difficult time believing this is on a GM platform.
  13. ccap41
    As far as looks go, I would buy this over a Bolt. Easily. As far as likely execution... Bolt still.. I'm glad Kia didn't try and make an awkward tall hatch car CUV like thing though. They just lifted it enough to make it look like a "real CUV" (Hahaha).
  14. ccap41
    Umm... No...
  15. ccap41
    Hahaha I thought the same thing yesterday!
  16. ccap41
    As ugly as that gen Escape was, it still looks better than any of the "coupe" CUVs. Yeah even if they completely re-engineered the second row to make it look unique to the two row, premium, thing, it would have to save them a ton of money.
  17. ccap41
    That's two performance metrics. Like i said, across all of the tests. acceleration, braking, cornering, slalom, etc. Hey look, your quote is about exactly what I said. It depends which one the buyer thinks looks the best. Sorry, isn't** It is a wash.
  18. ccap41
    Another SUV coupe? Hard pass. They all look like ass.
  19. ccap41
    The ATS is behind the C and 3/4 Series in performance as well. Even V Series. It's great but it doesn't dominate anything. It's basically a wash between which car the buyer thinks looks the best because the numbers are all too close and mixed with no clear "this car does everything the best". https://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/2015-bmw-m3-vs-2015-mercedes-amg-c63-s-2016-cadillac-ats-v-comparison-test-2015-bmw-m3-vs-2015-mercedes-amg-c63-s-2016-cadillac-ats-v-final-scoring-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-5
  20. ccap41
    I was just looking at that myself, SAE J1100. http://standards.sae.org/j1100_200911/
  21. ccap41
    It's a 3rd party test... There is no way BMW would release numbers of max head room with the seat higher than its lowest point. Same with all of the other measurements. What benefit would there be to that? Lie about their interior dimensions?
  22. ccap41
    No-Brainer. GMC. It's a good looking truck AND the Ram is a bad looking truck, so far.
  23. ccap41
    I wouldn't expect you to have agreed. Nothing fits you unless it's what you like. Everything else just so happens to be itty bitty and cramped. Yet you fit into an ATS... The drivers' seats are basically a wash, dimensionally. The rear seats is the only place there is sigificant differences. Oh and the headroom in the BMW is 3 inches more than the ATS/C63. From left to right: Giulia, M3, ATS-V, C63
  24. ccap41
    Sounds like they just don't know how to use the interior space that's available. The 3 Series and MB don't have the small car feel to them like the ATS does. Whatever it is, the ATS feels smaller.
  25. ccap41
    I would also love an Amorak.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search