Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ccap41

New Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,678

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    86

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ccap41

  1. ccap41
    It would be between these two little girls up front. But I think in the end I would go with this one..
  2. ccap41
    I wonder what I could get a GLI/GTI for with said discounts.. Probably too much still.
  3. ccap41
    I just built a SVR with every single box I could check and it rung up to $149,925..lol Oh wait, I forgot to add the spare wheel for $400! hahaha $150,325. Not sure if that's what I would go with but I know I couldn't get sick of that Jag V8. Something about that just gets me goin'. The 911 would tear it up but it would sound the best getting beat.
  4. ccap41
    Love these! Without thinking too much it would be hard to stray away from a 911 Turbo(S). It's just one badass car. But gimme a little bit and I'll see if I can come up with something I would rather have for 150-200k.
  5. ccap41
    I never would have guessed. I just assumed a smaller payment for the lease would save you money while the car is depreciating no matter what while I "own" it, somewhat regardless of the miles put on it.
  6. ccap41
    Interesting to know that, great find! I wonder if that 13% includes the regeneration from getting back down to pedestrian speeds. I know it's kind of splitting hairs at that point.. but not really as it's an electric vehicle that you can't just go to the gas station just outside of the track to fill up for the drive home. I also think that scale should say "hundred thousands" not just "thousands" at the bottom. It's a misleading graph as-is.
  7. ccap41
    I'm curious what kind of range depletion there is when you go balls out for just 1 0-60 run or 1/4 mile pass in a car like this.
  8. ccap41
    How did that not get totaled out? That had to be like 90% of its value if it was fairly base and a few years old.
  9. ccap41
    Completely agree with your second part. Auto makers are making vehicles to the point where average joe can barely touch his own car because it's just so complex or difficult to get to certain areas of a car. Then there are hybrids with insane electricity "flowing" through them that you have to be extra careful with.
  10. ccap41
    Hahaha right?! Pretty absurd price jump if you ask me.. But they must know people are willing to pay the difference.
  11. ccap41
    I would love that! Lol
  12. ccap41
    I have to have them fogs on any vehicle I own. Something about them I love irrationally.
  13. ccap41
    Jeez 7500 miles???? That's a little ridiculous, IMO.
  14. ccap41
    Yeah leasing properly can really benefit somebody. For instance, if my mom OR dad leased one of their two vehicles they'd probably save a munch of money. They both live only 3 miles from work but they di visit my sister a handful of times a year in IA so they would still surpass the minimum mileage on ONE of their vehicles. Then again, my dad keeps their vehicles for ~7-8 years so they do get their monies worth from them as-is. Similar situation for a buddy of mine's fiancé. He said once her car is paid off they will likely lease her next car because she puts so few miles on it. If you can fit into the bottom two rungs of a lease mileage-wise it can be pretty beneficial.
  15. ccap41
    EVERTHING falls at some point. Look at ANYTHING, EVER, AT ANY TIME in history and tell me it never changed or fell from leadership to peasant at some point. A good organization/company/country will sustain it longer but let's be honest.. nothing ever lasts forever. Period. That's just the way she goes.
  16. ccap41
    I probably should have clarified as well that each battery jump is NOT equal. 60kWh -> 75kWh = $8500 75kWh -> 90kWh = $15,000 90kWh -> 100kWh = $43,000(But this also gives no RWD option, only AWD)
  17. ccap41
    Do you already know their packaging for the Model 3? It might not be as bad as you think. We know larger batteries and all wheel drive will quickly drive the price up(and driving range). The jumps from battery packs and AWD alone are massive on the Model S. 60kWh -> 75kWh = $8500 60kWh RWD -> AWD = $5000 Base model -> 75kWh AWD = $13,500 There aren't a whole ton of options that jack the price sky high other than batteries and AWD. Yes, there are cold weather packages, their nifty air suspension, and then their Premium package but other than that Autopilot has been said it will be standard on the Model 3. Premium Package= $3000(most of this is junk like HEPA air filtration, LED interior lighting, lighted door handles...) Air Suspension= $2500 Cold Weather= $1000 Point being... They don't come stripped down and there isn't really a reason one must assume a 20-25k option list is a must on a Model 3.
  18. ccap41
    Yeah same here...
  19. ccap41
    Bye then
  20. ccap41
    FINALLY an engine exclusive to Lincoln AND something that should please just about everybody... Lincoln is ditching the "EcoBoost" naming and just using the "T" on their turbo engines. I think that alone kept them too close to Ford.
  21. ccap41
    Lol you're kidding, right? Why even post here if THAT get's deleted? Wtf was wrong it that?
  22. ccap41
    So it is more of a Subjective decision rather than an objective decision? Gotcha. Let the fairness fly!
  23. ccap41
    Legit question, Why can some get away going completely off topic and talking about posters in threads? Yet, other posts get deleted and/or edited? Sincerely yours, ConfusedPoster
  24. ccap41
    I don't see any issues with Cadillac(or any manufacturer) having a little radical concepts. That's just kind of what they all have always done. Every car gets watered down come production because of a multitude of reason. Some are financial, some are government regulations, and some just aren't functional. This concept actually looks pretty close to a production vehicle and that's impressive to me because there are manufacturers like MB who released that Vision-something-or-whatever that looks fake as F. Nothing about that will be production.
  25. ccap41
    You're not forced to add 20-25k in options on the Tesla. They're still expanding their charge network and improving the technology for reduced charge times.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search