Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

regfootball

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    21,732

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

 Content Type 

Everything posted by regfootball

  1. regfootball
    a twist action is harder for most folks to accommodate then a simple grab and pull. Door knobs were banished because of the difficulty of grasp and twist. It may seem cool because its new in budget cars but its not real ergonomic. I'd even argue its not near as safe to operate as a typical pull lever.
  2. regfootball
    outlander sport is a nice little rig. good to see the 2.4 and new CVT forthcoming. It might be my AWD go to work ride in the future if it does. If there were a chevy badge on the OS, it would sell 150k a year. If they keep the Outlander and sport fresh over time, bring back the midsize, and then grow the Mirage, that will be pretty good. Eclipse should not be brought back unless they make it say AWD option. I actually really dug the last Eclipse and it was nice being FWD for in the snow climes. When i sold and had people come in for Eclipses that was part of what they liked. They could buy their kid a sporty car but otherwise was like the FWD cars they were familiar with. 3000GT redux would be cool. Biggest gap Mits has is the Lancer lineup needs an update.
  3. regfootball
    ford's new mustang ecoboost is a 2.3t. made into a v8 it would be a 4.6. that would prob get 500+-600hp. that would be a durn nice lincoln engine.
  4. regfootball
    its a BITD sort of thing but really about what sort of buzz features the buyer demographic expects. i would say in 2015 or whenever, the market would be fine with the 3.6tt as a base engine. i do believe they will expect a DOHC v8, and that it would be appropriate for it to also be turbo. i think forced induction / turbo is becoming requisite in luxury cars. i think the tt v12 is a fantastic idea for a specialty model. i don't think the bare small block is what this kind of buyer wants or expects regardless of whether it is perception or other. I don't think the supercharged corvette mill is out of realm for say a V+ series or something. I don't think we are in the place anymore where it is a good idea for Chevy and Cadillac to share engines of any kind in uplevel trims or specialty models. Still dig the Cadillac sixteen. AWD should be built on about 80% + of this flagship. Myself I would enjoy to see a base ATS with AWD.
  5. regfootball
    oh, rebadging the should have been Chevy Trax with a butch grille
  6. regfootball
    how does one take personal responsibility for a self driving car? Someone's google prius spins out because it couldn't miss the inadvertent log or tire in the road, and ends up creaming me.
  7. regfootball
    The newer ones ARE (in general) the heavier ones tho. Pickups used to be around 4000 lbs, now they cluster around 6000. IOW; it's not the weight either way that has anything to do with crash results. trucks being body on frame behave so much differently in a crash. It's to say exactly how best to assign and use weight on trucks. unitbody vehicles are using more of the vehicles materials more efficiently so of course they will be lighter. Trucks have added so much stuff but since they are body on frame, it is tough to optimize them for crash when their structure is not the best for dealing with crashes to begin with.
  8. regfootball
    Chalk that up to the piss poor build quality of the '97 to '03 F-Series trucks where everything feels like its made out of paper mache glued together with old dog turds. The interior plastics certainly felt emaciated. "Chintzy" would be one way to put it, "cheap" would be another. I'm going to say to hell with politeness and mildness and say "$h!ty." The Taurus-look pickups were also notorious for their weak structures--poor crash test results and collapsible roof..inside, they went from cheap plastics and rounded on that era to blocky and cheap for the '04-09 and '10-14 generations... This new truck looks too much like the '10-14 with a Super Duty style nose tacked on, it doesn't really go anywhere new stylistically..same old boring ugly blocky truck. GM and Ram have much better styling, IMO. Ford purposely now changes the look little to little each year. Its as if they would take 25 years of the F150, a picture from each year, and make a cartoon book out of it. When you flip each page, you would notice little but subtle change. And there would be some change over time but it would be not much and even then the trucks would look similar. I think this new F150 reminds me of the early 90's ones actually.
  9. regfootball
    weight is not always the determining factor in safety, but its also an actual real world example of stereotypes in the market. Let me give you other examples, 'oh, it's a toyota, it's reliable' Weight is not really entirely about safety either. Another example. Something like a new Altima feels lighter and less solid on the road than the oft maligned for being heavier Malibu, because it is. But i know which one I would want to spend road miles in.
  10. regfootball
    I think if they would have just converted the crest to a chrome ring in the same shape or something......
  11. regfootball
    Balthy there are plenty of folks in these parts that like heavier iron in winter and in my time selling I encountered buyers first hand who dissed the weak build of the 97 + era trucks Even if they were the same weight as the pre 97, I always heard from the buyer that the pre 97 and post melted trucks were the ones they wanted because of how solid they felt in comparison.
  12. regfootball
    New look is very nice ! My iPad can't seem to pull up the front page stories when u click on them tho
  13. regfootball
    Tarted up accord
  14. regfootball
    i agree w/ ocn.... a 3.2t would be a good mill for this rig
  15. regfootball
    if i were truck shopping I would skip over the GM stuff and get this as I most often like the Fords better, but i have to admit the aluminum thing in a truck scares me a bit. What i would do is lease one probably if that were the case. I am not a typical truck buyer. So the lighter weight for handling and tossability would appeal to me. The 2.7 Ecoboost I would check into. Lots of roughneck truck lovers though like the fact that trucks are heavy and huge. The lower weight may turn them off. The melted ford trucks of the late 90's were light weight and there was a backlash to that. Now though, the engineering is more solid.
  16. regfootball
    http://www.caranddriver.com/news/2015-cadillac-ats-coupe-photos-and-info-news http://www.caranddriver.com/news/2015-cadillac-ats-coupe-photos-and-info-news 2015 ATS coupe photos
  17. regfootball
    I really don't like pushbutton or rotary knob trannies. Of course, I haven't tried one, but the shift knobs work well and are mistake proof. I do think they have a much better design but i won't say they knocked it out the park. The interior doesn't look any better than the Fusion, and the exterior sort of has a stretched Dart aura about it aside from its unoriginality. Kudos on std AWD for the v6. It does allow Chrysler to compete, although I don't think this shape immediately says 'this is a Chrysler' when you see it.
  18. regfootball
    sorento is a good ride and has a nice 'szie' to it. It is not a holking true 3 row, and it is not a compact. I looked at getting a base 4 popper once until i found out the real world mpg of the 4 popper is not at all very much better than the 6. A larger sorento 4 banger vs. a rav 4 for a similar price is a good deal. but not if the mpg sucks. The v6, there are so many choices out there. They get a lot of the basics right. Time for some new styling.
  19. regfootball
    a few years back, i read an article that had projected that by like 2020 or 2025 there would be like 10 major surviving automakers. And then right about then was when GM lost pontiac, saturn, saab, etc. You're probably looking at GM, Ford, VW, Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Merc, Hyundai, Fiat Not sure how the Chinese companies fit into that in other markets unless they are the low cost provider. Conversely, I think it is interesting in markets outside the US where the BMW's of the world are viewed as lux products, how they are gradually introducing cheaper and cheaper products. They know they have to go downmarket and bread and butter some to remain one of the standers in the market globally.
  20. regfootball
    lotta power for a 2.0. overstressed?
  21. regfootball
    CLA did not appear to cannibalize the other MB models......
  22. regfootball
    Azerbaijan is a bit of a lost fish
  23. regfootball
    Audi is becoming a crossover company
  24. regfootball
    It's better than the orig new beetle was in its last few years
  25. regfootball
    Ford knows how to build huge volume for so many of its models. Escape, Fusion, Explorer, Focus, F150, they don't need many models to put up huge volume numbers. Even the Edge is at 130k units. WOW
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search