Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Farewell Challenger, Hello Barracuda?

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    February 20, 2012

    Motor Trend is reporting that Chrysler may say farewell to the Dodge Challenger and in its place, bring back the Barracuda. Sources tell the magazine the car will ride on a new RWD platform that will be smaller and lighter than the current Challenger.

    Design will take cues from the Barracuda's three separate body styles from 1964 to 1974.

    Expect to see the new Barracuda sometime in 2014 or 2015.

    Source: Motor Trend

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    i am a HUGE fan of the cuda i can say it is my #1 favorite muscle car. i just kinda wish they would not get rid of the challenger. idk i will have to wait and see the designs. if they get a lighter platform with the same engines or better then it will be really nice.

    Edited by fullmoon97
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seems clear it would be a 'Dodge' in looking at the respective lineups.

    Interesting to see the guesswork sketches before something real is seen.

    Could a huge backlight -ala the '66- be pulled off today? :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd love to see a new barracuda, about the flavor of the '69 (my favorite), but like fullmoon, I don't want to see them discontinue the Challenger. Maybe if the kept the Challenger as a Fullsize coupe as it is now, and made the Barracuda as the smaller, lighter ponycar.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This particular rumor has been floating around for a bit and the majority of it isn't exactly certain.

    What is certain is that the Challenger's replacement will be smaller and lighter. It’s interesting to listen to the rumors of what platform they’ll use next. Some people say the CUSW-Plus platform can accept a rear-drive layout, other people say it’ll be the new LH-like E-Evo platform that we’ve yet to see, others think it’ll be on a heavily revised LX platform.

    It's also true Chrysler's styling department has had many sleepless nights wondering where they can take the Challenger's design. The current car draws owes its entire design to the original and gets all of the cues perfect. How can you update a design like that and still keep it familiar?

    It's understandable then why someone can put a lot of stock into the idea of a Barracuda revival — the original fish car spanned three generations and that offers you plenty of different styling cues to mix and match from. It’s therefore less of a challenge for Chrysler’s design team to style a new Barracuda than it is a brand-new Challenger.

    However, I don’t think that’s really the end-all-be-all here. I’d say it’s also true that ChryCo’s aware of how Porsche has evolved the styling of the 911, how Volkswagen evolved the styling of the old New Beetle into the new New Beetle, and even how they evolved the styling of their own Viper. I’d say nothing’s off the table just yet and the Challenger can certainly progress in the same fashion the 911, Beetle, and Viper have.

    We have about a year, give or take, until we know what they’ve decided to do.

    Footnote: I should also mention Chrysler's had plenty of agony trying to resecure the rights to the 'Cuda nameplate. A smaller company now holds the rights to it and have refused to let Chrysler get their hands on it. This might also play a very minor role in if the Barracuda is revived or not.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Chrysler Barracuda" has a nice ring to it. I don't think it or a new Challenger has to be retro. Why not a sleeker, modern-looking, lighter GT that still packs raunchy 300-400+ hp raunchiness? The retro pony cars were good for reboot (Mustang)/reentry (Challenger and Camaro), but it's time to expand what these cars can look like, add to the heritage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was kinda confusing to have the Charger and the Challenger names at the same time.

    How so? The Charger and Challenger co-existed together in the early 70's just fine. I love the current Challenger minus the interior, so I'm not too thrilled at the prospect of the Challenger going away. With that being said, if a 'Cuda does take it's place, I have faily high hopes it will be a winner given Chrysler's recent turnaround.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've heard the names used interchangeably by ppl in the general populace more than once. It's difficult not to want to correct them.

    Yeah...I've heard that also..esp. with the younger crowd that don't know of the older cars..though the older ones have been featured in many movies over the years, so some have seen images of 'em..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To you and me, yes sir, no problemo. But srsly, I have heard ppl call a Challenger a Charger, and vice versa. They're dopes, yes, just sayin'.

    That is something I would expect during their original runs, considering back then they were both 2 doors, but given the fact the Charger has been a sedan for 7 years now, it's just ignorance at this point to confuse the two.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's just that the names both start with C-H-A, I think. I put it down to momentary brain farts.

    Rather than an actual confusion of the two cars, that is.

    Edited by Camino LS6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's just that the names both start with C-H-A, I think. I put it down to momentary brain farts.

    Rather than an actual confusion of the two cars, that is.

    I'd certainly hope so.

    Course, it's always been amazing to me how, in the 73-77 GM A-bodies, people always seemed to confuse these, particularly the Malibu, Grand Prix, Cutlass and Regal. Maybe not so much the Grand Prix, because it, like the MC, were very distinctive in styling, particularly the front and side panels.

    *shrugs*

    Cort | 38.m.IL | pigValve + paceMaker + cowValve | 5 MCs + 1 Caprice Classic

    CHD.MCs.CC + RoadTrips.hobbies.RadioShows.us66 = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort

    * rNwJumpStartCruzNite | 5:30-10:30p; SAT, 05/12/12 | BeefVilla, 1225 W Spring St, S Elgin IL *

    "Don't get me wrong" __ Billy Joel __ 'My Life'

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • FYI - Using this story and my thoughts above, I wrote my House and Senate representatives on this and this is what I sent them:   Hello Suzan, Patty, Maria, Sam Graves, Republican for Montana and head of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is proposing a $250 annual charge for electric vehicles as part of an effort to shore up funding for the national highway system and other transportation projects. Graves stated that with the increase in electric, hybrid and just overall efficiency in internal combustion automobiles that the federal tax collected per mile traveled has dropped, making it a challenge to keep the Federal Highway Administration funded. With the new fees, Republicans hope to raise $50 billion in new funding over the next 10 years. The additional money would go to pay for highway repairs and additional funding for air traffic control. Republicans point out that since 2008, more than $275 billion has been shifted from the general fund to pay for road repairs.  The federal government has not raised fuel taxes, currently 18.3 cents per gallon, since October of 1993. The latest proposed fee schedule would be $250 per electric vehicle per year and $100 per hybrid-vehicle per year. An earlier proposal had the electric vehicle fee at $200 per year and also included a $20 per year fee for gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles.  The Federal fee would be on top of any state fees imposed. Many states have adopted EV fees to replace the loss in gas tax revenue at the local level. The federal fees are tied to inflation and would be recalculated each year and grow over time. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has pointed out that the proposed $250 fee would require the average EV owner to pay the equivalent 1366 gallons gas tax while hybrid owners would pay roughly the equivalent of 547 gallons of fuel tax on top of paying 18.3 cents at the pump. For an EV owner, they would be paying as much tax as someone driving 15,000 miles per year in an 11 mpg vehicle. The average amount of gas used by non-hybrid gasoline vehicles is roughly 489 gallons per year. I do not mind paying an equal share for my EV on the roads. Yet if they are going to charge me $250 then it is time to raise the gas tax equal to what Hybrid and EVs must pay. ICE = 489 gallons of gas X .183 cents per gallon = $89.49 cents per year based on the Governments only numbers. If they are to charge EVs $250, then they need to raise the Federal gas tax to .511 cents per gallon for equality and tie it into inflation so that gas tax goes up just as the Hybrid / EV tax goes up. With having to pull from the General fund $275 Billion to support the Federal Highway Administration, I find it a little odd that the estimated $50 Billion over 10 years really would make a difference compared to increasing the Federal Gas tax having everyone share in the responsibility to fund our inner state highway system. I look forward to hearing from you, Sincerely, G. David Felt   FYI 2024 according to statista.com, 134.55 billion gallons of gas were sold for the year. At .183 cents federal gas tax, that was $24,622,650,000 billion dollars collected in gas tax. At .511 center federal gas tax, that would have been $68,755,050,000 Billion collected in gas tax in addition to the Hybrid and EV fee that would be collected for our inner-state highway system.  
    • That is so true, all the shopping malls here have major charging areas that are free to the shoppers, but then pretty much anyone can pull in and plug in for an L2 charge. Most city government locations around here have free L2 chargers and Shell has many Volta free L2 charging at various tourist spots around Washington. Major work campuses have free L2 charging like Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Boeing, Paccar, to name just a few.  Fast charging locations are growing as Tesla has signed with the Kroger / QFC / Fred Meyers locations for major charging stations and EVgo / ChargePoint / Electrify America have signed on with Walmart / Safeway / Albertson for stations in their parking lots. Costco has signed on with a private Seattle company to install fast chargers for a fee on their lots. So lots of changes coming for sure. Be interesting to see when the Auto Industry start up gets more places open other than the first one they did on the East coast.
    • One, EVERYONE needs to write their House and Senate representatives on this and make sure they are aware of this very imbalanced approach to funding a government department. With that said, I do not mind paying an equal share for my EV on the roads. Yet if they are going to charge me $250 then it is time to raise the gas tax equal to what Hybrid and EVs must pay. ICE = 489 gallons of gas X .183 cents per gallon = $89.49 cents per year based on the Governments only numbers. If they are to charge EVs $250, then they need to raise the Federal gas tax to .511 cents per gallon for equality.
    • I could see maybe if they add a $250 federal tax on all new car purchases as a 1 time fee.  But to charge it every year is both a ripoff and unfair.  Fast forward 20 years and 90% of cars might be EV, so the fund roads through gas tax will be totally obsolete.  And it will be a tax more so on lower income and working people.  And the gas tax basically works that the college student driving a 10 year old Corolla because that is what they can afford, will pay the same road tax as a pro football player in an Escalade.  
    • @smk4565with all the good points lately! I also think that $50b over 10 years in new funding isn’t enough to cover the deficit the Highway dept is facing. If they’ve had to do $275b over 18 years, the math doesn’t add up.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search