• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    New York Auto Show: 2016 Chevrolet Malibu


    • Chevrolet Gives the Malibu A Drastic Makeover


    Chevrolet hopes to reverse their fortunes in the midsize sedan class with the introduction of 2016 Malibu at the New York Auto Show. The new sedan is larger, efficient, and more technologically advanced than the Malibu it replaces.

    The 2016 Malibu takes a lot of the design ideas found on the Impala and goes a bit further. Up front are slimmer headlights with higher trim models getting LED daytime running lights and a distinctive take on the brand's dual-port grille. Along the side are three creases which help give the Malibu an identity of its own. More importantly, Chevrolet increased overall length by 2.3 inches (191.5 to 193. 8 and wheelbase by 3.6 inches (107.8 to 111.4).

    The Malibu's interior has been also addressed with rear legroom seeing a 1.3 inch increase. Also, Chevrolet has redesigned the center stack to better delineate infotainment system and climate control. Luxury treatments on the Malibu include satin chrome accents on the dash, available leather seating, and ventilated seats.

    Tech-wise, all Malibus come with Chevrolet's MyLink infotainment system, with different trim levels getting different screen sizes, along with optional navigation. OnStar 4G LTE and wireless phone charging are also a part of the package.

    Power for the Malibu comes in three forms. First is a new turbocharged 1.5L EcoTec four-cylinder with 160 horsepower and 184 pound-feet. This engine comes with stop/start technology and active grille shutters. A six-speed automatic comes as standard. Next is the turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder with 250 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque. A new eight-speed automatic comes paired with this engine. Chevrolet promises better economy for both engines thanks to 300 pound weight drop.

    The final powertrain is the hybrid. An all-new, direct-injected 1.8L four-cylinder paired with a slightly modified two-motor drive from the 2016 Chevrolet Volt. Total power output stands at 182 horsepower. An 80-cell 1.5 kWh lithium-ion battery pack provides electric power.

    As for safety, the 2016 Malibu features a new system called Teen Driver. Standard on most Malibus, the system allows parents to set a predetermined speed and also track how their teen drove the vehicle. When the teen is in the vehicle, the system will mute the audio or any device paired with the vehicle if it detects a front-seat passenger isn't buckled up. It will also throw up audible and visual warnings if the vehicle is traveling over the predetermined speeds.

    The 2016 Chevrolet Malibu will hit dealers in the fourth quarter of this year.

    Source: Chevrolet

    Press Release is on Page 2


    All-New Malibu is Larger, More Technological and Efficient

    • New hybrid sedan projected to offer combined rating north of 45 MPG

    DETROIT – Chevrolet today introduced the all-new 2016 Malibu – a completely restyled midsize sedan engineered to offer more efficiency, connectivity and advanced safety features than ever.

    An all-new hybrid powertrain, which leverages technology from the Chevrolet Volt, will help offer a GM-estimated combined rating north of 45 mpg. The Malibu’s standard 1.5L turbo powertrain is projected to offer 37 mpg highway.

    The 2016 Malibu is also longer and lighter, with more interior space and improved fuel efficiency. Its wheelbase has been stretched close to four inches (101 mm), and it is nearly 300 pounds (136 kg) lighter than the current model.

    “Midsize customers tell us they want great fuel economy, connected technologies, wrapped in a gorgeous exterior. This is exactly what the 2016 Malibu was engineered to do,” said Jesse Ortega, Malibu chief engineer.

    The 2016 Malibu goes on sale in the fourth quarter of 2015. Additional vehicle highlights:

    • Available segment-exclusive OnStar 4G LTE in-vehicle connectivity as well as available wireless phone charging
    • Agile, sophisticated and sleek exterior design incorporates sophisticated details that advance Chevrolet’s signature cues
    • Standard preventive safety technologies include 10 standard air bags, with available features such as Forward Collision Alert and Rear Cross Traffic Alert. Automatic Parking Assist is also available
    • All-new Teen Driver feature, which allows parents to view their kids’ driving statistics, such as maximum speed, warning alerts and more
    • All-new, power-dense Ecotec 1.5L turbo engine with fuel-saving stop/start technology is standard, offering a GM-estimated 160 hp (119 kW)
    • High-output 2.0L turbo with GM-estimated 250 hp (186 kW) is available and is mated with a new eight-speed automatic transmission.

    The new Malibu will be offered in L, LS, LT and Premier trims, as well as the Hybrid model. The Premier trim, Chevrolet’s new uplevel designation, debuts in the 2016 Malibu. Additional model and trim details will be announced closer to the start of production.

    Malibu Hybrid technology

    The 2016 Malibu introduces new strong hybrid technology that leverages components and knowledge directly from the plug-in Chevrolet Volt. The Malibu Hybrid is projected to offer a combined rating north of 45 mpg – while maintaining the styling, comfort, driving dynamics and connectivity as gas-only models.

    An all-new, direct-injection 1.8L four-cylinder engine mated to a two-motor drive unit, slightly modified from the 2016 Chevrolet Volt drive unit, powers the Malibu Hybrid. The drive unit provides additional power to assist the engine during acceleration, for 182 horsepower (136 kW) of total system power.

    The engine also features Chevrolet’s first application of Exhaust Gas Heat Recovery, or EGHR, technology, which uses exhaust heat to warm the engine and cabin. EGHR improves engine warm up and ensures consistent fuel economy performance in cold weather. Additional fuel economy benefits come from Exhaust Gas Recirculation, or EGR.

    An 80-cell, 1.5 kWh lithium-ion battery pack provides electric power to the hybrid system. It can power the Malibu Hybrid up to 55 miles per hour (88 km/h) on electricity alone. The gasoline-powered engine automatically comes on at higher speeds and high loads to provide additional power.

    In addition to the drive unit, the Malibu Hybrid also shares the 2016 Volt’s blended regenerative braking system, which provides maximum kinetic energy recovery during braking to be stored into the battery system to help maintain charge, and drive unit power electronics.

    Turbocharged performance and efficiency

    An all-new, Ecotec 1.5L turbo is the standard engine in the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu, offering a GM-estimated 37 mpg on the highway. It is part of a new global family of small-displacement gas engines designed with greater power density to deliver confident performance with excellent efficiency.

    The new 1.5L turbo employs the stop/start technology introduced on the 2014 Malibu, which enhances efficiency in stop-and-go driving, contributing to a GM-estimated 27 mpg in city driving – an 8-percent increase over the current model. On the highway, 1.5L-equipped models also feature active grille shutters that reduce aerodynamic drag to optimize efficiency.

    The Malibu’s more-efficient standard engine delivers a GM-estimated 160 horsepower (119 kW) and 184 lb-ft of torque (250 Nm). The torque is comparable to the current model’s standard 2.5L naturally aspirated engine in a vehicle package that’s nearly 300 pounds lighter.

    A higher-output 2.0L turbocharged engine is available, offering a GM-estimated 250 horsepower (186 kW) and 258 lb-ft of torque (350 Nm), for a higher degree of performance – but not at the expense of good efficiency. Malibu 2.0T models are GM-estimated at 22 mpg in the city and 32 on the highway.

    An all-new, GM-developed eight-speed automatic transmission – the first eight-speed automatic in a GM front-wheel-drive vehicle – contributes to the 2.0T’s balance of performance and efficiency. The 1.5L turbo engine is matched with a six-speed automatic.

    Teen Driver and an expanded range of safety features

    Teen Driver, a standard feature on most trim levels of the next-generation Malibu, supports safe driving habits by muting the audio or any device paired with the vehicle when front-seat occupants aren’t wearing their safety belts. Teen Driver also provides audible and visual warnings when the vehicle is traveling over predetermined speeds.

    To use Teen Driver, a parent enables the feature with a PIN in the Settings menu of the Malibu’s MyLink system, which allows them to register their teen’s key fob. The system’s settings are turned on only to registered key fobs

    Chevrolet’s system is the first in the industry with a built-in system that lets parents view on a display how their teenager drove the vehicle. Maximum speed reached, distance driven and number of times active safety features were engaged are among the parameters that can be confirmed.

    Teen Driver complements a roster of standard and available safety features, including a rear-view camera system standard on LS, LT, Hybrid and Premier models.

    • Ten air bags, including front-seat knee air bags, head-curtain side-impact air bags and seat-mounted side air bags, are also standard.
    • Rear-view camera

    Available active safety features include:

    • Front Pedestrian Alert that uses a forward-looking camera to help avoid or reduce the harm caused by crashes with pedestrians ahead of the vehicle. The system can apply automatic last-second braking
    • New Lane Keep Assist with Lane Departure Warning
    • Side Blind Zone Alert with Lane Change Alert
    • New Forward Collision Alert with Following Distance Indicator
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Front and Rear Park Assist
    • Intellibeam, which automatically switches the headlamps to high beam for better road illumination and improved visibility
    • Adaptive Cruise Control with Front Automatic Braking
    • Automatic Parking Assist.

    Sleeker design with lighter, stronger body structure

    With a wheelbase stretching 3.6 inches (91 mm) longer than the current Malibu, along with a 2.3-inch (58 mm) longer overall length and the same overall width, the 2016 Malibu strikes a sleeker-looking proportion. The added wheelbase helps provide better in-cabin comfort and functionality.

    With styling influenced by the 2014 Impala, the all-new Malibu advances Chevrolet’s global design language with features such as slim, sweeping headlamps and a progressive take on the brand’s characteristic dual-port grille. Three body-side creases also add drama to the design and help distinguish the Malibu as a contemporary Chevy.

    The hood and the cowl – the area where the windshield meets the hood – are lower than the current model and contribute to the Malibu’s greater aerodynamic performance, as do active grille shutters on LS and LT models.

    Premium design cues are incorporated on all models, with contemporary lighting technology featured across the lineup, including light-emitting diode (LED) daytime running lamps on LT and Premier models. The Malibu Premier also receives LED taillamps.

    Beneath the new Malibu’s athletic-looking skin is a stronger, lighter body structure that contributes to its efficiency and driving dynamics. Greater use of high-strength steels enabled engineers to design the body structure with thinner components in some areas, delivering comparable crash performance with lower weight. The all-new body structure accounts for more than one-third of the Malibu’s nearly 300-pound weight reduction.

    Roomier, more comfortable and more connected interior

    The longer wheelbase allows a more open execution of Chevrolet’s signature dual-cockpit interior. Rear legroom improves by 1.3 inches (33 mm).

    The cabin’s open, expansive feel is reinforced with a greater emphasis on comfort, convenience and connectivity, allowing the Malibu to keep pace with customers’ connected lives. Highlights include:

    • Chevrolet MyLink with a seven-inch-diagonal color capacitive touch screen is standard on LS, LT and Hybrid models
    • Chevrolet MyLink with an eight-inch-diagonal capacitive touch screen is available on LT and Hybrid models and standard on Premier model
    • Chevrolet MyLink with navigation is available with the eight-inch MyLink system and features three-dimensional map views for most major U.S. cities and attractions
    • All-new Teen Driver feature is supported by the eight-inch MyLink system, allowing parents to restrict certain vehicle functions to support safer driving and to view their kids’ driving statistics such as maximum speed, warning alerts and more
    • OnStar 4G LTE with Wi-Fi hotspot is standard on all models with a three-month/3GB data trial (whichever comes first)
    • Wireless phone charging available on LT and Hybrid and standard on Premier
    • Dual rear-seat USB ports and a 110-volt power outlet is optional on LT and standard on Premier trim.

    The instrument panel “center stack” is all-new, with greater delineation between the infotainment system and climate system controls for easier, at-a-glance operation. The Malibu’s interior is also features:

    • Galvano (satin) chrome accents on the instrument panel and center console
    • Dedicated storage slot for mobile phones, which incorporates wireless charging, if equipped
    • Perforated leather-appointed seating surfaces available on LT and Hybrid and standard on Premier
    • Ventilated seats – a first for Malibu – are standard on Premier.

    Manufacturing

    The 2016 Malibu will be built from globally sourced parts at GM’s Fairfax Assembly Plant, in Kansas City, Kansas. The plant received a $600 million investment in paint shop and tooling upgrades in 2013.

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback




    A 1.5 turbo? No 2.5?

    4 extra inches of wheelbase but only 1.3 inches of added legroom?

    Wtf chevy ?

    Looks good though. I will give it that. That alone goes a long way. Exterior looks good, interior looks really good.

    Lame output from the 2.0. Is this on purpose as for example might the higher output 2.0 be headed for Impala?

    The 2.5 had good EPA numbers. Why didn't they keep it?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It seems like Chevy is differentiating between the Malibu and Impala at least power train wise. Keeping a gap of ~40 hp. While power may not be the main differentiator in this segment, the low power of the base engine compared to its competitors is perplexing.

     

    Design wise, I like it. It is not overtly trying and yet simple. It does mimic Impala from the rear panels.

     

    To GM's typical hypocrisy: the car is made "Sporty" yet no manual transmission! In a world where Mazda6 and Honda Accord Sport are getting high teens to low twenties manual transmission take rate, something from GM would be refreshing. Other than Mercedes Benz, GM is the worst when it comes aversion to offer stick cars.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The design is a huge leap forward and seems influenced by the Fusion, with a dash of Avalon and Impala.  The front end seems unnecessarily busy.  I'm with Reg on the puzzling small increase in rear legroom.  I'm not really a fan of small turbocharged engines, but the hybrid model sounds promising.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    they did well and we will see more things yet to come. This is only the intro of a new platform and we have more things yet that will be added.

     

    The key here is this car is made to look better and improve many details which it has. As for the engines it will be lightest in class but will still perform with the others easily but it will get better MPG for it. Note the Turbo engine like most will beat the EPA numbers in the real world. Each one I have driven did a little better city.

     

    Many wanted a little Impala do you got it. Other that are sniping are just going to snipe no matter what.

     

    The market will prove this car.

    Also a darker color really makes it look great. White is hard to do on most cars. They all look like they are from the Gas Company if they are mid size. .

     

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's a baby Impy..which is not a bad thing. And it's lighter, which had me worried about the 160/1.5 T engine there.

     

    Wonder how roomy in there....

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is only the intro of a new platform and we have more things yet that will be added.

     

    So this is no longer Epsilon 2 but the E2XX that will replace Epsilon2 and I believe the Lambdas (IIRC the Thetas will be replaced by a crossover version of the new D2XX)?

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dunno, people are praising the look, but i think that front looks terrible the rest of it looks pretty nice, but i can't get over how bad that front end is

    -1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A 1.5 turbo? No 2.5?

    4 extra inches of wheelbase but only 1.3 inches of added legroom?

    Wtf chevy ?

    Looks good though. I will give it that. That alone goes a long way. Exterior looks good, interior looks really good.

    Lame output from the 2.0. Is this on purpose as for example might the higher output 2.0 be headed for Impala?

    The 2.5 had good EPA numbers. Why didn't they keep it?

    300 lbs lighter + new 8 speed fwd transmission. They are saying that performance of the new powertrain will be equal or better than the 2.5 and with better fuel economy. That's why.

    The 2.0 is a torque machine not a horsepower machine. It will likely feel faster than V6es that have to wind up first.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The front end ruins it for me too, rest looks pretty good and hopefully the rear leg room is much better.

     

    To address Reg's concern, this is an area where there is more to it than the numbers. There may be an issue with the way rear seat room is measures skewing the number in an unfavorable way. The rear seat feels much much roomier than the current model.   Part of that is because the front seat feels roomier too.  I can sit in the front seat and move it further forward than I would in the current car and that in turn gives more room to the rear seat passenger. 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like the front, it has an Impala look and looks like a Chevy. The rear looks almost like a hatchback I prefer 3 box sedan styling, and the rear looks like a Hyundai. Exterior overall is decent, but not great.

    The interior is great, that might be the best mid size car interior, I would probably still take the Mazda 6 interior, but the Malibu is a close 2nd.

    Engines other than the 2.0T seem gutless, but a lot of people buy gutless engine cars so that might not matter.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I honestly don't like Chevy's dual port grille thingy. That said it at least looks better-integrated and not quite as ugly here than it does awkwardly grafted on the front of a Cruze or an Equinox. I'm hoping it'll show better in person.

     

    The slightly disappointing nose aside, this seems like a promising step forward. The rest of the car looks quite good.  I do hope Chevy's given more attention to making it at least somewhat fun to drive than they did the current model, but that's not a requirement to be a popular model in this segment. For that matter, neither is an attractive front-end...

     

    -RBB

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The front end ruins it for me too, rest looks pretty good and hopefully the rear leg room is much better.

    To address Reg's concern, this is an area where there is more to it than the numbers. There may be an issue with the way rear seat room is measures skewing the number in an unfavorable way. The rear seat feels much much roomier than the current model. Part of that is because the front seat feels roomier too. I can sit in the front seat and move it further forward than I would in the current car and that in turn gives more room to the rear seat passenger.

    The current Malibu is the worst for no foot space under the front seat and poor access to the footwell of the backseat otherwise. GM always has been bad about low rear seat cushions and tight head room also. Raise the rear seat, clear out the foot space, allow headroom, and the actual legroom number matters less.

    But if this car still has the 9 inches of nothing under the hood between the front clip and the power train, as this bs about new platform is BS. The added rear seat room could come equally from making the underwood space efficient instead of tacking on more length and still not using that real well either.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The front end ruins it for me too, rest looks pretty good and hopefully the rear leg room is much better.

    To address Reg's concern, this is an area where there is more to it than the numbers. There may be an issue with the way rear seat room is measures skewing the number in an unfavorable way. The rear seat feels much much roomier than the current model. Part of that is because the front seat feels roomier too. I can sit in the front seat and move it further forward than I would in the current car and that in turn gives more room to the rear seat passenger.

    Re-reading your quote again I think there is another important point you touched on. Malibu/regal/ cruze the current versions, the lower part of the dash sticks out way too far and are big time knee knockers compared to other makes. If they managed to fix that with better dash and airbag design, I can see where that would help with front seat comfort and rear seat space. Lots of GM cars though have that congested front part of the cabin at the knees.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just went and sat in the Malibu and Optima back to back to compare.  I'd say that these two are basically the same in headroom and legroom in the back.  Still can't put your feet under the front seat in the Malibu, but it is much further forward, so there is little need to. 

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Passat is the benchmark for rear cabin utility.  Altima is another car with a good back seat.  So is Legacy.  Fusion is adequately good.  If the Malibu = Fusion in the backseat now, that should be ok.  Just a shame with a tiny 1.5 litre motor not needing a v6 engine bay that they can't reapportion space back to where it matters.  Saw an early 2000's cab forward Intrepid today.  Made me think how ahead of their time those Chrysler cab forward designs were.  That Intrepid still looks good today.

     

    If GM would pick the base of the front seat up high enough to get your foot under, that is like adding 4-6 inches of legroom because your feet can reside their in a natural position, and your legs can be forward and untwisted.  Cruze has it FCOL........I imagine they can't still give this more room inside than the Impala in back.

     

    I was thinking about one of the comments of no MT.  I would only want to see an MT on this car with the 2.0.  With the 1.5 it would be fairly gutless.  I've driven the Fusion 1.6 MT and while it does ok once you get it up to 6th gear at highway speed, the rest of the time, its a lot of shifting and doesn't burst the dam with torque otherwise.  The Passat TSi is a different story, it has great torque but its a 1.8.  I would recommend to Chevy to not bother with a stick unless its a 1.8t or the 2.0t.

     

    Regarding the mpg, and going only to the 1.5t.  Its epa is only like 1 more mpg than the 2.5.  There is a lot of Chevy's buyer base that is turbo averse and i think to keep the NA engine in the lineup for those folks would be a good idea..........regarding the Turbo, it's mpg doesn't go up much vs. the Regal but loses all that power.  The Ecoboost 2.0 Taurus has practically the same mpg and is wayyyyyy heavier......for losing the hp and weight and having the 8 speed, the 2.0 should get 24/34 not 22/32.....

     

    Maybe Volt II should have been this size and with this body.  The hybrid is a great choice, but I would imagine having a plug in opportunity would be even nicer.

     

    Make no mistake though, if the pricing and option packaging work out right, this car is a home run.  It's perfect for those who want good style like a Fusion but don't want the Fusion or are tired of it.  This jumps to the top of my list for sedan midsizers.  Maybe I can get into one.  How can a new Regal top this?

     

    Those who critique the chevy sedan structure too, note, the difference between this and the next Cruze are quite wide.  The size is far enough apart, as is the stylizing and power etc.  And this still doesn't impede much on Impala.

     

    Anyone see, the LTZ trim is no more........why get rid of the LTZ moniker?

     

    (edit) something about this car reminds me of the Oldsmobile Auroras.....in character, which is cool.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You know... This isn't quite what I was expecting. Having chased the prototypes in person, I was thinking it would look differently. First impressions are, mixed, to say the least. That was what I thought last night, though. Today, things are different, and in a fairly good way.

     

    To elaborate, we have the age old problem of press photography and GM's horrible addiction of doctoring the photos. After the live shots began to show up across the internet, this Malibu started to look more attractive. Having let those sit and digest for a bit, I've come to conclusion that this is a proper follow-up to the 2008-2012 model. If fact, I feel much the same way I do now as I did back then. When that model was first shown there were a lot of mixed feelings about it. It was radically different, with some odd choices here and there. With time, though, it became one of the more timeless designs of the segment. Whether this one will follow in that model's footsteps directly or not remains to be seen. But, most notably, it has promise.

     

    It still looks a little awkward from certain angles, and I do wish Chevrolet would pick a grill and stick with it (Seriously, I though we were moving away from the horizontal bar), yet it still has presence. It's sleek, with flowing lines, great details, and a swept back tail reminiscent of the Audi A7 (The one thing I was expecting and was delivered). The interior, by all means, is a massive improvement. While it doesn't differ much from the Volt's new innards, its fairly pleasing to look at unlike the last one (and all Malibus since the nameplates reincarnation) and seems to have fixed the rear seat issues. Power-train-wise, the biggest announcement is the class-leading hybrid (atleast per GM's lofty specs). If it lives up to expectations and doesn't fall flat on its face like the Fusion, this will surely help the Malibu regain some of its losses over the years. The other two combinations are rather lackluster, but should be fine with the assured weight loss regimen it's been placed on.  

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A 1.5 turbo? No 2.5?

    4 extra inches of wheelbase but only 1.3 inches of added legroom?

    Wtf chevy ?

    Looks good though. I will give it that. That alone goes a long way. Exterior looks good, interior looks really good.

    Lame output from the 2.0. Is this on purpose as for example might the higher output 2.0 be headed for Impala?

    The 2.5 had good EPA numbers. Why didn't they keep it?

    300 lbs lighter + new 8 speed fwd transmission. They are saying that performance of the new powertrain will be equal or better than the 2.5 and with better fuel economy. That's why.

    The 2.0 is a torque machine not a horsepower machine. It will likely feel faster than V6es that have to wind up first.

     

     

    As a owner of a 3.6 V6 Bu and a owner of a 2.0 turbo I can tell you the Turbo is a much more satisfying car to drive. With the 8 speed even more so.

     

    The torque curve is flat and long. Torque feels like a old Pontiac like torque just the torque curve is wider.

     

    I will say this the car in person will look much different than in photo's. This is a very dimensional car as the body lines need to be seen in 3D to get the full effect.

     

    The way I see it this car if priced right and marketed right it will be at the top of the sales in this segment. I see It easily in the top three and could even go to the top if they do all things right.

     

    Price will be key to compete with the Korean cars.

     

    Edited by hyperv6
    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really no matter what it does it won't unseat Altima, Accord, Camry, and Fusion.  But it can move a lot closer.  Chevy will have to whore this thing out on 199 leases if it wants to crack the top 4 in the segment.  Not a reflection of the car, its a reflection of the typical buyers and their prejudices.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

      Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. dufus22
      dufus22
      (43 years old)
  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt - Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.cheersandgears.com
      Tesla Officially in Trouble, Business Insider Says!

      To quote Business Insider final comments on Tesla and the Chevy Bolt:
      "Clearly, Tesla would be in less trouble if the Chevy Bolt were a bad car. But it isn't. Teslas have always blown me away. The Bolt blew me away for different reasons. I just hope Tesla is prepared to take this into account." 
      Matthew is a Business Insider senior correspondent who covers transportation and as a fan of Tesla was excited to check out a Chevy BOLT as comparison to the Tesla. On a recent trip to california he took time to visit the closet Chevrolet Dealer to his hotel and this is what he found.
      He states that to borrow Barkley's line, "Tesla is in trouble." You have one of the world's biggest auto companies that is known for killing the electric auto stepping off the sidelines and actually committing considerable resources to building a long range EV where it can afford to lose money on it long term till the market changes. Tesla has 400,000 plus pre-orders, but is burning through cash by the billions and while the launch of the Tesla 3 is near and Tesla still has Sexy much like Apple to an iPhone. Tesla does not have the depth of customer auto experience to pull from and as the author points out, Tesla balance sheet is precarious as it is based on raising funds on a growth story. The author goes onto say that no one will cross shop a Tesla S or X with the Chevy BOLT. They will due to limited options cross shop the Tesla 3 to the Bolt.
      To pull some interesting statements from the story, the author had the following to say:
      "I found it more fun to drive than both the Tesla Model S and the Model X, but not the original Roadster, a much smaller vehicle."
      "The Bolt is plenty fast for most people."
      "GM isn't going to overwhelm Tesla with Bolt sales. I actually think the Model 3 will greatly outsell the Bolt once Tesla's car arrives. However, it's also possible that if the Model 3 is delayed or is slow to ramp up, Chevy will be preparing a mid-cycle refresh of the Bolt before Model 3 sales start to achieve some major momentum. In other words, GM will always be ahead, and the company — barring another massive financial meltdown — will never stop putting the Bolt up against the Model 3."
      BI covered the BOLT in follow stories with the next one being more of an official review that starts off with covering the auto with the following statement: "A platform, not business as usual!" 
      From ride-hailing to ride-sharing, self driving Chevy has delivered an auto for the future that gives GM options on how they build and expand their EV lineup. BI took delivery of their white Premier BOLT just before the blizzard that hit NY. Clearly a compact-crossover-hatchback look, design is what the magazine employees felt it was and is. Surprising the BI reviewers was the amount of cargo the auto can hold and how well it handled 4 people and grocery getting. BI states that GM has told them the next addition to the BOLT lineup will be a larger auto that can accommodate 5 or more people. An exceptionally well executed minimalist design that comes with an interior that feels more premium in comparison to auto's this size in the past from GM that felt clearly parts bin cheap. The review goes on to talk about how setting the front seat for a 6'4" tall driver and getting in the back with room ahead of the knees for the same size person is a nice welcome addition to such a compact auto. Heated steering wheel was welcomed by all. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto kept everyone happily connected to their phone while driving.
      The final statement to quote from the review is as follows:
      "We were impressed with the Bolt, as a car, as an electric car, and as a mobility concept. In many ways, it is GM's post-bankruptcy masterpiece, a real feather in the cap of CEO Mary Barra and her executive team, who took what the company had achieved with its ill-fated EV-1 back in the 1990s and turned it up to 11. 
      I also flat-out loved driving it. I blasted in and out of New York City twice, rocketed around the streets of Gotham, darting through traffic, and cruised along the highways of New Jersey. I also enjoyed just driving it around the quiet streets of the suburb where I live.
      The steering is quick and responsive, and the handling is sharp enough to provide the confidence you need when surfing that sweet EV torque.
      The single-pedal mode is also very cool — I dug not using the brakes at all for extended excursions in my town. After a bit of practice, you get into a kind of Zen state with it. 
      Not a single person asked me about the car, and that can be chalked up to the ho-hum design. But I didn't care. I was lovin' it. Plain and simple, the Bolt is fun."
      Here is where we have overlap between story #2 and Story #3 which covers the 7 Killer Features:
      Dual Screens- 10.2" touch screen infotainment center & an 8" drivers console display which are totally customizable. Auto's wireless charging console. BOLT App allowing you to be connected to your auto at all times. Five cameras: front, rear, side mirrors and their 360 camera. 9hr full charge time from a 240 volt charger. 25 miles per hour, faster with Level 3 DC charging. Lane Keep assist feature. Modern Seat design allowing for maximum space inside. Over all these writeups show that GM has delivered a superior auto to the Prius, Leaf, 500e, etc. The future will be bright for the BOLT as GM move the platform forward.

      BI Story #1
      BI Story #2
      BI Story #3
    • By William Maley
      At first glance, you might be thinking why is Buick teasing the LaCrosse sedan again. But actually, what you are looking at is the 2018 Buick Enclave that will be debuting next month at the New York Auto Show. The image shows the Enclave following the footsteps of the Encore and LaCrosse with a new waterfall grille and slimmer headlights. From spy shots we reported on last month, we're not expecting any major changes in the overall shape.
      Expect the current 3.6L V6 producing 305 horsepower to be residing under the hood, paired with a nine-speed automatic.
      Source: Buick

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      At first glance, you might be thinking why is Buick teasing the LaCrosse sedan again. But actually, what you are looking at is the 2018 Buick Enclave that will be debuting next month at the New York Auto Show. The image shows the Enclave following the footsteps of the Encore and LaCrosse with a new waterfall grille and slimmer headlights. From spy shots we reported on last month, we're not expecting any major changes in the overall shape.
      Expect the current 3.6L V6 producing 305 horsepower to be residing under the hood, paired with a nine-speed automatic.
      Source: Buick
    • By William Maley
      The Camaro Z/28 will be returning for an encore act and it might be using the next-generation of Chevrolet's small-block V8.
      Car and Driver reports that GM is working on the next-generation LT engines, codenamed LT6 and LT7. These new V8 engines will lose the pushrods and two-valve combustion chambers that have been a key part of the small-block V8. Instead, the new engines will feature dual overhead camshafts, four-valve combustion chambers, flat crankshaft, titanium connecting rods, and possibly dual injection (port and direct). For the Z/28, a 5.5L LT6 could produce 700 horsepower (that's without any sort of forced induction). 
      Car and Driver speculates there could also be a twin-turbo LT7 that could be used in the next Corvette, high-performance Camaros, and Cadillacs.
      The Camaro Z/28 could arrive next year as a 2019 model year vehicle.
      Source: Car and Driver

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The Camaro Z/28 will be returning for an encore act and it might be using the next-generation of Chevrolet's small-block V8.
      Car and Driver reports that GM is working on the next-generation LT engines, codenamed LT6 and LT7. These new V8 engines will lose the pushrods and two-valve combustion chambers that have been a key part of the small-block V8. Instead, the new engines will feature dual overhead camshafts, four-valve combustion chambers, flat crankshaft, titanium connecting rods, and possibly dual injection (port and direct). For the Z/28, a 5.5L LT6 could produce 700 horsepower (that's without any sort of forced induction). 
      Car and Driver speculates there could also be a twin-turbo LT7 that could be used in the next Corvette, high-performance Camaros, and Cadillacs.
      The Camaro Z/28 could arrive next year as a 2019 model year vehicle.
      Source: Car and Driver
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)