Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Cadillac Lays More Money On the Escalade's Hood

      Trying to prevent customers from defecting to the Lincoln Navigator

    There's a war going on between Cadillac and Lincoln. With the new Navigator, Lincoln has a very compelling alternative to Cadillac's aging Escalade. But Cadillac is fighting back by dumping a bunch of cash on the hood.

    Bloomberg obtained a memo sent to Cadillac dealers that announces a new promotion where current lease customers of 2016 Escalades are being offered a $10,000 discount on a new Escalade. Owners of 2016 Escalades have to make do with a $7,500 discount. The promotion runs until the end of May. GM Spokesman Jim Cain confirmed the promotion to Bloomberg.

    This isn't the first time Cadillac has put a huge amount of money onto the hood of the Escalade. Back in November, Cadillac was offering owners of Lincoln models from 1999 to the current model year a $5,000 discount on an Escalade.

    Cadillac still holds a significant edge over the Navigator in terms of sales - 8,111 Escalades vs. 4,062 Navigators through March. But Lincoln is gaining ground with Navigators only sitting on dealer lots 10 days on average. 

    “GM is trying to keep Escalade buyers out of Navigators, for sure. You’ve got a fresh Navigator and you’ve got an Escalade that is not new and is starting to age,” said Jeff Schuster, an analyst at LMC Automotive.

    “This is a particular battle that GM doesn’t want to lose ground in. It speaks to the importance of the Escalade.”

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    $7500 to $10000 on the hood because your greatest competitor puts up a NEW vehicle that directly competes with yours?  That sounds very pre-BK GM.  Only NEW (and better product) can arrest and correct that issue.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    $7500 to $10000 on the hood because your greatest competitor puts up a NEW vehicle that directly competes with yours?  That sounds very pre-BK GM.  Only NEW (and better product) can arrest and correct that issue.

    Yeah it sounds like something they should have held off for 6 months to see if the Navigator really steals any sales anyway. People still love the Escalade... Even if it is currently the worse of the two complete packages it's still a great overall vehicle. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    $7500 to $10000 on the hood because your greatest competitor puts up a NEW vehicle that directly competes with yours?  That sounds very pre-BK GM.  Only NEW (and better product) can arrest and correct that issue.

    Agreed.  And when the new GLS and new X7 hit the market in the fall or winter they’ll have $10k off Escalades for all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, balthazar said:

    $10K is nothing when the Escalade line is bringing in $1B in profit all by itself.

    Escalade over the past 4 years has averaged high 30,000s in sales, even with a few export sales, let's call it 40,000 units.  They would have to make $25,000 profit per unit to hit $1 billion.  I know it is made of Silverado parts, but that still seems like a big margin on an $85,000 vehicle.    Pre $10,000 discount, maybe.   

    But if the Escalade is responsible for $1 billion in profits, why did GM post a $330M profit for 2017 when factoring out the European sale/loss.  GM posted a $3.88B loss in 2017.   Even on 2015-2016 numbers where GM had a $9B profit, I find it hard to believe that the Escalade is 11% of their profit when it is less than 1% of their global sales volume.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You always get it backwards.

    Silverado has Escalade parts. ?

    And there's a lot more profit to be had when you look at the average and high-end MSRP Escalades, Cadillac sells some quantity stickering for over $100 grand.

    - - - -
    GM's 2017 EBIT profit was $12.8B, which matched 2016.
    Per-share dividend was $6.62. UAW employees got up to $11K profit-sharing checks. Stock rose 6% on the announcement.

    The Company is in very fine health. It's accounting mumbo-jumbo and a one-time $7.3B write down that resulted in a bottom line of a mere $300M profit.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    $7500 to $10000 on the hood because your greatest competitor puts up a NEW vehicle that directly competes with yours?  That sounds very pre-BK GM.  Only NEW (and better product) can arrest and correct that issue.

     

    It's called panic. Would love to see these two battle it out again.....but a few cool packages might be a better choice at this point though....

    Image will be an issue here...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, balthazar said:

    $10K is nothing when the Escalade line is bringing in $1B in profit all by itself.

    It's a huge percentage regardless of how much revenue the car brings in. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Escalade is a cash cow no doubt, I just don’t see it being 11% of GM’s total profit, though I would guess it has the highest per vehicle margin of any GM product.

    I don’t know they never went above the Ecalade, why did they stop?  Cadillac could easily have an SUV In the $125-175,000 range.  Go above the Navigator and make it 2nd rate.

    Edited by smk4565
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, balthazar said:

    As was stated, they go into the low $100Ks already.
    Just as the V8TT was predicted and now has been confirmed; even higher up Escalades are in the pipeline.
     

    I don't mean a higher trim Escalade, I mean a vehicle above Escalade.  Something like a Lamborghini Urus competitor with more luxury than an Escalade and more performance than a CT6 V-sport.  And maybe Escala will become a $150,000 base price SUV, I dunno, but I think if Cadillac wants to march upward, then SUV is where you do it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lambo is projecting worldwide 2018 sales of the Urus to be 1000 units. Is that worthy of building a competitor to? Other than the Cayenne GTS, I don't see any other sporting hi-po SUVs out there at this level.

    The next generation Escalade can easily be positioned 25% higher right off the bat... then Cadillac should add performance & packages well above that. 4.2TT has the EXACT same torque output as the Urus, piece of cake to slide one into an Escalade V-Sport.

    And Cadillac IS marching upward.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They'll top 1,000 Urus's easy, I think Lambo will double their worldwide volume of 3,500 units, Urus will easily be their top selling model.  Ferrari is going to make an SUV too, Bentley has one.

    The Escalade needs a $10k price cut to compete with Navigator, but they are going to magically raise the price $20,000 for the new one?    That  is in effect $30k more than the current sale price.  I don't see it happening, they tried to push the CTS up 20% in price and sales collapsed.

     I think a model better than Escalade is needed, leave the Escalade where it is.  But if they want to make a base Escalade $125,000 with a $200,000 V-sport to go against the G-wagen bring it on.  And good for Cadillac if they do it, if you can take a Tahoe and charge and extra $70k then take the money and run.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • It would be really sad if the urus becomes the top selling Lambo.

    • Navigator is competing with the Escalade, not the other way around. Escalade almost buried the Navigator- Cadillac is not going to lower the price on it, you're dreaming. But yes, I could see... OK not 25% ($18K) but a $10K raise for the next generation, then expand the range upward. And basically that price raise is accomplished by just increasing standard features. Don't need another SUV above it, the next gen Escalade will be the "better Escalade". Isn't it due in like 18 months?

    • Of course CTS sales decreased- it moved upmarket. S<E<C, 7<5<3. If BMW increased the price of the 3 to the 5, it's volume would lower also.

    • Remember: the Tahoe uses Escalade parts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 hours ago, balthazar said:

    • It would be really sad if the urus becomes the top selling Lambo.

     

    • Of course CTS sales decreased- it moved upmarket. S<E<C, 7<5<3. If BMW increased the price of the 3 to the 5, it's volume would lower also.

    • Remember: the Tahoe uses Escalade parts.

    I bet it will be.. 

    Actually, you have the '<' (less than) backwards above---  should read C<E<S, and 3<5<7.  

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, balthazar said:

    • It would be really sad if the urus becomes the top selling Lambo.

    • Of course CTS sales decreased- it moved upmarket. S<E<C, 7<5<3. If BMW increased the price of the 3 to the 5, it's volume would lower also.

    Dealers are already selling out of their Urus allotments and the thing doesn’t even arrive for 6 months.  It will be their best seller for sure.

    The CTS thing is exactly my point, the CTS should have stayed a 3-Series fighter and they should have had a new product above it.  Same with Escalade, it should stay at its current price and a new SUV should go above it.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Dealers are already selling out of their Urus allotments and the thing doesn’t even arrive for 6 months.  It will be their best seller for sure.

    The CTS thing is exactly my point, the CTS should have stayed a 3-Series fighter and they should have had a new product above it.  Same with Escalade, it should stay at its current price and a new SUV should go above it.  

    BMW has not stayed there, 2 series is the old 3 series as they pushed every model up. Hell the current 3/4 series is what the old 5 series used to be. Even MB has pushed the size and features up on their models so that lower models are now what the upper older versions used to be.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    BMW has not stayed there, 2 series is the old 3 series as they pushed every model up. Hell the current 3/4 series is what the old 5 series used to be. Even MB has pushed the size and features up on their models so that lower models are now what the upper older versions used to be.

    There is size creep in all segments, but the CTS is larger than a 5-series.  The CTS-V is 197.6 inches long that is bigger than the STS.  The 3-series sedan is 184.5 inches long, it also doesn't have a sales problem like the CTS has.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    There is size creep in all segments, but the CTS is larger than a 5-series.  The CTS-V is 197.6 inches long that is bigger than the STS.  The 3-series sedan is 184.5 inches long, it also doesn't have a sales problem like the CTS has.

    The ATS is sized to compete w/ the 3-series. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    The ATS is sized to compete w/ the 3-series. 

    The ATS is priced to compete with the 1/2 series and CLA. More space in a Cadillac is not a disadvantage.

    The new Navigator has a much better interior than the current Escalade.  The Escalade is more nimble, but in this segment, that is a very relative statement anyway.   That said, I'm told the new Escalade will have an Escala looking interior.  Much less brash than the Navigator, but no less luxurious. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    42 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The ATS is priced to compete with the 1/2 series and CLA. More space in a Cadillac is not a disadvantage.

    The new Navigator has a much better interior than the current Escalade.  The Escalade is more nimble, but in this segment, that is a very relative statement anyway.   That said, I'm told the new Escalade will have an Escala looking interior.  Much less brash than the Navigator, but no less luxurious. 

    Too true that it is all relative, my wife loves our Escalade, showed her the new Navigator and she did not like the design of the seats as well as many other things. Might be a wife issue, but she does love the Escala. 

    I am thinking that Lincoln might have gone too far with the split lower leg supports and the individual sections on the seat. Sometimes one could go too far with trying to have bleeding edge luxury it would seem.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Too true that it is all relative, my wife loves our Escalade, showed her the new Navigator and she did not like the design of the seats as well as many other things. Might be a wife issue, but she does love the Escala. 

    I am thinking that Lincoln might have gone too far with the split lower leg supports and the individual sections on the seat. Sometimes one could go too far with trying to have bleeding edge luxury it would seem

    Those seats are optional. Don't like 'em, don't buy 'em.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    I am thinking that Lincoln might have gone too far with the split lower leg supports and the individual sections on the seat. Sometimes one could go too far with trying to have bleeding edge luxury it would seem.

    Too much customization to get the perfect seating position?  ?

    "I wish my seat had LESS adjustablility" - Nobody

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    No need for Cadillac to worry, when the Maybach SUV goes on sale next year Lincoln will be giving $10,000 off on all Navigators with 0% financing.

    When will they build an SUV as large as the 'Gator or 'Slade? 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Aren't the seats like 50 way or something crazy like that?  I do like the Navi interior.   The available color choices are nice, really like the blue w white wood.  And it has a lower cargo floor and more 3rd row legroom than the GM triplets.  (Is GM finally going to get IRS w the next gen big SUVs?) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Aren't the seats like 50 way or something crazy like that?  I do like the Navi interior.   The available color choices are nice, really like the blue w white wood.  And it has a lower cargo floor and more 3rd row legroom than the GM triplets.  (Is GM finally going to get IRS w the next gen big SUVs?) 

    30-way, I believe. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Those seats are optional. Don't like 'em, don't buy 'em.

    So playing with the configurator, I see no other seat options. The seats are all the same, you just choose the adjustment level with or without massage. Maybe I am missing something but there seems to only be one seat design in a 10 way / 24 way depending on trim and then the perfect seat with massage 30 way.

    @ccap41 & @Cubical-aka-Moltar I agree that more ability to get the perfect position is always wanted by everyone. For me it is the style of the seats the wife does not like. They only have that one seat design with the split leg section that she does not like.

    Happy wife happy life, so right now I have to wait for a better Slade especially since the Germans cannot seem to build a real full size luxury SUV.

    And the G-Wagon is NOT a Slad or Navi.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    51 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    So playing with the configurator, I see no other seat options. The seats are all the same, you just choose the adjustment level with or without massage. Maybe I am missing something but there seems to only be one seat design in a 10 way / 24 way depending on trim and then the perfect seat with massage 30 way.

    @ccap41 & @Cubical-aka-Moltar I agree that more ability to get the perfect position is always wanted by everyone. For me it is the style of the seats the wife does not like. They only have that one seat design with the split leg section that she does not like.

    Happy wife happy life, so right now I have to wait for a better Slade especially since the Germans cannot seem to build a real full size luxury SUV.

    And the G-Wagon is NOT a Slad or Navi.

    The base seats are 10-way adjustable. The up-level seats are 30-way adjustable.  The 30-way are the ones with the independent thigh adjusters.  On the 10-way, they have a seam down the center, but are not split.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

     

    And the G-Wagon is NOT a Slad or Navi.

    Because the G-wagon is a mid size SUV it has the same length as an XT5.  It isn’t suppose to be a full size SUV.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Because the G-wagon is a mid size SUV it has the same length as an XT5.  It isn’t suppose to be a full size SUV.  

    Yeah, the GLS is the full size Merc.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Because the G-wagon is a mid size SUV it has the same length as an XT5.  It isn’t suppose to be a full size SUV.  

    But in the past you have compared it to the slade based on cost.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    But in the past you have compared it to the slade based on cost.

    The cost comparison is a partial fallacy, though...have to also take into account the size class.    Hence the GLS.      

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    ...than the STS.

    Don't know how to break this to you, but the STS has been gone for SEVEN model years now.

    - - - - -
    Yea, size is not playing into consideration in this tier, Cubie; if you're dropping $100K / the lease rate of, cramming your lux SUV into a short, low-roofed garage is not an issue- the E and the G are literally 2 inches apart in length.

    Edited by balthazar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    But in the past you have compared it to the slade based on cost.

    I have not, the most expensive Escalade costs less than the a base model G-wagen.  The G65 was like $250,000 in it's final edition.  It is ridiculous to compare them on price.  

    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Don't know how to break this to you, but the STS has been gone for SEVEN model years now.

    I know, I just brought it up because the CTS is now bigger than the STS was when it was here, and a complaint on the STS was it was too big, too heavy, not sporty enough to take on the smaller, more nimble Germans.  And Cadillac killed the STS, only to make the same car 4 years later, but with the name of their entry level car.  Horrible product planning.  That would be like killing the Malibu, only to make the Cruze a mid-size Camry/Accord fighter for $25,000 in 2022 and then wondering why it doesn't sell.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    Don't know how to break this to you, but the STS has been gone for SEVEN model years now.

    - - - - -
    Yea, size is not playing into consideration in this tier, Cubie; if you're dropping $100K / the lease rate of, cramming your lux SUV into a short, low-roofed garage is not an issue- the E and the G are literally 2 inches apart in length.

    Actually, the Escalade SWB is almost 20 inches longer than the G.   The GLS is closer in size. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, balthazar said:

    Correct- I picked the wrong 'G' out of the 10 or so 'G's MB has.

    Remember, the G is the one that you obsess over the exposed screw heads and other retro exterior trim. ;)

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    smk is like the M-B star in here, always with the same 3 points

    Yes---smk's 3 points may indeed be:

     * Sales figures are everything

     * Mercedes always has something coming that will beat anything current

    * Mercedes is the standard everyone else is chasing 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Yes---

     * Sales figures are everything

     * Mercedes always has something coming that will beat anything current

    * Mercedes is the standard everyone else is chasing 

    It is? ;)

    Where is their world best Full size and mid size Pickup Trucks? ?

    Right! :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One word: Unimog! 

    Okay Okay Okay it isn't a standard full size truck but hell if it isn't the best in the world at being versatile/flexible and doing truck things. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Yes---

     * Sales figures are everything

     * Mercedes always has something coming that will beat anything current

    * Mercedes is the standard everyone else is chasing 

    It is actually Mercedes has the best racing team

    Mercedes is the standard everyone is chasing 

    Sales figures are everything and Mercedes is #1 in luxury sales

    • Haha 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How many different leagues or classes does Mercedes even race in? 

    I love Mercedes but my god are you oblivious.

    I guess ignorance is bliss though so...?‍♂️

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    One word: Unimog! 

    Okay Okay Okay it isn't a standard full size truck but hell if it isn't the best in the world at being versatile/flexible and doing truck things. 

    I bet they could put leather seats in the back of a Unimog and pass it off as some sort of luxury wilderness exploration vehicle and sell them for $500k here as a Rolls Royce SUV competitor. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This is too funny and I HOPE HOPE HOPE Amazon moves forward with this as all the auto's on Amazon for sale will have a TRUMP TARIFF line that shows how much TARIFF tax they will pay. Trump’s ‘Pottery Barn rule’ problem
    • I don’t know if this vehicle, a Toyota Prius Hybrid HEV, represented an upgrade.  It’s just what I was assigned as a mid-size rented vehicle for 3 days.  I had a general idea that this vehicle was recently refreshed and that it looked a lot better.  As I got closer to it and got into it, I was able to get a better look.  The new Prius looks a lot better than I recall a Prius ever looking.  It looks sleek, sporty, and even sort of low-slung.  Interesting exterior features show that they made this a priority.  The front lights and fascia are thin and understated, working well with the more unified exterior.  The rear fascia is definitely Prius’s own and it gives the car some interesting, angled vantage points.  They even incorporated gullwing handles into the sedan’s rear doors and, having once had these in the last rendition of the W-body Buick Regal coupe, I like their look and just plain using them. Its low-slung aspect can present a slight demerit.  The windshield and profile of the front doors is very raked and, as a person of average height, I had to duck a little more than usual to enter the car.  Similarly, the rear backlite borders on almost being horizontal.  This does give the rear storage area a little more usable height. Inside, the front pillars’ rake is mitigated by fixed renditions of what used to be vent windows in older cars.  However, they still seem to block an instinctive sight line compared to more upright vehicles like the current Camry and Corolla.  Inside, the feeling is more cockpit-like.  Similarly, the rear view has the thicker pillars and flatter backlite that require more proactive work – looking over the shoulder attentively and using the amber traffic monitoring warnings in the outside mirrors.  A complementary feature is the chime that assisted lane changes. The Prius has a 4-cylinder engine that seems to spend more time in EV mode than did the hybrid Camry.  That means good fuel economy and, over 3 days, I only added 6 gallons for between 200 and 300 miles of motoring.  In terms of power, handling, and roadability, the Prius gets mixed comments from me.  It does have agility when the pedal is pressed and it moves from eco to power mode.  It also eases upward to higher than anticipated highway speeds if not paying attention!  The transmission is a CVT with a “faux” first gear and it works well.  The Prius has a more noticeable wheezing sound when in reverse gear, which actually advises those inside the car and near it.  However, when pushed, the powertrain gets buzzy, as in noisy.  But at steady speed, any engine noise is not that noticeable.  The vehicle’s handling, smoothness, and quietness vary.  Handling is always nimble and, even at highway speeds, it maneuvers adeptly.  The ride is mostly smooth.  However, noise control could use some improvement.  Some of that can come from the tires they equip the car with, fitted with aluminum wheels that hearken to the ones on Tesla products.  That said, it’s hard to tell if the drone is tire thum or wind.  However, if you prioritize handling among these, I was surprised to see how well the Prius handles … on the highway, on city streets, and even in tight parking spaces, where 3-point attempts are rarely necessary. The cockpit is unusual and very different from yesterday’s Priuses, which I’ve only seen and never driven or been a passenger in one.  I remember how the first model had an oval main instrument pod set up on the cowl in the middle of the dashboard but angled toward the driver.  Today’s Prius has thin and smaller pods, almost set on ledges that seem to staircase down as the cowl approaches the driver.  The main panel looks like a small tablet that is set quite far from the steering wheel.  Depending on how the wheel is titled, there could be some visibility issues seeing all the information.  This required adjusting the wheel and the seating height.  Also, the front seat can be very far from the pedals.  So, while the door is low, taller drivers might like this potential distance.  The infotainment center sits slightly forward of the main instrument screen and is conventionally placed atop the center stack.  Thankfully, it continues with touch operation as opposed to being operated via a remote dial.  Most functions are the ones you’ve known for a while, so setting things up doesn’t take long.  I did struggle a little with the Android Auto, even though the Bluetooth pairing was quick.  Note that, while the Camry has USB-C ports, the Prius does not.  Further down on the center stack, the climate control is easy to work with (not the 3-dial type that so many exports and even domestics have) and the A/C blows colder a little quicker than in the last Camry I drove.  The console deck is about the right height and its overall dimensions, including the box, are generous.  The compactness of the shift lever is sort of fun … think of a small underpowered low-cost EV Corvette! When going into gear, it’s not about moving the selector linearly.  A quick jog to the left and up toward the instrument panel is for reverse while that same quick jog followed by a rearward move puts the vehicle in drive.  It doesn’t take long to get used to this.  Also, the park feature is easy to work with.  Just push in P when stopped and, whether in reserve or drive, the gear selector goes to park.  The only thing is that it is not forgiving when shifting the lever … your foot must be firmly on the brake, so no slipshod maneuvers.  The seating is comfortable and the buckets seem a little high, but this offers support from top to bottom.  The same is true in the rear of the cabin and the headrests do intrude with an already thicker rear sail panel / C-pillar.  Legroom in the rear also seems good and the length of the vehicle allows for that.  Space is sensibly distributed in the 3 volumes from front to back. I always thought a Prius would have something daunting or different about it.  Its look is different in that it lost its first-gen look that looked like an upright Nissan Versa of 2016 … sort of like the runt of the litter that is on the run because it has been kicked in the rump.  This Prius looks planted.  Upon pushing the prominent and easy to use “power” button on the dash, there will be no noise and the dash will literally tell you when it, and you, are “ready” to go. It's a smaller but roomy vehicle where the price isn’t a bargain, but not that steep in today’s terms.  I find there are a few things that I wasn’t crazy about – the height, the main instrument pod sitting in the distance, and not the best noises suppression – but I liked most other things about it.  With so many Priuses going the long haul, this one will probably do the same … and look a lot more presentable while doing it. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • I'm laughing.   There are always reasons why things are "discounted." With me, it's DFW and Austin that give me heartburn.  San Antonio, too, even though I don't know it as well.  I just don't like the look of the DFW area, whether natural or built.  I don't like Austin for being the governmental engine of a big red place next to a massive university with over 50,000 students that is a big blue place.  I'm more of a moderate and don't want extremes in either element.  I also don't like the "way cool" leanings in Austin. Houston has its negatives, but I'd take it for nearby Galveston, and water in general, the extensive pinewoods, the dark red brick homes, an attractive downtown, and for being America's most ethnically diverse city that has always rolled with that spirit.  There is no "you shouldn't be here" factor.  IIR, I've heard of a saying about Madrid that goes, 'When you're in Madrid, you're from Madrid.'  Having lived in various places, I pay attention to those subleties.
    • Very cool to see This Hyundai Ioniq 5 Owner Managed 413,991 Miles In Under Four Years, With One Big Catch
    • Removing tariffs that idiot47 caused so much pain with for getting nothing in return show how stupid a person can be in not understanding true business and how to negotiate.  A real man with Business sense would have put together a package of tariffs to present to China to address specific areas that are an imbalance not just attack everything and see what falls out. As such, incompetence in not understanding the long road map to building greatness shows how foolish the current administration is and now they are going to sign an exception list for the auto industry. Destroy good trading partners just to cause Chaos! Never a sound business strategy. Trump to Sign Order Later Tuesday Easing Auto Tariff Impact
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search