Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • William Maley
    William Maley

    2018 GMC Terrain To Begin At $25,970

      How much will the 2018 GMC Terrain set you back?


    Before the 2018 GMC Terrain hits dealers this summer, the brand has announced pricing for their small crossover.

    The base Terrain SL FWD will set you back $25,970 (includes a $975 destination charge), or about $1,900 more than the equivalent 2017 model. SL models come with a proximity key with push-button start, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, and LED taillights. If you want all-wheel drive, you'll need to step up to the SLE which starts at $30,545. Opting for front-wheel drive on the SLE drops the price to $28,795. Moving up to the SLE also brings the 1.6L turbodiesel as an option. This will set you back $32,565 (FWD) and $34,315 (AWD).

    SLT models which add heated front seats and an upgraded 8-inch infotainment screen begin at $32,295 (FWD) and $34,045 (AWD).

    The Terrain Denali kicks off at $38,495 (FWD) and $40,245 (AWD). For the price, it comes with a 2.0L turbo-four offering 252 horsepower, 19-inch wheels, LED headlights, navigation, 7-speaker Bose sound system, heated steering wheel, and a hands-free power tailgate.

    Source: GMC
    Press Release is on Page 2


    2018 GMC Terrain Starts at $25,970

    • Premium compact SUV offers more value with new design, more premium features

    DETROIT — Pricing for the all-new 2018 Terrain will start at an MSRP of $25,970[1] when it goes on sale this summer, GMC announced today.

    The all-new Terrain offers greater refinement and versatility to adapt to customers’ unique needs, and it’s packed with more available features and advanced safety technologies than ever before. Three all-new turbocharged engines, leading with a 2.0L at launch — followed later with a 1.5L and an available 1.6L turbo-diesel — provide more choices when it comes to performance, efficiency and capability.

    “Terrain helped define the premium compact SUV segment and the all-new 2018 model elevates it with a stronger roster of standard and available features,” said Duncan Aldred, vice president of Global GMC. “GMC’s proven SUV experience makes it a more compelling choice than ever, with a strong blend of design, functionality and engineering excellence.”

    The all-new GMC Terrain provides great value in packaging with a host of standard premium features, including a new 170-hp, 1.5L turbo engine paired with a new nine-speed automatic transmission; driver-controllable Traction Select system; signature LED daytime running lamps and taillamps; leather-wrapped steering wheel; flat-folding front passenger seat; and keyless open and start.

    The Terrain Denali raises the bar even further to add a standard 252-hp, 2.0L turbo engine; 19-inch ultra-bright machined aluminum wheels; LED headlamps; heated leather-wrapped steering wheel; hands-free power programmable liftgate; an 8-inch diagonal infotainment system with navigation; Bose premium seven-speaker audio system; and a suite of standard safety features that includes:

    • Side Blind Zone Alert with Lane Change Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Park Assist
    • Safety Alert Seat

    Terrain SL and SLE Starting MSRPs

    • Terrain SL FWD — $25,970
    • Terrain SLE FWD — $28,795
    • Terrain SLE Diesel FWD — $32,565
    • Terrain SLE AWD — $30,545
    • Terrain SLE Diesel AWD — $34,315

    Terrain SLT Starting MSRPs

    • Terrain SLT FWD — $32,295
    • Terrain SLT Diesel FWD — $35,140
    • Terrain SLT AWD — $34,045
    • Terrain SLT Diesel AWD — $36,890

    Terrain Denali Starting MSRPs

    • Terrain Denali FWD — $38,495
    • Terrain Denali AWD — $40,245

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I continue to try and find something wrong with this vehicle and can't. If this is 450lbs lighter than my daughter's 'Nox.. the difference in HP from the V6 to this one's 2.0L will be null.. and based on my experience with the 2.0L in other vehicles.. probably make it more spry. Good looking exterior.. and that interior is a hit. It actually looks luxury, IMO, even in base form

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, frogger said:

    These are great on the inside, a strong contender for those that don't need the cargo space of the top sellers.

    They are tweeners.  They start about $2k more than a CR-V, but have more space... or $4k less than a Pilot and have less space. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Behind the back seat they are more Tucson sized.   The specifications state just under 30 cubic feet cargo capacity vs the just under 40 cubic feet of the Rogue, CRV, Rav4.  Maybe those 30 are more user friendly than the 40ish in the mainstream somehow.  The Regal Sportback has 31, but I doubt it is all as usable as a traditional CUV.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Edited by frogger
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Upon further inspection, I am still not sold on the exterior of the Terrain. There is just a lack of cohesive design here. I'm sure the interior is light years better but I would not be able to get past the outside of this thing. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, surreal1272 said:

    Upon further inspection, I am still not sold on the exterior of the Terrain. There is just a lack of cohesive design here. I'm sure the interior is light years better but I would not be able to get past the outside of this thing. 

    Odd, after years of being the outsider here and liking foreign made vehicles...GM builds something I would really like to own and no one else likes it.

    I must not be living right.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah..  But the truth of the matter is that most who buy this type of vehicle are not looking to carry around tree stumps and what not. The most they will pack in these or any in their class are gonna be bags of groceries. These.. THESE.. more than even the Yukons and Acadia sizes.. are the station wagons of our day. Oh.. Speaking of the Yukon and Acadia and Acadia+..  GMC has other options they can present to any custom looks for more room. More options in fact.. than any Honda dealership 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    I continue to try and find something wrong with this vehicle and can't. If this is 450lbs lighter than my daughter's 'Nox.. the difference in HP from the V6 to this one's 2.0L will be null.. and based on my experience with the 2.0L in other vehicles.. probably make it more spry. Good looking exterior.. and that interior is a hit. It actually looks luxury, IMO, even in base form

    I would agree with your sentiments.  I am not a GM SUV type of a guy, but I see a test drive in my future.  I really, really like it...a lot!

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Odd, after years of being the outsider here and liking foreign made vehicles...GM builds something I would really like to own and no one else likes it.

    I must not be living right.

    Your living just fine! Over all the look is fine with me too. I just have issue with that Blind Spot between C&D as big as Texas and those hideous head lights.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Yeah..  But the truth of the matter is that most who buy this type of vehicle are not looking to carry around tree stumps and what not. The most they will pack in these or any in their class are gonna be bags of groceries. These.. THESE.. more than even the Yukons and Acadia sizes.. are the station wagons of our day. Oh.. Speaking of the Yukon and Acadia and Acadia+..  GMC has other options they can present to any custom looks for more room. More options in fact.. than any Honda dealership 

    ohhh   very much so...and the interior is much nicer than any Honda product!

    Just now, dfelt said:

    Your living just fine! Over all the look is fine with me too. I just have issue with that Blind Spot between C&D as big as Texas and those hideous head lights.

    I think it is a little bit polarizing, but we will get used to it.  Better that than the snow plow predator front of a Lexus SUV....my sons girlfriends father bought one of those Lexus...son and his GF hate the thing with a purple passion.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @William Maley Bill do you know if they will have the All-Terrain package on this at launch? I love everything that is in the Denali package but the Chrome. Give me Monochromatic please! :D 

    2 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    ohhh   very much so...and the interior is much nicer than any Honda product!

    I think it is a little bit polarizing, but we will get used to it.  Better that than the snow plow predator front of a Lexus SUV....my sons girlfriends father bought one of those Lexus...son and his GF hate the thing with a purple passion.

    Love Predator Movies, TOTALLY AGREE as I HATE the Predator look on Lexus Auto's.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    @William Maley Bill do you know if they will have the All-Terrain package on this at launch? I love everything that is in the Denali package but the Chrome. Give me Monochromatic please! :D 

    Love Predator Movies, TOTALLY AGREE as I HATE the Predator look on Lexus Auto's.

    At the moment, no. That could change in the next year or two.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Your living just fine! Over all the look is fine with me too. I just have issue with that Blind Spot between C&D as big as Texas and those hideous head lights.

    This was the first thing I thought of when I saw the front end (and that's not a good thing). 

     

    IMG_4760.JPG

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    This was the first thing I thought of when I saw the front end (and that's not a good thing). 

     

    IMG_4760.JPG

    Yea, this is the ugliest 4Runner to date. I just do not get Toyota's Styling thought. At least they keept the visibility between the C & D pillars with a nice big Window.

    44 minutes ago, William Maley said:

    At the moment, no. That could change in the next year or two.

    I can see 1yr but 2yrs would be just stupid IMHO. Personally they should have it at launch. Thank you for giving us your input Bill. :)

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    :thumbsup: So the SLT would do me fine as I can get the either the 1.6L Turbo Diesel or 2.0L Turbo Gas. I can get just about everything else I want. :glare: Yet what Moron at GMC feels that only Denali passengers would want second row heated seats and Surround Vision? Jeep does this on their lower trim versions that this will compete with, GMC needs to step up.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    :thumbsup: So the SLT would do me fine as I can get the either the 1.6L Turbo Diesel or 2.0L Turbo Gas. I can get just about everything else I want. :glare: Yet what Moron at GMC feels that only Denali passengers would want second row heated seats and Surround Vision? Jeep does this on their lower trim versions that this will compete with, GMC needs to step up.

    Agree on them stepping up, but I can be happy with a very basic vehicle.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, frogger said:

    Yes the Equinox dash with contrasting materials, while probably using some cheaper materials, is nicer to look at IMO.

    But it looks like the rear pillars and the tiny window between them are subpar

    https://www.cars.com/articles/which-small-suv-in-2017-has-the-best-rear-visibility-1420695173096/

     

    Yup agree they also went with a sliver window. totally sucks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the pricing is good, it is a little more than a Toyota, Chevy or Mazda, but you expect that, GMC is positioned a little higher.  

    GMC needs a vehicle below the Terrain like in the Jeep Renegade segment.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    I disagree....

    It's not dead on, mind you but the Terrains headlight treatment looks like what's going on underneath the 4Runners headlights. Just design overkill to me. 

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    I will say the more I look at the interior and the info on the web site, the more I like the Interior. Very luxury like and I see no reason why anyone would not like being inside this CUV! I especially love the Sky Roof!2018-gmc-terrain-reveal-interior-mm1-lightbox-980x432-01.jpg

    2018-gmc-terrain-reveal-interior-mm1-lightbox-980x432-02.jpg

    2018-gmc-terrain-reveal-interior-mm1-lightbox-980x432-03.jpg

    2018-gmc-terrain-reveal-interior-mm1-lightbox-980x432-04.jpg

    2018-gmc-terrain-reveal-interior-mm1-lightbox-980x432-05.jpg

    http://www.gmc.com/suvs/2018-terrain-small-suv.html

     

    The interior is a huge plus but getting past the outside would be the trick for me. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

    It's not dead on, mind you but the Terrains headlight treatment looks like what's going on underneath the 4Runners headlights. Just design overkill to me. 

    The interior is a huge plus but getting past the outside would be the trick for me. 

    You might warm up to it with time. I do think that I will test drive one when I buy my next car.

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    I think the pricing is good, it is a little more than a Toyota, Chevy or Mazda, but you expect that, GMC is positioned a little higher.  

    GMC needs a vehicle below the Terrain like in the Jeep Renegade segment.  

    Really agree on the one vehicle lower thing.  Not so much for cost but for size.  The Encore is too small for me and if anything the Terrain is too large.

    ..and one more comment for surreal, agree on the Interior.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Yeah I see zero reason for GMC not getting a Trax variant.. perhaps a lil more emphasis on the off road capabilities like the Trax Activ concept 

    I would upvote that idea by a hundred if I could.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    You might warm up to it with time. I do think that I will test drive one when I buy my next car.

    Really agree on the one vehicle lower thing.  Not so much for cost but for size.  The Encore is too small for me and if anything the Terrain is too large.

    ..and one more comment for surreal, agree on the Interior.

    Not likely. Not really a fan of CUVs as it is. The previous Terrain at least looked like a real SUV even if it wasn't. This one goes in completely the opposite direction. Oh well. Can't win them all. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    Yeah I see zero reason for GMC not getting a Trax variant.. perhaps a lil more emphasis on the off road capabilities like the Trax Activ concept 

    Why Not take the Trax and make it a Hummer Capable competitor to Jeep. Totally Focused as a GMC Trax All-Terrain version only.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    OK, So I have looked and looked and can only find the following from GM

    1.5L Turbo Gas Motor 170HP, ??? Torque

    2.0L Turbo Gas Motor 252HP, ??? Torque

    1.6L Turbo Diesel Motor 136HP, 250 LB-FT of Torque.

    This diesel is less HP and Torque than the older 2.0L diesel that the Cruz had. and why no Torque #'s on the other engines? While initially I was excited by the Diesel option, this is a big let down to me in the poor Numbers and I wonder if all they really did was make it quiet and go after MPG only?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    OK, So I have looked and looked and can only find the following from GM

    1.5L Turbo Gas Motor 170HP, ??? Torque

    2.0L Turbo Gas Motor 252HP, ??? Torque

    1.6L Turbo Diesel Motor 136HP, 250 LB-FT of Torque.

    This diesel is less HP and Torque than the older 2.0L diesel that the Cruz had. and why no Torque #'s on the other engines? While initially I was excited by the Diesel option, this is a big let down to me in the poor Numbers and I wonder if all they really did was make it quiet and go after MPG only?

    1.5T - around 184 lb-ft (about the same as the 1.5T in the Malibu gets)

    2.0T - around 260 lb-ft (about the same as the 2.0T in the Malibu gets)

    1.6 Diesel - The old 2.0 was not a GM motor. and 250 lb-ft will be more than enough to move this new lighter Terrain along smartly, especially with a 9-speed automatic.

    You have to basically ignore horsepower numbers in diesels. They're low because diesels turn at half the RPM that gasoline motors do and still produce the same torque. Horsepower is a measurement of torque at a specific RPM... since the RPM is lower, the horsepower numbers are lower.  In passenger cars, horsepower is nearly meaningless..... in diesel passenger cars, it is entirely meaningless. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    1.5T - around 184 lb-ft (about the same as the 1.5T in the Malibu gets)

    2.0T - around 260 lb-ft (about the same as the 2.0T in the Malibu gets)

    1.6 Diesel - The old 2.0 was not a GM motor. and 250 lb-ft will be more than enough to move this new lighter Terrain along smartly, especially with a 9-speed automatic.

    You have to basically ignore horsepower numbers in diesels. They're low because diesels turn at half the RPM that gasoline motors do and still produce the same torque. Horsepower is a measurement of torque at a specific RPM... since the RPM is lower, the horsepower numbers are lower.  In passenger cars, horsepower is nearly meaningless..... in diesel passenger cars, it is entirely meaningless. 

    I just like the diesel rumble, actually...this thing with a mild tune and an exhaust would be awesome...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    1.5T - around 184 lb-ft (about the same as the 2.0T in the Malibu gets)

    2.0T - around 260 lb-ft (about the same as the 2.0T in the Malibu gets)

    1.6 Diesel - The old 2.0 was not a GM motor. and 250 lb-ft will be more than enough to move this new lighter Terrain along smartly, especially with a 9-speed automatic.

    You have to basically ignore horsepower numbers in diesels. They're low because diesels turn at half the RPM that gasoline motors do and still produce the same torque. Horsepower is a measurement of torque at a specific RPM... since the RPM is lower, the horsepower numbers are lower.  In passenger cars, horsepower is nearly meaningless..... in diesel passenger cars, it is entirely meaningless. 

    Much appreciated Drew, while I know the HP # is lower and I tend to ignore it as Torque is much more important, I was surprised that the Torque number was 16 lb-ft less than the old engine. I was hoping to maintain or go higher on torque to really make it scoot especially in AWD mode. Wait and see how people think when it comes out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, dfelt said:

    Much appreciated Drew, while I know the HP # is lower and I tend to ignore it as Torque is much more important, I was surprised that the Torque number was 16 lb-ft less than the old engine. I was hoping to maintain or go higher on torque to really make it scoot especially in AWD mode. Wait and see how people think when it comes out.

    There are 3 more gears in the box over the old 2.0T diesel. It'll do fine.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Why Not take the Trax and make it a Hummer Capable competitor to Jeep. Totally Focused as a GMC Trax All-Terrain version only.

    OK!!! OK!!!... did U understand me saying OK!!!??? I have said about a thousand times that GMC should not only house the profit making Denali sub-brand.. but also the profit potential of a Hummer sub-brand. Call it Alpha (which was a trim of Hummer) if they like.. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    OK!!! OK!!!... did U understand me saying OK!!!??? I have said about a thousand times that GMC should not only house the profit making Denali sub-brand.. but also the profit potential of a Hummer sub-brand. Call it Alpha (which was a trim of Hummer) if they like.. 

    Something like how Jeep uses the Trailhawk sub-brand for it's trail-rated variants...(now across 4 model lines).

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

    OK!!! OK!!!... did U understand me saying OK!!!??? I have said about a thousand times that GMC should not only house the profit making Denali sub-brand.. but also the profit potential of a Hummer sub-brand. Call it Alpha (which was a trim of Hummer) if they like.. 

    So True, we are in Sync, now if we can just keep saying this so GM takes notice and does it! :P 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/5/2017 at 0:41 PM, dfelt said:

    Much appreciated Drew, while I know the HP # is lower and I tend to ignore it as Torque is much more important, I was surprised that the Torque number was 16 lb-ft less than the old engine. I was hoping to maintain or go higher on torque to really make it scoot especially in AWD mode. Wait and see how people think when it comes out.

    The 1.5T is not identical to the Malibu's engine. I believe I read that It has a different turbocharger, but in any case, it makes 203 lb-ft of torque, which is also documented in first drive reviews of the new Equinox. The GMC will get a 9-speed automatic standard, the Equinox 1.5T only gets a 6-speed.

    http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevrolet/equinox/2018/2018-chevrolet-equinox-first-drive-review/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Id like to add:  Because it seems NOBODY wants to talk about the REALITY OF WHY manufacturing will NEVER come back to North America no matter WHAT kind of monies we throw at it to try to bring it back. And FYI, NOBODY is REALLY investing in ACTUALLY bringing back manufacturing to North America...  PRELUDE Nixon opened up the door to do trade with China. (not a bad thing) Reagan allowed Wallstreet and corporate America to move manufacturing from the US to China.  (In hindsight, a very bad thing for what it was to be)  CHAPTER 1 The industrial revolution arrived. It supercharged the British Empire and it helped to introduce a young country into being a very powerful nation in the decades to come.  We are here to talk about the young nation and not about the British Empire. CHAPTER 2 Ultimately, the industrial revolution brought many innovations on how to produce and manufacture even more efficiently and faster.  It helped win a world war or two and the last man standing so to speak allowed this young nation become almost the sole superpower on the planet. CHAPTER 3  Many many many products were produced.  Many many new technologies came to be that introduced a new modern society. And those new modern products also brought with them NEW MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES. CHAPTER 4 Remember when I said that this new nation rose up to the challenge to help win a world war or two?  Well, it was the industrial revolution ace up the sleeve that the USA had and the sheer amount of war machines produced efficiently and with speed was the key to these victories.  Especially that last world war.  When the war was over, the USA enjoyed the technology of mass production that was the envy of the world. (remember the bolded part.) CHAPTER 5  Eventually, manufacturing left the USA to go to China. The world followed suit.  China produces the world's gadgets. CHAPTER 6   (THIS IS THE IMPORTANT CHAPTER THAT NOBODY TALKS ABOUT) China has invested TRILLIONS of dollars in manufacturing. Why? THE WORLD depends on it. China holds itself PROUD to be the world's producer of goods. China wants to CONTINUE TO BE the world's producer of goods. So...China has upgraded their manufacturing plants to be very very state of the art. They will CONTINUE to INVEST not only in monies to ALWAYS RENOVATE their manufacturing plants, but they TEACH their populace to go to ENGINEERING schools so they could ALWAYS have STATE OF THE ART MANUFACTURING.  CHAPTER 7    (ALSO IMPORTANT THAT NOBODY TALKS ABOUT) The USA actually stopped renovating in manufacturing looong before the manufacturing plants left for China. But that is not the issue. The issue is, there are NO monies invested RIGHT now to bring back manufacturing. There are NO plants being built.  LOL tariffs...   And where are those monies from the tariffs?   No American company has invested in manufacturing plants to be built. No American company has worked with AMERICAN engineering schools to teach graduating students to manufacture goods in the USA to actually be with techniques of the early 2000s let alone 2025.  Loooooong gone are those 1930s/1940s/1950s techniques...  We are in 2025 let us not forget.   The USA doesnt even have the TOOLING of those 1930s/1940s/1950s plants. Those were sold to China and elsewhere in the world, but those metal tooling dies right now, have probably been recycled. NEW technologies to manufacture...   CHAPTER 8  (A TRUTH THAT WILL PROBABLY HURT BUT DEFINITELY NOT TALKED ABOUT) A certain American does not favour education.  This certain American favours ignorance.   MOST Americans do NOT want to work in a factory.  But ALL Americans do NOT realize MODERN factory work is NOT how it used to be.  To be fair, Apple iPhone workers in China committing suicide because of shytty work hours is also loooong gone. But then again, American media does not allow for  American peoples to know what a modern manufacturing plant consists of.  Also, engineering is too hard for those subset of Americans to actually learn how to manufacture goods in a modern state of the art way to not only compete with China, but to surpass their prowess in manufacturing to BRING BACK manufacturing from China to the USA.    CHAPTER 9 (ALSO IGNORED) And even if, some manufacturing plants came back to the USA.   There is something that we learned DURING the industrial revolution that says the USA will NEVER get ANY manufacturing plants back.  Sheer volume.  The WORLD has China to produce its goods.  China will ALWAYS remain CHEAPER to produce there just BECAUSE of economies of scale.   The skilled labour is in China.  The raw materials are shipped to China to produce whatever you want to produce. ALL the plants of whatever you have thought of producing whatever you want are ALL in China.  All kinds of different ports exist in China to accept ALL kinds of RAW materials.  ALL the ports are huuuuuge in China. ALL the ports are state of the art.  The BOATS to ship ANYTHING ALL OVER THE WORLD are ALL in China.  The boats are huuuuge and the ports could accept them.  And ALL that coordination is done by STATE OF THE ART communication, education and logistics.   PS:  China and the Chinese government subsidize world ports. The USA once did that...  The USA declares the  Panama Canal as their own.  Past history is past history in subsidizing the canal, but China actually finances it PRESENTLY to open up a bigger canal.  The USA whines abut the name of Gulf of Mexico....      In 2025, CHINA is the envy of the world in manufacturing techniques.     No...manufacturing is NEVER coming back to the USA.   Forget about tariffs, ICE agents, DOGE, assassinations, school shootings and everything wrong (or right) about right wing politics  and left wing lunacy.  THOSE are  just ADDED reasons NOT to do business in the USofA. 
    • IIRC the other founder of Turning Point died of Covid after denying safety steps for covid or something. You can argue morality and logic, but the impacts/results/effects of what you do are objective and real.  A bit of non political fun, this is gorgeous.  If I wasn't turning 60 years old today, I would drive that damn thing. 
    • 100% spot on analysis of Kirk. Yes, the way he died was horrible, no matter what side of the political spectrum on which you stand. However, let us not ignore the man's ACTUAL words and actions that helped fuel the "radicalization" of certain factions in this country and create this exact scenario where someone decided to take matters into their own armed hands. Ten years of pure madness fueled by one giant narcissistic A-Hole in D.C.
    • This guy gets the toxic state of America right on so many levels. it's pretty much cooked.  Drew feel free to delete this if need be. 
    • I like a lot of this guys analysis, he explains well why American manufacturing is declining at a greater and greater pace and why jobs are moving away from the United States.   
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search