Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    March 2019 Sales Figures

      ...find out who was lucky in the green last month.

    Quarterly:
    Ford Motor Company - Down 1.6% for the quarter, Down 1.6% for the year
    General Motors Co. - Down 7% for the quarter, Down 7% for the year
    Tesla - Up 110% for the quarter, Up 110% for the year

    Monthly:
    Audi of America -  Up 1.1% for the month, Up 9.4% for the year
    BMW of North America - 
    Up 0.4% for the month,  Down 1.9% for the year
    FCA US LLC -  Down 7% for the month, Down 3% for the year
    Genesis Motor America - 
    Honda Motor Co. - 
    Up 4.3% for the month,  Up 2.0% for the year
    Hyundai Motor America -  Up 1.7% for the month, Up 2.1% for the year
    Jaguar Land Rover North America - 
    Down 7% for the month 
    Kia Motors America - Up 10.2% for the month, Up 7.6% for the year
    Mazda North American Operations - Down 19.1%  for the month, Down 15.7% for the year
    Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 2.7% for the month, Down 9.3% for the year
    Mitsubishi Motors North America -  
    Up 36.9% for the month, Up 17.6% for the year
    Nissan Group - Down 7.2% for the month, Down 12.1% for the year
    Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 0.5% for the month, Up 7.7% for the year
    Subaru of America, Inc. - 
    Up 6.0% for the Month, Up 4.7% for the year
    Toyota Motor North America - Down 3.5% for the month, Down 5% for the year
    Volkswagen of America - 
    Up 14% for the month, Up 2.3% for the year
    Volvo Cars of North America, LLC -  Up 16.2%  for the month, Up 9.8% for the year

    Brands (Quarterly):
    Buick -  Down 8.7% - 51,876 QTD / YTD
    Cadillac -  Down 2.0% - 35,995 QTD / YTD
    Chevrolet - Down 7.8% - 452,401 QTD / YTD
    GMC - Down 4.4% - 125,577 QTD / YTD
    Ford - Down 2.1% - 565,274 QTD / YTD
    Lincoln - Up 11.2% - 24,974 QTD / YTD
    Tesla - Up 110% - 30,600 QTD / YTD

    Brands (Monthly):
    Acura - Up 10.4% - 14,408 MTD / 36,385 YTD
    Alfa Romeo - Down 31% - 1,774 MTD / 4,286 YTD
    Audi - Up 1.1% - 20,302 MTD / 14,859 YTD
    BMW - Up 2.9% - 32,228 MTD / 73,888 YTD
    Chrysler - Down 38% - 12,169 MTD / 31,591 YTD
    Dodge - Down 6% - 46,367 MTD / 110,517 YTD
    Fiat - Down 45% - 847 MTD / 2,214 YTD
    Genesis - 
    Honda - Up 7.9% - 134,101 MTD / 333,402 YTD
    Hyundai - Up 1.7% - 61,177 MTD / 147,585 YTD
    Infiniti - Down 23.1% - 13,406 MTD / 34,315 YTD
    Jaguar - Up 13% - 3,679 MTD
    Jeep - Down 11% - 87,328 MTD / 212,804 YTD
    Kia - Up 10.2% - 55,814 MTD / 136,596 YTD
    Land Rover - Down 13% - 9,492 MTD
    Lexus - Up 8.2% - 29,249 MTD  / 66,791 YTD
    Mazda - Down 19.1% - 26,934 MTD / 70,833 YTD
    Mercedes-Benz - Down 4.9% - 27,004 MTD / 71,171 YTD 
    Mercedes-Benz Vans - Up 19.1% - 3,533 MTD / 7,476 YTD
    MINI - Down 16.8% - 3,769 MTD / 8,905 YTD
    Mitsubishi - Up 17.6% - 19,599 MTD / 42,067 YTD
    Nissan - Down 5.3% - 137,365 MTD / 331,536 YTD
    Porsche - Up 0.48% - 4,779 MTD / 15,024 YTD
    Ram Trucks - Up 15% - 51,822 MTD / 137,013 YTD
    Smart - Down 18.2% - 90 MTD / 231 YTD
    Subaru - Up 6.0% - 61,601 MTD / 156,754 YTD
    Toyota - Down 5.1% - 185,696 MTD / 476,923 YTD
    Volkswagen - Up 14% - 37,092 MTD / 85,872 YTD
    Volvo - Up 16.2% - 9,569 MTD / 22,058  YTD

    Edited by Drew Dowdell

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    56 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    It's surprising to see Alfa down with their hot CUV out now. 

    Apparently not that hot.  Their exteriors are nice to look at, but their interiors leave me flat. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Apparently not that hot.  Their exteriors are nice to look at, but their interiors leave me flat. 

    I've never been in one but I've seen a few and they're quite the looker. It would be tough to take the dive in on Alfa's reliability though. I'm not sure where they are at now but FCA doesn't seem to be too high on reliability lists outside of Ram, Wrangler, GC, and the LX siblings. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The problem with Alfa Romeo is it doesn’t have a 10 year bumper to bumper warranty.

    I could see having an Alfa as a lease for 3 years, wouldn't want one as it ages..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    I could see having an Alfa as a lease for 3 years, wouldn't want one as it ages..

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    I just priced one on the website and it came out about $75 a month cheaper than the GLC optioned to the same price.  That's before any discounts on either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I just priced one on the website and it came out about $75 a month cheaper than the GLC optioned to the same price.  That's before any discounts on either. 

    So $75 a month cheaper isn’t enough to move the needle.    The GLC outsells the Stelvio nearly 10-1. 

    I don’t think the Alfa name has enough cache either and they don’t advertise a lot either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So $75 a month cheaper isn’t enough to move the needle.    The GLC outsells the Stelvio nearly 10-1. 

    I don’t think the Alfa name has enough cache either and they don’t advertise a lot either.

    I agree with you that they don't advertise enough. They also don't have enough dealers.

    But $550 v. $625 a month is certainly enough to move the needle. 

    I just think people don't know about the Stelvio. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So $75 a month cheaper isn’t enough to move the needle.    The GLC outsells the Stelvio nearly 10-1. 

    I don’t think the Alfa name has enough cache either and they don’t advertise a lot either.

    Saw a Stelvio new at the 24hr fitness last night when I went to work out, the sun roof was partially open. I told the person they were calling for rain and he looked at me pissed and said there was nothing he could do as it was no longer functional, being taken in today and so far he had buyers remorse due to the poor quality of the CUV.

    I have to think that anyone that is willing to pay the money these auto's command will look at the reviews and think twice about buying their quality-less auto's.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Being Italian one would expect the Stelvio to be of low quality and poor reliability, but high style.  At least they aren't known for catching fire spontaneously like Ferraris and Lamborghinis. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robert Hall said:

    Being Italian one would expect the Stelvio to be of low quality and poor reliability, but high style.  At least they aren't known for catching fire spontaneously like Ferraris and Lamborghinis. 

    Yet Italians are well know for stylish quality built boats, why can they not seem to figure this out for the Auto's they build. Just crazy. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yet Italians are well know for stylish quality built boats, why can they not seem to figure this out for the Auto's they build. Just crazy. :P

    FIAT owns most if not all Italian automakers.  That is the problem.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Saw a Stelvio new at the 24hr fitness last night when I went to work out, the sun roof was partially open. I told the person they were calling for rain and he looked at me pissed and said there was nothing he could do as it was no longer functional, being taken in today and so far he had buyers remorse due to the poor quality of the CUV.

    I have to think that anyone that is willing to pay the money these auto's command will look at the reviews and think twice about buying their quality-less auto's.

    Exactly.  $75 a month savings  isn’t enough to get rained on.  They need to lease them for about $400 a month.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    Ding! Winner. 

    Alfa hasn’t figured out how to lease these out yet.  The sales dude who went with me on my Stelvio test drive last week said they conquest some bmws but bmw sets up their lease to hook the first timer and then when you try to return it they knock you with fees so bad for ‘damage’ and other stuff.  They ‘lessen the damages ‘ if you re-lease   And the douche cycle begins and you can’t get out  that’s how bmw does it  

    And yes, a huge warranty would help them sell cars too. 

    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    Yup. 

    If anyone wants to see my test drive of the Stelvio write up I got that in the forum a couple days ago.  Stelvio is nice enough that it should sell. It just needs leasing and incentive programs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Exactly.  $75 a month savings  isn’t enough to get rained on.  They need to lease them for about $400 a month.

    Haha, I agree 400 is the magic number I think for Alfa. And that’s what I told sales guy my cap would be for an Alfa.  ?

    they had one with around a 500 lease. 

    I think if they can lease lease them as cheap as the genesis g70 will eventually end up. Genesis will need to lease those for 400-450. 

    I’ll just wait till some Chevy dealer gets super desperate and find another Malibu to lease for an absurdly low pynt...like 250

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    Ding! Winner. 

    Alfa hasn’t figured out how to lease these out yet.  The sales dude who went with me on my Stelvio test drive last week said they conquest some bmws but bmw sets up their lease to hook the first timer and then when you try to return it they knock you with fees so bad for ‘damage’ and other stuff.  They ‘lessen the damages ‘ if you re-lease   And the douche cycle begins and you can’t get out  that’s how bmw does it  

    And yes, a huge warranty would help them sell cars too. 

    The Alfa interiors aren't as good as any German car, not even close. So there is one problem, they have performance but the Germans have that too.  And the reliability worries I feel like are a huge obstacle.   You almost know going in it will break so why buy it?  

    Alfa almost has to give these cars away for 5 years and prove they are reliable before masses will pay money for them.  

    3 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    Haha, I agree 400 is the magic number I think for Alfa. And that’s what I told sales guy my cap would be for an Alfa.  ?

    they had one with around a 500 lease. 

    I think if they can lease lease them as cheap as the genesis g70 will eventually end up. Genesis will need to lease those for 400-450. 

    They should be selling Alfa's at $400 a month for 72 months. I get that is $28k, but that is about what people are willing to risk on one of these.  For a hot second Alfa was bragging how the Guilia was the fastest 4-door around the Nurburgring and the Stelvio was the fastest SUV, then Mercedes took both those away about a month later.   So you are getting 2nd place performance with sub par interior and bottom of the barrel reliability.  Not a recipe for success.

    Edited by smk4565
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    What will Peugeot have to give their cars away for the first five to ten years?

    Depends on who they compete with.  If they go into a mass market at a good price, I think people will give them a chance.  Alfa is trying to go against BMW, Audi and Mercedes, those are heavyweights.  I don't think Peugeot has built in negative perception either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    What will Peugeot have to give their cars away for the first five to ten years?

    Considering the mess they left when they were here last, that is more like giving it away for 20 plus years to build up enough history of reliable auto's for people to pay a premium. Will not trust a Peugeot. 

    1 minute ago, smk4565 said:

    Depends on who they compete with.  If they go into a mass market at a good price, I think people will give them a chance.  Alfa is trying to go against BMW, Audi and Mercedes, those are heavyweights.  I don't think Peugeot has built in negative perception either.

    I your 40 plus years old, you know the crap they had and how they left people holding the bag of the garbage they tried to sell and then dumped and fled. I do not trust them period. They are just barely 1 step above Alfa that should have stayed in the history books for the garbage it is.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    How did GM get its butt kicked on the sales front?

    Buick and GMC SUVs are a bit dated, there seem to be 5 new crossovers every month hit the market, just in the past year or so you had Atlas, Acent, Palisade, Telluride enter the Traverse segment.  Kona, Passport, etc.  They just keep coming.   Cadillac is struggling, BMW X7 is probably going to outsell the Escalade and Navigator this year, Cadillac and Chevy sedans are dated and sedans industry wide are struggling.  The butt kicking will get worse when you remove Impala, LaCrosse, XTS, Cruze, Volt off the list next year.  I don't think they'll make up that volume it will just go elsewhere, but I don't think GM is playing a market share game either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

     I don't think GM is playing a market share game either.

    I totally agree with this, unlike GM of past and other American manufactures that ignored Deming and Drucker who ended up going to Japan and teaching them about Quality Management for Profit, Mary is a student of them. 

    Right now Mary knows that if she is able to turn consistent profits and plan for the future, they can take back the market share and leadership role, but this first comes by making sure the company is profitable which she has done even if many of us do not agree with how the auto's are being built now. She is for sure investing in the future and will leave GM with a legacy that will be realized after the fact.

    Profitable GM with Quality will bring market share and long term growth.  Another outstanding CEO was IBM Gerstner hired in 1993 and turned IBM into one of the most profitable service companies and proved he also built a deep bench of leadership by taking his Golden Parachute over 10 years to prove what he built would last and still does today.

    It will be very interesting to watch everyone from the Germans to the Asian and American auto companies and see who becomes the new leader in the EV auto world.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’ve said this for years but I’ll say it again. More and more folks are buying used and CPO for more than obvious reasons. Sales trends over the last few years reflect this. Thank you high priced new cars.  

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • And you actually think this scenario will exist? You guys are down a fascist road. You have been on this road for a few months now. Legalities rae ignored with fascist regimes.  Besides, Trump has been impeached before. Twice I believe and nothing has changed. Trump has been indicted and nothing has happened. France convicted their former leader and is now serving jail time for lesser crimes...   Serious crimes, but less corrupt than Trump.   He will spend time in jail despite Sarkozy appealing his verdict.    You folk better fight back for your country, you guys are slowly losing it... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp98kepmj9lo Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy has been sentenced to five years in jail after being found guilty of criminal conspiracy in a case related to millions of euros of illicit funds from the late Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi. The Paris criminal court acquitted him of all other charges, including passive corruption and illegal campaign financing. The ruling means he will spend time in jail even if he launches an appeal, which Sarkozy says he intends to do.  
    • Peter DeLorenzo said this: https://www.autoextremist.com/ Detroit. The negative auto industry news is starting to pick up speed. For instance, the Robert Bosch company is cutting 13,000 jobs, or close to 3 percent of its global workforce, due to a difficult market, tariffs and high costs. VW is “pausing” EV production at its German facilities due to the tariffs and drastically slowing demand in the U.S. Valmet Automotive Oyj, the Finland-based contract supplier that produces various Mercedes-Benz models, is reducing its workforce by one third due to the darkening industry outlook in Europe. U.S. tariffs on Canadian parts and autos exploded to $380 million this past July. Lucerne International Inc., an auto supplier, decided against a $50 million facility in Detroit directly due to the tariffs. And GM is expected to make major cuts to its "Factory Zero" output in October. These developments represent just the tip of the iceberg, as suppliers are upending or scrapping future plans altogether due to the capriciously unpredictable nature of the tariffs. And that isn’t even getting to the automakers themselves. Product plans are being upended or cancelled altogether, as uncertainty reigns throughout the industry. All because the current occupant of the White House is stuck with an 80s mindset on everything, and is wreaking havoc on an industry that he and his minions haven’t even the first clue of understanding.   This is best exemplified given the attitude that the Dear Leader believes he can snap his fingers and that “fixes” will be immediate and dramatically positive, even though the required transformation to supply chains, factory builds and product planning will play out in years, not months.   The industry is trying to adapt to the current “finger-snap” mindset in Washington, and it isn’t going well. Short-term solutions such as Stellantis turning back the clock and going all-in on ICE muscle machines again are just that: short-term. How long Stellantis can live with that and how far it can carry that product strategy remains to be determined, although it’s clear that for a certain faction of the car-buying population, this direction is exactly what the doctor ordered.   But let’s not forget that two of the three “domestic” (I use that term purposely, as people forget that Stellantis is a foreign-owned company) automakers spent billions on top of billions on EV research and development, battery manufacturing facilities and a plethora of products. Was all of this work wasted? Not in the least, as the lessons learned in the process will prove to be invaluable going forward. But the current reality in Washington – which equates EV development as the Devil’s Work – means that those billions spent on bringing EVs to the masses will have to be tabled, except for selective instances of appropriate products for certain segments, of course. (And no, that does not mean EV pickups, which have turned out to be a fool’s errand as they don’t – or can’t – function as real working pickup trucks.)   So, Ford, GM and Stellantis are being forced to approach the next few years with a scattershot approach, cranking out ICE vehicles to stay alive and afloat, while plotting their next move to meet whatever is coming in the future, as advanced battery development – emphasizing light weight and density – continues at a torrid pace and an actual working national charging network slowly but surely solidifies.   Let me emphasize that none of these developments will be happening in a vacuum or with any degree of certainty. As long as the current administration is allowed to conduct “business” on the whims of Dear Leader, these auto manufacturers and their suppliers will be teetering on the brink of disaster for the foreseeable future.   Vehicle prices are soaring, and the typical auto buyer will be pressed to the limit in order to afford a new (or used) vehicle. This is the ugly reality facing this industry right now.   I’ve been accused of being overly negative on the future of this industry, but frankly, I haven’t been sounding the alarm loudly enough. Suppliers are going to fall by the wayside, costing countless jobs, and the manufacturers will be forced to jettison thousands of employees too.   This is not going to end well for this industry, and for those who are unwilling to believe it I’m afraid you’re in for a very rude awakening.   The clock is ticking on the U.S. automobile industry as we know it. And the most pathetic thing is that it didn’t have to unfold this way.   But here we are.   And that’s the High-Octane Truth for this week.
    • Something interesting is happening ... at least to me. We know ITA Airways is going from Sky Team (Delta) to Star Alliance (United).  That's because Lufthansa acquired that big stake in them. When you go scout out redemption options on United, there is very little crossing of the pond on Lufthansa's if you are going to Italy ... slim to none.  United carts you on the over-the-water segment and ITA takes care of the rest from the Italian gateway.   It's almost as if they picked up ITA to be a low-cost workhorse for them.  Between the mileage redemption flyers and conventional paying passengers, the ITA planes are sure to be (close to) full. However, I'd much rather be on Lufthansa than domestic United for the longest leg. Because they haven't still disengaged, ITA segments are still being offered up on the Sky Team (Delta, specifically) website.  There will be that overlap for about 2 to 3 more months, I believe. Fleets change, alliances change, etc.  Many times, change sucks.
    • So not everyone can read the WSJ artical, but to summarize it: Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors, is adjusting the company's ambitious electric vehicle (EV) goals due to a slowdown in market growth and changing consumer demand. Market Slowdown and Production Capacity Mary Barra has recently acknowledged that the electric vehicle market is experiencing a slowdown in growth, leading GM to revise its previous forecast of producing 1 million electric vehicles by the end of 2025. At a recent event, she stated, "We’re seeing a little bit of a slowdown right now... the market’s not developing as quickly as we anticipated". This shift indicates that GM is now taking a more cautious approach to its EV production timeline, recognizing that the anticipated demand may not materialize as quickly as expected.  Consumer Demand and Affordability Concerns Barra emphasized that GM's production decisions will be guided by consumer demand. The company is facing challenges related to affordability, as many potential buyers are hesitant to invest in EVs due to high prices and limited charging infrastructure. GM plans to keep its electric car prices between $30,000 and $40,000 to stimulate demand, but this strategy may strain profit margins due to the high costs associated with EV battery production.  CBT Automotive Network Political and Economic Pressures The EV market is also influenced by political and economic factors. Changes in federal policies, including the potential rollback of EV incentives, have created uncertainty in the market. Barra noted that the regulatory environment has shifted, impacting GM's strategy and the overall pace of EV adoption. Despite these challenges, GM remains committed to its long-term vision for electrification, viewing the next decade as a transformative period for mobility.  c-suiteinsider.com Conclusion In summary, Mary Barra's decision to scale back GM's lofty EV ambitions is driven by a combination of market conditions, consumer demand, and political pressures. While GM continues to invest in electric vehicles, the company is adopting a more measured approach to align its production capacity with the current state of the market. This strategic pivot reflects the complexities of transitioning to an all-electric future amid evolving consumer preferences and regulatory landscapes. So how is this a "Joke in Clown Shoes" to use your phrase? Good CEO's adjust based on the market and political pressure all the time, so care to explain how this is any different than CEO's who are using Idiot47 and his clown administration to monopolize their profits? IQ79 aka Idiot47 is trying to stop legal voting as the population is fed up with his clown administration. At this point, he is in for a rude awakening and I hope he gets what he deserves, a Blue wave that give total control of the house and senate to the democrats so they can impeach him and his lemmings.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search