Jump to content
William Maley

Cadillac News: Spying: Cadillac ATS-V, Now With No Camo!

Recommended Posts

Feast your eyes on this. Left Lane News got their hands on new spy shots which show off the upcoming Cadillac ATS-V Coupe with no camouflage at all.

The ATS-V looks to our eyes as being a CTS-V that has been left in the wash for a bit too long. The front has an aggressive front splitter that appears to be made out of carbon fiber, along with mesh grilles for the front clip. There is a hood bulge with an air vent to help cooling. Around back is a spoiler sitting on the trunk lid. The pictures also reveal the ATS-V having massive disc brakes, possibly carbon ceramic.

One item still up in the air is what powers the ATS-V. All signs appear to be pointing to TT 3.6 with 425 horsepower.

All we'll be revealed in due time when the ATS-V debuts next month at the LA Auto Show.

Source: Left Lane News

William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at william.maley@cheersandgears.com or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First impression was H'mmm nice but something is just not right. Then I figured it out. I do not like the front top grill with what looks to me to be an after thought of Chrome around the grill. It looks cheap and does not scream performance but Chromed mid tear car. I am sadly not impressed. This car should have just stayed monochromatic and if they wanted Chrome, left it to the rims, Door Handles at most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's getting there.  But it is not as impressive in the photos as the new M4 I saw in-person at the grocery store parking lot today.

 

Let's see how that match-up stacks up in a Car & Driver comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

If they are a pro photographer, then their 300mm lens should be an APO lens so there is minimal distortion and this should be pretty accurate.

 

Cadillac needs to realize that not every car needs to be blinged out with Chrome. Performance auto's are better looking monochromatic IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

If they are a pro photographer, then their 300mm lens should be an APO lens so there is minimal distortion and this should be pretty accurate.

 

Cadillac needs to realize that not every car needs to be blinged out with Chrome. Performance auto's are better looking monochromatic IMHO.

 

 

It is not the distortion from optics but it is the illusion (compression) from physics. A telephoto lens will compress objects closer than a normal range lens would.

 

wntlines.jpg

 

Oh please tell me where is distortion here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like all three.

Some guy on another site said "forte Koup, is that you"? Lmao. And sort of true.

I sat in a new ATS coupe last weekend. I fit like a glove. And it's so much easier to get in and out of. The car has no useful backseat to speak of, however, and it is bland and safe. 25 Cadillacs in a row and they all blend into each other now.

New CTS AWD for 40g, wish I could! But here is the deal, between the dead looks, too high prices, and lack of space and room in nearly all Cadillacs, this is why Caddy is trending down.

They need to sex up the whole model lineup fast. Add crossovers. Manage pricing better and give us some room ! I would bring the ATSL to the states and make that the sedan offering and use it to lure people back to the brand. I would clean up the CTS and make sure the CT6 launch is not botched.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again with the 'back seat room' fallacy? Over @ BMW & MB, the critics are more worried about 'back seat in handling with less overall legroom'… hmmm; which the better spot to be in?

 

ATS-V spy pic is clearly distorted, not going to go by that one.

On another forum a number of the wags are laughably calling the sides of the ATS 'bland/ boring' meanwhile holding up the BMW4 as 'the way to do it', when a simple glance shows they both have the same elements & conceptual approach to the sides respectively. IE; front fender edge becomes belt line, declining character line going forward thru the doorhandles, 'flat' wheel well lips, and two lower, more dramatic flares at the rocker.  

 

Isn't Cadillac up 20% over the last 2 years? That's 'up', not "down".

 

Here's to hoping the new logo goes the way to New Coke, but much faster.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only thing I don't like is the rear spoiler, but guess the extra downforce is a necessity...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I would hold on before judging on these photos.

 

1. It is taken at 300 mm at f5.6, which possibly means at that super-telephoto level, the image will look compressed.

2. The angle from top is possibly not the best one to shoot a car as the plan view dominates the profile and sides.

3. Lighting creates an illusion - Bright sunlight and white do not go well.

If they are a pro photographer, then their 300mm lens should be an APO lens so there is minimal distortion and this should be pretty accurate.

 

Cadillac needs to realize that not every car needs to be blinged out with Chrome. Performance auto's are better looking monochromatic IMHO.

 

 

It is not the distortion from optics but it is the illusion (compression) from physics. A telephoto lens will compress objects closer than a normal range lens would.

 

wntlines.jpg

 

Oh please tell me where is distortion here?

 

Yes your right compression not distortion, course home sick now so my mind sure is not working, but thanks for posting the comparison for all of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on what you want to compress and make not as impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JUST DO IT CADILLAC.  COuld be part of renaming it from ATS to CT3 or CT4.  It looks better too.

 

There's a bit of awkwardness at the top of the window of the rear door, the curve was flattened a bit too much, but otherwise this would benefit Caddy huge.

 

Cadillac_ATS_vs_ATS-L.jpg

 

cadillac-ats-l-china-21.jpg?109b36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I don't like is the top grille looks too small, and the lower air intake under the bumper is huge.  Other cars use that styling cue also, it looks bad on all them.  Why make your grille tiny, when that is a focal point, and make the air intake huge.

 

Not a fan of black wheels on any car, but I am sure they have silver ones too, so not worried about that.  The engine and performance data will be interesting to see how it compares to the Germans.  The Lexus IS-F sucks, so I guess not much to worry about there, unless Lexus learns how to give a car torque.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love that added room of the ATS-L that should be here in America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JUST DO IT CADILLAC.  COuld be part of renaming it from ATS to CT3 or CT4.  It looks better too.

 

There's a bit of awkwardness at the top of the window of the rear door, the curve was flattened a bit too much, but otherwise this would benefit Caddy huge.

 

 

 

 

ATS-L looks good. Its front fascia and grill are different, too, and I like it more than the SWB ATS's front end.

 

But why get an ATS-L when you can get a CTS for 320i money? The deals on CTS are amazing, and I'm surprised it's not selling any better. I'd seriously consider one if I were in the market for a 5-series sized car:

 

kri2o.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think prospective ATS buyers would find it far more significant that the competition has less FRONT legroom than the ATS. Quick, someone 'shop some lines over a 3-series sedan's front door, and let the incessant harping begin.

Edited by balthazar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Trucar doesn't, seemingly, include the cost of options.
How they 'calculate' a new 'actual transaction price' MSRP without such, I've yet to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Trucar doesn't, seemingly, include the cost of options.

How they 'calculate' a new 'actual transaction price' MSRP without such, I've yet to learn.

You configure a vehicle with the options you want, and they give you a quote for that vehicle as-equipped. Click on "Options."

 

TrueCar provides a useful baseline price for car shopping. I configure cars on TrueCar to match what the dealer has in stock, then email the internet sales department to beat the TrueCar price. On every occasion, it's worked. Makes sense, as TrueCar charges dealers $299 per transaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an unusual price... my area is $10k more than that.

I guess my area is very competitive. There are 17 Cadillac dealers within 60 miles of here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks pow, I wasn't processing their site correctly.

 

Now I see verification of exactly what I've been stating here. 2014 mercedes s550 RWD with the middle option package they give there to chose from, reveals a car that MSRP's for 119,095, but that car's average transaction price is 108,230, or $11,270 off sticker.

 

Like I said; MB moves their (retail) s-classes by offering a free smart four two in the deal. In other words; appealing to the value shopper by giving a 5-digit discount. They 'hide' this by only offering 'factory' incentives around a mere 3,000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many claims to the effect that the ATS-V will be powered by the 3.6 Bi-Turbo. GM has not disclosed anything to this regard, so that is speculation at this point. Whether it is educated speculation or not, we'll find out soon enough at the LA Autoshow.

 

Still, it brings back the entire debate on whether the 3.6TT is a better engine than the LT1. And, in this regard, there should be very little argument. If it does indeed use the twin turbo V6, what GM has done is basically chose the heavier, bulkier, laggier, more expensive, lower performance engine in hope that it'll somehow have greater appeal in a performance car.

 

The LT1 is the superior engine in every respect, I mean EVERY. There are plenty of myths out there such as...

 

  • The 3.6 Bi-Turbo is smaller displacement so it should be lighter or more compact? (False; the 3.6 is heavier and taller)
  • The 3.6 Bi-Turbo has better fuel economy? (False, the 3.6 in the CTS-V has similar city MPG and worse Highway MPG)
  • The turbos endow the 3.6 with better low end torque? (False, the 3.6 makes less torque at every point torqur curve from 0 rpm to the rev limit)

 

Here are the cold hard facts.

  • Weight: LF3 3.6TT = 485lbs -- LT1 6.2 = 465lbs
  • Power: LF3 3.6TT = 420bhp -- LT1 6.2 = 460bhp
  • Torque: LF3 3.6TT = 430lb-ft -- LT1 6.2 = 465lb-ft*
  • Turbolag LF3 3.6TT = some -- LT1 6.2 = none
  • Size: LF3 3.6TT = taller -- LT1 6.2 = lower profile
  • MPG: LF3 3.6TT = 17/25 -- LT1 6.2 = 17/30**
  • Service: LF3 3.6TT = complex -- LT1 6.2 = simple
  • Cost: LF3 3.6TT = expensive -- LT1 6.2 = less so
  • Prestige/perception: = Debatable / depends on buyer

* Not just higher maximum torque, but higher torque is EVERY point on the torque curve from 0 rpm to the rev limit.

 

** Based on the EPA numbers for CTS V-sport and Stingray. Projected numbers for the ATS-V is 18/26 using the LF3 vs 16/28 using the LT1 given that the ATS is a lighter car than the CTS and a heavier car than the Stingray.

 

Here are the two engine's torque and power curves superimposed for a crystal clear comparison.

 

ILq50m.jpg

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 78 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac will be unveiling the CT5 sedan at the New York International Auto Show next month. 
      The CT5 is build on the next generation of GM's Alpha platform and will come in rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations.  Power will be provided by either a 2.0T 4-cylinder or 3.0 Twin-Turbo V6.  Both engines will send power to the wheels via a 10-speed automatic transmission.  The CT5  will offer Luxury and Sport trims.
      In a video series called "Sensory Symphony", Cadillac slowly peels back the specially design camouflage film to trigger an ASMR response in the viewer while slowly revealing the car. This is to bring awareness to the CT5's auditory experience with active noise cancellation and other sound optimizations. 
      The Cadillac CT5 will be built at GM's Lansing Grand River plant. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac will be unveiling the CT5 sedan at the New York International Auto Show next month. 
      The CT5 is build on the next generation of GM's Alpha platform and will come in rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations.  Power will be provided by either a 2.0T 4-cylinder or 3.0 Twin-Turbo V6.  Both engines will send power to the wheels via a 10-speed automatic transmission.  The CT5  will offer Luxury and Sport trims.
      In a video series called "Sensory Symphony", Cadillac slowly peels back the specially design camouflage film to trigger an ASMR response in the viewer while slowly revealing the car. This is to bring awareness to the CT5's auditory experience with active noise cancellation and other sound optimizations. 
      The Cadillac CT5 will be built at GM's Lansing Grand River plant. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The saying goes there is no replacement for displacement, but at Cadillac that is no longer the case when it comes to the trunk badges.  Starting in 2020 on the XT6, Cadillac will drop the engine displacement badge from their vehicles. Instead, they will use a number that represents torque in newton-meters and rounded up to the next number that ends in 00 or 50.  Turbo models will get a T, while V-series models will retain their V in place of the number.
      For the XT6, that means its 271 lb-ft of torque converts to 373 newton-meters and then gets rounded up to 400. 
      Once the scheme rolls out to other models it could look like this:
      XT4 2.0T - 350T
      XT5/XT6 3.6 - 400
      Escalade 6.2 - 600  (current model, future model could be different)
      ATS/CTS/CT6 2.0T - 400T (current model, future CT4 and CT5 could be different)
      ATS/CTS/CT6 3.6 - 400
      CTS 3.6TT - 600T
      CT6 3.0T - 550T
      If the V-series cars used the numbers, it would look like this:
      ATS 3.6 TT - 600T
      CTS-V 6.2 - 900(S?)
      CT6-V 4.2T - 850T
      Cadillac President Steve Carlisle said "We're not talking about displacements anymore. [The new badging's] purpose is to communicate power and performance, not just for internal combustion engines, but also for other propulsion."  This is a nod to Cadillac's first all-electric model coming in 2022. Cadillac has not yet revealed what letter the electric vehicles will use. The CT6 PHEV still sold in China could potentially wear a 600 badge.
      This move by Cadillac resembles Audi's move to a horsepower based naming scheme used in Europe.
      The 2020 Cadillac XT6 will be built in Spring Hill TN and will go on sale later this year.
      Related:
      Detroit 2019: 2020 Cadillac XT6
      Cadillac XT6 Gets $53,690 Starting Price
       
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The saying goes there is no replacement for displacement, but at Cadillac that is no longer the case when it comes to the trunk badges.  Starting in 2020 on the XT6, Cadillac will drop the engine displacement badge from their vehicles. Instead, they will use a number that represents torque in newton-meters and rounded up to the next number that ends in 00 or 50.  Turbo models will get a T, while V-series models will retain their V in place of the number.
      For the XT6, that means its 271 lb-ft of torque converts to 373 newton-meters and then gets rounded up to 400. 
      Once the scheme rolls out to other models it could look like this:
      XT4 2.0T - 350T
      XT5/XT6 3.6 - 400
      Escalade 6.2 - 600  (current model, future model could be different)
      ATS/CTS/CT6 2.0T - 400T (current model, future CT4 and CT5 could be different)
      ATS/CTS/CT6 3.6 - 400
      CTS 3.6TT - 600T
      CT6 3.0T - 550T
      If the V-series cars used the numbers, it would look like this:
      ATS 3.6 TT - 600T
      CTS-V 6.2 - 900(S?)
      CT6-V 4.2T - 850T
      Cadillac President Steve Carlisle said "We're not talking about displacements anymore. [The new badging's] purpose is to communicate power and performance, not just for internal combustion engines, but also for other propulsion."  This is a nod to Cadillac's first all-electric model coming in 2022. Cadillac has not yet revealed what letter the electric vehicles will use. The CT6 PHEV still sold in China could potentially wear a 600 badge.
      This move by Cadillac resembles Audi's move to a horsepower based naming scheme used in Europe.
      The 2020 Cadillac XT6 will be built in Spring Hill TN and will go on sale later this year.
      Related:
      Detroit 2019: 2020 Cadillac XT6
      Cadillac XT6 Gets $53,690 Starting Price
       
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Currently, the least expensive way to get into a 3-row Cadillac was to pony up $76 kilo-dollars for a base Cadillac Escalade. Even then, check too many boxes on the option sheet and the price could easily head well into the $80k range.  When the Cadillac XT6 hits dealership later in couple months, that line in the sand will fall by over $20k.
      Cadillac will begin taking orders on the XT6 later this month with a base price starting at $53,690. That gets you a front-wheel drive Premium Luxury model.  The XT6 Sport with standard all-wheel drive starts at $58,090 (including destination charge for both).
      All XT6 models are powered by a 3.6 liter V6 producing 310 hp and a 9-speed automatic transmission shifting power to the wheels.  Active fuel management and Start/Stop are standard.  The Sport model features standard Continuous Damping Control suspension.
      You can read more about the Cadillac XT6 from our coverage of the reveal at the 2019 Detroit Auto Show.
       

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...