Jump to content
William Maley

GM News: General Motors Agrees To $900 Million Settlement Over Ignition Switch

Recommended Posts

General Motors has agreed to a $900 million settlement with the U.S. Government over a criminal case dealing with faulty ignition switches.

 

According to Reuters, prosecutors charged the company with wire fraud and scheming to conceal material facts from a U.S. regulator. The company acknowledged that it didn't reveal the issue to safety watchdogs or customers in due course. Along with the fine, GM will have an independent monitor to oversee its recall and safety-related practices for the next three years. If GM follows this along with other obligations, the criminal charges will be dropped.

 

“They let the public down... They didn’t tell the truth,” said U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in a press conference this morning in New York City.

 

"The mistakes that led to the ignition switch recall should never have happened," said GM CEO Mary Barra in a statement. "We have apologized and we do so again today."

 

Now at this time, the Justice Department hasn't charged any individual over the ignition switch problem. This has caused some criticism to come out.

 

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

Bharara hasn't ruled out charging individual GM employees, but explained there are "legal and factual" challenges to bringing them to trial. "The law does not always let us do what we wish we could do."

 

Separately, General Motors has agreed to $575 million settlement dealing with civil lawsuits.

 

Source: Reuters, The Detroit News (2)


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever one's opinions were on the issue, it is an appropriate time for closure. Given the precedent set by the fine levied against Toyota the punishment seems appropriate.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that this is time to put this to rest and move forward. Just at Toyota paid 1.2 Billion for their recall issues, this is inline with this recall issue.

 

I expect FCA to pay about the same amount due to the lack of follow through on their recalls especially in regards to the deaths by fire on the gas tank issues.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest wings4life

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

 

 

Oh there is certainly a uproar.  From the link below,

 

"Hundreds of deaths resulted from GM's conduct, and yet they simply write a check and go home. This is a remarkably jaw-dropping and incredibly sad result."

- Robert Hilliard

 

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/17/safety-advocates-disgusted-justice-department-gm-deal/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever one's opinions were on the issue, it is an appropriate time for closure. Given the precedent set by the fine levied against Toyota the punishment seems appropriate.

In my opinion, closure would be those individuals not working their anymore..or auto company ever again.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is no different than any of the other big defect issues covered up. Nor did anyone go to jail from the Power issues in California that made the Erin Brockovich story so big.

 

We have had decades of these cover ups and people expect it to change?

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is no different than any of the other big defect issues covered up. Nor did anyone go to jail from the Power issues in California that made the Erin Brockovich story so big.

 

We have had decades of these cover ups and people expect it to change?

Did they lose their jobs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly. Who knows?

But to hear such inanities from folks who root for the brand that produced the Pinto and Explorer makes me want to vomit.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

+1

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

 

 

Oh there is certainly a uproar.  From the link below,

 

"Hundreds of deaths resulted from GM's conduct, and yet they simply write a check and go home. This is a remarkably jaw-dropping and incredibly sad result."

- Robert Hilliard

 

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/17/safety-advocates-disgusted-justice-department-gm-deal/

In full agreement.
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here is the deal.

 

GM did wrong with the Cheap switch and should be penalized for it. Their damaged culture made this an easy thing to hide in such a large company. Odds are one or two people screwed up and covered their asses. There were some people let go but many had already left with the bail out so some may have already been gone.

 

Now where I do not agree with the settlements is where drivers who died because of their own actions after the ignition cut out. The simple facts are this. The columns do not lock and the car generally can be turned enough to get to the side of the road. Second the Air Bags are a secondary restraint and need to be used with a belt. Brakes were still operational as with the check valve in the booster you get 2-3 stops with full power assist. Finally a driver with all their faculties generally can shift to neutral and restart the car. Many of these accidents could have been avoided and many of the deaths were due to the choices and condition they put themselves in, My point in these cases is GM should share responsibility but if the driver was impaired, not belted and or speeding or in an out of control condition they also too should share in this.

To be this is like the case we had locally where a driver of a Blazer hit a tree drunk at 90 MPH and it caught fire and burned him to death. GM was not allowed to add in the driver was drunk at the time of the accident and the fact that hitting a tree at 90 MPH could result in a fired that could kill a person impaired.

 

This was a case where a company did screw up but in many cases so did the driver and many times it directly resulted in the difference of them living and dying. The ignition may have contributed but the 70 MPH in a 25 zone, drunk and no belt was the life and death part of the equation.

 

The one good thing that did come from this for GM is the fact this went down around the time Mary was fighting the old Culture people still in GM after the bail out. This pretty much shut them down and let her make the needed changed to fix many of these bad culture things. Lutz started the purge and Mary gain a lot of traction once this issue came up. Because of it today GM is farther along with the correction to their corporate culture than they would have been with out it. It is sad it took this but at least some good came of it and it will help prevent this from happening again;. It is good when a company does become better due to a crisis but too often they don't.

 

Not all customers are innocent and not all corporations are corrupt. Each side has their share of good and bad. That is just human nature and the right culture will help keep it in check. The GM culture was so bad they would often time do more damage to themselves.

 

Also to bring people to trial is not easy in cases like this. Odds are the evidence to all involved may be circumstantial at best or we would have seen the government take specific people to task. We have to remember this is the company so incompetent as recent as 2005 when asked by Lutz why they could not make panel gaps as well as Hyundai he was told we can but we were never told to do it nor could they ask. Yes it was that bad inside back then. Not an excuse just a reflection of what was going on and how bad it was. They could not even take care of themselves.

Edited by hyperv6
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a lot of complexity to how a corporation is organized that makes it very difficult to actually charge employees of a corporation found to be the actual perpetrators of the offences charged to the entity. Only in the most hideous and heinous of crimes is it possible to actually separate the employees or any related party within the entity from the entity itself.

 

Limited liability makes it that it is the corporation itself as an entity that gets blamed first. Then the case is made of the groups that comprise the entity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

+1

 

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

 

 

Oh there is certainly a uproar.  From the link below,

 

"Hundreds of deaths resulted from GM's conduct, and yet they simply write a check and go home. This is a remarkably jaw-dropping and incredibly sad result."

- Robert Hilliard

 

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/17/safety-advocates-disgusted-justice-department-gm-deal/

In full agreement.

 

 

Writing a check and going home?

 

GM as a corporation was grilled night and day with this fiasco...

 

Many people wont buy a GM vehicle every again...

The thing is...a 2016 Cadillac CT6 has nothing to do with a 2002 Chevrolet Cobalt...in that the people in charge of manufacturing cheap parts in the Cobalt are no longer around to make such decisions on the Cadillac CT6...

 

The people that did the damage are running around free...

 

2 different things...

And THAT is why I downvoted...

 

A company has NOTHING to do with ANY good or bad...it is the people that run the company...and like Hyper mentioned...most if not all ppeople that had something to do with this already left the company...

 

Again...why I downvoted...because this burnt LS7 dude is one biased poster...

 

ANYTHING to denounce GM...

 

I wonder if you commented on the latest corrupt corporation thread over at VW???!!!

 

Nah...just ignore the VW thing...

Its only American car companies and especially GM that screw the American consumer and its only American car companies especially GM that circumvent American laws just to beefen up the bottom line...

 

 

And no...deaths are deaths and circumventing software programs to allow to pollute are 2 different things...but...one is not more evil when corruption is concerned...

 

But because we have a biased poster in da house...I decided to make him and VW an example...

 

And no...not because "everybody does it"  that GM or VW CEOs should be let free with a slap on their wrists....and not because VW is German and GM is American that we should hate on VW more than GM or vice versa....

 

What Im trying to say that..is...instead of looking at a specific car company to crucify...why dont we focus on the stupid corrupt corporation culture in general and stop THAT culture from repeating itself time and time again...  the PEOPLE...the HUMANS involved!!!

 

The way you agreed to those stupid articles...its like you are ready to boycott GM..and ONLY GM...well....start boycotting just about 90% of ALL corporations...because one way or other...the people that run ALL corporations are one way or other...CORRUPT...from hidden defects that kill people...to sexual assaulting fellow employees...to racial/gender/sexual/religious discrimination...

There's a lot of complexity to how a corporation is organized that makes it very difficult to actually charge employees of a corporation found to be the actual perpetrators of the offences charged to the entity. Only in the most hideous and heinous of crimes is it possible to actually separate the employees or any related party within the entity from the entity itself.

 

Limited liability makes it that it is the corporation itself as an entity that gets blamed first. Then the case is made of the groups that comprise the entity.

No its not...

politicians have made such laws...the ones that are just as corrupt as the people that run those companies...just reverse the laws and bring back the political power to the average citizen...

 

And you know who actually changes that?

 

The average citizen!!!

Except the average North American citizen couldnt be bothered...

 

A country like Greece however...the people...forced the entire European Community to re-think its strategy on the bailouts and the Austerity measures forced upon them...with a fast referendum...that had to take place...and they rejected what was offered to them...which forced big wig banks guys and German politicians to re-think what it is they were doing...when they were THREATENING to dismantle Greece if they went on with a referendum...

 

Power to the people...is something we North Americans yell constantly...but we do nothing about it!!!

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course...burnt LS7 downvotes...

 

Chicken shyte...offer a rebuttal...

 

But no...like a baby...like a spoiled modern society self important dweeb...stamp on the ground and downvote...

 

I think I found you your life's soul mate...

Go to Vancouver Island...she is awaiting for you...

 

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

+1

“GM killed over 100 people by knowingly putting a defective ignition switch into over 1 million vehicles. Yet no one from GM went to jail or was even charged with criminal homicide. This shows a weakness in the law not a weakness in the facts," said Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety.

 

 

That line stands out to me and bothers me the most. Knowing those people are still employed AND never faced any criminal charges after KNOWINGLY putting a defective ignition switch in.

 

 

Oh there is certainly a uproar.  From the link below,

 

"Hundreds of deaths resulted from GM's conduct, and yet they simply write a check and go home. This is a remarkably jaw-dropping and incredibly sad result."

- Robert Hilliard

 http://www.autoblog.com/2015/09/17/safety-advocates-disgusted-justice-department-gm-deal/

In full agreement.

 

Writing a check and going home?

 

GM as a corporation was grilled night and day with this fiasco...

 

Many people wont buy a GM vehicle every again...

The thing is...a 2016 Cadillac CT6 has nothing to do with a 2002 Chevrolet Cobalt...in that the people in charge of manufacturing cheap parts in the Cobalt are no longer around to make such decisions on the Cadillac CT6...

 

The people that did the damage are running around free...

 

2 different things...

And THAT is why I downvoted...

 

A company has NOTHING to do with ANY good or bad...it is the people that run the company...and like Hyper mentioned...most if not all ppeople that had something to do with this already left the company...

 

Again...why I downvoted...because this burnt LS7 dude is one biased poster...

 

ANYTHING to denounce GM...

 

I wonder if you commented on the latest corrupt corporation thread over at VW???!!!

 

Nah...just ignore the VW thing...

Its only American car companies and especially GM that screw the American consumer and its only American car companies especially GM that circumvent American laws just to beefen up the bottom line...

 

 

And no...deaths are deaths and circumventing software programs to allow to pollute are 2 different things...but...one is not more evil when corruption is concerned...

 

But because we have a biased poster in da house...I decided to make him and VW an example...

 

And no...not because "everybody does it"  that GM or VW CEOs should be let free with a slap on their wrists....and not because VW is German and GM is American that we should hate on VW more than GM or vice versa....

 

What Im trying to say that..is...instead of looking at a specific car company to crucify...why dont we focus on the stupid corrupt corporation culture in general and stop THAT culture from repeating itself time and time again...  the PEOPLE...the HUMANS involved!!!

 

The way you agreed to those stupid articles...its like you are ready to boycott GM..and ONLY GM...well....start boycotting just about 90% of ALL corporations...because one way or other...the people that run ALL corporations are one way or other...CORRUPT...from hidden defects that kill people...to sexual assaulting fellow employees...to racial/gender/sexual/religious discrimination...

I have to kind of disagree with the line(sorry quoting and $h! is nearly impossible from a phone so I apologize if I botched editing what I'm even quoting) "The thing is...a 2016 Cadillac CT6 has nothing to do with a 2002 Chevrolet Cobalt...in that the people in charge of manufacturing cheap parts in the Cobalt are no longer around to make such decisions on the Cadillac CT6..." it kind of does because while Hyper and you say "most if not all" of the employees from that situation are gone that isn't really a complete known. It is just an assumption/guess. Which, in my opinion, is the ONLY thing that bothers me still. They are paying their financial dues yada yada yada.. I understand that. But those people who KNEW they were defective parts(which there were people that knew) shouldn't have a job there anymore, for sure. Period. I understand things come from the top, which has changed, but there were still people who KNEW they were defective. Again, this is just my opinion. But I know that knowing they are still there... There are too many other car companies right now to choose from making great cars to give them a leg up at all. I cannot and will not completely shut them out but it's just another part that grinds my gears about GM.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have to kind of disagree with the line(sorry quoting and $h! is nearly impossible from a phone so I apologize if I botched editing what I'm even quoting) "The thing is...a 2016 Cadillac CT6 has nothing to do with a 2002 Chevrolet Cobalt...in that the people in charge of manufacturing cheap parts in the Cobalt are no longer around to make such decisions on the Cadillac CT6..." it kind of does because while Hyper and you say "most if not all" of the employees from that situation are gone that isn't really a complete known. It is just an assumption/guess. Which, in my opinion, is the ONLY thing that bothers me still. They are paying their financial dues yada yada yada.. I understand that. But those people who KNEW they were defective parts(which there were people that knew) shouldn't have a job there anymore, for sure. Period. I understand things come from the top, which has changed, but there were still people who KNEW they were defective. Again, this is just my opinion. But I know that knowing they are still there... There are too many other car companies right now to choose from making great cars to give them a leg up at all. I cannot and will not completely shut them out but it's just another part that grinds my gears about GM.

 

That is thing though...you also speculated that some of those people are actually still employed there...

 

BTW...you bought a Fprd product in 2013, like myself...in the 1970s...Ford killed many also...to say that they learned their lesson from gas tanks and such...the Panther cars had the same problem as the Pinto cars in the late 1990s...yet...you still bought a Ford...

 

 

OK...That was the 1970s...and the 1990s...

Toyota...Unintended accelration.

Honda...Takata...airbags.

Audi...unintended acceleration

VW and Audi...circumventing software that masks air pollution...sure its serious...

 

So...now that we;ve eliminated 6 car companies...including GM and Ford just to be fair..because to say ts ONLY GM its ludicrous..maybe now if you tell me your next car will come from Chrysler...oops...they too have had corruption...OK...7 car companies...

 

To say that your next vehicle will come from Volvo, Mazda and Peugeot..Ill buy into your logic and thought process...but if not...Im sorry...but your logic is a no go with me...

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olds, I never meant to vouch for Limited Liability. It's pretty clear from Ccap's post. If any of those employees come forward with their previous knowledge of it; there would be a lot of cries for accessory charges.

 

Them being quiet is what is keeping a potential floodgate of litigation (yes even more) closed. 

 

Anyways, lets move on!

 

...If someone could model the effective Nox emissions of the average VW Tdi model and the effective death per ton of Nox emmisions (various health complications. (There's too many variables to control really, but for the basis of talking points)....

 

It'd be interesting if VW would not only be fined for the emissions violations but for the latent damage that the vastly higher than expected emissions cause. I mean it's a real phenomenon; thousands of people die because of all the respiratory problems caused by it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Burnt LS7...

 

You could downvote this too...

 

It just show hw much of a loser you really are...

 

You stated an opinion...I countered...and no other rebuttal...

 

Why is that?

because it shows you are a weasel...a biased poster against one bloody company...

 

I dont care....GM or Ford or Honda...they are all corporations with their CEOs thinking about THEIR own bottom line and THEIR own well being...not mine...

 

Be a stooge in hatin' GM and lovin' whatever company makes you cream your pants....and stooge you are...because you have no intelligence to back up ANY opinion you may have...and THAT is sad...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to kind of disagree with the line(sorry quoting and $h! is nearly impossible from a phone so I apologize if I botched editing what I'm even quoting) "The thing is...a 2016 Cadillac CT6 has nothing to do with a 2002 Chevrolet Cobalt...in that the people in charge of manufacturing cheap parts in the Cobalt are no longer around to make such decisions on the Cadillac CT6..." it kind of does because while Hyper and you say "most if not all" of the employees from that situation are gone that isn't really a complete known. It is just an assumption/guess. Which, in my opinion, is the ONLY thing that bothers me still. They are paying their financial dues yada yada yada.. I understand that. But those people who KNEW they were defective parts(which there were people that knew) shouldn't have a job there anymore, for sure. Period. I understand things come from the top, which has changed, but there were still people who KNEW they were defective. Again, this is just my opinion. But I know that knowing they are still there... There are too many other car companies right now to choose from making great cars to give them a leg up at all. I cannot and will not completely shut them out but it's just another part that grinds my gears about GM.

That is thing though...you also speculated that some of those people are actually still employed there...

 

BTW...you bought a Fprd product in 2013, like myself...in the 1970s...Ford killed many also...to say that they learned their lesson from gas tanks and such...the Panther cars had the same problem as the Pinto cars in the late 1990s...yet...you still bought a Ford...

 

 

OK...That was the 1970s...and the 1990s...

Toyota...Unintended accelration.

Honda...Takata...airbags.

Audi...unintended acceleration

VW and Audi...circumventing software that masks air pollution...sure its serious...

 

So...now that we;ve eliminated 6 car companies...including GM and Ford just to be fair..because to say ts ONLY GM its ludicrous..maybe now if you tell me your next car will come from Chrysler...oops...they too have had corruption...OK...7 car companies...

 

To say that your next vehicle will come from Volvo, Mazda and Peugeot..Ill buy into your logic and thought process...but if not...Im sorry...but your logic is a no go with me...

You are correct but I believe in the Article the way it was worded made it sound like they are still working there as the employees back in the 70's I have absolutely no clue about. I have said it before about the GM situation that..time heals all wounds. And I believe it with this as well. Well, ford has airbag issues as well, I believe. I think I have a current outstanding recall for an air bag. It just isn't one of the takata ones. With those other problems was their proof that said employees KNEW about the problem while continuing to use the part in the cars? Or was it just a big fck up that was discovered later? Honestly, I do not know that answer. But that is my gripe. They knew and possibly still have a job there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olds, I never meant to vouch for Limited Liability. It's pretty clear from Ccap's post. If any of those employees come forward with their previous knowledge of it; there would be a lot of cries for accessory charges.

 

Them being quiet is what is keeping a potential floodgate of litigation (yes even more) closed. 

 

Anyways, lets move on!

 

...If someone could model the effective Nox emissions of the average VW Tdi model and the effective death per ton of Nox emmisions (various health complications. (There's too many variables to control really, but for the basis of talking points)....

 

It'd be interesting if VW would not only be fined for the emissions violations but for the latent damage that the vastly higher than expected emissions cause. I mean it's a real phenomenon; thousands of people die because of all the respiratory problems caused by it.

That is a very interesting way to look at that. I like it. It's a regulation for a reason. That one may take much more work to prove a death but you can guarantee people are looking into it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then again, the `~$38,000 dollar fine per vehicle probably accounts for the latent damage.

 

I mean $18 billion dollars would bankrupt VW, but if they could cough up the dough... 

 

Let's continue this convo in the VW thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I have to kind of disagree with the line(sorry quoting and $h! is nearly impossible from a phone so I apologize if I botched editing what I'm even quoting) "The thing is...a 2016 Cadillac CT6 has nothing to do with a 2002 Chevrolet Cobalt...in that the people in charge of manufacturing cheap parts in the Cobalt are no longer around to make such decisions on the Cadillac CT6..." it kind of does because while Hyper and you say "most if not all" of the employees from that situation are gone that isn't really a complete known. It is just an assumption/guess. Which, in my opinion, is the ONLY thing that bothers me still. They are paying their financial dues yada yada yada.. I understand that. But those people who KNEW they were defective parts(which there were people that knew) shouldn't have a job there anymore, for sure. Period. I understand things come from the top, which has changed, but there were still people who KNEW they were defective. Again, this is just my opinion. But I know that knowing they are still there... There are too many other car companies right now to choose from making great cars to give them a leg up at all. I cannot and will not completely shut them out but it's just another part that grinds my gears about GM.

That is thing though...you also speculated that some of those people are actually still employed there...

 

BTW...you bought a Fprd product in 2013, like myself...in the 1970s...Ford killed many also...to say that they learned their lesson from gas tanks and such...the Panther cars had the same problem as the Pinto cars in the late 1990s...yet...you still bought a Ford...

 

 

OK...That was the 1970s...and the 1990s...

Toyota...Unintended accelration.

Honda...Takata...airbags.

Audi...unintended acceleration

VW and Audi...circumventing software that masks air pollution...sure its serious...

 

So...now that we;ve eliminated 6 car companies...including GM and Ford just to be fair..because to say ts ONLY GM its ludicrous..maybe now if you tell me your next car will come from Chrysler...oops...they too have had corruption...OK...7 car companies...

 

To say that your next vehicle will come from Volvo, Mazda and Peugeot..Ill buy into your logic and thought process...but if not...Im sorry...but your logic is a no go with me...

You are correct but I believe in the Article the way it was worded made it sound like they are still working there as the employees back in the 70's I have absolutely no clue about. I have said it before about the GM situation that..time heals all wounds. And I believe it with this as well. Well, ford has airbag issues as well, I believe. I think I have a current outstanding recall for an air bag. It just isn't one of the takata ones. With those other problems was their proof that said employees KNEW about the problem while continuing to use the part in the cars? Or was it just a big fck up that was discovered later? Honestly, I do not know that answer. But that is my gripe. They knew and possibly still have a job there.

 

Yeah...Ford has an airbag recall....My Fusion has it too..

 

Is yours about some sort of module being defective and in case of a crash...the airbag might not deploy?

 

Maybe they are working at GM still...

 

This is why I said...instead of "boycotting" GM, why dont we actually fight to get these guys FIRED from GM...and put on trial?

 

Not only GM employees ...Delco employess too...because I remember even some engineers at Delco KNEW that the part would fail...told their bosses, but their bosses did nothing also...because contract is too big to deny...everybody it seems was thinking in terms of money...

 

EVERYBODY HAS A MORAL OBLIGATION.  The excuse of...I was just doing my job...should not fly in a circumstance like this one.

 

We..have turned into a society of zombies only looking at money and material objects...

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anon

Glad to see some sensible posts on this topic. Let's not forget, as some will now try and misdirect our attention and focus on VW and their criminal behavior as of late, that GM was once fined a then record $45 million in 1995 for what amounted to practically the same offense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to see some sensible posts on this topic. Let's not forget, as some will now try and misdirect our attention and focus on VW and their criminal behavior as of late, that GM was once fined a then record $45 million in 1995 for what amounted to practically the same offense. 

Glad to see that you are still a hater...

 

Here...I nice photograph of a nice VW Beetle approx 80 years ago...

rare-history-photos-8-638.jpg?cb=1424457

 

volkswagen-beetle-hitler.png

 

I think that what VW has done in history is a far worse crime than what GM has done...

 

WHAT???

 

213624008_624.v1414922051.jpg

 

Yup...VW Beetle underneath those military clothes...

 

I see that you dont want to let go of GM's crap...Im curious though...have you forgiven and forgave VW?

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 16 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      In April of 2013, Ford and General Motors announced they would be working together on developing new nine and ten-speed automatic transmissions. The nine-speed automatic would be for front-wheel drive models, while rear-drive models got the ten-speed. Already, a number of Ford and GM vehicles are using the ten-speed. But GM will be the only one using the nine-speed.
      Automotive News reports that Ford is electing to use a new series of eight-speed automatic transmission on their vehicles. The company said the new nine-speed didn't provide enough of an improvement in fuel economy to justify the added cost and weight. According to a source, Ford made this decision before GM began to use this transmission on their production models.
      "Typically, if anyone gave me a transmission that didn't require much work, outside of tuning it for a specific vehicle, I would take it and run. It's a lot of design work after the fact to come up with their own flavor. It shows there might be some different schools of thought in terms of transmission efficiency," said Dave Sullivan, an analyst with AutoPacific Inc.
      While GM claims the nine-speed brings “smoother shifts” and a better driving experience, it hasn't brought any real gains to fuel economy. The 2017 Chevrolet Malibu 2.0T only saw an increase of one mpg on the highway when compared to the 2016 model with a six-speed automatic (33 vs. 32). The 2019 Buick Envision 2.0T saw its highway fuel economy drop by one when equipped with the nine-speed auto (25 vs. 26).
      It should be noted that one of the eight-speed transmissions Ford is using is based on the new nine-speed, minus a gear.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Cadillac's leadership is seeing a major change as current president Johan de Nysschen will be stepping down effective immediately. In his place will be Steve Carlisle who is currently president and managing director of GM Canada.
      “We appreciate Johan’s efforts over the last four years in setting a stronger foundation for Cadillac. Looking forward, the world is changing rapidly, and, beginning with the launch of the new XT4, it is paramount that we capitalize immediately on the opportunities that arise from this rate of change. This move will further accelerate our efforts in that regard,” said General Motors President Dan Ammann in a statement.
      No reason was given as to why de Nysschen is leaving after leading the brand for over three years. His tenure saw Cadillac make a number of dramatic changes including moving the brand's headquarters to New York City and introducing a new nomenclature system.
      Steve Carlisle has been part of GM since 1982 when he was an industrial engineering co-op student at the Oshawa assembly plant. He was named the president of GM Canada back in 2014 and helped the region get back on its feet. Last year, GM was number one in retail sales in Canada, with Buick, Cadillac, and GMC posting their best ever sales.
      “The potential for Cadillac across the globe is incredible and I’m honored to be chosen to be a part of mapping that future. I look forward to building on our current momentum as we continue on our mission to position Cadillac at the pinnacle of luxury,” said Carlisle.
      We'll be updating this story if any new information comes out.
      UPDATE: Automotive News and Wards Auto have learned some possible reasons as to why de Nysschen was shown the door. One is Cadillac's slumping sales. In 2017, sales in the U.S. dropped eight percent - the second straight year of a sales decline. Sales are doing slightly better in 2018 - up 8.1 percent - some of this is due to incentives being placed on slow-selling models.
      Project Pinnacle which was de Nysschen's ambitious incentive plan that would divide dealers into five tiers based on sales volume. Each tier would have different requirements in terms of showroom and service, along with perks. One contentious point that irked a number of dealers was smaller dealers setting up a "virtual showroom" where buyers could order vehicles. These dealers would not be able to stock Cadillac vehicles. Since then, Project Pinnacle has undergone a number of changes.
      Wards Auto says de Nysschen didn't move fast enough to join the fast-growing trend of crossovers. Cadillac has introduced the XT4 at the New York Auto Show last month are there plans to launch a couple more in the coming years, but this is only going to widen the gap between Cadillac and competitors.
      Both outlets report there has been growing tension between de Nysschen and GM. Such examples include him proclaiming that "Cadillac would be the technical leader at GM in the future," partly due to the launch of SuperCruise. Apparently, de Nysschen forgot about the Chevrolet Bolt and Volt. There was also the comment he made about Apple's CarPlay saying it was “extremely clunky”. (Mr. de Nysschen, have you even used CUE?! -WM)
      Source: General Motors
      GM Names Steve Carlisle Senior VP and President, Cadillac
      Johan de Nysschen leaves GM to pursue other interests; Travis Hester becomes president and managing director, GM Canada DETROIT — General Motors today announced the appointment of Steve Carlisle as General Motors senior vice president and president, Cadillac, replacing Johan de Nysschen, who is leaving the company effective immediately.
      Travis Hester, currently vice president, Global Product Programs, is named president and managing director, GM Canada, replacing Carlisle. The transition will begin immediately.
      “We appreciate Johan’s efforts over the last four years in setting a stronger foundation for Cadillac,” said General Motors President Dan Ammann. “Looking forward, the world is changing rapidly, and, beginning with the launch of the new XT4, it is paramount that we capitalize immediately on the opportunities that arise from this rate of change. This move will further accelerate our efforts in that regard.”
      Carlisle was most recently president and managing director of GM Canada, where he led a resurgence of the GM Canada franchise. In 2017, GM was number one in automotive retail sales in Canada, with Buick, GMC and Cadillac achieving their best ever sales years. Carlisle also reestablished key relationships in Canada with retailers, employees and government officials.
      “The potential for Cadillac across the globe is incredible and I’m honored to be chosen to be a part of mapping that future,” said Carlisle. “I look forward to building on our current momentum as we continue on our mission to position Cadillac at the pinnacle of luxury.”
      Carlisle will report to Dan Ammann.
      Carlisle began his GM career in 1982 as an industrial engineering co-op student at the Oshawa Truck Assembly Plant. Over the course of his career with General Motors, Carlisle has held several senior leadership positions that have taken him across the globe, including vice president, Global Product Planning (2010-2014); vice president, U.S. Sales Operations (2010); and president and managing director, Southeast Asia Operations (2007-2010).
      Hester brings extensive global leadership and global product development experience to his new role at GM Canada. Since 2016, he has led the team responsible for balancing all aspects of vehicle development, including quality, cost, appearance, purchasing, customer acceptance and performance targets.
      Hester will report to Alan Batey, president, GM North America.
      Hester began his GM career in 1995 in Australia as a technical support engineer for GM Holden. He held a variety of positions in Australia before moving to the U.S. in 2005. Since 2005, Hester has held engineering positions in both the U.S. and China, including chief engineer for several global premium luxury vehicles, the Buick Regal, Buick LaCrosse and the Chevrolet Sonic. Hester became vice president, Global Product Programs, in 2016.

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Another day, another raid by German prosecutors into Volkswagen's diesel emission scandal. Yesterday, 160 investigators conducted searches in about 10 premises in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg owned by Porsche. Prosecutors said in a statement to Reuters the raids are part of an investigation into Porsche employees on charges of fraud and fraudulent advertising tied to the cheating software used on diesel engines.
      “The three suspects include a member of the management board and a member of Porsche AG’s higher management. The third suspect is no longer employed at Porsche AG,” said prosecutors.
      A Porsche spokesman confirmed the searches to Reuters, but declined to comment any further.
      On the same day, two Audi sites were also searched according to Stuttgart prosecutors and an Audi spokesman. The searches relate to another investigation dealing with the diesel emission scandal.
      Source: Reuters

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Ahead of releasing this month's sales numbers, General Motors has announced that it will start reporting sales quarterly instead of monthly.
      “Thirty days is not enough time to separate real sales trends from short-term fluctuations in a very dynamic, highly competitive market. Reporting sales quarterly better aligns with our business, and the quality of information will make it easier to see how the business is performing,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president, Sales Operations in a statement this morning.
      GM cites many reasons for the change to quarterly reporting - weather, product launches, number of selling days, incentives, and seasonal factors.
      “It’s not that (GM) doesn’t want to talk about how many cars they are selling or if they’re having a bad month. They’re still going to report everything quarterly,” explained IHS Markit analyst Stephanie Brinley.
      “It changes the tone of the story, because with month-to-month results it is difficult to really get a good picture of the industry.”
      "I understand the reasons they are doing it. There can be a lot of fluctuation during a month," said Michelle Krebs, executive analyst with Autotrader to Automotive News.
      Krebs went onto say that other automakers might consider following General Motors lead. She used the example of Chrysler which ended the practice of reporting sales-figures for 10 days in 1991. Other automakers would follow suit, but it took some time. GM didn't make the switch till 1994.
      "What happened was they decided to go monthly, and everybody did it. That would make me believe everybody is going to follow suit and follow GM's lead."
      But this move could bring forth some unattended consequences. Monthly sales numbers are used by many people and industries to help gauge the economy. It could also make estimates made by third-parties not fully reflect the automaker’s performance.
      “Right now, the market looks at whether someone comes in above or below forecasts. If GM’s sales are estimated monthly, those estimates could be really high and then the results come in lower when you look at quarterly sales. That could have unintended consequences.”
      But the inverse - GM posting higher sales numbers than what was estimated - is also true.
      One thing is certain, we just don't know how this is going to work out.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Detroit News, General Motors
      Press Release is on Page 2


      GM to Begin Reporting U.S. Sales on a Quarterly Basis
      DETROIT – General Motors announced today it will begin reporting its U.S. vehicle sales on a quarterly basis, effective immediately. In 2018, second quarter sales will be released on July 3, third quarter sales on October 2 and fourth quarter sales on January 3, 2019.
      “Thirty days is not enough time to separate real sales trends from short-term fluctuations in a very dynamic, highly competitive market,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president, Sales Operations. “Reporting sales quarterly better aligns with our business, and the quality of information will make it easier to see how the business is performing.”
      In the auto industry, monthly sales are subject to many issues that make them more volatile than quarterly sales, including product launch activity, weather, other seasonal factors, the number of selling days and incentive activity.
      GM’s high level of transparency on total, brand and nameplate sales, fleet mix and inventory will not change. The company will also continue sharing J.D. Power PIN estimates for incentive spending and average transaction prices.
      The company’s March 2018 U.S. sales will be released today at 9:30 a.m. EDT.

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The U.S. Justice Department has offered Fiat Chrysler Automobiles a possible settlement over its emissions-cheating EcoDiesel engine. But it will likely cost FCA a large chunk of cash.
      Bloomberg obtained a copy of the settlement offer that was sent to FCA's lawyers. The key detail of the proposed settlement says the settlement “must include very substantial civil penalties” that discourage others future violations and that “adequately reflect the seriousness of the conduct that led to these violations.” The proposed settlement doesn't mention an end of the criminal investigation by the Justice Department.
      Spokespeople for FCA did not respond for comment.
      Bloomberg also obtained a term sheet sent by FCA to Government lawyers back in December. In the sheet, FCA acknowledged that the final settlement would include "civil penalties, an emissions fix for the diesel vehicles and environmental mitigation efforts." The mitigation efforts could include "projects to promote low- or zero-emissions “mobility projects”."
      The saga of FCA's EcoDiesel mess dates back to last January when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accused the automaker of having multiple defeat devices installed on the 3.0L EcoDiesel V6 - used in the Ram 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee. Since then, FCA has been working with the EPA and Justice Department on trying to clear this mess up. The automaker has also brought their 2017 and 2018 models equipped with the EcoDiesel into compliance via new software and hopes to do the same for the older models.
      Source: Bloomberg

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.