Jump to content

Chrysler News: FCA and PSA are in Merger Talks


Recommended Posts

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA are in merger talks.  This after the failed merger negotiations last spring between FCA and Renault.   The merger is reportedly an all-share merger of equals with PSA CEO Carlos Tavares at the helm as CEO and FCA Chairman John Elkann retaining his position in the new company. 

The "talks are fluid" and the paper reported that "no guarantee that any final agreement will be reached".

FCA had previously turned down a merger offer from PSA back in March.  PSA is still digesting their acquisition of Opel from General Motors.


View full article

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The 300 is a full size.  The wheelbase is only a couple inches shorter than the CT6.  It just has shorter overhangs.   In fact, the wheelbase is about 9 inches longer than the full size Impala.  The w

Better bundle up for the freezing Pacific North"Wet" Fall and Winter weather. 😜 Drizzle?! Is that what you guys call steady rain now just to feel better about it? 🤣

FCA needs to discontinue Chrysler model vehicles already, they're just hogging capital and plant space.

FCA needs to discontinue Chrysler model vehicles already, they're just hogging capital and plant space.

Edited by USA-1
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, balthazar said:

And what are fiat & alfa doing??

Good point, those two need to go too, Fiat for sure. I was just thinking the Domestic side of FCA with the next UAW strike looming. Although I do like the Alfa Ro Guilia Quadrifoglio always have since the new ones came out, neighbor has a bright blue one that looks pretty sweet and the exhaust note is pretty burly for a TTV6. I know they're pretty unreliable still, but it looks different and stands out from the crowd. AR's have a poor reliability image and are too overpriced to be successful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is tremendous brand overlap that has to be solved with all these. But if you look at it from a standpoint of engines and transmissions, battery and electric motor, etc,  you really need like 3 four cylinder engines and a couple V6 that could get spread across 3 million units per year.  And probably 3-4 platforms that can underpin 30 different models and all you have to change is the styling.

For sure need Ram, Jeep and Peugeot, and they need a luxury brand so Alfa or Maserati has to stay.  They don’t need 12 brands though probably 5-6 will do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, balthazar said:

Don't forget lancia- the brand sold 300K units in 1990, it's down to 48K in 2018, 80% of those sales in just Italy. FCA has allowed it to die on the vine. Kill Lancia; the money is better utilized at Chrysler.

Lancia is just a Chrysler 300 with a Thema badge on it. They only have the one model

Edit: I told a lie. The Ypsilon is still in production. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Lancia is just a Chrysler 300 with a Thema badge on it. They only have the one model

Edit: I told a lie. The Ypsilon is still in production. 

Really? Jeez, Daimler/Chrysler really got their money out of that Benz platform, old E Class right? Has to be well over 15 yrs. old by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

Really? Jeez, Daimler/Chrysler really got their money out of that Benz platform, old E Class right? Has to be well over 15 yrs. old by now.

The LX platform is not an old E-class platform.  They used the rear suspension, the transmission, and some of the switch gear from the E-Class and that was it, and that was only in the first generation.  By the time the second generation rolled around, there was no Benz left except for the 5-speed automatic in the V8 models. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The LX platform is not an old E-class platform.  They used the rear suspension, the transmission, and some of the switch gear from the E-Class and that was it, and that was only in the first generation.  By the time the second generation rolled around, there was no Benz left except for the 5-speed automatic in the V8 models. 

I don't closely follow Chrysler or MB like some of you on here, but I knew it had to do with at least parts sharing with the E Class in the beginning. Either way it's very long in the tooth and due to get the axe, but FCA is slowing letting it die like many of their models. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, USA-1 said:

I don't closely follow Chrysler or MB like some of you on here, but I knew it had to do with at least parts sharing with the E Class in the beginning. Either way it's very long in the tooth and due to get the axe, but FCA is slowing letting it die like many of their models. 

All it needs is a visual and interior refresh and it would be fine to run another 4 or 5 years.  The powertrain and performance are plenty competitive. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Drew Dowdell said:

All it needs is a visual and interior refresh and it would be fine to run another 4 or 5 years.

Even the latest LD platform is 9 years old, that's ancient in the automotive world! It needs more than just another minimal refresh like it's had since 2005. It has dinosaur hide for seats at this point! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, USA-1 said:

Even the latest LD platform is 9 years old, that's ancient in the automotive world! It needs more than just another minimal refresh like it's had since 2005. It has dinosaur hide for seats at this point! :D

That's just it.... a new car built on an older car platform is still a new car... it doesn't need to be all new just for the sake of being new. The LX platform already can do things like lane monitoring and automatic cruise control... what else should it have that it doesn't have now? It gets competitive fuel economy, has competitive horsepower, they just need an interior refresh and they'd be good. 

They're my favorite long distance cruiser when I'm renting a car. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

That's just it.... a new car built on an older car platform is still a new car... it doesn't need to be all new just for the sake of being new. The LX platform already can do things like lane monitoring and automatic cruise control... what else should it have that it doesn't have now? It gets competitive fuel economy, has competitive horsepower, they just need an interior refresh and they'd be good. 

They're my favorite long distance cruiser when I'm renting a car. 

I could tell you had a spot reserved for it in your heart :D

It's not a bad looking car just so much of the same. I drove one with a "Hemi" back in 2009 just to see how they were. The dealer had installed aftermarket wheels on it so the suspension and brakes couldn't handle the extra unsprung weight, it drove like a tank and the 5 speed hunted for gears like crazy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

I think manufacturers need to work on heavier refreshes to make platforms last longer, their investments. 

I can't imagine how much money could be saved/profited if they extended a platform for even one additional year after all fixed costs associated to R&D have been amortized. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

I could tell you had a spot reserved for it in your heart :D

It's not a bad looking car just so much of the same. I drove one with a "Hemi" back in 2009 just to see how they were. The dealer had installed aftermarket wheels on it so the suspension and brakes couldn't handle the extra unsprung weight, it drove like a tank and the 5 speed hunted for gears like crazy. 

The 8-speed is substantially better. If you haven't driven one since 2009, that's probably why you feel the way you do about it. A 2019 300S is a great car.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not like platforms are weak, or lacking crash performance design, or ride poorly (platform is a strictly minor factor in that), or are still using decades-old suspension, or ANYTHING like that. And the other issue is that the SOP here is a ‘clean sheet’ redesign. All that says is the previous one they advertised & sold for years is garbage.

We’re way past the need for completely new platforms for the same brand/ model.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The 8-speed is substantially better. If you haven't driven one since 2009, that's probably why you feel the way you do about it. A 2019 300S is a great car.

Meh, they just don't do it for me bored with it's same basic look for 15 years. To each their own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Yesterday, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Groupe PSA officially merged to become Stellantis, the fourth-largest automaker in the world. But this merge has produced some consequences that need to be addressed. One of those being Peugeot's re-entry back in to the U.S.
      “We were last speaking about [Peugeot’s U.S. re-entry] a year and a half ago, before Stellantis. We can’t not take into account that in the coming days Peugeot will be part of this new world. I imagine in the coming months due to the new strategy we will have to adapt and reconsider all elements, including this one,” said Peugeot CEO Jean-Philippe Imparato to Automotive News.
      A key reason for this reconsideration not wanting overlap brands in the U.S.
      This is a polar opposite to comments made last year by Larry Dominique, CEO of PSA North America.
      Imparto's focus for Peugeot in the near future is concentrating on its core markets - Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. There are also plans to get the brand back on track in China. As for the U.S., Imparto said it was "still on the table" down the road.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Yesterday, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and Groupe PSA officially merged to become Stellantis, the fourth-largest automaker in the world. But this merge has produced some consequences that need to be addressed. One of those being Peugeot's re-entry back in to the U.S.
      “We were last speaking about [Peugeot’s U.S. re-entry] a year and a half ago, before Stellantis. We can’t not take into account that in the coming days Peugeot will be part of this new world. I imagine in the coming months due to the new strategy we will have to adapt and reconsider all elements, including this one,” said Peugeot CEO Jean-Philippe Imparato to Automotive News.
      A key reason for this reconsideration not wanting overlap brands in the U.S.
      This is a polar opposite to comments made last year by Larry Dominique, CEO of PSA North America.
      Imparto's focus for Peugeot in the near future is concentrating on its core markets - Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. There are also plans to get the brand back on track in China. As for the U.S., Imparto said it was "still on the table" down the road.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      Future small cars from Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will not be using an updated version of their small car platform. Instead, they'll be underpinned by PSA Group's Common Modular Platform (CMP).
      Automotive News obtained a letter sent by FCA to suppliers in July stating "to immediately stop any research, development and tooling construction activities on future B-segment (small/subcompact) cars." These include the Fiat 500 and Jeep Renegade to give some context. The letter goes on to say it is moving to CMP and that vehicles based on this will be built at the company's Tychy, Poland plant - home to 500 and Lancia Yplilon production. 
      FCA had already put a stop, albeit a temporary one on developing parts for the five new small cars that were destined to use this platform due to COVID-19. There will be one model that will move forward on this orphaned platform - the upcoming 500 electric for Europe.
      As for CMP, this underpins the Peugeot 208 and 2008; Opel/Vauxhall Corsa, Mokka; and the DS3 Crossback. It allows for both combustion and electric powertrains.
      Moving to CMP is another step towards FCA and PSA Group's merger to become Stellantis. It is unclear whether or not the U.S. will see any of the new models that will use CMP from FCA's brands.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Future small cars from Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will not be using an updated version of their small car platform. Instead, they'll be underpinned by PSA Group's Common Modular Platform (CMP).
      Automotive News obtained a letter sent by FCA to suppliers in July stating "to immediately stop any research, development and tooling construction activities on future B-segment (small/subcompact) cars." These include the Fiat 500 and Jeep Renegade to give some context. The letter goes on to say it is moving to CMP and that vehicles based on this will be built at the company's Tychy, Poland plant - home to 500 and Lancia Yplilon production. 
      FCA had already put a stop, albeit a temporary one on developing parts for the five new small cars that were destined to use this platform due to COVID-19. There will be one model that will move forward on this orphaned platform - the upcoming 500 electric for Europe.
      As for CMP, this underpins the Peugeot 208 and 2008; Opel/Vauxhall Corsa, Mokka; and the DS3 Crossback. It allows for both combustion and electric powertrains.
      Moving to CMP is another step towards FCA and PSA Group's merger to become Stellantis. It is unclear whether or not the U.S. will see any of the new models that will use CMP from FCA's brands.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      It has been some time since we last reported on PSA Group's plan to re-enter the U.S. When we last checked in, Peugeot was chosen as the brand to be entering the U.S. by 2023 and rumors were swirling about a possible merger between PSA Group and FCA. A lot has changed since then as the two automakers begin to finalize plans for a merger, and the COVID-19 pandemic has no end in sight in the U.S. What does that mean for Peugeot's return to the U.S.?
      "My role is to grow the PSA business in North America, growing our mobility capability and preparing for the launch of Peugeot." said Larry Dominique, CEO of PSA North America to Automotive News.
      "From our standpoint, we're planning as if [the merger] doesn't exist. We're marching forward as if PSA was going to be there by themselves."
      Dominique is right now focused on the present with the top priority being building out a dealer network for both U.S. and Canada before the launch. He explained that the company is planning a two-prong approach, having franchised dealers and online retailing.
      "The future success for OEMs is the reduction of distribution costs while ensuring both retail and OEM margin sustainability. This has to be done through strong pricing power, not volume turnover," he said.
      Part of this is due to COVID-19 pandemic which has many automakers rethinking how they sell vehicles, something Dominique admits is a big challenge.
      "All my competitors are going to be focusing on digital, which means we have to step up our game and deliver an even stronger customer experience when we launch Peugeot in North America. We need to get out of an environment where the retailers are dependent upon just F&I and service to pay their bills."
      Another challenge facing Dominique, what models to sell in the U.S. The market has changed a lot since PSA Group announced its intentions to re-enter the U.S. Consumers now are focused on trucks and crossovers.
      "I don't have a full-sized truck,. But the C and D segments are what's relevant to us. The C and D segments are high volume and important to North America. That's where we're going to focus initially,"
      To us, this hints at the 3008 and 5008 crossovers being some of the first models to be available.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...