Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Mark Reuss Takes On Role of President of GM

      Succeeds Dan Ammann who will be heading up Cruise Automation


    Aside from announcing fourth-quarter sales numbers, General Motors had another big announcement today. GM's Product chief Mark Reuss will succeed Dan Ammann as the company's president. The appointment is effective immediately according to the company. 

    “I am very proud to have spent my entire career at General Motors, and to now take on this new role is truly a great honor. With our current lineup of outstanding cars, trucks, and crossovers around the world, I’m looking forward to keeping our momentum going at full speed,” said Reuss in a statement.

    In November, GM announced Ammann would step down as GM President to take charge of GM's Cruise Automation unit.

    Reuss will still be overseeing GM's Global Product Group and Cadillac, but will also add the responsibility for GM's quality organization. He will also be tasked with building out a product development team that will focus on autonomous and electrified vehicles.

    Source: General Motors


    Mark Reuss Named General Motors President

    DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) today announced the appointment of Mark Reuss as company president, effective immediately. Reuss currently leads the Global Product Group and Cadillac and will now assume responsibility for the Quality organization.

    “Mark’s global operational experience, deep product knowledge and strong leadership will serve us well as we continue to strengthen our current business, take advantage of growth opportunities and further define the future of personal mobility,” said GM Chairman and CEO Mary Barra. “Mark has played a critical role in leading the development of the company’s award-winning vehicles while transitioning his team to prepare for growing electrification and autonomous technologies.”

    According to Reuss, “I am very proud to have spent my entire career at General Motors, and to now take on this new role is truly a great honor. With our current lineup of outstanding cars, trucks and crossovers around the world, I’m looking forward to keeping our momentum going at full speed.”

    Reuss added responsibilities for Cadillac and global portfolio planning in June 2018. Since then, he has been building an integrated product development and Cadillac organization to support an accelerated product and technology launch cadence and the brand’s global growth plans. Cadillac will be introducing a new vehicle every six months through 2021.

    Reuss has also been leading the transformation of the company’s global product development workforce and processes to drive world-class levels of engineering in advanced technologies and improve quality and speed to market. He is doubling the resources allocated to electric and autonomous vehicle programs in the next two years.

    • Upvote 1


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    To be able to keep Cadillac on a quality focus growth I think this guy is spreading himself a bit too thin.

    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    14 minutes ago, thedriver said:

    this would be great news if gm still sold cars, especially performance ones...

    Camaro? V-series? Corvette?

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i love how GM is taking the profits and not putting them back into products to serve the market now, they are throwing the money for stuff people want to buy out the window at automation and electrification.  

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Exactly.  Why should I help GM ruin what I like about them... by buying something from them?  I feel like I've been duped, and I do not like that atall.  They think they have us by the balls.  Ram makes a sweet truck.  Jeep makes a great CUV/SUV.  Screw GM with their electric/autonomous BS.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    17 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

    Exactly.  Why should I help GM ruin what I like about them... by buying something from them?  I feel like I've been duped, and I do not like that atall.  They think they have us by the balls.  Ram makes a sweet truck.  Jeep makes a great CUV/SUV.  Screw GM with their electric/autonomous BS.

    I really love Jeep. Were I to be buying an SUV...Jeep it would be.

    Explorer and Escape are decent products also in their segment.

    38 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    Save the CT6, even if the flagship is nowadays the Escalade.  The FWD sedans can safely die.  We need the CT6 badly.

    We really do.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Edge is pretty good too.   

    Disclaimer: By me saying that the Edge is pretty good and agreeing that Explorer and Escape are good in no way does it mean I like CUVs and SUVs.   

    I havent been inside GM's latest CUVs and SUVs or driven them for me to form an opinion on them, but I can say that if I was into CUVs and SUVs, I would without a shadow of a doubt trust Ford's CUvs and SUVs.  

    Back to GM.

    I really like Mark Ruess.  Something about Dan Amman I did not like.  I do not know what it is about Dan that I did not like. Probably his lack of vision on the marketing of his brands and vehicles.  I hope Mark does a better job at that. 

    Mark is a true car guy.  It may pain @ocnblu, but maybe the electric future GM is betting on, Mark could put some car guy DNA into them. Make them more Tesla in terms of sporty ride and acceleration (on certain EV models), rather than bland Prius...maybe he could better differentiate which EVs need to be more Tesla-like and which ones need to be more Prius-like and execute them properly. 

    Hopefully, he would not be spreading himself too thin as GM needs to have Cadillac running at a superior pace in terms of quality and vision, and the whole EV thing. Well, GM is literally betting the farm on them, so the EVs HAVE to be nothing but the best!  

     

     

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There is no natural personality in an electric motor.  Any uniqueness will need to be added artificially.  It will be no more exciting than a generic Power Wheels chassis with a silhouette body hung on it of any number of styles.  Gag.Me.With.A.Spoon.  No way in hell, Paco.

    • Haha 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    There is no natural personality in an electric motor.  Any uniqueness will need to be added artificially.  It will be no more exciting than a generic Power Wheels chassis with a silhouette body hung on it of any number of styles.  Gag.Me.With.A.Spoon.  No way in hell, Paco.

    It's a crying shame you don't have children. Someone five hundred years in the future could get a kick out of watching your descendants whine and moan about how electric wheeled cars are being replaced with fission powered Jetsonesque flying cars.

    And my electric powered stationary tools in my workshop would like a word with you about nothing electric powered having personality.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    16 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    It's a crying shame you don't have children. Someone five hundred years in the future could get a kick out of watching your descendants whine and moan about how electric wheeled cars are being replaced with fission powered Jetsonesque flying cars.

    And my electric powered stationary tools in my workshop would like a word with you about nothing electric powered having personality.

    You are so true, it is amazing the personality even between my electric drills that I have.

    Electric has just as much personality as ICE. We just have to have open minds, eyes, ears to see the differences.

    Funny thing is over the holidays was doing some home repair and I have two identical 18v cordeless drills and one tends to have a grunt noise to it where the other is much higher pitched whir noise. Both have never failed me and yet while they look identical and both do their job, they clearly have their own personality of noises. lol

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Exactly.  Why should I help GM ruin what I like about them... by buying something from them?  I feel like I've been duped, and I do not like that atall.  They think they have us by the balls.  Ram makes a sweet truck.  Jeep makes a great CUV/SUV.  Screw GM with their electric/autonomous BS.

    why can't they do both.  take risk and invest for the innovation.  don't skim the R&D money off the successful products and not put it back into the big sellers.

    what is GM's payoff for dumping all this money of R&D into autonomous and electric?  are they just doing this out of the kindness of their heart or did the government hold them ransom to do this?  Or is it for PR reasons?

    Infuriates me that all this money going into electrics and autonomous and no one can say when in the future i can stop anywhere on the highways, plug in my car for 3 minutes, and fully charge to 300 mile range (that doesn't die in cold weather).  Until that day is known, GM still has to put full effort into their ICE cars and make them competitive.  Just now we'll get chevy blazer for example.  where ford edge and murano have been around forever.

    Edited by regfootball
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    9 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Its one thing to humanize a dog. At least its living and breathing. Its another to humanize an object. 

    If you really want personality in your transportation medium,  horses are the way to go.  Im not trying to be funny,  just pointing out that an inanimate object have no personalities...

    1. I am against 'humanizing' animals. I like 'em, there's a couple living here, but they're not 'children' and they're not 'human'.  And in case anyone was wondering, I also hate 'talking dog' commercials.
    2. Inanimate objects sometimes DO have personalities.  Frankly, I get more enjoyment out of a choice inanimate object than I do out of an animal.  And the inanimate object doesn't even have to make noise/run for it's personality to shine out.  I thought you guys were car people? ;)
     

    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, regfootball said:

    no one can say when in the future i can stop anywhere on the highways, plug in my car for 3 minutes, and fully charge to 300 mile range (that doesn't die in cold weather).  

    I am not aware of any ICE auto that can refill in 3 minutes with 300 miles of range. XFC does bring 400 miles of range in 15 min and that should go down over the next few years as solid state batteries with capacitor storage is added to EVs. The charging infrastructure is extensive and growing daily. It is just a matter of time, much as it was with ICE auto's in the early 1900's when you had to think about where a gas station was to make sure you had enough fuel for trips, now at least even if there is no XFC or level 4 charger, there are usually Level 3 DC or level 2 charges to be found and always Level 1 or 110 V chargers so an EV can get power always in the 21st century.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    ..much as it was with ICE auto's in the early 1900's when you had to think about where a gas station was to make sure you had enough fuel for trips...

    Dave- you keep trotting this out as if it were unequivocal. 1. Early 1900s autos were not taken on long trips- there was zero highways and very very few paved roads; you actually couldn't get very far if you wanted to. They were only used for occasional local drives; they were not depended on as transportation by & large. 2. You discount the then-plentiful farms having various fuels on hand, and early cars were simplistic enough to run on a variety of fuels. There was no range anxiety back then.

    Still, a number of determined motorists completed cross-country trips in the very early years:
    https://www.wired.com/2016/05/tale-epic-coast-coast-road-trip-1903/

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Call me greedy, but i want it all. Good gas powered drivers, and my EV tech too,

    If GM doesn’t, sure I will find someone who does....

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 hours ago, dfelt said:

    I am not aware of any ICE auto that can refill in 3 minutes with 300 miles of range. XFC does bring 400 miles of range in 15 min and that should go down over the next few years as solid state batteries with capacitor storage is added to EVs. The charging infrastructure is extensive and growing daily. It is just a matter of time, much as it was with ICE auto's in the early 1900's when you had to think about where a gas station was to make sure you had enough fuel for trips, now at least even if there is no XFC or level 4 charger, there are usually Level 3 DC or level 2 charges to be found and always Level 1 or 110 V chargers so an EV can get power always in the 21st century.

    So if it takes 15 years or 25 years to get to that point why divert all the resources to the stuff that won’t sell for 15-25 years. Let that development support itself. Gm still has to build and develop competitive ICE  lines of cars and trucks that are among the best offerings out there until that time, and they need those R&D resources to do that. You cannot lose your market share by not reinvesting In What people want to buy now. 

    Edited by regfootball

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    23 hours ago, balthazar said:

    1. I am against 'humanizing' animals. I like 'em, there's a couple living here, but they're not 'children' and they're not 'human'.  And in case anyone was wondering, I also hate 'talking dog' commercials.

    You and me both!  I especially HATE IT!!! 🤬 when people dress up their dogs....

    23 hours ago, balthazar said:

    2. Inanimate objects sometimes DO have personalities.  Frankly, I get more enjoyment out of a choice inanimate object than I do out of an animal.  And the inanimate object doesn't even have to make noise/run for it's personality to shine out.

     I understand FULLY!!!  @dfelt  mentioned his drills...

    I too, have my favorite tools.

    A Black and Decker Fire Storm cordless drill, that I absolutely refuse to give up.  I love it!!! But Im also on my 3rd Ni-Ca battery on it that I bought for it. 50 bucks. I could buy a brand new Lithion battery powered Ryobi or Makita or whatever...but that Black and Decker, its been with me since 1994. We've been through a lot.  I bought it for my dad.XMAS gift. He used it a lot. I used it a lot. As long as I could always buy a Ni-Ca battery for it, I will never let it go. 

    Plus...with my cars that Ive owned. There is ALWAYS a sad moment when I replace them with something new. I aint happy for a new car. Im saddened that Im departing with the old one. I actually cried when I traded in my Olds Alero for the Impala I bought. 

    23 hours ago, balthazar said:

    I thought you guys were car people? ;)

    I just confessed to crying over my Olds Alero when I gave it up for another car.  I think that qualifies. 

    But, let us be real here. Anthropomorphism is what is happening here.  Inanimate objects do not have personalities. We as humans, assign personalities to them. 

    But...animals actually DO have personalities for real...

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’ve been known to put sweaters on dogs when it’s really cold... and I definitely let them on the furniture. 

    As far as getting sads when selling an old car, I did kind of miss my old Jeep when I traded March 31, 2017.   But I’d had it almost 17 years and 170k miles...it was at the point where I didn’t trust it anymore and it would needed expensive repairs. Pic below taken the day I traded it. 

    74EFA529-8FE4-4DA7-95B4-D711A2D73609.jpeg

    6C6E94A7-260F-4725-B3A1-DBB6DBCC5372.jpeg

    888F9565-ED95-4663-8FCB-59EE74CCA6F9.jpeg

    • Like 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    19 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    I’ve been known to put sweaters on dogs when it’s really cold... and I definitely let them on the furniture. 

    As far as getting sads when selling an old car, I did kind of miss my old Jeep when I traded March 31, 2017.   But I’d had it almost 17 years and 170k miles...it was at the point where I didn’t trust it anymore and it would needed expensive repairs. Pic below taken the day I traded it. 

    74EFA529-8FE4-4DA7-95B4-D711A2D73609.jpeg

    6C6E94A7-260F-4725-B3A1-DBB6DBCC5372.jpeg

    888F9565-ED95-4663-8FCB-59EE74CCA6F9.jpeg

    Foot in mouth....regarding hating when people put clothes on dogs.  LOL  

    But that little fella, yeah, poor guy. He probably gets just as cold as we do in freezing cold weather... I guess I could be more sensitive...LOL

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Certain breeds really need them.  One should always wrap his wiener, for example.

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, mine are Arizona dogs.  2nd winter in Ohio, but this winter so far is mild compared to last year. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      DETROIT — General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM) delivered 746,659 vehicles in the United States in the second quarter of 2019.
      Crossover sales set a new second quarter record after sales grew year over year by 17 percent. Sales of the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 crew cab and GMC Sierra 1500 crew cab were both up 12 percent year over year. The Chevrolet Equinox and Traverse and GMC Canyon all delivered record second quarter sales. Sales of every Buick crossover were up year over year, with the Envision posting a 28 percent sales increase. The Enclave was up 21 percent and the Encore was up 5 percent. Buick deliveries were up 5 percent and GMC deliveries were up 10 percent. The all-new Cadillac XT4 continues to lead its segment and the all-new Cadillac XT6 has begun shipping to dealers. Cadillac crossover deliveries were up 19 percent in total year over year, helping the brand grow both total and retail sales. The Chevrolet Suburban, Tahoe and GMC Yukon XL were each up more than 20 percent compared to a year ago. Overall, GM deliveries during the second quarter were down 1.5 percent versus a year ago, in line with third-party estimates for industry sales. The company estimates that its retail market share was even with a year ago, with truck and crossover deliveries offsetting lower passenger car sales.  
       
        QUARTER 2 (CALENDAR YEAR-TO-DATE) JANUARY - JUNE   2019 2018 %Change Volume   2019 2018 %Change Volume   Cascada 1,312 1,374 -4.5   2,058 2,292 -10.2   Enclave 15,159 12,551 20.8   27,739 22,420 23.7   Encore 24,291 23,167 4.9   48,897 48,635 0.5   Envision 9,138 7,118 28.4   16,761 16,814 -0.3   LaCrosse 2,487 4,053 -38.6   5,389 11,119 -51.5   Regal 2,985 4,507 -33.8   6,393 8,215 -22.2   Buick Total 55,373 52,891 4.7   107,240 109,695 -2.2   ATS 371 3,785 -90.2   893 7,747 -88.5   CT6 1,862 2,427 -23.3   4,050 4,894 -17.2   CTS 2,443 2,640 -7.5   4,871 5,082 -4.2   Escalade 9,432 9,655 -2.3   16,251 17,766 -8.5   XT4 7,080 0 ***.*   14,106 0 ***.*   XT5 13,118 17,045 -23.0   26,396 31,890 -17.2   XT6 74 0 ***.*   74 0 ***.*   XTS 5,359 3,665 46.2   9,093 8,563 6.2   Cadillac Total 39,739 39,222 1.3   75,734 75,949 -0.3   Blazer 11,772 0 ***.*   14,795 0 ***.*   Bolt EV 3,965 3,483 13.8   8,281 7,858 5.4   Camaro 12,433 13,588 -8.5   24,516 25,380 -3.4   Colorado 31,669 41,016 -22.8   65,163 69,875 -6.7   Corvette 5,788 5,785 0.1   9,731 10,242 -5.0   Cruze 16,166 37,836 -57.3   39,477 77,691 -49.2   Equinox 85,657 73,967 15.8   174,157 156,365 11.4   Express 21,528 21,413 0.5   38,743 41,187 -5.9   Impala 12,536 13,595 -7.8   25,795 27,662 -6.7   LCF 1,305 756 72.6   1,864 1,286 44.9   Malibu 30,974 42,267 -26.7   65,171 76,417 -14.7   Silverado HD 31,496 37,452 -15.9   61,037 76,471 -20.2   Silverado LD 109,930 118,077 -6.9   194,426 214,603 -9.4   Silverado MD 1,038 0 ***.*   1,314 0 ***.*   Sonic 4,024 4,582 -12.2   8,484 10,565 -19.7   Spark 7,226 4,454 62.2   13,649 11,399 19.7   Suburban 18,266 15,136 20.7   29,295 29,861 -1.9   Tahoe 32,942 26,880 22.6   53,795 50,523 6.5   Traverse 38,152 35,892 6.3   72,375 74,090 -2.3   Trax 21,790 26,507 -17.8   46,370 46,989 -1.3   Volt 1,146 4,336 -73.6   3,666 7,814 -53.1   Chevrolet Total 499,847 528,100 -5.3   952,248 1,019,019 -6.6   Acadia 28,420 20,108 41.3   59,620 50,008 19.2   Canyon 11,909 9,635 23.6   18,863 16,848 12.0   Savana 9,503 7,167 32.6   16,069 11,964 34.3   Sierra HD 13,946 14,364 -2.9   23,188 27,022 -14.2   Sierra LD 42,911 45,042 -4.7   74,215 73,852 0.5   Terrain 24,988 22,327 11.9   50,352 55,291 -8.9   Yukon 20,023 19,520 2.6   34,970 34,522 1.3   GMC Total 151,700 138,163 9.8   277,277 269,507 2.9   GM Vehicle Total 746,659 758,376 -1.5   1,412,499 1,474,170 -4.2  
    • By Drew Dowdell
      General Motors and Bechtel are teaming up to form a new company to deploy a widespread fast-charging network. Neither company plans to put any money into the project, outside investors are being solicited.  The network will help General Motors, which plans to introduce 20 new EVs by 2023.  It will also help other manufacturers of EVs. 
      General Motors will provide data to help decide where to locate the EV charging stations and Bechtel will use its own experts for the engineering and building of the stations. Much of the data will come from GM's OnStar system to help learn where people tend to park.  Data from both electric and gasoline powered vehicles will be used.
      Additional fast-charging infrastructure is seen as a requirement to increasing electric vehicle sales. According to a survey by AAA, one of the biggest concerns Americans have about EVs is having enough locations to charge them.  
      The network built by Bechtel and GM will not be limited to interstate highways where most fast charging stations have been located so far.  The company will also locate chargers in urban areas targeting apartments and condos where drivers cannot have a home charger of their own. 
      The new venture joins major initiatives from Electrify America, a Volkswagen funded EV station program, and Tesla with Supercharging, to build out a nationwide network of charging stations. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      General Motors and Bechtel are teaming up to form a new company to deploy a widespread fast-charging network. Neither company plans to put any money into the project, outside investors are being solicited.  The network will help General Motors, which plans to introduce 20 new EVs by 2023.  It will also help other manufacturers of EVs. 
      General Motors will provide data to help decide where to locate the EV charging stations and Bechtel will use its own experts for the engineering and building of the stations. Much of the data will come from GM's OnStar system to help learn where people tend to park.  Data from both electric and gasoline powered vehicles will be used.
      Additional fast-charging infrastructure is seen as a requirement to increasing electric vehicle sales. According to a survey by AAA, one of the biggest concerns Americans have about EVs is having enough locations to charge them.  
      The network built by Bechtel and GM will not be limited to interstate highways where most fast charging stations have been located so far.  The company will also locate chargers in urban areas targeting apartments and condos where drivers cannot have a home charger of their own. 
      The new venture joins major initiatives from Electrify America, a Volkswagen funded EV station program, and Tesla with Supercharging, to build out a nationwide network of charging stations. 
  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...