Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jessi_chan

Two New Bibles Preach A Hip, Eco-Friendly Gospel

   22 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think about the 2 new versions of the Bible?

    • I think it is a very smart way to get people to read the Bible.
      3
    • I don't care for these versions.
      2
    • I don't care one way or the other.
      17

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

33 posts in this topic

Please discuss your opinions.... it is basically a new version of the Bible for Goths and for the whole green movement... I don't really know if care one way or the other about this, but hey this guy is just jumping on the bandwagon about the whole environmental friendly stuff with everyone else I bet these versions will probably sell. They even have pretty pictures in these books. :P

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...toryId=97537385

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is also a new version for gays and a version for lesbians.

Finally... there really was Adam and Steve.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not very religious, but I think its a good idea. I MUCH prefer this version of Christianity to the far right Neoconservative view that seems kind of prevelent today.

Chris

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also the lolcat bible.

I'm not sure about those other two though. The Green Bible makes sense, but I think trying to make the Word more "accessable" by secularizing kinda brings it down.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is also a new version for gays and a version for lesbians.

Finally... there really was Adam and Steve.

:lol:

There's also the lolcat bible.

I'm not sure about those other two though. The Green Bible makes sense, but I think trying to make the Word more "accessable" by secularizing kinda brings it down.

The Lolcat one is awesome.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think too many people don't know that christian churches have a history of something called stewardship...these (green) bibles are ridiculous.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I view religion the same way I view everything else, that is, in relation to everything else. I see no way any single religion, as interpreted by man, can be "right" because many of them have similar structures but are wildly different in detail. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Glad to see religious tolerance is alive and well on the site. I'd hate to see the reaction if it was discovered there were Blacks and Mexicans that visited this place too. Sieg heil!

hehe for some reason when i read that i thought about the dane cook skit about the public restrooms

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna have to go out on a limb here and say I happen to like the Bible the way it is...then again I'm a fairly conservative Catholic and as far as I'm concerned the Bible isn't broke so don't fix it!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No more ridiculous than religion itself.

+1

I'm gonna have to go out on a limb here and say I happen to like the Bible the way it is...then again I'm a fairly conservative Catholic and as far as I'm concerned the Bible isn't broke so don't fix it!

I used to think that, but when I learned about the whole process of how the Bible came to be, I realized that there was so much at play that I couldn't find it credible anymore. Most of the New Testament was written well after Jesus' death. There were also several other gospels and books written that were "removed" or "discarded" from the current compilation. Who's to say the right decisions were made? Knowing how rife the early church was with corrupting political influences, and knowing what I know about human nature and contemporary examples of churches becoming corrupted through politics, I can't call the Bible anything more than a compilation of allegories that may or may not have a loose relation to any reality that may have occurred.

Not trying to be argumentative, but the Bible has changed a lot over the years, especially during its earliest years, and then again during the Protestant Reformation when a couple minor books were discarded from that Bible.

Edited by Croc
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+1

I used to think that, but when I learned about the whole process of how the Bible came to be, I realized that there was so much at play that I couldn't find it credible anymore. Most of the New Testament was written well after Jesus' death. There were also several other gospels and books written that were "removed" or "discarded" from the current compilation. Who's to say the right decisions were made? Knowing how rife the early church was with corrupting political influences, and knowing what I know about human nature and contemporary examples of churches becoming corrupted through politics, I can't call the Bible anything more than a compilation of allegories that may or may not have a loose relation to any reality that may have occurred.

Not trying to be argumentative, but the Bible has changed a lot over the years, especially during its earliest years, and then again during the Protestant Reformation when a couple minor books were discarded from that Bible.

Yeah, it's be translated so many times, and into so many languages that, due to translations errors and other factors, it's much different than it was in it's earliest incarnation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the original Greek and Hebrew texts are avaialble for your reading pleasure. There's no denying that there's a human element involved in the Bibles that we have today. Most of the translations out there today aim for one of two targets: 1) To be a literal, word for word translation of the original texts, or 2) to make the points that the original text was trying to make. Those two targets should be one and the same but aren't because language has evolved over time. But at least the majority of the popular translations are one step removed from the original scrolls. I suspect that is not the case of these Bibles. They might be more of a translation of a translation - in other words a paraphrase. Most are very readable so they can be OK in some circumstances, but many of them are less concerned with conveying the original text than they are proving a point the human author is trying to make.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it's be translated so many times, and into so many languages that, due to translations errors and other factors, it's much different than it was in it's earliest incarnation.

but ye somehow It's

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it's be translated so many times, and into so many languages that, due to translations errors and other factors, it's much different than it was in it's earliest incarnation.

but yet somehow It's relevant to my life today,

word-by-word in literal translation. :rolleyes:

Edited by Sixty8panther
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Glad to see religious tolerance is alive and well on the site. I'd hate to see the reaction if it was discovered there were Blacks and Mexicans that visited this place too. Sieg heil!

i've been kinda curious what a poll on here would show how this board's members are spread out religiously.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not the wording that's what's important, it's the point it's trying to make. "Thou shalt not kill" is still "Thou shalt not kill" regardless of how you spin it.

no simpler way to put it, exactly

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh, for me it's a case of "whatever blows your dress up" .

I really don't care what sort of religion anyone chooses as long as they don't try to foist it on me.

I personally have no use for any religion, but freedom of religion is of major importance to me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it's be translated so many times, and into so many languages that, due to translations errors and other factors, it's much different than it was in it's earliest incarnation.

No, not changes through translation, but intentional changes in content.

Also, there's a book out called Misquoting Jesus, that delves into many of the changes to the Bible over the years. Here's a link to a writeup on it:

http://research.unc.edu/endeavors/spr2006/feature_05.php

Edited by Croc
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Who's Chatting

    There are no users currently in the chat room