Jump to content
Create New...

Kia News: Don't Expect A High-Performance Stinger Anytime Soon


Recommended Posts

Hyundai-Kia's performance head said there is more performance to be unlocked in the Stinger, but it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

“The car technically has more potential no doubt, but at this point there is no plan to do more,” said Albert Biermann to Motoring.

“We have to launch this car and see how it does in the market place. What kind of customers do we get? What would be their next requirement from Kia? I think first we need to establish some sort of customer base of these kinds of cars and then maybe next steps can happen. But we need to do this carefully. Step by step."

In the meantime, Biermann suggested that Kia could do GT variants of existing models - think changes to the exterior, suspension, and powertrain. We know there are GT versions of the Optima and Rio in the cards. Once this happens, Kia might consider hopping up the Stinger.

“At a later stage, when the GT is more established into a stronger sub-label within Kia, then maybe at some point we need a GTR or something,” said Biermann.

“But for now there is nothing going on.”

Source: Motoring


View full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

It will already have higher performance for the dollar than most cars in that price class anyway. 

I'm betting they're leaving room for Genesis to use a version.

Thinking you are correct on the Genesis version.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually after doing a bit of research and checking this out, I would have to without any question whatsoever put it above the Fusion Sport and maybe above the 300 as a car I would actually buy.

Would also buy this over the Nissan Maxima from the other thread...

Sheet metal is much more interesting than the Acura TLX SH-AWD also...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

It will already have higher performance for the dollar than most cars in that price class anyway. 

I'm betting they're leaving room for Genesis to use a version.

I highly doubt that considering Biermann's comments made last month,
 

Quote

What will not happen is any N version of Genesis models according to Biermann. This is a surprising reversal from last year as Biermann said that Genesis vehicles were in the plans for N in the next five years. No reason was given as to why.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

Since Genesis is it's own brand, they probably wouldn't use Hyundai's 'N' sub-brand but their own, maybe 'P' for performance... ;)

 

P and low output Stinger do not sound like a good combination...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

It doesn't have to be a high performance brand (AMG, M, V-series) to be higher performance than the Stinger.

Rationally, yes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, A Horse With No Name said:

P and low output Stinger do not sound like a good combination...

Just hope they do not make the P Stinger in Yellow! :P 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dfelt said:

Just hope they do not make the P Stinger in Yellow! :P 

There will be a stream of them flowing out of the factory...business will be golden!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with just doing a more powerful version is the price point. A $50,000 or $60,000 Kia isn't going to sell.  The K900 proves that, the Cadenza is a sales did also.  Their path to success here is Optima level interior with with rear drive and turbo 4 and 6 cylinder engines priced $30-40k.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hyundai and Kia make their bread and butter vehicles with such low expense that adding a low volume high margin product like this is just toying with the market.  Where GM can't support an SS here, Kia is just playing with resources and seeing if they hit a nerve.

The Genesis is a dud though in terms of drive.  I hope this is better.

The pulled Optima styling is a bit of a miss here for me because they had the opportunity to pull Kia into the 2020's here.  Instead, its a warmed over Optima.  Doesn't make it bad, just tired.

I do like the hatch though.  That saves it.  And the interior is in with the theme.

For a lot of people this package makes more sense than a Camaro.  Camaro has no backseat, and not much else plus is claustrophobic.  This ventures off into Teslaville.  This sort of packaging may become more what boomers look for in a sports car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, regfootball said:

Hyundai and Kia make their bread and butter vehicles with such low expense that adding a low volume high margin product like this is just toying with the market.  Where GM can't support an SS here, Kia is just playing with resources and seeing if they hit a nerve.

The Genesis is a dud though in terms of drive.  I hope this is better.

The pulled Optima styling is a bit of a miss here for me because they had the opportunity to pull Kia into the 2020's here.  Instead, its a warmed over Optima.  Doesn't make it bad, just tired.

I do like the hatch though.  That saves it.  And the interior is in with the theme.

For a lot of people this package makes more sense than a Camaro.  Camaro has no backseat, and not much else plus is claustrophobic.  This ventures off into Teslaville.  This sort of packaging may become more what boomers look for in a sports car.

Agree that boomers might like this more in terms of a sports car.  For me...couple of years my youngest will be away at college.  35K would buy a nice used Boxster or Cayman...

Edited by A Horse With No Name
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

The problem with just doing a more powerful version is the price point. A $50,000 or $60,000 Kia isn't going to sell.  The K900 proves that, the Cadenza is a sales did also.  Their path to success here is Optima level interior with with rear drive and turbo 4 and 6 cylinder engines priced $30-40k.  

The K900 proves nothing.  As a car, I like it, but it looks too much like an Optima for that price. It also has zero sporting intentions, it rides as soft as an LS460.  The Stinger does not look like an Optima. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The K900 proves nothing.  As a car, I like it, but it looks too much like an Optima for that price. It also has zero sporting intentions, it rides as soft as an LS460.  The Stinger does not look like an Optima. 

Stinger actually looks good, the more I look at it the more I like it...it does have the Kia Family language all over it...and does look a bit like an Optima IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Stinger actually looks good, the more I look at it the more I like it...it does have the Kia Family language all over it...and does look a bit like an Optima IMHO.

Have you seen one in person yet? The long, low hood will let you know this is no camcord competitor.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Have you seen one in person yet? The long, low hood will let you know this is no camcord competitor.

No I have not...but I have checked out quite a few photographs...and I really kind of like it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The K900 proves nothing.  As a car, I like it, but it looks too much like an Optima for that price. It also has zero sporting intentions, it rides as soft as an LS460.  The Stinger does not look like an Optima. 

So if they bring out a V8 Stinger for $65,000 is anyone going to buy it?  Or will they just buy a BMW or Audi instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

So if they bring out a V8 Stinger for $65,000 is anyone going to buy it?  Or will they just buy a BMW or Audi instead.

A question no sane person is asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

So if they bring out a V8 Stinger for $65,000 is anyone going to buy it?  Or will they just buy a BMW or Audi instead.

$65,000 gets you a 4 cylinder in a German car the Stinger's size. You make a compelling case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

$65,000 gets you a 4 cylinder in a German car the Stinger's size. You make a compelling case.

I like the Stinger,  but it's appeal is the value play.  If it costs as much as a German car that appeal is gone.   The V6 Stinger does 0-60 in 4.9 seconds, same as a $56,000 BMW 540i.  Good value, but I can't see Kia putting a twin turbo V8 in the Stinger and then having to charge way more money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

I like the Stinger,  but it's appeal is the value play.  If it costs as much as a German car that appeal is gone.   The V6 Stinger does 0-60 in 4.9 seconds, same as a $56,000 BMW 540i.  Good value, but I can't see Kia putting a twin turbo V8 in the Stinger and then having to charge way more money.

Not all of us feel like blowing 60 grand on a car...Thirty for a John Cooper Works Mini hard top for me and I would be satisfied.

And while I prefer German cars and have two sitting in my driveway, they are not the only cars on the planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why the Stinger shouldn't be super high performance and 60 grand.  I read in South Korea it might start at like $27k, which if it is priced like that in the USA, it is incredible value.  The Stinger needs to target the Camaro and Mustang (and Challenger/Charger), go after the sports car buyer who wants more practicality, but doesn't want to give up the performance.  The Stinger is only 2 inches longer than a Camaro or Mustang.  That is Kia's formula for success with this car.   Going after luxury sedans is suicide, when you have sales of a lot of luxury sedans down 20% as buyers go to crossovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it more than the 5 door Regal or any fwd based entry lux, maybe more than most rwd entry lux as well, kind of over loving the c300.  Just based on pics, initial reviews, and an auto show exterior view from 20 feet away.

A shooting brake version would be awesome.

 

 

Edited by frogger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Which is why the Stinger shouldn't be super high performance and 60 grand.  I read in South Korea it might start at like $27k, which if it is priced like that in the USA, it is incredible value.  The Stinger needs to target the Camaro and Mustang (and Challenger/Charger), go after the sports car buyer who wants more practicality, but doesn't want to give up the performance.  The Stinger is only 2 inches longer than a Camaro or Mustang.  That is Kia's formula for success with this car.   Going after luxury sedans is suicide, when you have sales of a lot of luxury sedans down 20% as buyers go to crossovers.

I don't think they will be drawing from the same pool of buyers.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, frogger said:

I like it more than the 5 door Regal or any fwd based entry lux, maybe more than most rwd entry lux as well, kind of over loving the c300.  Just based on pics, initial reviews, and an auto show exterior view from 20 feet away.

A shooting brake version would be awesome.

 

 

Agree on a shooting brake version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Stinger is in a weird place in the market. It's not a Camaro/Mustang, too small to be a Charger, not premium enough to be an A7, substantially more powerful and sporty than a Regal Sportback. 

However, that also makes it rather unique and it might catch a small but solid following. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The Stinger is in a weird place in the market. It's not a Camaro/Mustang, too small to be a Charger, not premium enough to be an A7, substantially more powerful and sporty than a Regal Sportback. 

However, that also makes it rather unique and it might catch a small but solid following. 

Kia needs to do something to bring a little excitement to the brand...I like it...kind of a unique vehicle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The Stinger is in a weird place in the market. It's not a Camaro/Mustang, too small to be a Charger, not premium enough to be an A7, substantially more powerful and sporty than a Regal Sportback. 

However, that also makes it rather unique and it might catch a small but solid following. 

The Camaro is 188-190 inches long, the Mustang 188.4 and the Stinger is 190.  So it is sized right there with those cars has turbo 4 base, probably priced the same, it just has 4 doors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

The Camaro is 188-190 inches long, the Mustang 188.4 and the Stinger is 190.  So it is sized right there with those cars has turbo 4 base, probably priced the same, it just has 4 doors.

who cares how long it is.... seriously....

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

who cares how long it is.... seriously....

People who want to make up false metrics to shame everything that isn't a Benz....seriously...

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

who cares how long it is.... seriously....

What I am saying is that it is the same size as a Camaro or Mustang with similar performance and price to those 2 but with way more practicality.  Kia should be targeting sports car buyers you want more a more practical car.  Not targeting 3-series drivers who won't consider a Kia and who are going to buy an X3 anyway because they want to get out of a sedan and into an SUV for more practicality.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

What I am saying is that it is the same size as a Camaro or Mustang with similar performance and price to those 2 but with way more practicality.  Kia should be targeting sports car buyers you want more a more practical car.  Not targeting 3-series drivers who won't consider a Kia and who are going to buy an X3 anyway because they want to get out of a sedan and into an SUV for more practicality.  

I think it will be a different sort of buyer all together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

What I am saying is that it is the same size as a Camaro or Mustang with similar performance and price to those 2 but with way more practicality.  Kia should be targeting sports car buyers you want more a more practical car.  Not targeting 3-series drivers who won't consider a Kia and who are going to buy an X3 anyway because they want to get out of a sedan and into an SUV for more practicality.  

I don't think there will be much Mustang/Stinger cross shopping though I agree with you that there should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I don't think there will be much Mustang/Stinger cross shopping though I agree with you that there should be.

Personally a huge part of me would rather have the Stinger...it a fresh idea rather than a remake of a fifty years old one.

If it is enough cheaper than a three series I could see cross shopping... especially if you are like me and have three kids in College.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Personally a huge part of me would rather have the Stinger...it a fresh idea rather than a remake of a fifty years old one.

If it is enough cheaper than a three series I could see cross shopping... especially if you are like me and have three kids in College.

I could never cross shop a Stinger with a Mustang or Camaro simply because a coupe would never be allowed.  The fact that the Regal Sportback is interesting to him and is a hatchback means that the Stinger is a possibility.  I like the looks of the Regal and especially the interior better though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I could never cross shop a Stinger with a Mustang or Camaro simply because a coupe would never be allowed.  The fact that the Regal Sportback is interesting to him and is a hatchback means that the Stinger is a possibility.  I like the looks of the Regal and especially the interior better though. 

Like I said, car shopping with a significant other makes life interesting.  I really liked the Regal and LaCrosse but my wife did not.

For the $34K this costs I would be buying  John Cooper Works MINI or saving a little bit of coin and getting a Golf R.

Regal would also I think have better sound deadening than the Stinger....I like listening to Music when I drive, this is a real consideration for me.

Also entering into the Calculus...GM has much better paint and rust proofing than KIA IMHO....living in Ohio....that would be a consideration.

But with my youngest a Junior in High school this year....and probably going away to college when she graduates...I think I have bought my last practical car.

MINI JCW FTW, I think...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

Like I said, car shopping with a significant other makes life interesting.  I really liked the Regal and LaCrosse but my wife did not.

For the $34K this costs I would be buying  John Cooper Works MINI or saving a little bit of coin and getting a Golf R.

Regal would also I think have better sound deadening than the Stinger....I like listening to Music when I drive, this is a real consideration for me.

Also entering into the Calculus...GM has much better paint and rust proofing than KIA IMHO....living in Ohio....that would be a consideration.

But with my youngest a Junior in High school this year....and probably going away to college when she graduates...I think I have bought my last practical car.

MINI JCW FTW, I think...

 

We're in such an odd situation.  We have no kids nor any plans for kids, yet we need to plan our vehicle purchases around hauling some combo of our 7 nieces and nephews, or my in-laws around. As much as we like the Encore, it was really a mistake on our part going with a vehicle that small. 

Unless I find an Avalanche, my choices are likely going to be Durango / Explorer / Tahoe.   His will either be pre-owned CTS or leased Regal Sportback... or if things really change for us, a new S90. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

 

We're in such an odd situation.  We have no kids nor any plans for kids, yet we need to plan our vehicle purchases around hauling some combo of our 7 nieces and nephews, or my in-laws around. As much as we like the Encore, it was really a mistake on our part going with a vehicle that small. 

Unless I find an Avalanche, my choices are likely going to be Durango / Explorer / Tahoe.   His will either be pre-owned CTS or leased Regal Sportback... or if things really change for us, a new S90. 

After having test drove many times the Ford Explorer in all trims, the only one worth considering is the Explorer Sport. Durangos just rock as do Tahoes. I would probably take either Durango or Tahoe with the V8's over the TTV6 of the ford. Plus I actually think the fit and finish is better in those two. Course the Son choose the Jeep GC over the Explorer and Durango. He loves his Jeep's.

8 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The Pacifica almost has me convinced....

But I'd like to do a bit of mild off-roading. So Avalanche/Tahoe are at the top of my list. 

Hyrbid Tahoe, Yukon or Escalade. They are awesome and I wish GM would bring them back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dfelt said:

After having test drove many times the Ford Explorer in all trims, the only one worth considering is the Explorer Sport. Durangos just rock as do Tahoes. I would probably take either Durango or Tahoe with the V8's over the TTV6 of the ford. Plus I actually think the fit and finish is better in those two. Course the Son choose the Jeep GC over the Explorer and Durango. He loves his Jeep's.

I'd like the Jeep GC too... but if I'm going to get that type of vehicle, I'm thinking a 3-row is preferable.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Durango is nice.....as is the Tahoe.  Had a '15 Tahoe as a rental a couple years ago, really enjoyed driving it...quite nice for a BOF full size, drove better than the previous gen Yukon I had driven.  I don't need a 3-row, so the GC is fine for me..75% of the time it's just me in the car. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings