Jump to content
Create New...

Robert Hall

Premium Subscriber
  • Posts

    32,320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    219

Everything posted by Robert Hall

  1. I watched a fair bit of the previous World Cup 4 years ago because I used to hang out after work w some German guys I worked with and watch matches at a Buffalo Wild Wings in Tempe AZ. It's fun to watch. Though I mostly watch F1, Indy Car and DTM and then NFL and some NBA when in season...
  2. Hah-hah, no that was me on 3 occasions where I went for Indian or Pakistani curry without taking Immodium before and after...unstable bowels. I learned Chicken Vindaloo and 115 degree days don't mix well...
  3. Having had to clean up the aftermath of explosive diarrhea and vomit from multiple cars, leather gets my vote every time.
  4. I had cloth a long time ago...'80s Fords. But my more recent vehicles have been leather..leather is so much easier to keep clean...
  5. So Cadillac and M-B don't offer cloth interiors in the US? I'm not a fan of cloth interiors, but I know some people like them.
  6. Wowza..that is a slick custom. The late 40s GM coupes (before the '48-49 redesigns) were so bloated and humpy, this looks great though..
  7. Saw a really clean late 90s final generation Olds 88 in black. Haven't seen one of those in years...
  8. That would be socialism!
  9. Metric would be something like 250 cubits though. This was inches. Don't always believe Google search results I guess
  10. Oddly, the Golf R comes up as 22.8, but the regular Golf and GTI come up as 17.4 when googling...does the R have a smaller backseat or something?
  11. Styling?
  12. Less rear overhang.
  13. Golf: 17.4 ft³, 53.7 ft³ XT4: 22.3 ft³, 48.9 ft³ With the seat down, the Golf has about 5 more cubic feet of space. With the back seat down, the XT4 has only slightly more space than the Trax! Trax: 18.7 ft³, 48.4 ft³ In comparison, the XT4's GM brand relatives are way more spacious. Equinox: 29.9 ft³, 63.5 ft³ Terrain: 29.6 ft³, 63.3 ft³ So utility was not a priority in the XT4 development, it sounds like...even the larger XT5 isn't that great--- XT5: 30 ft³, 63 ft³ compared to the Acadia: Acadia: 12.8 ft³, 79 ft³ (that seat up figure is odd, 3rd row?)
  14. Way better looking than any current Toyota or Lexus sedan..
  15. Well, he does live in Amish country, maybe the local culture has rubbed off on him...;)
  16. ICE and EV are far more complex than the propulsion systems the Amish are used to...they still roll like it's 1699...
  17. That looks more like a '74 front end. The '73 had 4 round taillights, the '74 had 2 trapazoidal rounded ones. Here's a '74 in what appears to be the same green.
  18. It is smaller, remember, the XT4 is in the Equinox/Terrain compact family, while the Blazer is a midsize like the Acadia and XT5.
  19. Cool...I often saw Uber and others testing such Fusions and Bolts around my office in downtown Scottsdale.
  20. GM is pretty much dead in Europe after selling off Opel..
  21. Not an issue for Mall Rated CUVs...though it may drag on curbs. It is funny how low so many CUVs are in the front, though. My sister's Trax had a black rubber air dam thingy under the front fascia, she tore that off shortly after getting it, going in and out of the driveway in Phoenix..
  22. Maybe it will be in the next Transformers movie along w/ the updated '19 Camaro..that would be some product placement synergy..
  23. I think I don't find any of these appealing given my bias against FWD/transverse engine platforms.. I'll stick w/ JGC.
  24. I guess I want to see it in person before I judge the styling very much. Definitely Camaro overtones.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search