Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    New York 2018: 2019 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupe and Cabriolet Follow in the Sedan's Footsteps

      Its all about the small changes


    Mercedes-Benz used the Geneva Motor Show to introduce an updated version of the C-Class sedan. Next week at the New York Auto Show, Mercedes will follow this up with the introduction of the 2019 C-Class coupe and cabriolet.

    The exterior is slightly re-worked with a new grille and LED head and taillights. C43 models feature more prominent diffuser and circular exhaust tips at the rear.  Inside, all C-Class coupes and cabriolets get a larger 10.25-inch infotainment screen as standard. A 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster is available as an option.

    The C 300's turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder sees a slight boost in horsepower from 241 to 255. On the other end, the C43's 3.0L twin-turbo V6 sees horsepower bumped from 362 to 385. 

    On the safety front, the C-Class coupe and cabriolet can be optioned with the Intelligent Drive suite of driver assistance technologies. This includes adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring, lane keep assist, land change assist, active steering assist, and automatic emergency braking.

    Like the 2019 C-Class sedan, the coupe and cabriolet will be available at Mercedes dealers later this year.

    Source: Mercedes-Benz
    Press Release is on Page 2


    The new C-Class Coupe and Cabriolet

    • The two-door C-Class models are now even sportier

    Mar 20, 2018 – Stuttgart: Just a few weeks after the world premiere of the newly updated C-Class sedan and wagon, the two-door version of the C-Class appears in top form with the redesigned coupe and cabriolet. Sportiness and driving pleasure have been enhanced with a sharper design, digital cockpit and new, more powerful engines. The new, efficient four-cylinder engine on the C 300 and C 300 4MATIC models and upgraded AMG-enhanced 3.0-liter V6 in the Mercedes-AMG C 43 4MATIC underscore the dynamic nature of this highly emotional and appealing C-Class model. The redesigned 2019 C- Class Coupe and Cabriolet will be celebrating their World Premiere at the New York International Auto Show in March 2018 and will go on sale in the U.S. by late 2018.

    The secret of the C-Class's success is partly due to the wide model range, also including two sporty two-door versions: the coupe, launched at the end of 2015, and the cabriolet, launched in 2016, each address the heart and mind in equal measure.

    Shortly after the redesigned C-Class Sedan was introduced, the two-door models too are benefiting from extensive revisions. The most important enhancements at a glance:

    • New four-cylinder engine for sporty driving pleasure with high efficiency
    • Advancement of the sporty design in particular at the front and tail end, new light-alloy wheels, new colors
    • Standard LED High Performance headlamps with new design; optional LED Intelligent headlamps with ULTRA WIDE Highbeam
    • Enhanced interior with larger central media display equipped as standard (10.25 inches), optionally available digital instrument cluster (12.3 inches) and new multifunction steering wheel with Touch Control Buttons. Many opportunities for individualization, e.g. through new Natural Grain trim elements
    • Future-oriented driving assistance systems from Mercedes-Benz with S-Class functions and cooperative driver support

    Sport plus efficiency: new four-cylinder

    The following C-Class Coupe and models are available:

    Coupe

    C 300

    C 300
    4MATIC

    AMG C 43

    Cylinders/arrangement

    4/in-line

    4/in-line

    6/V

    Displacement (cc)

    1,991

    1,991

    2,996

    Output (hp)

    255

    255

    385

    at rpm

    5,800-6,100

    5,800-6,100

    6,100

    Max. torque (lb-ft)

    273

    273

    384

    at rpm

    1,800-4,000

    1,800-4,000

    2,500-5,000

    Acceleration 0-60 mph (s)

    5.9 est.

    5.9 est.

    4.5 est.

    Top speed (mph)
    (electronically limited)

    130

    130

    130

     

    Cabriolet

    C 300

    C 300
    4MATIC

    AMG C 43

    Cylinders/arrangement

    4/in-line

    4/in-line

    6/V

    Displacement (cc)

    1,991

    1,991

    2,996

    Output (hp)

    255

    255

    385

    at rpm

    5,800-6,100

    5,800-6,100

    6,100

    Max. torque (lb-ft)

    273

    273

    384

    at rpm

    1,800-4,000

    1,800-4,000

    2,500-5,000

    Acceleration
    0-60 mph (s)

    6.1 est.

    6.2 est.

    4.6 est.

    Top speed (mph)
    (electronically limited)

    130

    130

    130

    More powerful, more efficient engine

    The 2019 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Coupe and Cabriolet will also benefit from a new 2.0-liter inline-4 turbo engine that produces 255 hp (vs. 241 previously), an increase in 14 hp, and 273 lb-ft of torque. The Coupe and Cabriolet are also equipped with a 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic transmission that affords a dynamic driving experience.

    Mercedes-AMG: More performance for the C 43

    With a multitude of carefully coordinated measures the AMG developers have enhanced the vehicle dynamics even further. The AMG-enhanced 3.0-liter V6 engine now produces 385 hp (vs. 362 hp previously), an increase in 23 hp. The peak torque of 384 lb-ft is available in a wide engine speed range from 2,500 to 5,000 rpm. The new C 43 Coupe accelerates from a standstill to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds (estimated), and the Cabriolet in 4.6 seconds (estimated).

    4MATIC all-wheel drive: Traction even in difficult road conditions

    At market launch the C 300 is available with 4MATIC permanent all-wheel drive for improved traction and driving stability, especially in adverse road conditions. The 4MATIC has an active all-wheel torque distribution of 45 % to the front and 55 % to the rear. As ever, the combination of the ESP® driving dynamics control system with the 4ETS electronic traction system makes regular differential locks superfluous. This saves weight and noticeably improves handling safety as well as ride comfort.

    The all-wheel drive is standard equipment for the Mercedes-AMG C 43, and features rear-biased torque distribution with a front/rear axle split of 31 to 69 percent.

    More dynamic design and LED High Performance headlamps as standard

    The newly redesigned C-Class combines emotion with intelligence. The vehicle's appearance is defined in particular by its front and tail end and the design of the headlamps and taillamps.

    The front design exudes sportiness at first glance. Powerful styling elements such as the new bumper and the standard-fit diamond radiator grille lend the two-door C-Class models an individual character. The standard-fit LED High Performance headlamps have a new design that lends an especially distinctive appearance. For the first time in this model series, LED Intelligent headlamps with ULTRA WIDE high beam are additionally available (see below for details).

    The rear appears broad and agile, thanks to dynamic details and a standard-fit two-pipe exhaust system. A particular highlight both day and night are the revised, more accentuated all-LED taillamps.

    The sporty design features are heightened with the AMG Line. For example, the AMG Line exterior includes the diamond radiator grille with chrome pins plus an AMG-specific front bumper with new geometry, sporty air intakes and its chromed trim element. The exterior with the Night Package sports an even more athletic look with its black design features. These include the black trim elements in the AMG front bumper and the AMG rear bumper plus exterior mirror housings painted in high-gloss black.

    The paint color spectrum has also been broadened. New colors are Mojave Silver Metallic and – exclusively for the coupe and cabriolet within the C-Class family: Graphite Grey.

    Digital cockpit

    The sporty interior with its individual integral-look seats is characterized by further-enhanced perceived quality and flowing shapes and the facelift takes it into the digital era.

    The center console is characterized by an elegant flowing trim element with new materials: Natural Grain Brown Walnut or Natural Grain Grey Oak.
    Magma Grey/Black are newly available as interior colors.

    The KEYLESS-GO starting function is standard. The start/stop button comes in a new turbine-look design. The vehicle key also features a new design.

    On the cabriolet, the soft top can be operated from the outside with the vehicle key and the "Open/Close" buttons.

    An eye on the future: fully digital instrument cluster available as an option

    The standard multimedia display above the center console has a 10.25-inch screen. The C-Class also features a new optional, fully-digital instrument cluster with the three visually distinguishable styles "Classic," "Sport" and "Progressive," which also transform the look of the central display when equipped with this option.

    The C-Class has touch-sensitive controls in the steering wheel that respond to swiping motions like the screen of a smartphone. They enable the driver to control the functions of the instrument cluster and of the entire infotainment system without having to take their hands off the steering wheel. The operation of DISTRONIC and cruise control with controls directly on the steering wheel is another new feature.

    The infotainment system can additionally be operated via the touchpad with controller (new: haptic feedback) in the center console or by means of voice control. Vehicle functions such as the seat heating can now also be voice controlled. The optional head-up display is now adjustable over an even wider range.

    Future-oriented assistance systems on a par with the S-Class

    The new C-Class features the latest Mercedes-Benz driving assistance systems offering the driver cooperative support, and therefore provides a higher level of active safety than its predecessor. The C-Class is able to drive semi- autonomously in certain situations. To do this it keeps a close eye on the traffic situation: improved camera and radar systems allow it to see up to approximately 1,640 feet (500 m) ahead. The vehicle's surroundings are scanned by radar across a distance of up to approximately 820 feet (250 m) to the front, 130 feet (40 m) to the sides and 260 feet (80 m) to the rear, while with the camera a range of up to 1,640 feet (500 m) is possible to the front, including 295 feet (90 m) in 3D.

    The C-Class also uses map and navigation data for assistance functions. For example, Active Distance Assist DISTRONIC as part of the Driver Assistance Package is able to give the driver map-based support in numerous situations, and predictively adjust the speed e.g. when approaching bends, junctions or roundabouts. Other new developments include intuitively understandable Active Lane Change Assist and Active Emergency Stop Assist as new functions of Active Steering Assist.

    The new C-Class comes with extended Active Brake Assist as standard. Depending on the situation, this can help to mitigate the consequences of rear- end collisions with slow-moving, stopping or stationary vehicles ahead, and even with crossing pedestrians and cyclists, or prevent them altogether.

    LED Intelligent headlamps: Optimum visibility in all conditions

    LED Intelligent headlamps are new and available on request in the coupe and cabriolet. These allow electronically controlled adjustment of the headlamps to suit the current traffic situation.

    In high-beam mode, Adaptive Highbeam Assist Plus enables continuous long- range illumination of the road ahead. When no other road user is detected, the road ahead is straight and the vehicle speed is above 25 mph, ULTRA WIDE high beam is switched on automatically. When there are oncoming vehicles or vehicles ahead, the high beam is automatically switched off. The ULTRA WIDE high beams are always active only if high beam mode has been manually switched on.

    The multimedia systems: Tailor-made information and music offerings

    The C-Class comes as standard featuring Apple CarPlayTM and Android Auto smartphone integration, two USB ports, an SD card reader, Bluetooth connection and media interface.

    The latest-generation COMAND Navigation available as optional equipment offers fast 3D hard-disc navigation with topographical map display, photo- realistic 3D buildings and 3D map rotations. Comprehensive information is displayed on the navigation map: in addition to real-time traffic density information it can e.g. include Car-to-X warning messages, the weather, filling stations including current fuel prices and free parking spaces.

    With the Concierge service (included for one year in conjunction with COMAND, and available as a subscription service thereafter), Mercedes me connect customers have a host of individual services at their disposal: from making restaurant reservations and obtaining tips about tourist routes, to gathering information on cultural or sporting events and sending navigation destinations directly to the vehicle.

    The C-Class uses NFC technology

    Mobile devices corresponding to the Qi standard can be charged conveniently while on the move with the optional wireless charging system. The charging surface in the quick stowage tray at the front of the center console is also suitable for large smartphones.

    Both C-Class Coupe and Cabriolet models are produced at the Mercedes-Benz Bremen plant. The redesigned 2019 C-Class Coupe and Cabriolet will be celebrating their World Premiere at the New York International Auto Show in March 2018 and will go on sale in the U.S. by late 2018.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    19 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Everyone likes LED lights, more power and bigger screens, so nice little improvements. 

    More power is the only thing I like in your list there.

    LED lights?

    Cool, I guess. Neat feature. Like chrome trim was back in the day. But it aint something that makes or breaks a deal for me.

    Bigger screens?

    The only bigger screen I want is bigger windows so I could see where the phoque Im driving...because I actually...um...drive. I like to look out the damned window when I.....um....drive.  Im not into TV screens on my console. I prefer buttons. No...I dont talk to my car to turn on the heat. I talk to my wife to turn HER heat on if you know what I mean...

    So...the more power part is the only thing I like.  The only thing I get excited for. That and when I get my wife excited...SHE still turns me on!  

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    What a BLAND auto, no Passion at all! :nono:

    A RWD 2dr convertible has 'no passion'??   BS.   Cadillac needs something like this...something fun instead of more boring, bland transverse engine FWD CUV lease appliances....

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    A RWD 2dr convertible has 'no passion'??   BS.   Cadillac needs something like this...something fun instead of more boring, bland transverse engine FWD CUV lease appliances....

    Or at the very least, some CUVs and SUVs that have sporty intentions...

    BMW and Mercedes offers those too...even though I dont like ANY CUV or SUV short of a Wrangler, I do recognize trends in the market place...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Or at the very least, some CUVs and SUVs that have sporty intentions...

    BMW and Mercedes offers those too...even though I dont like ANY CUV or SUV short of a Wrangler, I do recognize trends in the market place...

    And BMW and M-Bs SUVs are RWD/AWD SUVs, not generic FWD/AWD transverse engine CUV appliances...(not talking about the entry level shit like the X1 and GLA, but the good stuff).  GM doesn't even have a RWD/AWD SUV unibody platform; so Cadillac gets stuck with the FWD/AWD transverse engine CUV appliances..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    A RWD 2dr convertible has 'no passion'??   BS.   Cadillac needs something like this...something fun instead of more boring, bland transverse engine FWD CUV lease appliances....

    It is all yours, never got the convertible thing, does nothing for me. I have to laugh at the waste of seats in the rear as you can see they are useless when any real person drives and then they pull them up to make the rear headrests look like big space from the front headrests and yet they are then so close to the dash which means only small people can drive the car.

    As far as the look goes, BLAND, Dash just looks cheap and as I said your welcome to the Convertible thing, and all the skin cancer that goes with it. Just never saw or got the convertible thing even when riding in them, no big deal to me, but I do acknowledge that to others they love that open air driving.

    MEH, I take an MB CUV over this every day!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    We know, you can only appreciate vehicles that can seat NBA players or NFL linebackers.  You can't seem to comprehend that not everyone wants or needs a 6000lb SUV.

    I dont  need or want a 6000 lbs SUV.

    I do however want a 6000 lbs sedan or coupe. I dont need that either. But I want one. 

    Related image

    But Ill take a small convertible if anybody offered me one. 

    Related image

     

    *SIGH*

    Cadillac does NOT offer a car like this Benz though, so my choices are limited if I wanted to spend  a good chunk of my money on a small convertible and I wanted a luxury oriented convertible. Sure there is the Camaro convertible, but I want to buy something from a luxury brand....

    Yup...Benz it is! 

    So yeah...I  too call bullshyte MR. DFELT on the C Class convertible lacking passion!

    PS: It dont matter if the dash "looks" cheap...

    The 3 pointed Star up front is what counts...THAT is THE point!

     

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hate the rear end of the c-class; THAT at least is unquestionably bland, plus I get a strong toyota solara vibe off it. The rest of the car is fine, tho I wish MB would go back to distinguishing the noses on all their model lines from each other.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    I hate the rear end of the c-class; THAT at least is unquestionably bland, plus I get a strong toyota solara vibe off it. The rest of the car is fine, tho I wish MB would go back to distinguishing the noses on all their model lines from each other.

    They were going for a consistent rear end with their other 4 seat 2drs--E-class, S-class, AMG GT all have similar rounded tails with horizontal lights, for better or for worse... 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    It is all yours, never got the convertible thing, does nothing for me. I have to laugh at the waste of seats in the rear as you can see they are useless when any real person drives and then they pull them up to make the rear headrests look like big space from the front headrests and yet they are then so close to the dash which means only small people can drive the car.

    As far as the look goes, BLAND, Dash just looks cheap and as I said your welcome to the Convertible thing, and all the skin cancer that goes with it. Just never saw or got the convertible thing even when riding in them, no big deal to me, but I do acknowledge that to others they love that open air driving.

    MEH, I take an MB CUV over this every day!

    It's ironic that you defend the size of the 4 door ATS and how absurdly small the back seat is yet you get on a 2 door convertible for its back seat space.. go on.. :retard:

    LOL serously?!?! your defense for not wanting a convertible is mo-fckn SKIN CANCER?!? GTFO. 

    Edited by ccap41
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    It's ironic that you defend the size of the 4 door ATS and how absurdly small the back seat is yet you get on a 2 door convertible for its back seat space.. go on.. :retard:

    LOL serously?!?! your defense for not wanting a convertible is mo-fckn SKIN CANCER?!? GTFO. 

    Yeah, his obsession w/ full size SUVs and slagging on cars about rear seat room gets so one-note and tiresome...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Yeah, his obsession w/ full size SUVs and slagging on cars about rear seat room gets so one-note and tiresome...

    His posts are as predictable as they get. Every car thread gets the same comments, every SUV thread gets the same comments, and everything needs to be EV. Rinse and repeat. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    It's ironic that you defend the size of the 4 door ATS and how absurdly small the back seat is yet you get on a 2 door convertible for its back seat space.. go on.. :retard:

    LOL serously?!?! your defense for not wanting a convertible is mo-fckn SKIN CANCER?!? GTFO. 

    Being a skin cancer survivor and having my face redone makes one think twice about being in the sun and especially in a convertible, but like I said even before I had cancer I never got the convertible thing. The rear seats, why bother, just make is storage room and give the front seats that much more room to be adjustable.

    1 hour ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Yeah, his obsession w/ full size SUVs and slagging on cars about rear seat room gets so one-note and tiresome...

    Same as your obsession about cars.

    Both of you do the same Shampoo, Rinse, Repeat!

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I really like this Benz... probably the best looking option in the respective segments, though those segments are rather thin.  I would put the Infiniti Q60 as a very close second place for coupes.   If Genesis ever does a G70 Coupe, it would also be an interesting entry. 

    But why bother with the back seats?

    You could give so much more room to the front two people with more adjustable seat options if you just made that unusable seat area storage area. I never got that even in the tight pony cars.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    But why bother with the back seats?

    You could give so much more room to the front two people with more adjustable seat options if you just made that unusable seat area storage area. I never got that even in the tight pony cars.

    Has to do with EPA classifications and such. That's why some cars like the FR-S/86 have back seats, but they're basically unusable. 

    Plus, MB already has 2-seater convertibles. You can still put kids in the back seat of a C-Class Cabrio

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I really like this Benz... probably the best looking option in the respective segments, though those segments are rather thin.  I would put the Infiniti Q60 as a very close second place for coupes.   If Genesis ever does a G70 Coupe, it would also be an interesting entry. 

    A Genesis coupe would be interesting.  I saw a Q60 up close and personal in a parking lot the other day, they really are sharp in person.  It was a medium/dark blue...lots of interesting contours.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    A Genesis coupe would be interesting.  I saw a Q60 up close and personal in a parking lot the other day, they really are sharp in person.  It was a medium/dark blue...lots of interesting contours.

    Yes... this. Dark Blue is the color I'd pick also. 

    It's been a long time since a Japanese car has caught my eye.  It was probably the original Infiniti G-coupe too. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have a buddy in Denver that had a G37 coupe in a silver blue, was a sharp car..of all things, the manual transmission failed and had to be replaced under warranty..

    The Q60 I saw looked like this..

    Edit: this color is Iridium Blue.  They also have a light silver blue called Hagane Blue. 

     

    Infiniti_Q601_by_Dennis_Malcolm_Byron-1200x700.jpg

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I have a buddy in Denver that had a G37 coupe in a silver blue, was a sharp car..of all things, the manual transmission failed and had to be replaced under warranty..

    The Q60 I saw looked like this..

     

     

    Infiniti_Q601_by_Dennis_Malcolm_Byron-1200x700.jpg

    :wub::wub::wub::wub::wub::wub::wub:

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Speaking of Infiniti... Their Q50 Hybrid seems like one hell of a bargain on the used market. Makes me want one really bad. I really like the updated(whenever the current gen came out) styling and it seems like it'd be a fantastic daily driver. 

    One example: Q50 Hybrid

    The miles and price vary some but you could get in one for less than 25k with what I would still consider lower miles, <40k. 

    Another: Another Q50 Hybrid

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If I'm going used bang for buck daily entry lux sedan with ICE I'm not fond of, I would probably just get a CTS VSport and put up with CUE.  The MPG on the Infiniti would definitely nice with the gas prices as they are up here currently.

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Has to do with EPA classifications and such. That's why some cars like the FR-S/86 have back seats, but they're basically unusable. 

    Plus, MB already has 2-seater convertibles. You can still put kids in the back seat of a C-Class Cabrio

    I am 6'2" and can sit in the back seat of an E-class convertible, it has a very usable back seat.  The C-class convertible rear seat is small, I think I tried sitting in one once and it is tight, more for kids, but at least it is there.  It is no worse than the 3rd row in most SUVs which can only fit kids.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    Too bad Cadillac doesn't know how to design the rear 1/3 of a coupe. They call it quits at the end of the door and just sh!t all over the floor instead. 

    [shudder]

    Infiniti_Q60S_3.0t_AWD_Sport_Tech_(V37)_–_Heckansicht,_21._April_2017,_Düsseldorf.jpg

     

    THIS, while not especially remarkable, is 1000 times more appealing :

    2016-atsv-coupe-07-rear.jpg

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, balthazar said:

    [shudder]

    Infiniti_Q60S_3.0t_AWD_Sport_Tech_(V37)_–_Heckansicht,_21._April_2017,_Düsseldorf.jpg

     

    THIS, while not especially remarkable, is 1000 times more appealing :

    2016-atsv-coupe-07-rear.jpg

    Based 100% on looks, I’d take the rear end of the Infiniti. 

    The ATS Coupe does look way better than the last CTS Coupe. Boy did I hate that thing. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Based 100% on looks, I’d take the rear end of the Infiniti. 

    The ATS Coupe does look way better than the last CTS Coupe. Boy did I hate that thing. 

    ATS V beats Infiniti

    2018CAC220001_1280_06.png

    The lower you go the bigger any spoiler looks but when your right behind it, it looks well balanced and far better than the Jelly Bean Rear of the Infiniti.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Being brutally honest; I'm totally amazed by this.

    I have to agree with @ccap41.  Looks wise I think Infiniti is much better, especially rear IMPO.

    I like ATS sedan a lot but I never liked how they did the coupe personally.  I think the rear quarter looks very awkward.

    vehicles-ats-coupe-trims-standard.png?im

    Not crazy about the kink in the rear windows but otherwise the design and lines are much more cohesive in Q60.

    2018-infiniti-q60-q60_2.0t_pure-small.jp

    Edited by ykX
    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, ykX said:

    I have to agree with @ccap41.  Looks wise I think Infiniti is much better, especially rear IMPO.

    I like ATS sedan a lot but I never liked how they did the coupe personally.  I think the rear quarter looks very awkward.

    vehicles-ats-coupe-trims-standard.png?im

    Not crazy about the kink in the rear windows but otherwise the design and lines are much more cohesive in Q60.

    2018-infiniti-q60-q60_2.0t_pure-small.jp

    Toss in the Lexus RC, a bit busier styling and more detailing in the rear quarters..

     

    Lexus-RC-300-FSPORT-styles-1204x555-LEX-RCG-MY17-0062-01-D.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting. To my eye, the Q60 looks like pieces from 10 different cars were glued together, with a thin coat of bondo to try and smooth out the seams. It's a bewildering array of disharmonious lines. Those little plastic 'mud flaps' behind the  wheels, the tacked-on scoop on the front fender, the way toyota couldn't be bothered to make the quarter window 'black out' match the shape of the glass - too many pieces/lines; it's hugely incohesive.

    The lexus RC above (which could easily be from the same brand it's so remarkably similar) is noticably better... but we can't see either fascia from the profile view. ;)

    Like I stated- the ATS coupe isn't knocking socks off, but it's got a 'carved from one piece' look without being overwrought.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, balthazar said:

    Being brutally honest; I'm totally amazed by this.

    Cadillac can't make pretty coupes. They haven't for quite awhile now and it's all in the rear 1/3 of the vehicle. 

    1 hour ago, ykX said:

    I have to agree with @ccap41.  Looks wise I think Infiniti is much better, especially rear IMPO.

    I like ATS sedan a lot but I never liked how they did the coupe personally.  I think the rear quarter looks very awkward.

    vehicles-ats-coupe-trims-standard.png?im

    Not crazy about the kink in the rear windows but otherwise the design and lines are much more cohesive in Q60.

    2018-infiniti-q60-q60_2.0t_pure-small.jp

    Yeah! It's everything behind the doors that is just botched. It's like the quit trying and just pulled the body back to the required distances and said, "it's done."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @Cubical-aka-Moltar Personally, not crazy about Germans as well. Audi is probably the worst offender.  

    I think it is pretty hard to make a good looking coupe when the starting point a sedan. I think Q60 looks better mainly because the design is a bigger departure from Q50

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    Challenger does the B pillar best, it’s not there. I thought the Mustang was like that as well but it looks like it might be from that pic. 

    It's there on the Challenger, hidden by the glass like on the ATS, Q60 and Mustang. 

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    MB came SO CLOSE but still had to 'cheap out' & have that little fixed quarter window there instead of engineering a pivoting pane. Like this: fully retractable side glass, no fixed panes ~

    1959-cadillac-eldorado-seville-no-reserve-1.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, balthazar said:

    MB came SO CLOSE but still had to 'cheap out' & have that little fixed quarter window there instead of engineering a pivoting pane. Like this: fully retractable side glass, no fixed panes ~

     

    The Cadillac had a long wheelbase that allowed for the window to drop down...the M-B wheelbase isn't long enough for that kind of clearance..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Which reminds me...

    My favorite car of all time is EXACTLY what you folk are kvetching about...(the wheelbase of MY favorite car of all time just ekes it out, I guess!) 

    Related image

    Oh YEAH!!!

    Related image

    I aint judging here..but none of those coupes hold a candle to MY favorite car of all time...

    Wait a minute...I lied...here comes the JUDGE!

    Image result for 1970 pontiac gto

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Its all about the roll-over safety.

    Yes...yes...the M-B coupe's roof is engineered to not collapse in case of a roll-over....

    I applaud the fact that Mercedes Benz went all out to make a pillar-less roof. Its a good thing in my book. 

    But for modern coupes....

    This is my #1 side profile that I prefer.

     

     

    2018-infiniti-q60-q60_2.0t_pure-small.jp

    Tied with this guy

    2017-Dodge-Challenger-side-view.jpg

     

    2nd place belongs to this guy

    2015-ford-mustang-side-exterior-view_100499750_l.jpgAnd then everybody else...

     

    What I like about this guy

    Mercedes-Benz-E-Class_Coupe-2017-1280-18

     

    1. pillar-less roof line

    2. Long hood, short deck styling. But they all do that...

    3. That is about it. The lines are just as conservatively boring as the ATS coupe.   

    If you noticed, the Infiniti, The Challenger anf the Mustang all have hips....I like hips. I like curvy. In my women and in my cars... 

    The Mercedes Benz and the ATS are androgynous, sexless... 

    Not my style man.  Not. My. Style. 

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • ^ See that fixed black pillar above the rear wheel? IMO that's not a pillarless roofline.

    • RE the '59 vs. the MB as pictured above- the MB has a much higher relative beltline & shorter glass, and both cars have the rearward point of the window ending well over the rear wheel... but only 1 of those 2 engineered a way to lower that whole pane of glass- the one with the bigger challenge to do so logistically.

    • Not seeing anything (modern) pictured on this page stirring my soul. I kinda like the Audi out on the road, it sometimes catches my eye, but in the pic above it just looks... weird/unpleasant. Also VERY depressing how --other than the Challenger-- every modern car is doing the exact same thing with the upper & lower horizontal bodyside peaks. Anyone going to try and do their own thing, ever?? 

    The infiniti is easily the worst/most awkward, the BMW is the most dated/boring. Base ATS in that straight profile also looking a bit boring.  The white MB looks decent, but there's a noticible distortion in the photo making either end appear truncated.

    It seems tough to balance clean vs. cluttered design and still get everything cohesive. Most of the above still look like pieces from multiple vehicles pasted together. The red MB is clean, no wierdness, but it looks like it could have been built in 2005. Probably the MOST cohesive design here is the Challenger, and I do like it, but it's also been around a while. No 9s or 10s for me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A coworker recently bought one of these... after seeing them in person, I'd characterize the styling as if Lamborghini made an economy hatchback.  It's a sleek shape with a lot of Lambo in the profile and front.   My coworker is 5'7", we had an local happy hour a few weeks ago I drove down to Akron and met up w/ my coworkers I hadn't seen in 6 months (as we all work from home), and I rode a few miles in his new Prius..at just under 6'0" my head was right into the roof glass...tight inside.  Neat looking little car, though. 
    • This is too funny and I HOPE HOPE HOPE Amazon moves forward with this as all the auto's on Amazon for sale will have a TRUMP TARIFF line that shows how much TARIFF tax they will pay. Trump’s ‘Pottery Barn rule’ problem
    • I don’t know if this vehicle, a Toyota Prius Hybrid HEV, represented an upgrade.  It’s just what I was assigned as a mid-size rented vehicle for 3 days.  I had a general idea that this vehicle was recently refreshed and that it looked a lot better.  As I got closer to it and got into it, I was able to get a better look.  The new Prius looks a lot better than I recall a Prius ever looking.  It looks sleek, sporty, and even sort of low-slung.  Interesting exterior features show that they made this a priority.  The front lights and fascia are thin and understated, working well with the more unified exterior.  The rear fascia is definitely Prius’s own and it gives the car some interesting, angled vantage points.  They even incorporated gullwing handles into the sedan’s rear doors and, having once had these in the last rendition of the W-body Buick Regal coupe, I like their look and just plain using them. Its low-slung aspect can present a slight demerit.  The windshield and profile of the front doors is very raked and, as a person of average height, I had to duck a little more than usual to enter the car.  Similarly, the rear backlite borders on almost being horizontal.  This does give the rear storage area a little more usable height. Inside, the front pillars’ rake is mitigated by fixed renditions of what used to be vent windows in older cars.  However, they still seem to block an instinctive sight line compared to more upright vehicles like the current Camry and Corolla.  Inside, the feeling is more cockpit-like.  Similarly, the rear view has the thicker pillars and flatter backlite that require more proactive work – looking over the shoulder attentively and using the amber traffic monitoring warnings in the outside mirrors.  A complementary feature is the chime that assisted lane changes. The Prius has a 4-cylinder engine that seems to spend more time in EV mode than did the hybrid Camry.  That means good fuel economy and, over 3 days, I only added 6 gallons for between 200 and 300 miles of motoring.  In terms of power, handling, and roadability, the Prius gets mixed comments from me.  It does have agility when the pedal is pressed and it moves from eco to power mode.  It also eases upward to higher than anticipated highway speeds if not paying attention!  The transmission is a CVT with a “faux” first gear and it works well.  The Prius has a more noticeable wheezing sound when in reverse gear, which actually advises those inside the car and near it.  However, when pushed, the powertrain gets buzzy, as in noisy.  But at steady speed, any engine noise is not that noticeable.  The vehicle’s handling, smoothness, and quietness vary.  Handling is always nimble and, even at highway speeds, it maneuvers adeptly.  The ride is mostly smooth.  However, noise control could use some improvement.  Some of that can come from the tires they equip the car with, fitted with aluminum wheels that hearken to the ones on Tesla products.  That said, it’s hard to tell if the drone is tire thum or wind.  However, if you prioritize handling among these, I was surprised to see how well the Prius handles … on the highway, on city streets, and even in tight parking spaces, where 3-point attempts are rarely necessary. The cockpit is unusual and very different from yesterday’s Priuses, which I’ve only seen and never driven or been a passenger in one.  I remember how the first model had an oval main instrument pod set up on the cowl in the middle of the dashboard but angled toward the driver.  Today’s Prius has thin and smaller pods, almost set on ledges that seem to staircase down as the cowl approaches the driver.  The main panel looks like a small tablet that is set quite far from the steering wheel.  Depending on how the wheel is titled, there could be some visibility issues seeing all the information.  This required adjusting the wheel and the seating height.  Also, the front seat can be very far from the pedals.  So, while the door is low, taller drivers might like this potential distance.  The infotainment center sits slightly forward of the main instrument screen and is conventionally placed atop the center stack.  Thankfully, it continues with touch operation as opposed to being operated via a remote dial.  Most functions are the ones you’ve known for a while, so setting things up doesn’t take long.  I did struggle a little with the Android Auto, even though the Bluetooth pairing was quick.  Note that, while the Camry has USB-C ports, the Prius does not.  Further down on the center stack, the climate control is easy to work with (not the 3-dial type that so many exports and even domestics have) and the A/C blows colder a little quicker than in the last Camry I drove.  The console deck is about the right height and its overall dimensions, including the box, are generous.  The compactness of the shift lever is sort of fun … think of a small underpowered low-cost EV Corvette! When going into gear, it’s not about moving the selector linearly.  A quick jog to the left and up toward the instrument panel is for reverse while that same quick jog followed by a rearward move puts the vehicle in drive.  It doesn’t take long to get used to this.  Also, the park feature is easy to work with.  Just push in P when stopped and, whether in reserve or drive, the gear selector goes to park.  The only thing is that it is not forgiving when shifting the lever … your foot must be firmly on the brake, so no slipshod maneuvers.  The seating is comfortable and the buckets seem a little high, but this offers support from top to bottom.  The same is true in the rear of the cabin and the headrests do intrude with an already thicker rear sail panel / C-pillar.  Legroom in the rear also seems good and the length of the vehicle allows for that.  Space is sensibly distributed in the 3 volumes from front to back. I always thought a Prius would have something daunting or different about it.  Its look is different in that it lost its first-gen look that looked like an upright Nissan Versa of 2016 … sort of like the runt of the litter that is on the run because it has been kicked in the rump.  This Prius looks planted.  Upon pushing the prominent and easy to use “power” button on the dash, there will be no noise and the dash will literally tell you when it, and you, are “ready” to go. It's a smaller but roomy vehicle where the price isn’t a bargain, but not that steep in today’s terms.  I find there are a few things that I wasn’t crazy about – the height, the main instrument pod sitting in the distance, and not the best noises suppression – but I liked most other things about it.  With so many Priuses going the long haul, this one will probably do the same … and look a lot more presentable while doing it. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING  
    • I'm laughing.   There are always reasons why things are "discounted." With me, it's DFW and Austin that give me heartburn.  San Antonio, too, even though I don't know it as well.  I just don't like the look of the DFW area, whether natural or built.  I don't like Austin for being the governmental engine of a big red place next to a massive university with over 50,000 students that is a big blue place.  I'm more of a moderate and don't want extremes in either element.  I also don't like the "way cool" leanings in Austin. Houston has its negatives, but I'd take it for nearby Galveston, and water in general, the extensive pinewoods, the dark red brick homes, an attractive downtown, and for being America's most ethnically diverse city that has always rolled with that spirit.  There is no "you shouldn't be here" factor.  IIR, I've heard of a saying about Madrid that goes, 'When you're in Madrid, you're from Madrid.'  Having lived in various places, I pay attention to those subleties.
    • Very cool to see This Hyundai Ioniq 5 Owner Managed 413,991 Miles In Under Four Years, With One Big Catch
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search