Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    And Now, The 2014 Chevrolet SS


    By William Maley

    Staff Writer - CheersandGears.com

    February 16, 2013

    It feels like an eternity when GM announced that a Holden Commodore would be returning to the states as a Chevrolet, wearing the nameplate of SS. Well its official as GM has pulled the camouflage away and revealed 2014 SS.

    We know that SS is the new VF Commodore wearing some Chevrolet badging. What we didn't know what would be under the hood, until now. The SS will be packing a 6.2L LS3 V8 producing 415 horsepower and 415 pound-feet of torque. All of the punch is routed to a six-speed automatic with paddle shifters. Those looking for a manual are out of luck.

    Chevrolet has made sure that the SS delivers on the performance mission and has fitted a sport suspension, Brembo brakes, forged-aluminum nineteen-inch wheels wrapped in Bridgestone ultra-high-performance tires. The SS has a almost 50/50 weight distribution, and a low center of gravity thanks to an aluminum hood and rear deck lid.

    Inside the SS, Chevrolet has equipped it with standard features such as leather seats, Chevrolet MyLink infotainment system with navigation, Bose nine-speaker sound system, push-button start, forward collision alert and lane departure warning, a color heads-up display on the windshield and the first application of active park assist in a Chevrolet.

    The new SS arrives at dealers in the fourth quarter.

    2014 Chevrolet SS
    Album: 2014 Chevrolet SS
    9 images
    0 comments

    William Maley is a staff writer for Cheers & Gears. He can be reached at [email protected]or you can follow him on twitter at @realmudmonster.

    Press Release is on Page 2


    2014 Chevrolet SS: Performance Sedan with Racing DNA

    DAYTONA, Fla., Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013, 12:01 a.m. EST – As Chevrolet's first V-8, rear-wheel-drive performance sedan since 1996, the new Chevrolet SS is designed to deliver performance on the street and on the track. The 2014 Chevrolet SS will debut this weekend at the Daytona International Speedway as the SS racecar makes its NASCAR debut during the Daytona 500.

    "The Chevrolet brand was largely built on the strength of rear-drive performance sedans, yet it's been 17 years since we've offered one," said Mark Reuss, president of General Motors North America. "The all-new Chevrolet SS fills that void and fills it better than any other vehicle in the brand's rich history. The comfort, convenience, spaciousness and V-8 power make the SS a total performance package unlike any other on the road today."

    The Chevrolet SS benefits from the proven, race-tested, global rear-wheel drive architecture that is the foundation for the Camaro, Caprice Police Patrol Vehicle and Holden's VF Commodore.

    The Chevrolet SS is powered by the LS3 Chevrolet V-8, expected to deliver 415 horsepower and 415 lb-ft of torque. Also used in the 2013 Chevrolet Corvette, the LS3 displaces 6.2 liters, more than the 5.5-liter V-8 powering the Chevrolet SS NASCAR competitors.

    The LS3 is married to a six-speed automatic transmission, which can be shifted manually using TAPshift paddles mounted on the steering wheel. With an aggressive 3.27 final-drive ratio, the Chevrolet SS accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in about five seconds – making it one of the quickest sedans on the market.

    To ensure that it turns and stops as well as it accelerates; the Chevrolet SS also features a sport-tuned chassis, including:

    • MacPherson strut front and multilink independent rear suspension geometry
    • Electronic power steering system, optimized for sport driving
    • Standard Brembo brakes, with ventilated, 355-mm rotors and two-piece, four-piston front calipers
    • Forged aluminum wheels, wrapped in ultra-high-performance Bridgestone tires: 19 x 8.5 inch wheels with 245/40ZR19 tires in front; 19 x 9.0 inch wheels with 275/35ZR19 tires rear

    Handling is also improved by a near 50/50 weight distribution, and a low center of gravity – made possible in part by the aluminum hood and rear deck lid that are 30 percent lighter than traditional steel panels.

    "Our goal was to create a car that delivers incredible grip and handling balance while cornering, while still being comfortable to drive on the road," said David Leone, executive chief engineer GM global programs. "The perfect weight balance and lower center of gravity were a big part of that goal because it enabled the team to tune for a more comfortable highway ride without sacrificing handling or driver confidence while cornering at the limits."

    Similarly, the design of the SS blends performance cues and premium details.

    "From every angle, the Chevrolet SS says power and performance," said John Cafaro design director Chevrolet passenger cars and small crossovers. "The combination of an aggressive rear-wheel drive stance and body-side attitude with the right balance of detail and refinement inside and out are the perfect home for Chevrolet's V-8 performance package."

    The staggered front and rear wheels, which are pushed out to the corners, enhance the sporting, muscular stance of the SS. Up front, the aluminum hood features a subtle "power bulge" hinting at the power of the engine underneath. At the rear, the tapered, tear-drop shape contributes to improved aerodynamic performance. Premium cues include jewel-like chrome accents, standard high-intensity discharge headlamps and light-emitting diode daytime running lights.

    The spacious interior of the SS will comfortably accommodate five adults, with 42 inches of front legroom, and 39 inches of rear legroom. Leather seating surfaces are standard, as are eight-way power adjustable front bucket seats with additional side bolstering that hug the driver and front passenger in tight-handling situations. The SS emblem is prominently stitched onto the soft-touch instrument panel which features two types of chrome finishes – a satin gloss and a bright chrome. At night, the interior is illuminated by ice blue ambient lighting.

    An integrated center stack includes infotainment, climate and other vehicle controls. The Chevrolet SS also offers a long list of technology features as standard equipment including:

    • Color, in-dashboard touch screen that supports Chevrolet MyLink and the next-generation navigation system
    • Bose® Nine-speaker premium sound system
    • Color heads-up display
    • Push-button start
    • StabiliTrak Electronic Stability Control
    • Forward Collision Alert
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Side Blind Zone Alert
    • Rear-vision camera Rear Cross Traffic Alert

    The SS is also the first Chevrolet to offer Automatic Parking Assist, which provides hands-free parking help. This efficient 'hands-free' parking assistant uses the ultrasonic sensing system to detect the width and depth of either parallel or reverse right-angle parking spaces. While the driver controls the throttle, transmission, and brake, the Automatic Parking Assist controls the steering inputs necessary to neatly park the Chevrolet SS.

    The 2014 Chevrolet SS will be available in the fourth quarter of 2013, with prices set closer to the on-sale date. When it arrives in showrooms, the SS will join the Corvette and Camaro, whose combined sales have made Chevrolet America's favorite performance brand for the last two years.

    2014 CHEVROLET SS PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATIONS

    Overview

    Model: Chevrolet SS

    Body style / driveline: front-engine, rear-drive

    Construction: unitized body structure and frame; two-sided galvanized steel (except roof)

    EPA vehicle class: large

    Manufacturing location: Elizabeth, Australia

    Powertrain

    Engine: 6.2L OHV V-8

    Displacement (cu in / cc): 376 / 6162

    Bore & stroke (in / mm): 4.06 x 3.62 / 103.25 x 92

    Block material: cast aluminum w/ cast-in-place iron bore liners

    Cylinder head material: aluminum

    Valvetrain: overhead valve; two valves per cylinder; roller lifters

    Ignition system: coil-near-plug ignition

    Fuel: sequential fuel injection

    Compression ratio: 10.7:1

    Horsepower (hp/ kW @ rpm): 415 / 309 @ 5900

    Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm): 415 / 563 @ 4600

    Fuel: premium recommended not required

    Transmission: Hydra-Matic 6L80 6-speed automatic w/ TapShift

    Chassis/Suspension

    Front: multi-link MacPherson strut; direct-acting stabilizer bar; progressive-rate coil springs; fully adjustable camber, caster and toe

    Rear: four-link independent; progressive-rate coil springs over shocks; stabilizer bar; fully adjustable camber and toe

    Steering type: electric power

    Brakes

    Front

    Type: ventilated disc

    Rotor diameter x thickness (mm): 355 x 32

    Caliper four-piston fixed

    Rear

    Type: ventilated disc

    Rotor diameter x thickness (mm): 324 x 22

    Caliper: single-piston sliding

    Wheels/Tires

    Wheel size and type: 19 x 8.5-inch forged, fully polished aluminum (front)

    19 x 9-inch forged, fully polished aluminum (rear)

    Tires: P245/40R19 (front)

    P275/35R19 (rear)

    Dimensions

    Exterior

    Wheelbase (in / mm): 114.8 / 2916

    Overall length (in / mm): 195.5 / 5185

    Overall width (in / mm): 74.7 / 1898

    Overall height (in / mm): 57.9 / 1491

    Track (in / mm): front: 62.6 / 1590

    rear: 62.4 / 1612

    Interior

    front / rear

    Seating capacity: 2 / 3

    Legroom (in / mm): 42.3 / 1074 39.7 / 1008

    *SAE certified.

    Note: Information shown is current at time of publication.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I don't think they need a manual because few people buy them, and this car isn't going to sell in much volume anyway, if they offered a manual they might sell 300 a year, it isn't worth trying.

    The styling is really bland and it looks closer to a Buick Regal than any Chevy product. I see it has the same bubble trunk as the Regal, Malibu and Cadillacs, I am hating that and don't know why GM is putting it on every car now. The 2014 Impala looks way better than the SS. The Interior of the SS is okay, looks like the Impala's.

    Chevy managed to make a car even more boring and with less character than the Hyundai Genesis. The Genesis has 429 hp and an 8-speed though, and probably weighs less.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Anyone else think it odd that the full size Cadillac sedan has 300 hp and the full size Chevy sedan has 415? The ATS, CTS and XTS all get a 300ish HP V6 where at the V8s? And the CTS-V is hardly a sufficient offering when Mercedes has 7 passenger cars with an available V8.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mercedes doesn't have any 7-passenger cars.

    7 different car models with a V8. C-Class, E-class, S-class (CL-Class merging with S-class in 2014), CLS, SLK, SL, SLS. Cadillac has 1, Chevy now has 3. Cadillac needs some more love in the high performance area, or even just mid-range V8 luxury sedan, Hyundai makes more V8 sedans than Cadillac.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the case you are making is that GM could only afford 1 transmission, then they chose the wrong one for this sort of car.

    Besideswhich, it's the same damn trans the Camaro has.

    spend how much to certify, advertise, and distribute a car that only 300 people would buy (without an automatic)? They would have to price it at 50k to make up for the 20k in marketing costs each car would bear just to get the word out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mercedes doesn't have any 7-passenger cars.

    7 different car models with a V8. C-Class, E-class, S-class (CL-Class merging with S-class in 2014), CLS, SLK, SL, SLS. Cadillac has 1, Chevy now has 3. Cadillac needs some more love in the high performance area, or even just mid-range V8 luxury sedan, Hyundai makes more V8 sedans than Cadillac.

    Apples and oranges, though...GM's bread and butter is cheap FWD appliances...Mercedes is all about expensive RWD models..though they are sadly getting into the appliance thing also.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Back to the SS though, it is just a disappointing car, and another example of wasted resources. The Malibu is a mess, yet GM loves to get distracted by cars like the SS, SSR pickup, Sky/Solstice, etc. As much as I don't like Toyota, at least they focus on what matters and sell a boat load of appliances.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mercedes doesn't have any 7-passenger cars.

    7 different car models with a V8. C-Class, E-class, S-class (CL-Class merging with S-class in 2014), CLS, SLK, SL, SLS. Cadillac has 1, Chevy now has 3. Cadillac needs some more love in the high performance area, or even just mid-range V8 luxury sedan, Hyundai makes more V8 sedans than Cadillac.

    Apples and oranges, though...GM's bread and butter is cheap FWD appliances...Mercedes is all about expensive RWD models..though they are sadly getting into the appliance thing also.

    Well Cadillac wants to be "Standard of the World" so that means expensive RWD V8 and V12 models and 200 mph super cars. Standard of the World means going up against Mercedes, Rolls, Bentley, Lamborghini, etc. Where is Cadillac's Lexus LFA or Audi R8 rival? Where is the V12 sedan to compete with the S600, Bentley Flying Spur and Rolls Royce Ghost. Cadillac is just not there, and never will be because GM is about FWD appliances. Which is fine, Toyota has been makings billions of profit for years on appliances.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I must be the only one who likes the styling of it? The only thing I really don't care about is the park assist and lane departure warning. Id love to have one, but I highly doubt it will be in my price point so it looks like I'll have to pick up a nice second hand G8.

    On a side note the automatic transmission doesn't bother me either. My wifes Cruze and my Silverado with the manual shift mode work great to me.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, it's pretty much the same place. ;)

    But I believe dfelt was referring to the flair & fluidity (& level of uniqueness) of the SS concept, whereas this SS gives a rather generic serving of the 'same old'.

    Exactly, You read me well my friend.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have never been a fan of the G8's styling -- I hated those Pontiac nostrils (fake intakes on the hood). But this is, well, pretty uninspiring if rather unoffensive. Honestly, even the Malibu's nose look better sculpted and purposeful. Overall the VF Commodore looks better and more coherent -- not that it's that stunning either.

    Why the LS3 is sticking around is baffling. The LT1 should be standardized across the board.

    Personally, I don't see why they needed the Impala and the Malibu. These two should be one product. The Malibu should have been on the Impala's longer wheelbase and the Impala should be de-contented to be inline with the Malibu's price point. The car should have a V6 for people who want one. The SS being V8 only isn't a bad idea. Anyone who will rather have better mileage can get a Bu. Anyone who wants more luxury can buy a Buick if the preference is FWD or a Caddy if the preference is RWD.

    Chevy needs to focus on being the value brand. Buick as the comfort luxury brand. And Caddy the sport luxury brand. There should be as little overlap in products as possible between these. GM is not doing that...

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the case you are making is that GM could only afford 1 transmission, then they chose the wrong one for this sort of car.

    Besideswhich, it's the same damn trans the Camaro has.

    spend how much to certify, advertise, and distribute a car that only 300 people would buy (without an automatic)? They would have to price it at 50k to make up for the 20k in marketing costs each car would bear just to get the word out.

    Utter nonsense!

    If offered, the manual would account for nearly half of sales.

    This is a limited production performance car, and the intended market wants the manual.

    GM did learn (through G8 and Camaro sales) that it doesn't make sense to import a v6 version, but they seem to have missed the memo on the manual transmission.

    While opinion is divided on the styling, the desire for a manual is overwhelming - just scan around enthusiast sites (the target market).

    This car is meant to be an enthusiast's car, so the normal dumbing-down to an automatic is exactly the wrong way to sell it.

    As for marketing, those who want the car already know about it.. And with expected volumes of 3-5000 per year acceptable to Mark Reuss, how much advertising do you need for a car that makes its own news?

    You have to understand performance cars and performance car buyers - the usual sheeple coddling doesn't apply.

    Edited by Camino LS6
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the case you are making is that GM could only afford 1 transmission, then they chose the wrong one for this sort of car.

    Besideswhich, it's the same damn trans the Camaro has.

    spend how much to certify, advertise, and distribute a car that only 300 people would buy (without an automatic)? They would have to price it at 50k to make up for the 20k in marketing costs each car would bear just to get the word out.

    Utter nonsense!

    If offered, the manual would account for nearly half of sales.

    This is a limited production performance car, and the intended market wants the manual.

    GM did learn (through G8 and Camaro sales) that it doesn't make sense to import a v6 version, but they seem to have missed the memo on the manual transmission.

    While opinion is divided on the styling, the desire for a manual is overwhelming - just scan around enthusiast sites (the target market).

    This car is meant to be an enthusiast's car, so the normal dumbing-down to an automatic is exactly the wrong way to sell it.

    As for marketing, those who want the car already know about it.. And with expected volumes of 3-5000 per year acceptable to Mark Reuss, how much advertising do you need for a car that makes its own news?

    You have to understand performance cars and performance car buyers - the usual sheeple coddling doesn't apply.

    Of course, in order to support your statements, you have to make the assumption that enthusiasts and performance car buyers ONLY drive manuals. That's far from true.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the case you are making is that GM could only afford 1 transmission, then they chose the wrong one for this sort of car.

    Besideswhich, it's the same damn trans the Camaro has.

    spend how much to certify, advertise, and distribute a car that only 300 people would buy (without an automatic)? They would have to price it at 50k to make up for the 20k in marketing costs each car would bear just to get the word out.

    Utter nonsense!

    If offered, the manual would account for nearly half of sales.

    This is a limited production performance car, and the intended market wants the manual.

    GM did learn (through G8 and Camaro sales) that it doesn't make sense to import a v6 version, but they seem to have missed the memo on the manual transmission.

    While opinion is divided on the styling, the desire for a manual is overwhelming - just scan around enthusiast sites (the target market).

    This car is meant to be an enthusiast's car, so the normal dumbing-down to an automatic is exactly the wrong way to sell it.

    As for marketing, those who want the car already know about it.. And with expected volumes of 3-5000 per year acceptable to Mark Reuss, how much advertising do you need for a car that makes its own news?

    You have to understand performance cars and performance car buyers - the usual sheeple coddling doesn't apply.

    Of course, in order to support your statements, you have to make the assumption that enthusiasts and performance car buyers ONLY drive manuals. That's far from true.

    Not at all.

    But on a car of this sort, a manual option is required.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I feel the lack of the manual and new engine is a major marketing mistake. But I would love to see or hear all the facts involved as things are not always as easy and straight forward as they appear. The BS they had to go through and the cost involved for the GTO was crazy and a lot more than most realize.

    Now that is not to excuse the mistake here but just something we all need to consider. Bringing these cars over is not the same as building them in Lansing.


    The only way I see to fix many of the issues here is to move the 2016 car built here to the Camaro, CTS and ATS line if it is on the Alpha. This would resolve much of what is involved and let us have more of what we want.

    Trust me if it was such a slam dunk the people opposed to it at GM would have no argument but when in fact they do.


    The pace car at Daytona look good in blue and white stripes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, this was it. The last chance to get it right for the Zeta cars.

    The way I see it, the strategy they have adopted here is just the final mistake in a long history of mistakes.

    Zeta was wasted, and its potential barely explored.

    All that I can do now is hope that a few tweaks can be applied to the SS in time to make it somewhat successful.

    Lacking that, a flop with this car could be used to seal the fate of GM RWD going forward.

    So, warts and all, I hope this thing sells.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Back to dwight's post, Chevy has Malibu and Impala for the same reason Ford has Fusion and Taurus, Nissan has Altima and Maxima, Toyota has Camry and Avalon. Midsize 4 cyl appliance, full size 4cyl and V6 appliance. Covering two major volume niches.

    As for the SS, if there is a next generation, I wonder if their will be one NA made model to cover performance (SS) and police (PPV) use...for 2014 at least, there are two related-but-distinct models (SS and Caprice PPV) for those niches.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have never been a fan of the G8's styling -- I hated those Pontiac nostrils (fake intakes on the hood). But this is, well, pretty uninspiring if rather unoffensive. Honestly, even the Malibu's nose look better sculpted and purposeful. Overall the VF Commodore looks better and more coherent -- not that it's that stunning either.

    Why the LS3 is sticking around is baffling. The LT1 should be standardized across the board.

    Personally, I don't see why they needed the Impala and the Malibu. These two should be one product. The Malibu should have been on the Impala's longer wheelbase and the Impala should be de-contented to be inline with the Malibu's price point. The car should have a V6 for people who want one. The SS being V8 only isn't a bad idea. Anyone who will rather have better mileage can get a Bu. Anyone who wants more luxury can buy a Buick if the preference is FWD or a Caddy if the preference is RWD.

    Chevy needs to focus on being the value brand. Buick as the comfort luxury brand. And Caddy the sport luxury brand. There should be as little overlap in products as possible between these. GM is not doing that...

    I disagree that the Malibu and Impala should be one product, as Hyundai has the Sonata and Azera, Toyota the Camry and Avalon. There is room for both. I could see them making the Imapala and SS into one product though, as the Impala looks better, this gives Chevy something in line with the Charger and 300.

    Having 3 sedans, and them overlapping Buick is a bit too much though. A good idea may have been to make the Impala RWD so that it wasn't the same size and prize as a LaCrosse.

    I do agree that Chevy needs to be the value brand though, which is why a possibly $45,000 base price V8 sedan doesn't make a lot of sense.

    Edited by smk4565
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In all honesty, I'd have been perfectly happy with a Ute or wagon equipped no better than the VE/G8 as far as electronica goes. And, I'd have even been happy with the old 350HP LS1 - if the car had a manual.

    My GTO was so equipped, and it was a ball to drive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dodge and Ford are also 'value brands' and have sedans that range that high in price, though. Buick is just filler between Chevy and Cadillac, sort of how Mercury was between Ford and Lincoln, so there is going to be overlap.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Daryl, thanks for posting that. Great!

    In 1983, Chevrolet lowballed the sales chances of the Monte Carlo SS homologation special... and we know what happened there, it became a great seller for Chevrolet, with a lot of goodwill for the brand.

    This is what the SS is for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well Cadillac wants to be "Standard of the World" so that means expensive RWD V8 and V12 models and 200 mph super cars. Standard of the World means going up against Mercedes, Rolls, Bentley, Lamborghini, etc. Where is Cadillac's Lexus LFA or Audi R8 rival? Where is the V12 sedan to compete with the S600, Bentley Flying Spur and Rolls Royce Ghost. Cadillac is just not there, and never will be because GM is about FWD appliances. Which is fine, Toyota has been makings billions of profit for years on appliances.

    One thing at a time! And they are focusing on the right priorities. Get into the luxury compact segment first with the ATS -- that's the biggest slice of the pie and they weren't even fighting for it. Get the CTS updated and moved upmarket so it can be a 5-series / E-class competitor. Next up the LTS to be in the S-class segment. Everything else can and should come later. The only mistake they made thus far, IMHO, is the XTS. That should have been the Buick flagship.

    Lexus and Audi were successful before the LF-A or the R8. And one can argue that they could be just as successful with or without those cars. Adding a XLR is not going to change their market share or balance sheet tangibly. Competing with the LF-A or R8 is not particularly difficult. Drop a 7.0L or supercharged derivative of the LT1 (550~650 bhp) into a more carbon intensive version of the C7 platform and you have a super car that can run with a Ferrari. But, as much of a Halo car as that may be, it is not worth delaying the LTS over.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Standing back a bit, I could certainly get behind the Malibu & Impala becoming a single model (aside from the emotional reaction to dropping one of the nameplates). The Azera/Avalon analogy doesn't hold great import, as those cars sell in relatively small numbers (well, the Azera does). IMO, these classes of car just aren't that different functionally/size-wise that their parallel existence is so mandatory, they're just different flavors of the same ice cream (same goes for the import examples cited above).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the case you are making is that GM could only afford 1 transmission, then they chose the wrong one for this sort of car.

    Besideswhich, it's the same damn trans the Camaro has.

    spend how much to certify, advertise, and distribute a car that only 300 people would buy (without an automatic)? They would have to price it at 50k to make up for the 20k in marketing costs each car would bear just to get the word out.

    Utter nonsense!

    If offered, the manual would account for nearly half of sales.

    This is a limited production performance car, and the intended market wants the manual.

    GM did learn (through G8 and Camaro sales) that it doesn't make sense to import a v6 version, but they seem to have missed the memo on the manual transmission.

    While opinion is divided on the styling, the desire for a manual is overwhelming - just scan around enthusiast sites (the target market).

    This car is meant to be an enthusiast's car, so the normal dumbing-down to an automatic is exactly the wrong way to sell it.

    As for marketing, those who want the car already know about it.. And with expected volumes of 3-5000 per year acceptable to Mark Reuss, how much advertising do you need for a car that makes its own news?

    You have to understand performance cars and performance car buyers - the usual sheeple coddling doesn't apply.

    Of course, in order to support your statements, you have to make the assumption that enthusiasts and performance car buyers ONLY drive manuals. That's far from true.

    Not at all.

    But on a car of this sort, a manual option is required.

    how many people with the money in hand, ready to spend, when writing the check, will a) buy an SS and b) buy one with a manual.

    then it's a matter of whether they can cover the cost of it.

    When it comes down to brass tacks its one of two things, chevy either has determined there is no hard evidence to suggest they can make the numbers work on the manual (internet posters who never buy any new cars and can't probably afford the gas in the beater they already drive are certainly numerous on the net, or they may just simply be waiting some period of time to get the manual out. BMW never has the M version of each of its cars ready at the get go.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, GM's ambitions for this car are modest enough. And, 46% of GXP buyers is the best indicator you could ask for.

    Yes, GM could be waiting to announce a manual - hopefully, that's the case.

    Most of the folks posting about this actually own G8s or Camaros, or similar cars, and they are the target market.

    So, I'll have to stick to my points on this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It will be interesting to see why GM claims no Manual?

    As for the Zeta how much of a waste will be decided by the 2016 as I see more ground being gained with a new platform. The coming Camaro will be proof of this very soon.

    As for Malibu You either need to combine the Impala and Bu or the Bu and Cruze. Buick also has an issue with the Verano, Regal and Lacrosse. Some how I expect a realignment with these brands once the RWD sub Alpha is here or if it gets here. With Buick already making noise with a RWD midsize and Chevy making noise of a possible small RWD there is some major changes coming.

    We need to remember the Regal and Bu are pre Chapter 11 cars and for the most part were used just because Chevy needed a new Bu ASAP and the Regal was a easy fix for Buick that had no real product or anything close.

    The key is very much in what we do not know but either way GM did drop the ball here. They will be able to nurse this for two years but they had better get it right on the new clean sheet of paper.

    I just hope the cost cutting is not in play here or it will send a very poor signal to the public.

    The greatest key will be where the 2016 is built and I would keep an eye on the Lansing Plant.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There certainly is enough widespread pressure that GM will have to respond to the question of the manual.

    I'd say the press release was vague enough that they could claim it was always part of the plan. At least I have not seen an official word that it will not be offered.

    The waste I see in Zeta was how the architecture was handled from the very start. All of the back and forth, all of the indecision, they were just fumbling one aspect after the other - for years. So many missed opportunities, and expensive errors that one can hardly count them.

    Hell, they practically had to be forced at gunpoint to build Camaro.

    Very slow learners high up within GM.

    If they have truly learned from all of that, and prove it with the deployment of Alpha, then maybe things really are getting better.

    We shall see.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There certainly is enough widespread pressure that GM will have to respond to the question of the manual.

    I'd say the press release was vague enough that they could claim it was always part of the plan. At least I have not seen an official word that it will not be offered.

    The waste I see in Zeta was how the architecture was handled from the very start. All of the back and forth, all of the indecision, they were just fumbling one aspect after the other - for years. So many missed opportunities, and expensive errors that one can hardly count them.

    Hell, they practically had to be forced at gunpoint to build Camaro.

    Very slow learners high up within GM.

    If they have truly learned from all of that, and prove it with the deployment of Alpha, then maybe things really are getting better.

    We shall see.

    I do have to agree that there does seem to be very slow learning people at the helm...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I sat in a 2014 Impala today and have to say, I really like the interior. They did a great job on it, and the front end of that car looks sharp in person as well. The back of the Impala is sort of boring and doesn't really look like the other Chevy's but they nailed that interior and it has the best front end design of any Chevy.

    The Malibu interior on the other hand looks tacky and the back seat room is non existent if the driver's seat is pushed back. The Malibu has nothing I liked about it and I can see why it is the 7th or 8th best selling car in the class despite being brand new. The Impala is too big though to compete with the Fusion, Camry, etc, so they need both.

    The Impala and XTS have similar shapes and very similar interiors as far as how they are shaped and the size. GM does have an overlap problem, the Regal doesn't seem to fit in, and the XTS could have been a Park Avenue, and the Lacrosse maybe made a bit smaller and Regal deleted.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While the lack of a manual transmission is deflating, you also have to understand this car has one car dead in its sights: the Dodge Charger SRT8. The Charger SRT8 also lacks the option of a manual transmission and no one questions its image as an American performance icon.

    Granted, yes a manual transmission would've given the SS an honest leg up on the competition, but I don't think the lack of that option thereof will really have a negative impact on sales or on the SS's image.

    Standing back a bit, I could certainly get behind the Malibu & Impala becoming a single model (aside from the emotional reaction to dropping one of the nameplates).

    Actually, the answer is far better than that. Simply merge the Malibu and Impala and label the result as a Malibu. The Impala name would go on whatever replaces this car.

    Edited by black-knight
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It will be interesting to see why GM claims no Manual?

    As for the Zeta how much of a waste will be decided by the 2016 as I see more ground being gained with a new platform. The coming Camaro will be proof of this very soon.

    As for Malibu You either need to combine the Impala and Bu or the Bu and Cruze. Buick also has an issue with the Verano, Regal and Lacrosse. Some how I expect a realignment with these brands once the RWD sub Alpha is here or if it gets here. With Buick already making noise with a RWD midsize and Chevy making noise of a possible small RWD there is some major changes coming.

    We need to remember the Regal and Bu are pre Chapter 11 cars and for the most part were used just because Chevy needed a new Bu ASAP and the Regal was a easy fix for Buick that had no real product or anything close.

    The key is very much in what we do not know but either way GM did drop the ball here. They will be able to nurse this for two years but they had better get it right on the new clean sheet of paper.

    I just hope the cost cutting is not in play here or it will send a very poor signal to the public.

    The greatest key will be where the 2016 is built and I would keep an eye on the Lansing Plant.

    Toyota, Ford, Nissan, Hyundai all have the two tier solution....the camry+avalon, maxima+altima....etc.

    the two models together = great volume. where ford may sell 200,000 fusions and 60,000 taurus, GM may sell 150,000 malibus and 150,000 impalas.

    The Impala is unique for GM because it has been able or had to sell at lower prices. Now they are trying to move up, the Malibu sales should be geared towards the value set a little more. But GM will never give up being able to make the large Impala affordable for a big set of the population.

    To divert from the 4 sedan solution would be suicide. And to give up one of the two brands, Impala or Malibu just for the sake of reducing a model would be suicide. And Cruze is establishing itself as a nameplate possibly with legs. You cannot redefine the size classes of those cars.

    Gm has buick because some love GM but don't want a Chevy. In order to keep the showroom doors open, you have to offer enough variety and models to give people a somewhat full lineup (trust me i know what happens to a brand and dealers when the brand does not have enough segments of the market filled). Buick needs at least 3 sedans. Older folks always will believe Buick will have a large car and Buick needs a small cheap car like the Verano to keep the doors open and traffic coming in. The Regal is still the best Buick but it needs to repackage and reprice everything and refocus the car. Maybe the next Regal is actually something different.

    If anything, Chevy is lacking models and variety in its lineup. Look at Hyundai.

    SS is here to give RWD fans a GM RWD choice, and to basically prop up Holden and Austrialia a bit. I really doubt GM cares whether Zeta dies off but re-doing the commodore had more to do with throwing a bone to the Aussies so they could sell other Holdens and not lose the business.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No manual is stupid, IMHO. I'm sure GM could have lived with bearing the certification cost for a manual transmission...

    Styling wise, I like the car though I prefer the Impala's/Traverse's front end design to this more Malibu-inspired look...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No manual is stupid, IMHO. I'm sure GM could have lived with bearing the certification cost for a manual transmission...

    Styling wise, I like the car though I prefer the Impala's/Traverse's front end design to this more Malibu-inspired look...

    I too like the Impala nose better but I think they were locked in to what Holden had and just had to adapt. This is one Holden that is a Holden first and Chevy second. That will change in 2 years with the new global platform.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It will be interesting to see why GM claims no Manual?

    As for the Zeta how much of a waste will be decided by the 2016 as I see more ground being gained with a new platform. The coming Camaro will be proof of this very soon.

    As for Malibu You either need to combine the Impala and Bu or the Bu and Cruze. Buick also has an issue with the Verano, Regal and Lacrosse. Some how I expect a realignment with these brands once the RWD sub Alpha is here or if it gets here. With Buick already making noise with a RWD midsize and Chevy making noise of a possible small RWD there is some major changes coming.

    We need to remember the Regal and Bu are pre Chapter 11 cars and for the most part were used just because Chevy needed a new Bu ASAP and the Regal was a easy fix for Buick that had no real product or anything close.

    The key is very much in what we do not know but either way GM did drop the ball here. They will be able to nurse this for two years but they had better get it right on the new clean sheet of paper.

    I just hope the cost cutting is not in play here or it will send a very poor signal to the public.

    The greatest key will be where the 2016 is built and I would keep an eye on the Lansing Plant.

    Toyota, Ford, Nissan, Hyundai all have the two tier solution....the camry+avalon, maxima+altima....etc.

    the two models together = great volume. where ford may sell 200,000 fusions and 60,000 taurus, GM may sell 150,000 malibus and 150,000 impalas.

    The Impala is unique for GM because it has been able or had to sell at lower prices. Now they are trying to move up, the Malibu sales should be geared towards the value set a little more. But GM will never give up being able to make the large Impala affordable for a big set of the population.

    To divert from the 4 sedan solution would be suicide. And to give up one of the two brands, Impala or Malibu just for the sake of reducing a model would be suicide. And Cruze is establishing itself as a nameplate possibly with legs. You cannot redefine the size classes of those cars.

    Gm has buick because some love GM but don't want a Chevy. In order to keep the showroom doors open, you have to offer enough variety and models to give people a somewhat full lineup (trust me i know what happens to a brand and dealers when the brand does not have enough segments of the market filled). Buick needs at least 3 sedans. Older folks always will believe Buick will have a large car and Buick needs a small cheap car like the Verano to keep the doors open and traffic coming in. The Regal is still the best Buick but it needs to repackage and reprice everything and refocus the car. Maybe the next Regal is actually something different.

    If anything, Chevy is lacking models and variety in its lineup. Look at Hyundai.

    SS is here to give RWD fans a GM RWD choice, and to basically prop up Holden and Austrialia a bit. I really doubt GM cares whether Zeta dies off but re-doing the commodore had more to do with throwing a bone to the Aussies so they could sell other Holdens and not lose the business.

    GM is just trying to get back to where they need to be and get the base solid models to where they can support the companies. It takes time and money so once they reach that they will widen the variety more. Buick really has yet to get s full clean sheet of paper car yet as most investment is going into Chevy and Cadillac first. GM just does not have the money to fix everything at once let alone the man power. This deal is going to take at least a decade to pull off if nothing goes wrong.

    The Zeta is at the end of it's life and GM just did a mild refresh on the car. Chevy needed a new stock car and to secure a slot for a larger RWD. I can see with the point of development they are at the real interest is in the new RWD in 2016. That car will more than likely be built here and be able to do more things and be more car for more buyers. Holden is really the Chevy down under anymore and each will have mostly the same line up. They are about 80% there now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Zeta is at the end of it's life and GM just did a mild refresh on the car. Chevy needed a new stock car and to secure a slot for a larger RWD. I can see with the point of development they are at the real interest is in the new RWD in 2016. That car will more than likely be built here and be able to do more things and be more car for more buyers. Holden is really the Chevy down under anymore and each will have mostly the same line up. They are about 80% there now.

    I just hope they really are committed to a larger RWD platform and don't just use Epsilon II 'lwb' for all future 'large' models..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why are we now talking about Cadillac and freakin' Mercedes in a Chevrolet thread??? :stupid:

    Focus, people.

    and now Ford?

    Good point...I wonder if Ford will ever have a RWD full sizer in NA again (or Aus for that matter, after teh current Falcon runs it's course).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Zeta is at the end of it's life and GM just did a mild refresh on the car. Chevy needed a new stock car and to secure a slot for a larger RWD. I can see with the point of development they are at the real interest is in the new RWD in 2016. That car will more than likely be built here and be able to do more things and be more car for more buyers. Holden is really the Chevy down under anymore and each will have mostly the same line up. They are about 80% there now.

    I just hope they really are committed to a larger RWD platform and don't just use Epsilon II 'lwb' for all future 'large' models..

    GM is committed to RWD the only questions remains will the VF global replacement be a enlarges Alpha or a smaller Omega based platform. I get the feeling the Omega may be used as GM needs more use than just one Cadillac.

    Ford and GM down under are no longer even a contest as the Falcon sales have really tanked. While the Holden may not still be a #1 car in the market they still sell a lot more RWD vehicles than Ford.

    The economics will improve for more models here if they can build it here. No matter what market they sell the new car in the numbers will never great but as a whole globally they will be good enough. The key is to build these cars to where they can be sent to where the profits are greater vs. less with an export.

    I have been dealing with several customers in Australia and have been picking their brains on cars and the market there. Keep in mind these are two Chevy owning diehard car guys but they admit the market in Australia has shifted in a great way. What once was cool is now being replaced with Asian imports. They both would not have any issue with the next car being a Chevy or a Holden just as long as it is RWD and offers a V8. They both would love to have a Camaro. One owns a 67 SS now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There would be enough biz globally for a large rwd platform that would be the Chevy cop cars and ss, holden commodore, Opel flagship. And basis for caddy even. I would want that future platform to be awd capable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • Community Hive Community Hive

    Community Hive allows you to follow your favorite communities all in one place.

    Follow on Community Hive
  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I have to say that I am very excited by this potential competitor to the Cadillac EscaladeIQ. Both Full size Luxury SUVs. Interiors Yes I know the Genesis is a concept and the suicide doors and flip chairs will not make it to production, but I do hope those chair designs do as they look very comfy and supportive. I have to say that I really like the exterior styling of the Genesis even more than the Escalade.
    • Yeah, it doesn't seem super space efficient.
    • So three major problems with this car, one, terrible Jellybean external shape, not impressed at all with the style. Second is the buttonless dash having everything via a touch screen and rotary knob, terrible safety issue as your eyes will be off the road more than on trying to find the right option in the right menu. Third is the center pack clearly cuts into valuable leg space based on their own picture. This is a hard pass.
    • Great Masculine shape, really digging the style they did here.
    • First seen at the Shanghai Auto Show (see article: Polestar 4 - The New Breed of Electric SUV Coupe), Polestar brought the Polestar 4 to the New York International Auto Show for North Americans to see in person. Polestar calls the Polestar 4 an "electric SUV 4-door coupe". Outside of that marketing speak, the Polestar 4 is a slightly lifted four-door hatchback about 190 inches in length, or roughly 2 inches shorter than a Toyota Camry.  Built without rear glass, the Polestar 4 makes use of a rear camera for visibility astern. Polestar 4 features a plethora of standard content, including 20-inch 5 V-spoke black diamond cut alloy wheels, panoramic glass roof, adaptive cruise control, 360 parking camera with 3D view, energy saving heat pump, front-illuminated Polestar logo, e-latch doors, power-operated tailgate with soft close, Polestar digital key, wireless phone charging, and 8-way electrical driver seat and 6-way electrical passenger seat. The fastest production car the brand has ever developed to date, Polestar 4 can accomplish a 0-60 mph sprint in 3.7 seconds and in top spec can produce 544 horsepower. Long-range single-motor variants have 272 horsepower and a targeted EPA range of over 300 miles. All long range variants have a 102 kWh battery capable of 200 kW charging on a DC Fast Charger and 11 kW on home level-2 charging. Google built-in is ... built in and includes Google Assistant, Google Maps and Google Play. Polestar continues to offer a leading connected in-car experience. As with all other Polestar cars, regular over-the-air updates allow for new features and improvements to be sent remotely to all vehicles. Pricing starts at $54,900, with orders opening in April for deliveries in the latter half of this year.   View full article
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings