Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Volkswagen's CEO Says A Badge-Engineered Version of the Ranger Could Happen

      This could make a number of people happy

    Since Volkswagen and Ford announced a new partnership back in the summer, there have been rumors flying around if it could expand into other areas. The two said it would primarily focus commercial vehicles, but they were open to other opportunities. As we reported last week, the two are discussing the possibility of expanding into autonomous tech and electric vehicles.

    Recently, Volkswagen Group CEO Herbert Diess gave an interview to Automotive News. He reiterated that the focus of the partnership is for commercial vehicles, but could expand.

    “There’s nothing signed yet with Ford. We are in talks. Most of the talks have been centered around our light-duty vehicles — our small commercial vehicles business in Europe, where we found huge synergies. We are both relatively small in size against our peers, so what we’re talking about is sharing a few platforms and manufacturing sites there, which makes sense. And within the dialogue, we are also touching other options, but this will be the main focus if we come to a conclusion,” said Diess.

    One example Diess brought up is using the Ford Ranger as a replacement for the Volkswagen Amarok. The current truck has been on sale since 2010 with a range of diesel engines to compete against the likes of the Ranger, Toyota HiLux, and Nissan Navara. Developing a new model would cost a fair amount of cash that Volkswagen would like to use elsewhere. This is where Ford could in and allow Volkswagen to use the Ranger as a basis for a next-generation Amarok. This may allow Volkswagen to sell the Amarok in the U.S. Of course, there is also the Atlas Tanoak concept shown at the New York Auto Show earlier this year that Volkswagen is considering sending into production.

    “If the Ford relationship works out well, we would have an Amarok successor, which would be then appropriate for sales worldwide — potentially as well for the United States. The other option is a unibody pickup, which is something for America, which is probably still a bit risky,” said Diess.

    This is one of many decision that Volkswagen might make in the near future. Another is allowing Ford to use their MEB toolkit for electric vehicles.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Because a badge engeneered Routan Dodge van was such an amazing success. VW had a 39 month backlog/inventory at one point.

    Next up...the return of diesel and the air cooled bug.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I honestly have not figured out what is so great about VW products. German heritage but clearly my American self just does not like the bland blah looks, feel, driving dynamics of the Nazi cars. 

    • Confused 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    22 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    I honestly have not figured out what is so great about VW products. German heritage but clearly my American self just does not like the bland blah looks, feel, driving dynamics of the Nazi cars. 

    True, Henry Ford's cars underwhelm...

     

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    45 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Maybe Ford could get a badge-engineered Taurus from the new Arteon.

    That's just about as wrong as interbreeding a cat and a dog and calling it a cog...

    42 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    I honestly have not figured out what is so great about VW products. German heritage but clearly my American self just does not like the bland blah looks, feel, driving dynamics of the Nazi cars. 

    When one needs to look 70 years back in the past to dislike something...hmmm...why not just say they are not your thing? no car is for everyone.

    20 minutes ago, frogger said:

    True, Henry Ford's cars underwhelm...

     

    The current generation, yes...but for Decades they built wickedly cool stuff. It's almost as after the late 1970's they took a Canadian snowstorm as inspiration for their products. Bland.

    • Like 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    That's just about as wrong as interbreeding a cat and a dog and calling it a cog...

     

    Replacing one largish fwd sedan with another largish fwd sedan, seems straightforward enough.   And there have been Fords rebadged as VWs and VWs rebadged as Fords in S America, so not a new concept...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    20 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    That's just about as wrong as interbreeding a cat and a dog and calling it a cog...

    When one needs to look 70 years back in the past to dislike something...hmmm...why not just say they are not your thing? no car is for everyone.

    The current generation, yes...but for Decades they built wickedly cool stuff. It's almost as after the late 1970's they took a Canadian snowstorm as inspiration for their products. Bland.

    COG = :roflmao:

    I get the point your making, but my comment is what I feel spot on for the bug history that to me never really did it and I feel that same passion from that era continues today at that company. Maybe I would feel different if after WWII they had closed VW and required it to start up as another auto company name. My issue, point made and I understand what you are saying my friend.

    I get what your saying in regards to Ford. They had some amazing products, but the mass market versions of cars for the most point did underwhelm.

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    20 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    Replacing one largish fwd sedan with another largish fwd sedan, seems straightforward enough.   And there have been Fords rebadged as VWs and VWs rebadged as Fords in S America, so not a new concept...

    Yeah...but Ford will really loose what is left of their American automotive identity if they start selling Euro Sedans as Fords.

    The bland nature of current product from most car makers is why I have moved back into being a railfan and a fan of vintage Woodworking tools from being an automotive fan.  As an enthusiast getting excited about most of today's cars is nothing short of impossible.

    Either start building passionate interesting products or we really can go to an era of self driving appliances.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    17 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Yeah...but Ford will really loose what is left of their American automotive identity if they start selling Euro Sedans as Fords.

    The bland nature of current product from most car makers is why I have moved back into being a railfan and a fan of vintage Woodworking tools from being an automotive fan.  As an enthusiast getting excited about most of today's cars is nothing short of impossible.

    Either start building passionate interesting products or we really can go to an era of self driving appliances.

    Well, they already have several Euro sedans in their line...the Fiesta, Focus, the Fusion/Mondeo, and the current Taurus is on a old Volvo-derived platform. 

    Edited by Robert Hall

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Robert Hall said:

    Well, they all ready have Euro sedans in their line...the Focus, the Fusion/Mondeo, and the current Taurus is on a Volvo-derived platform. 

    ...and that is one reason their corporate identity is dilluted and I rant on endlessly so.

    • Haha 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, if it gives Ford at least one other carin the line up, it would sure help! 

    Both automakers are battered and weak, so sharing a few products for now would not be a bad thing....

     

    I mean, how much worse of a car could it be than a 80s Ford Escort? Now that was bland......

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    Well, if it gives Ford at least one other carin the line up, it would sure help! 

    Both automakers are battered and weak, so sharing a few products for now would not be a bad thing....

     

    I mean, how much worse of a car could it be than a 80s Ford Escort? Now that was bland......

    A modern base spec fiesta is just as much of a pentalty box to drive.

    • Haha 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    A modern base spec fiesta is just as much of a pentalty box to drive.

    Yep, that is quite true.....

    And then they finally have a fun compact to drive in the latest Focus, and you can’t get a tranny to last more than 30k.....

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    8 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    Yep, that is quite true.....

    And then they finally have a fun compact to drive in the latest Focus, and you can’t get a tranny to last more than 30k.....

    Awkward back seat layout and ungainly styling from the rear kill the current Focus for me.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, daves87rs said:

    Yep, that is quite true.....

    And then they finally have a fun compact to drive in the latest Focus, and you can’t get a tranny to last more than 30k.....

    I mean... my car has 34k on it.. 😉

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    I mean... my car has 34k on it.. 😉

     

    Obviously you are a man who enjoys a walk on the wild side and taking chances...

    Just kidding.

    My beef with Ford is not that they build bad transmissions, it is that they need to be building more class leading product.

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They've had the same transmission with issues since 2012. They should have made a more drastic fix to it. I definitely get the shutter but the warranty has been extended on the transmission to 100k because they know they built a POS. 

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

    They've had the same transmission with issues since 2012. They should have made a more drastic fix to it. I definitely get the shutter but the warranty has been extended on the transmission to 100k because they know they built a POS. 

    My friends Focus has like 60K on it...shifts a bit awkward, but not terrible. He likes the car and drives it everywhere....he had a Saturn before the Focus.

    If you blame Ford for all of the crappy transmissions they put in Focus and Fiesta, you have to give them credit for the decent transmissions they put in everything else IMHO.

    And while we are bitching about transmissions, how about many of the older Nissan CVT transmissions? Those made the Ford Focus and Fiesta seem as smooth as 20 year old Scotch by comparison....and yet few people ever pan them.

    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually, I am FOR Ford replacing their current CARS with VW-built ones (excluding the Mustang!).  Think about it: no one really buys Ford CARS anymore (SUV/CUVs yes, cars no), so it seems that Ford and VW should do what they do best. 

    As for the Routan, the idea was sound but the execution was not there.  Anybody with a clue knew it was still a Chrysler minivan with a VW logo on it.  As we have seen, there were few if any takers when they existed on dealerships, excluding those that were heavily discounted.

    One question: is VW build quality as good as (or better than) Ford build quality?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m split on that. Because Ford cars do decent in Europe and Ford is well differentiated from VW. 

     

    The Polo is simply not a Fiesta. The Focus is far more fun than the Golf. The Golf is more, Golf.

    The Transit is the best or nothing in terms of cargo vans.

    Electric vehicles I think Ford has the edge here too. They don’t have to produce nearly as many for compliance, and they have 300 mile plus crossovers in mind from the very beginning . I think Ford is eyeing Porsche’s 800KW charging tech.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 11/5/2018 at 3:49 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Yeah...but Ford will really loose what is left of their American automotive identity if they start selling Euro Sedans as Fords.

    1

    They've been doing that for decades.  The original Focus, the Contour, the final Cougar, even the current Fusion.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    One question: is VW build quality as good as (or better than) Ford build quality?

     

    For both, it highly depends on which plant they come out of.  VW's Chattanooga plant seems to do good work, every Passat I've driven has been very solid and well built.  Their plant in Mexico, not as much. 

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    They've been doing that for decades.  The original Focus, the Contour, the final Cougar, even the current Fusion.

    Again...I think they need something more uniquely Ford.

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Again...I think they need something more uniquely Ford.

     

    Would that not be the 4 door muttang that Ford has talked about? :duck:

    • Haha 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Ford unveiled the 2020 Escape ahead of the New York International Auto Show and yesterday I finally got my chance to check it out. 
      The Escape’s overall shape has lost some of its edge. It is now more rounded and car-like born out by the fact that it is longer, lower, and wider than the current model.  From certain angles in the front, it almost looks to be a Tesla, an association I’m sure Ford won’t mind me making. In back, it has lost almost all of its character. Scrape the badges off and I couldn't tell you what manufacturer this car came from.
      Inside is a mixed bag. The dash is laid out in a simple organized fashion and I like how it no longer juts out at you as the outgoing model does.  The screen is well placed and easy to reach. My experiences with Sync3 in the past have been good, so I expect that will carry over into this Escape. The rear seat room is good for the class, though the rear seats do sit lower than I would like.
      Where I’m let down is in the quality of materials. Everything seems to be made of hard plastic. The door panels in the rear were especially tupperware feeling. One strange item is the unusual placement of the engine start/stop button, down and behind the steering wheel almost as if they were intentionally making it hard to reach. I did back to back comparisons with Ford’s competition at the show and I would put the new Escape near the bottom of the list on interior quality. It is even a step backward from the current Escape.
      The Escape will have four powertrain choices, a 1.5-liter turbo, a 2-liter turbo carried over from the previous generation, and making a return is the hybrid version, powered by a 2.5 liter 4-cylinder. A plug-in hybrid will also be available, but only in front-wheel drive form.  The most interesting of these engines is the 1.5 liter. It is a 3 cylinder EcoBoost producing 180 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque. It is capable of running on just 2 cylinders during times of light load. I liked the 1-liter 3-cylinder EcoBoost in the Ford Fiesta, and if this new 1.5 liter runs the same, that would be a good thing. Driving impressions will have to wait till later this year when the Escape goes into production.
      Overall I think this Ford could and should do better on the interior quality. A 3-cylinder turbo may be a hard sell no matter how good the mileage is and Ford will have an interesting time convincing customers of that. 
      You can read more about the 2020 Ford Escape from the release article below.
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Ford unveiled the 2020 Escape ahead of the New York International Auto Show and yesterday I finally got my chance to check it out. 
      The Escape’s overall shape has lost some of its edge. It is now more rounded and car-like born out by the fact that it is longer, lower, and wider than the current model.  From certain angles in the front, it almost looks to be a Tesla, an association I’m sure Ford won’t mind me making. In back, it has lost almost all of its character. Scrape the badges off and I couldn't tell you what manufacturer this car came from.
      Inside is a mixed bag. The dash is laid out in a simple organized fashion and I like how it no longer juts out at you as the outgoing model does.  The screen is well placed and easy to reach. My experiences with Sync3 in the past have been good, so I expect that will carry over into this Escape. The rear seat room is good for the class, though the rear seats do sit lower than I would like.
      Where I’m let down is in the quality of materials. Everything seems to be made of hard plastic. The door panels in the rear were especially tupperware feeling. One strange item is the unusual placement of the engine start/stop button, down and behind the steering wheel almost as if they were intentionally making it hard to reach. I did back to back comparisons with Ford’s competition at the show and I would put the new Escape near the bottom of the list on interior quality. It is even a step backward from the current Escape.
      The Escape will have four powertrain choices, a 1.5-liter turbo, a 2-liter turbo carried over from the previous generation, and making a return is the hybrid version, powered by a 2.5 liter 4-cylinder. A plug-in hybrid will also be available, but only in front-wheel drive form.  The most interesting of these engines is the 1.5 liter. It is a 3 cylinder EcoBoost producing 180 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque. It is capable of running on just 2 cylinders during times of light load. I liked the 1-liter 3-cylinder EcoBoost in the Ford Fiesta, and if this new 1.5 liter runs the same, that would be a good thing. Driving impressions will have to wait till later this year when the Escape goes into production.
      Overall I think this Ford could and should do better on the interior quality. A 3-cylinder turbo may be a hard sell no matter how good the mileage is and Ford will have an interesting time convincing customers of that. 
      You can read more about the 2020 Ford Escape from the release article below.
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Volkswagen is introducing a concept that will see production for South America, but they brought the concept to New York to show it off alongside the Volkswagen Atlas Basecamp Concept
      The Volkswagen Tarok is built on VW's MQB modular platform and along with the VW Atlas, is one of the largest MQB vehicles to date at 193.5 inches long. The Tarok features a Chevy Avalanche like bed with a mid-gate that allows the rear seats to be folded forward allowing cargo as long as 73.2 inches. The mechanism uses an electronic lock and sealing system to keep moisture out of the cabin.
      The Tarok Concept is powered by a 1.4-liter, 147-horsepower four-cylinder turbocharged and direct-injection TSI engine, mated to a 6-speed automatic transmission and permanent 4Motion all-wheel drive.
      Volkswagen showed another truck concept at last year's NY Auto Show, the Atlas Tanoak Concept. VW says that while there are no plans for US production, the Tanok is being used to gauge US reaction to a pickup from Volkswagen. 




      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Volkswagen is introducing a concept that will see production for South America, but they brought the concept to New York to show it off alongside the Volkswagen Atlas Basecamp Concept
      The Volkswagen Tarok is built on VW's MQB modular platform and along with the VW Atlas, is one of the largest MQB vehicles to date at 193.5 inches long. The Tarok features a Chevy Avalanche like bed with a mid-gate that allows the rear seats to be folded forward allowing cargo as long as 73.2 inches. The mechanism uses an electronic lock and sealing system to keep moisture out of the cabin.
      The Tarok Concept is powered by a 1.4-liter, 147-horsepower four-cylinder turbocharged and direct-injection TSI engine, mated to a 6-speed automatic transmission and permanent 4Motion all-wheel drive.
      Volkswagen showed another truck concept at last year's NY Auto Show, the Atlas Tanoak Concept. VW says that while there are no plans for US production, the Tanok is being used to gauge US reaction to a pickup from Volkswagen. 



    • By Drew Dowdell
      Volkswagen is bringing a concept version of their Atlas SUV to the New York International Auto Show.  Called the Atlas Basecamp, it is a ruggedized version of their Atlas crossover. 
      Built on an SEL Premium trim with the 276hp V6 and 4Motion All-Wheel Drive, the concept includes a lift kit, custom body moldings, all-terrain tires, roof rack with lightbar, and some fifteen52 Traverse MX concept wheels that are expected to go into production.
      All of these parts signal an intent by Volkswagen to get more off-roady with the Atlas to more directly take on the Jeep Cherokee and other coming Jeep models. We think VW should built it. 
      We'll have more for you about the Atlas Basecamp from the New York Auto Show starting April 17th. 



      View full article
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Gale
      Gale
      (29 years old)
    2. manicrodder
      manicrodder
      (66 years old)
    3. Thed
      Thed
      (25 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...