Tata Nano $2,500 interior picture gallery

[Oracle of Delphi]

I have no words! :rotflmao:

[VenSeattle]

Is that a clay mock-up of the interior? It's... It's... *speechless*

[FUTURE_OF_GM]

Wow...

Looks like an Opel.

Oh wait, isn't this what you guys build over there?

[Oracle of Delphi]

Wow...

Looks like an Opel.

Oh wait, isn't this what you guys build over there?

No, that's the future of Holden! :AH-HA_wink:

[Intrepidation]

That shifter looks wrong.

[Oracle of Delphi]

That shifter looks wrong.

Don't let blu see it! He said earlier he was having vivid dreams. :rotflmao:

Edited January 20, 2008 by Pontiac Custom-S

[ocnblu]

Oh my, I love the angle of that shifter in the bottom picture... and look how big it is!

[Satty]

No b-pillar! Glad they didn't wuss out.

[deftonesfan867]

No b-pillar! Glad they didn't wuss out.

[Robert Hall]

That interior looks like it would have been right at home in a '90s GM product (cheap gray plastic everywhere).

[Satty]

Honestly, for what it is, its not bad. I'm sure the materials are horribly cheap, but its a $2500 car. They did a smart thing with the dash, its symmetrical, they can easily make it LHD or RHD. Its not worse than Chrysler's CCV concept from the late 90's, which didn't even have a fuel gauge, just three LEDs, all three lit meant a full tank, 2/3 lit meant half a tank, 1 lit meant empty. Brilliant in its simplicity, I guess.

[Intrepidation]

It has 2 front cupholders...the Astra doesn't even have that

[loki]

no more cup holders, you have a trough to hold all liquids now.

well for the price, what could you expect? what kinda engine it have?

[Intrepidation]

Something they found out of a lawnmower I suspect.

[K.C.]

No b-pillar! Glad they didn't wuss out.

:rotflmao:

[daves87rs]

NOt as bad as I thought it would be......

Could be a decent extra car...

[daves87rs]

Something they found out of a lawnmower I suspect.

Push or riding?

[jcgable]

"What surprised most Tata executives was how the Nano appealed to women. 80% of Nano buyers were women, all of which claimed that the detachable shifter was their favorite feature..."

Ten bucks that we will be reading this quote in 3 months...

[ocnblu]

They're gonna hafta stand in line like everybody else. :AH-HA_wink:

[capriceman]

what kinda engine it have?

.6L 32BHP

I think our riding lawnmowers have 25hp now

[Intrepidation]

Push or riding?

Depends on the trim level

[Northstar]

Funny and crappy as it may be, considering the price its not bad at all when you compare it to certain GM cars costing 10 times more.

[Intrepidation]

See,w hat has also made me curious is why on earth would you pay for this just because it's new when you could pay the same and get a perfectly good and far superior used car for the same or even less money. I paid $2,100 for mine after all, and I got for my car for my money, that's far safer, more powerful, nicer inside and out, and much more features. This question also applies to who would buy a Chinese $h!box new whenever they make it to US soil.

Of course in India it's different, but I'm just saying why would anyone in a developed country like in Europe or America where they've sold good cars for years buy one?

I guess some people just gotta have `em new...even if the break after 3 days of ownership and fall apart after a month.

Edited January 21, 2008 by Dodgefan

[vonVeezelsnider]

I guess some people just gotta have `em new...even if the break after 3 days of ownership and fall apart after a month.

^*cough* Kia *cough*

[jcgable]

^*cough* Kia *cough*

I'm part of your school of thought, however every Kia owner I know is very happy. For college students, being able to buy a car with some premium features for much much less is a really good option...