Jump to content
William Maley

Mercedez Benz News Rumorpile: Mercedes-Benz Plans Four New EVs By 2020

Recommended Posts

Mercedes-Benz is getting ready to launch four new electric vehicles - two sedans and two SUVs - by 2020. Autocar reports that the German brand is accelerating plans after the German government announced that it would be offering subsidies on all EVs priced less than €60,000 (about $66,900) to spur sales.

 

The outgoing R&D boss at Mercedes-Benz, Thomas Weber has put these plans into motion and hinted that the electric models will share links with standard models. This means the sedans will have a connection to the C and S-Class, while the SUVs will share bits from the GLA and GLC.

 

Sources tell Autocar that the designs share the basic elements with the gas-powered models, but will have their own touches to make them recognizable as EVs. In terms of platforms, the two sedans and GLC-sized model will use a new one known as MEA (Modular Electric Architecture). MEA allows Mercedes to offer an electric vehicle with either rear-wheel or all-wheel drive in combination with three electric motors. The GLA-sized model will utilize the same platform that underpins the B-Class Electric Drive.

 

As for power, Mercedes' r&d is working on a range of electric motors producing 75 to 400kW (101 to 536 horsepower). Batteries will come from Accumotive that will provide a minimum range of 250 miles.

 

Source: Autocar


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems that since BMW came out with their iPerformance Line, MB now needs to copy them also. 

 

iPerformance story here: http://www.cheersandgears.com/topic/86922-bmw-iperformance-anything-new-or-just-addressing-cafe/

 

I just hope that Cadillac does not ignore this market. They need to have EV's in all levels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercedes said they are not doing a sub-brand like BMW i, and are not copying them in that.  I see this more as Tesla fighters.  I am loving the prospect of a small to mid-size sedan with a 536 hp electric motor powering the rear wheels.  

 

I could see them doing some sort of GLA electric, that gives them a cheaper fwd electric car, that is better than the B-class.  But the fun stuff will be the twin motor 500+ HP stuff like the Tesla Model S.

 

And I think Dr. Thomas Weber will be missed.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mercedes said they are not doing a sub-brand like BMW i, and are not copying them in that.  I see this more as Tesla fighters.  I am loving the prospect of a small to mid-size sedan with a 536 hp electric motor powering the rear wheels.  

 

I could see them doing some sort of GLA electric, that gives them a cheaper fwd electric car, that is better than the B-class.  But the fun stuff will be the twin motor 500+ HP stuff like the Tesla Model S.

 

And I think Dr. Thomas Weber will be missed.

So the more than $100K BMW i8 is a "sub brand"?

Whatever you say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one car is supposed to be a sedan bigger than a C-class, but smaller than an E-class, for sure they would want that to cost under 50,000 Euro or whatever the threshold is for the German gov't tax credit or subsidy that they have for electric cars.    They need volume to justify the platform.   The 2nd sedan will be large, and I imagine be based on this:

 

mercedes-benz-intelligent-aerodynamic-au

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHy not just offer EV options for the existing lines, instead of bringing out 4 MORE additional models??

If slotting between the C & E, the sedans would HAVE to be dubbed 'D-class' now that MB has supposedly gotten their naming system in order.

Too many models !!

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHy not just offer EV options for the existing lines, instead of bringing out 4 MORE additional models??

If slotting between the C & E, the sedans would HAVE to be dubbed 'D-class' now that MB has supposedly gotten their naming system in order.

Too many models !!

It's Mercedes. The naming problems of others do not apply to them. They were the first to create a one letter car and are above all criticisms of such things. :breakdance:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because making an electric car on a platform designed for gas engine in the front and a drivetrain running down the middle doesn't make sense.   If they make an electric car platform they can load the floor plan with batteries and electric motors.  More interior room, and they have more flexibility with styling.

 

They are making 10 plug-in hybrid versions of existing models though, for those that want an electrified C, E, S, GLE, GLC, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

WHy not just offer EV options for the existing lines, instead of bringing out 4 MORE additional models??

If slotting between the C & E, the sedans would HAVE to be dubbed 'D-class' now that MB has supposedly gotten their naming system in order.

Too many models !!

It's Mercedes. The naming problems of others do not apply to them. They were the first to create a one letter car and are above all criticisms of such things. :breakdance:

 

They haven't even named it yet, or said exactly what these will be.  One can speculate they are going right after Tesla though.   Maybe they will make the E-wagen.  Perhaps an E-wing with gullwing doors.

 

The good thing about Mercedes is huge R&D budget and they aren't constrained as to what they can build or how many models they can have.  A lot of the cars share drive trains and they only have like 4 platforms (not counting G-wagen) that they build a lot of variants off of.  While the other guys talk about it, or show concept cars, Mercedes builds dream cars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHy not just offer EV options for the existing lines, instead of bringing out 4 MORE additional models??

If slotting between the C & E, the sedans would HAVE to be dubbed 'D-class' now that MB has supposedly gotten their naming system in order.

Too many models !!

It's Mercedes. The naming problems of others do not apply to them. They were the first to create a one letter car and are above all criticisms of such things. :breakdance:

They haven't even named it yet, or said exactly what these will be. One can speculate they are going right after Tesla though. Maybe they will make the E-wagen. Perhaps an E-wing with gullwing doors.

The good thing about Mercedes is huge R&D budget and they aren't constrained as to what they can build or how many models they can have. A lot of the cars share drive trains and they only have like 4 platforms (not counting G-wagen) that they build a lot of variants off of. While the other guys talk about it, or show concept cars, Mercedes builds dream cars.

And yet again, you don't get it. That breeze you felt over your head was the joke that flew by it.

Of course, maybe it wasn't really a joke.

Btw, do you want me to repost those pictures of those "dream cars" Mercedes didn't build because they are no damn different from any other automaker in that regard?

Good grief. You must love Kool Aid.

Edited by surreal1272

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A twin motor electric with over 500 HP is going to be awesome. Tesla very well could be the future, they are getting ready to fight the future. They aren't going to sit idle and let Tesla pass them by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A twin motor electric with over 500 HP is going to be awesome. Tesla very well could be the future, they are getting ready to fight the future. They aren't going to sit idle and let Tesla pass them by.

Interesting how you only focus on the 500+ HP rather than admit that MB will also produce some best effort at that cause their basic engine will start at 75kW or 101HP which is half of what the Chevy BOLT will be which is 150kW or 200HP.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A twin motor electric with over 500 HP is going to be awesome. Tesla very well could be the future, they are getting ready to fight the future. They aren't going to sit idle and let Tesla pass them by.

Interesting how you only focus on the 500+ HP rather than admit that MB will also produce some best effort at that cause their basic engine will start at 75kW or 101HP which is half of what the Chevy BOLT will be which is 150kW or 200HP.

It's the tasty Mercedes Benz Kool Aid that does it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHy not just offer EV options for the existing lines, instead of bringing out 4 MORE additional models??

If slotting between the C & E, the sedans would HAVE to be dubbed 'D-class' now that MB has supposedly gotten their naming system in order.

Too many models !!

That was the first thing that I thought of too. Make EV versions of the C or E but don't make a third vehicle slotted between them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A twin motor electric with over 500 HP is going to be awesome. Tesla very well could be the future, they are getting ready to fight the future. They aren't going to sit idle and let Tesla pass them by.

Interesting how you only focus on the 500+ HP rather than admit that MB will also produce some best effort at that cause their basic engine will start at 75kW or 101HP which is half of what the Chevy BOLT will be which is 150kW or 200HP.

 

There won't be only 1 motor per car.   The earlier reports were a 300 kw (400 hp) electric motor would be the base motor for rear drive vehicles.  All wheel drive vehicles get another motor or two up front.  So there could be a 101 hp motor on each front wheel, a 400 hp motor in the back, now you have 602 hp in an all wheel drive car, or put the 540 hp motor in back and you have 740 hp total.

 

Perhaps also they want a few electric motors of different power levels for use in plug-in hybrids too.  Mercedes like in house made stuff, they probably don't want to buy off some other maker, just like they don't buy transmissions from ZF or Aisin.    Maybe they need the 101 hp electric motor to put on each front wheel of the mid-engine super car Tobias Moors wants to build.  Put 2 of those up front, with a 600 hp V8 in back, and they can go Ferrari hunting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the cars will be a lot closer than we are speculating. Pretty much Mercedes next-gen platform share common bones for a lot of cars/cuvs.

 

I'm thinking along the lines of Voltec and D2XX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Mercedes said they are not doing a sub-brand like BMW i, and are not copying them in that.  I see this more as Tesla fighters.  I am loving the prospect of a small to mid-size sedan with a 536 hp electric motor powering the rear wheels.  

 

I could see them doing some sort of GLA electric, that gives them a cheaper fwd electric car, that is better than the B-class.  But the fun stuff will be the twin motor 500+ HP stuff like the Tesla Model S.

 

And I think Dr. Thomas Weber will be missed.

So the more than $100K BMW i8 is a "sub brand"?

Whatever you say.

 

'sub brand' has nothing to do with price...it simply means brand-within-a-brand.  BMW's i and M ranges fit that definition, as does M-B's AMG and Maybach ranges.    Same with Cadillac and V-series, Chrysler and SRT, Ford and SVT/ST, etc..

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercedes said they are not doing a sub-brand like BMW i, and are not copying them in that. I see this more as Tesla fighters. I am loving the prospect of a small to mid-size sedan with a 536 hp electric motor powering the rear wheels.

I could see them doing some sort of GLA electric, that gives them a cheaper fwd electric car, that is better than the B-class. But the fun stuff will be the twin motor 500+ HP stuff like the Tesla Model S.

And I think Dr. Thomas Weber will be missed.

So the more than $100K BMW i8 is a "sub brand"?

Whatever you say.

'sub brand' has nothing to do with price...it simply means brand-within-a-brand. BMW's i and M ranges fit that definition, as does M-B's AMG and Maybach ranges. Same with Cadillac and V-series, Chrysler and SRT, Ford and SVT/ST, etc..
They are sold at BMW dealerships and are BMWs so I think the term "sub-brand" is a huge misnomer.

I would say the same thing for the other brands as well. I don't feel that is the right term for it anyway but maybe that's just me.

Edited by surreal1272

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Mercedes said they are not doing a sub-brand like BMW i, and are not copying them in that. I see this more as Tesla fighters. I am loving the prospect of a small to mid-size sedan with a 536 hp electric motor powering the rear wheels.

I could see them doing some sort of GLA electric, that gives them a cheaper fwd electric car, that is better than the B-class. But the fun stuff will be the twin motor 500+ HP stuff like the Tesla Model S.

And I think Dr. Thomas Weber will be missed.

So the more than $100K BMW i8 is a "sub brand"?

Whatever you say.

'sub brand' has nothing to do with price...it simply means brand-within-a-brand. BMW's i and M ranges fit that definition, as does M-B's AMG and Maybach ranges. Same with Cadillac and V-series, Chrysler and SRT, Ford and SVT/ST, etc..
They are sold at BMW dealerships and are BMWs so I think the term "sub-brand" is a huge misnomer.

I would say the same thing for the other brands as well. I don't feel that is the right term for it anyway but maybe that's just me.

 

It is the right term.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercedes said they are not doing a sub-brand like BMW i, and are not copying them in that. I see this more as Tesla fighters. I am loving the prospect of a small to mid-size sedan with a 536 hp electric motor powering the rear wheels.

I could see them doing some sort of GLA electric, that gives them a cheaper fwd electric car, that is better than the B-class. But the fun stuff will be the twin motor 500+ HP stuff like the Tesla Model S.

And I think Dr. Thomas Weber will be missed.

So the more than $100K BMW i8 is a "sub brand"?

Whatever you say.

'sub brand' has nothing to do with price...it simply means brand-within-a-brand. BMW's i and M ranges fit that definition, as does M-B's AMG and Maybach ranges. Same with Cadillac and V-series, Chrysler and SRT, Ford and SVT/ST, etc..
They are sold at BMW dealerships and are BMWs so I think the term "sub-brand" is a huge misnomer.

I would say the same thing for the other brands as well. I don't feel that is the right term for it anyway but maybe that's just me.

It is the right term.

Again, merely stating my opinion that it is a misused term in this case. I view those more as a brand extension.

Also, my mention of price was meant as a tongue in cheek response to SMKs assertion that Benz won't go that route, even that is exactly what it is looking like.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure there will be a $100k+ EV car, but it will probably also do 0-60 in 3 seconds flat, so bring it in.   AMG is going to be doing electric cars in 10 years I bet.  Electric is going to be the future, the gas engine eventually won't be able to catch up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the German government taking people's money and forcing changes where they are not needed nor desired.  I guess those who try to hold onto their infinitely practical gas or diesel powered vehicles will be sent to concentration camps next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt they will bring back concentration camps.

 

Eventually though electric will overtake gas cars, just like self driving cars will become common.  There will always be gas cars for the exhaust note in a sports car, or perhaps longer range driving (500+miles), but when batteries and electric motors get cheaper, the performance level is undeniable.

 

Just think of this, the first smart phone came out 9 years ago.  And look how fast things went since.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eventually though electric will overtake gas cars, just like self driving cars will become common.

Won't happen in our lifetimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Eventually though electric will overtake gas cars, just like self driving cars will become common.

Won't happen in our lifetimes.

 

Sure it will.  Take a car like the Corvette Z06, fastest car GM has ever made in 100 years, and the Tesla sedan is faster on the first generation.

 

5 years ago a Nissan Leaf at $35k had a 100 mile range, now we are seeing 200 mile range for similar price out of a Bolt or Model 3 next year.   In 5 more years they will be a 300 mile range for $30k.  And with an electric cost of $250 a year vs $2,500 a year for gas, that gets to be an easy sell for electrics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      2021 is going to be a very interesting year for the Mazda3 as two more engines become available.
      According to separate reports from Jalopnik and Hagerty, Mazda will be dropping in the turbocharged 2.5L four-cylinder found in the 6, CX-5, and CX-9. The engine produces 227 horsepower on regular or 250 on premium. Like other Mazda models with this engine, the 3 will have it paired only with a six-speed automatic. Both reports say the engine will have AWD as standard. According to Hagerty's source, the engine will be available on a new trim called Premium Plus - likely taking the top spot in the 3's trim lineup. The source also confirmed this engine will not mean the return of the Mazdaspeed name for a hot variant. 
      The other engine is a 2.0L four-cylinder that Jalopnik reports is only for the sedan. Hagerty believes this engine is the SkyActiv-G used in the previous-generation 3, not the SkyActiv-X with its compression-ignition system.
      Not surprisingly, Mazda said they "“have not announced any details for the 2021 Mazda3," when asked about this.
      Source: Hagerty, Jalopnik

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      2021 is going to be a very interesting year for the Mazda3 as two more engines become available.
      According to separate reports from Jalopnik and Hagerty, Mazda will be dropping in the turbocharged 2.5L four-cylinder found in the 6, CX-5, and CX-9. The engine produces 227 horsepower on regular or 250 on premium. Like other Mazda models with this engine, the 3 will have it paired only with a six-speed automatic. Both reports say the engine will have AWD as standard. According to Hagerty's source, the engine will be available on a new trim called Premium Plus - likely taking the top spot in the 3's trim lineup. The source also confirmed this engine will not mean the return of the Mazdaspeed name for a hot variant. 
      The other engine is a 2.0L four-cylinder that Jalopnik reports is only for the sedan. Hagerty believes this engine is the SkyActiv-G used in the previous-generation 3, not the SkyActiv-X with its compression-ignition system.
      Not surprisingly, Mazda said they "“have not announced any details for the 2021 Mazda3," when asked about this.
      Source: Hagerty, Jalopnik
    • By William Maley
      Nearly a decade ago, Nissan launched an ambitious assault on the U.S. commercial van market with the launch of their NV vans. It started with the Titan-dervived, body-on-frame NV1500/2500/3500 vans. This was followed by the unibody NV200 van, which was for a time the "Taxi of Tommorow" in New York City. But Nissan is reportedly throwing in the towel.
      Automotive News has learned from a source that it will end production of their commercial vans. No time frame was given.
      "We don't want to go more in the business of vans in the U.S. We will exit," said the source.
      Nissan spokesman Brian Brockman declined to comment about the future of the commercial vans, only saying in a statement that the automaker " is considering a number of opportunities to streamline the product portfolio and drive efficiencies within our manufacturing operations."
      When the NV lineup was launched in 2009, Nissan was hoping to steal away sales from the Detroit Three. At the time, Ford and GM had 97 percent of the large van segment. The NV was positioned as being a more modern option compared to the Ford E-Series and Chevrolet Express/GMC Savana. It was more comfortable with adjustable seats, taller ceiling for easier access to the cargo area, and pre-drilled holes in the body to allow owners to add interior racks easily. But Nissan wasn't able to make decent inroads into this market, only achieving around an eight percent share in the marketplace.
      What was the NV's downfall?
      Brand Loyalty to the American brands Using a modified Titan platform for the larger vans comprised them in urban areas with their extended front nose, and cargo capacity. "A third of the vehicle is dedicated to the engine and passenger compartment instead of cargo. The van takes up more real estate for the same amount of cargo space," explained Sam Fiorani, vice president at AutoForecast Solutions. NV200 Taxis were dinged by taxi companies poor ride quality, difficulty entering/exiting the van for elderly passengers, and increasing maintenance costs. Proved to a be a difficult sale to fleet buyers due to the automaker lacking the numerous combinations of light-trucks that the Detroit three can offer. Trucks and vans work hand in hand to attract sales in the commercial market. "Chevrolet and Ford can be everything to everybody," said Tyler Slade, operating partner at Tim Dahle Nissan Southtowne in Salt Lake City. "When we went to some of these fleet companies, it didn't make sense for them to have trucks from Ford and vans from Nissan." Add in $2.8 billion in cuts that the company is planning to stay afloat and COVID-19, and the death knell was coming sooner than later for the NV family.
      If Nissan does go forward with dropping the NV family, this will be a major blow to about a forth of Nissan dealers in the U.S. They made various investments such as installing heavy-duty lifts capable of lifting fully-loaded vans and having a dedicated sales staff to handle specific fleet issues.
      "Dealers now have serious concerns about their investments in commercial vehicles," said Slade.
      There is also the question as to whether Nissan may try again. Automotive News notes that in the new business strategy outlined last month, Nissan is wanting more global cooperation with its alliance partner Renault. The French automaker already has a number of vans in its lineup and is quite successful in various markets. Nissan already sells a version of the Renault Traffic, called the NV300 in Europe.
      But getting a Renault van into the U.S. as a Nissan will be difficult and costly in terms of homologation. Also, Nissan would still need to figure out how to appeal to larger fleet buyers that go with Ford or GM.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), The Drive
      Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers & Gears

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...