William Maley

Cadillac News: Cadillac Offers Buyouts To Their Smallest Dealers

31 posts in this topic

Cadillac is offering 400 of its smallest dealers a buyout if they don't want to be part of the ambitious and contentious Project Pinnacle.

Automotive News reports the offers will range from $100,000 to $180,000. The dealers eligible for the buyout sold less than 50 new Cadillac models in 2015. While the 400 dealers make up 43 percent of Cadillac's total number of dealers in the U.S. (around 925), this group only made up 9 percent of total sales last year.

Cadillac President Johan de Nysschen said the buyouts is to give those an alternative who don't want to forward with the new program.

“This is going to be a long, arduous and challenging journey and certainly not one for the faint-hearted. Some people may choose to make life a little easier than what lies ahead,” said de Nysschen.

de Nysschen did say while Cadillac has too many dealers compared to their rivals, the buyout program isn't meant to be seen as a way to get rid of low-volume dealers. 

Project Pinnacle is a new incentive program that will separate dealers into five tiers based on sales volume. Each tier offers a varying level of customer perk along with different requirements for services and facilities. For example, small stores cannot stock vehicles on site. Instead, they would offer a virtual showroom for customers to explore and order a vehicle. This program has gotten backlash from dealer groups, saying it would violate franchise laws and be unfair to the smaller dealers. 

Those who have been offered the buyout have until November 21st to either take it or move forward with Project Pinnacle, which is expected to begin January 1st.

Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

 


View full article

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a bright idea.  Dealer franchise laws do need to go.  Cadillac can survive if not thrive on about 500 dealers.  The little guys need to disappear.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a long over do move. 

If you want a stronger dealer network you must make them stronger. 

GM has too many dealers period and Cadillac was one that was the most effected.  To make them stronger you must weed out the weak and under performing dealers. In many cases selling Cadillac's was apart time job as they were also selling Chevy and Buicks. 

The dealers here all sold less than 50 cars a year. In many cases some were selling one to two a month. 

Cutting the number of dealers will move more sales to the stronger dealers and make it easier for more stand alone dealers going forward and for them to be able to better take care of the customers. 

Most metro areas only need one dealer and an area like LA could use a couple but there are many places there is just no need for a dealer. Also if customers are remote and not close to a dealer GM can fall back on the other dealers to fix cars if needed. In a pinch they can help arrange a customer repair at a dealer that is local if the customer is ok with this. 

This is not unlike the Chevy dealers now taking care of the Hummer Customers now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a simple engineer far removed from sales, can someone please help me to understand how eliminating dealers will increase sales?  This does not sound like a smart plan.  How does GM suffer if some dealers sell far less than others?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great plan as we need to dump the little dealers who do not have the cash to invest in a luxury dealership, does not have the sales to support a luxury style of dealership and does not offer the service one would expect of a luxury dealership.

In a span of 18 miles, I have the one big dealership that I go to as the service is far superior and two small ones that usually only carry a couple cars, an escalade, etc. These two small dealerships are also part of a mega Cadillac, Buick, GMC, Chevy, Pontiac, Oldsmobile and Saturn mega store concept from the 80-90's that are very dated and clearly not a place that Luxury buyers would go to.

This is about giving the buyer the buying experience they expect. We have a MB dealership on the north end, one on the eastside, one in the south end. Total of 3 MB dealerships, same with BMW and they service the greater Seattle Tacoma area. 3 Counties and are very successful. Cadillac on the other hand has 12 dealerships servicing this same area. Most look like dated tear downs from the 70-80's and clearly we only need 3-4 at most.

This is about changing to insure that the buying experience is what one would expect of a luxury dealership. Not trying to be all things to everyone out of one lot. GM does not need that unlike MB or BMW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm.  I wonder how many Cadillac owners would be happy that their local dealership that is only 5 miles away, will close because the owner can't meet the renovation timeline demanded by GM.....and they then have to drive 100 miles to find the next nearest dealership.

 

I know I would be pissed, and I could care less that my dealership did not decorate in time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

As a simple engineer far removed from sales, can someone please help me to understand how eliminating dealers will increase sales?  This does not sound like a smart plan.  How does GM suffer if some dealers sell far less than others?

It is simple. 

 

You can have  bunch of dealers that sell a few cars and make for a weak network system of dealers competing for a fewer number of cars. 

Or you can have a fewer number of dealers selling more cars and making more money being able to better serve customers with better facilities and better staff as they will be more profitable to provide this. 

 

The 400 dealers here sell much less than 50 cars a year and only account for 9% of sales. The for the most part are not making money and can not provide the service standards Cadillac would like to see their dealers supply. Also the small number of sales would go to the stronger dealers and provide more income to the strong dealers that can serve the customers better. 

It is more not so much about decoration as it is level of service and the ability to afford it.

The weak dealers selling 1-2 cars a month are a parasite that hurt the entire network vs. helping it. 

Ford and GM both have way too many dealers than they need. Years ago you could get away with multiple dealers on every corner but no longer. There are strenght and  profits in larger dealers with volume and less competition between dealers on transaction price. 

Even at Chevy vs Toyota the Chevy stores per small metro area can number 5-10 and Toyota 1-3. 


Ford in out area has helped cut the number of dealers with buy outs from Super Stores that own dealers in many cities. Some stores closed and others were enlarged but are part of a network that is working under one owner. This has helped their stores be more profitable. 

While some may not be happy driving farther it has not hurt the Mercedes, BMW and Audi dealers in out area. The numbers even low have declined here too. There is now only a couple in the Cleveland. Akron, Canton area. They are all large new dealers with top level service vs. the past where they were just tagged in with another brand and only selling 1-2 cars a month as a part time dealer for all intents. 


GM would like to kill off about 1/3-/1/2 of the Chevy dealers too but the cost would be too great to buy them out. 

This is not much different than the killing of Pontiac and Olds. GM also had too many divisions for the number of cars they sold. With cost going up it was more and more difficult to make so many models and market them at the lower numbers and show a profit. 

 

Ideally today one volume brand and one Luxury division is appropriate. In the Case of GM Buick is a non factor since China keeps them alive. The key for them is to use them for the low end Luxury and not let Cadillac worry about that. It is a case where a liability can be turned into an advantage as BMW and Benz try to work for more numbers with lower end cars in North America. 

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I woudl agree with hyper, but our dealership experiences are now very different. Kind of interesting in a way.

When i was a kid we took our Ford Country Squire wagons to a small town Ford dealer, town was no bigger than 500 people and the sales and service departments shared the same counter.  The owners two hunting dogs usually slept in front of that counter.  You would be hard pressed to find 30 cars on the lot, new or used.

Took my MINI Cooper S in for a recall on the power steering pump, went to Midwest Auto Group here in Columbus for the work and an Oil change. they are one of the largest European car dealers in the world, and have perhaps several thousand cars on hand. Pulled in next to a black on black 2017 Rolls Royce in the service bay, after pulling past several Ferrari's, Lotuses, Jags, Volvos and the like.

Very, very different dealership experience!

Thankfully, both dealerships offered free coffee...

...and GM's weak link is their dealer network.  Dealer network is also holding back VW and to a lesser extent FCA and a few others.

Will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

As a simple engineer far removed from sales, can someone please help me to understand how eliminating dealers will increase sales?  This does not sound like a smart plan.  How does GM suffer if some dealers sell far less than others?

I don't think it will increase sales but there is no way a dealer selling less than 1 car a week is making enough on it's own to profit so I'm assuming they're getting money from the mother ship therefore is they decrease their sales slightly by closing doors they will increase their margins and profits with lower total sales. That's just my guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To anyone questioning this move as non-effective or illogical.. in terms of gaining more sales..The level of customer experience from one portion of a divisional dealership.. Chevy/Cadillac does not translate into a positive one in relation to proper customer relations. As much as I love GM.. my Chevy dealership experience is no way no how as rich as my experience at the Cadillac dealership I deal with. The dealership is a Cadillac-Only store.. and based on customer treatment.. it benefits greatly from not being associated with the Chevy store.

It pretty much boils down to U will not get Ritz Carlton treatment at the Hilton. That carries over in sales.. PERCEPTION of luxury has to start out where U buy and with the people U deal with along the way of purchase. A person used to selling, trained to sell a Chevy Sonic or Silverado pick-up should have nothing to do with a sales of a $95K CT6. Let me make it even crazier in clarity.. A PERSON SELLING A TAHOE DOES NOT HAVE THE TRAINING TO HANDLE A SALE TO SALE OF AN ESCALADE. And yes the Tahoe can hit $70K.. but the mentality of that buyer simply is different. It is the reason why a Chevy buyer will spend $70K on the LOADED Tahoe but not feel up to spending $70K on the base Escalade.. and vise-versa. Luxury is a state of mind.. and JDN seems to have a handle on it. There is a direct correlation as to why Cadillac ATPs are up, and leading the segment... and it is not only because Cadillac sells Escalades. The CTS, XTS, ATS, and XT5 are moving, some slower than others, without massive incentives being lobed at the customers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks hyper, pretty much what I expected in terms of their thinking.  I am just not sure it will matter much, while absolutely inconveniencing some current and future customers who have to then seek out and drive to further to a dealer.  And the justification to those customers, is that their long time dealer did not live up to standards set.  Hmmm.  I doubt one customer will ever think or say, ‘yeah, get rid of them.  I will drive elsewhere.’  But I digress.

 

Oh, and I completely disagree about your similarity analogy to GM killing off redundant brands, which has a direct and hard impact on profit, complexity, product planning, etc.  At least from the corporations POV.  The customer just sees another loss.  Or perhaps that’s what you meant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cadillac currently has 3x as many dealers as Benz, for instance, yet sells about a 1/3 as many cars. There is also a measure of desirability viewed from simple things as foot traffic in and out of dealership. Having less dealerships also means U can have the best personal condensed into one dealer as opposed to spread all over the place

 

vz8p3n.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

I woudl agree with hyper, but our dealership experiences are now very different. Kind of interesting in a way.

When i was a kid we took our Ford Country Squire wagons to a small town Ford dealer, town was no bigger than 500 people and the sales and service departments shared the same counter.  The owners two hunting dogs usually slept in front of that counter.  You would be hard pressed to find 30 cars on the lot, new or used.

Took my MINI Cooper S in for a recall on the power steering pump, went to Midwest Auto Group here in Columbus for the work and an Oil change. they are one of the largest European car dealers in the world, and have perhaps several thousand cars on hand. Pulled in next to a black on black 2017 Rolls Royce in the service bay, after pulling past several Ferrari's, Lotuses, Jags, Volvos and the like.

Very, very different dealership experience!

Thankfully, both dealerships offered free coffee...

...and GM's weak link is their dealer network.  Dealer network is also holding back VW and to a lesser extent FCA and a few others.

Will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

See I like the small town service where you can wonder back to the back of the shop and really talk to the guy working on your car. Few dealers will let you wonder anymore.

Today many customers are all about get me in and get me out while giving me a Danish and few WiFI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

Thanks hyper, pretty much what I expected in terms of their thinking.  I am just not sure it will matter much, while absolutely inconveniencing some current and future customers who have to then seek out and drive to further to a dealer.  And the justification to those customers, is that their long time dealer did not live up to standards set.  Hmmm.  I doubt one customer will ever think or say, ‘yeah, get rid of them.  I will drive elsewhere.’  But I digress.

 

 

 

Oh, and I completely disagree about your similarity analogy to GM killing off redundant brands, which has a direct and hard impact on profit, complexity, product planning, etc.  At least from the corporations POV.  The customer just sees another loss.  Or perhaps that’s what you meant.

 

The fact is times have changed, cost are higher than ever and the way of doing business has to change or you will be out of business. We have yet to see the last automaker fail and we will see more. Development cost are so high we are seeing things like Ford and Chevy working together on transmissions not because they want to but because they have to.

Companies just can't offer 14 variations of the same kind of car any longer as it is too expensive unless it is sold globally. Volume of each model needs to be high today as it is difficult to survive moving forward selling only a small volume at a low cost.

Generally customers and even people here on the web sight do not understand the cost of doing business today in making autos. They may see a loss of a division but a Corporations see it as a way to make more money and cut cost.

Profits have to be up to pay the bills and to develop new and competitive product. If not you die.

I am still a die hard Pontiac fan but I fully understand why from a business standpoint why they were killed. knowing how the new global market works Pontiac fell too far behind not going global and holding volumes much too small.

The inability of GM to understand how to Run Pontiac caught up to them. In the end they got Pontiac to a point in 2003 with no real RWD performance option for the GM performance division. Yet we had the Aztek? 

Globally Pontiac was a mystery to most and really had no global market outside the Holden based cars that came way too late to help.

 

As to back to the topic. Driving farther is not going to be an issues as most customers will have to drive as far to find a Audi or Benz dealer as it is.

My buddy had to drive over an hour to a Porsche dealer and that was not an issue to him as it was a good dealer {Penske} and he was willing to do it because he wanted a Porsche.

We had a local one but the market was so small it was removed and placed in Cleveland with the existing dealer as even Porsche cut the number of dealers. This is not just a GM thing. Our Benz dealers also merged or sold out too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

Hmmm.  I wonder how many Cadillac owners would be happy that their local dealership that is only 5 miles away, will close because the owner can't meet the renovation timeline demanded by GM.....and they then have to drive 100 miles to find the next nearest dealership.

 

I know I would be pissed, and I could care less that my dealership did not decorate in time.

Cadillac is not FORD, Chevy or DODGE, they are a Luxury brand that should have world class service and dealerships. Simple, you cannot sell enough to justify the luxury line, then you do not have it.

Many Ford Dealerships have Lincoln and they do Lincoln a dishonor by having them in the same show room.

Luxury is Luxury and deserves to have it's own place.

Fact of life is that while many rich people will go to Walmart to save money, They still do not want their luxury products on the same shelf there.

Same with Cars, People who buy fords and Chevy's for the most part stay with those dealerships and rarely move up to the luxury line if it is shown there. Luxury buyers expect a much higher level of service and dealership.

Ford would be wise to make this change if they want Lincoln to Compete with Cadillac, MB, BMW etc. Otherwise accept that Lincoln is a Buick competitor.

Just how I see it and I think many others do also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

Thanks hyper, pretty much what I expected in terms of their thinking.  I am just not sure it will matter much, while absolutely inconveniencing some current and future customers who have to then seek out and drive to further to a dealer.  And the justification to those customers, is that their long time dealer did not live up to standards set.  Hmmm.  I doubt one customer will ever think or say, ‘yeah, get rid of them.  I will drive elsewhere.’  But I digress.

Wings, I am one of those customers that with 3 cadillac dealerships in my general area, 15 mile circle, the two closest to me are terrible and deserve to be closed down. I now drive to the farthest dealer who has outstanding service, attention to detail, etc. In fact I take my Trailblazer SS there to get the synthetic oil changed as the service is that much better and the price of the oil change between Cadillac and Chevy is nothing since it is synthetic. 

I am a customer who does drive a little farther for better service yet same price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, hyperv6 said:

See I like the small town service where you can wonder back to the back of the shop and really talk to the guy working on your car. Few dealers will let you wonder anymore.

Today many customers are all about get me in and get me out while giving me a Danish and few WiFI.

Agree completely.  Part of my Mustang fetish comes from this dealer in 1971...We got a new Country Squire wagon that was blue....there was a blue Mach one in the service bay next to our wagon when we picked up our nice new wagon.

7 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Wings, I am one of those customers that with 3 cadillac dealerships in my general area, 15 mile circle, the two closest to me are terrible and deserve to be closed down. I now drive to the farthest dealer who has outstanding service, attention to detail, etc. In fact I take my Trailblazer SS there to get the synthetic oil changed as the service is that much better and the price of the oil change between Cadillac and Chevy is nothing since it is synthetic. 

I am a customer who does drive a little farther for better service yet same price.

I am the same way.  I have a regular independent mechanic who works on my cars and he is a bit of a hike but worth it.  And for dealership service, i sue a dealership on the far side of town, as their service is excellent.

The dealer nearest me is god awful.  My former boss Eric had to show them how to use their alignment machine to get a proper alignment on his teenage daughters car. They were literally clueless on how to operate their own equipment.

15 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Cadillac is not FORD, Chevy or DODGE, they are a Luxury brand that should have world class service and dealerships. Simple, you cannot sell enough to justify the luxury line, then you do not have it.

Many Ford Dealerships have Lincoln and they do Lincoln a dishonor by having them in the same show room.

Luxury is Luxury and deserves to have it's own place.

Fact of life is that while many rich people will go to Walmart to save money, They still do not want their luxury products on the same shelf there.

Same with Cars, People who buy fords and Chevy's for the most part stay with those dealerships and rarely move up to the luxury line if it is shown there. Luxury buyers expect a much higher level of service and dealership.

Ford would be wise to make this change if they want Lincoln to Compete with Cadillac, MB, BMW etc. Otherwise accept that Lincoln is a Buick competitor.

Just how I see it and I think many others do also.

One reason that I am thinking of buying a used Luxury car with my next automotive purchase.  The bar really is set much higher.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dfelt said:

Wings, I am one of those customers that with 3 cadillac dealerships in my general area, 15 mile circle, the two closest to me are terrible and deserve to be closed down. I now drive to the farthest dealer who has outstanding service, attention to detail, etc. In fact I take my Trailblazer SS there to get the synthetic oil changed as the service is that much better and the price of the oil change between Cadillac and Chevy is nothing since it is synthetic. 

I am a customer who does drive a little farther for better service yet same price.

You are lucky to have the dealers close. I was referring to those in rural areas perhaps, that don't.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes sense to do this, if a dealer is selling 3-4 cars per month, that isn't a viable dealership.    Better to buy those out and make the remaining dealerships nicer.

As far as travel goes, once you buy the car you don't really need to take it to the dealer for service.  Aside from the independent shops, and Midas and Mienke and Monro type places there are a lot of service options.  Plus you could take your Cadillac to any GM dealer to fix since the 2.0T, 3.6 V6 and 6.2 V8 are GM corporate engines, nothing in there that a Chevy mechanic couldn't fix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cadillac will come to you to get your auto, take it, service it, wash it, vacuum it and return it in clean condition to your home or work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

town where my mom lives, 50k pop in a rural midwest area......huge GM dealer that's been a regional pillar for decades.  They have all the GM brands.  I bet they don't sell a ton of Caddies, and it is one of the nook in a corner stores.  Closest other GM dealers at least an hour away i think.

No Lexus or Infiniti or Audi for an hour away.  Conservative buyers there like their GM's and even if they don't buy in big number the Cadillacs, they are still aspirational there.  Lots of SRX's sold.  Maybe they sell (purely a guess) 50-100 caddies a year.  But their same buyers buy lots of pickups and have money and when they want a car they may want a cadillac too.

Cadillac should be analytical on which of those smaller dealers they try to cut out.  Part of GM's success over history is because they are in these smaller town midwest pockets no other dealers are.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, regfootball said:

town where my mom lives, 50k pop in a rural midwest area......huge GM dealer that's been a regional pillar for decades.  They have all the GM brands.  I bet they don't sell a ton of Caddies, and it is one of the nook in a corner stores.  Closest other GM dealers at least an hour away i think.

No Lexus or Infiniti or Audi for an hour away.  Conservative buyers there like their GM's and even if they don't buy in big number the Cadillacs, they are still aspirational there.  Lots of SRX's sold.  Maybe they sell (purely a guess) 50-100 caddies a year.  But their same buyers buy lots of pickups and have money and when they want a car they may want a cadillac too.

Cadillac should be analytical on which of those smaller dealers they try to cut out.  Part of GM's success over history is because they are in these smaller town midwest pockets no other dealers are.

This makes sense and I would have to think they would have some common sense about this type of dealer. The focus needs to be on areas like where I live where you have two small towns with a single store approach like that and the service sucks, sales have to be insignificant and you can drive an extra 15 min to a much bigger dealer with much better service. No need for a dealer between Seattle and Tacoma or Seattle and Everett here that cannot offer a true luxury experience.

They need to focus on these small dealers that just do not make sense any longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/27/2016 at 4:21 AM, hyperv6 said:

It is simple. 

 

You can have  bunch of dealers that sell a few cars and make for a weak network system of dealers competing for a fewer number of cars. 

Or you can have a fewer number of dealers selling more cars and making more money being able to better serve customers with better facilities and better staff as they will be more profitable to provide this. 

 

The 400 dealers here sell much less than 50 cars a year and only account for 9% of sales. The for the most part are not making money and can not provide the service standards Cadillac would like to see their dealers supply. Also the small number of sales would go to the stronger dealers and provide more income to the strong dealers that can serve the customers better. 

It is more not so much about decoration as it is level of service and the ability to afford it.

The weak dealers selling 1-2 cars a month are a parasite that hurt the entire network vs. helping it. 

Ford and GM both have way too many dealers than they need. Years ago you could get away with multiple dealers on every corner but no longer. There are strenght and  profits in larger dealers with volume and less competition between dealers on transaction price. 

Even at Chevy vs Toyota the Chevy stores per small metro area can number 5-10 and Toyota 1-3. 


Ford in out area has helped cut the number of dealers with buy outs from Super Stores that own dealers in many cities. Some stores closed and others were enlarged but are part of a network that is working under one owner. This has helped their stores be more profitable. 

While some may not be happy driving farther it has not hurt the Mercedes, BMW and Audi dealers in out area. The numbers even low have declined here too. There is now only a couple in the Cleveland. Akron, Canton area. They are all large new dealers with top level service vs. the past where they were just tagged in with another brand and only selling 1-2 cars a month as a part time dealer for all intents. 


GM would like to kill off about 1/3-/1/2 of the Chevy dealers too but the cost would be too great to buy them out. 

This is not much different than the killing of Pontiac and Olds. GM also had too many divisions for the number of cars they sold. With cost going up it was more and more difficult to make so many models and market them at the lower numbers and show a profit. 

 

Ideally today one volume brand and one Luxury division is appropriate. In the Case of GM Buick is a non factor since China keeps them alive. The key for them is to use them for the low end Luxury and not let Cadillac worry about that. It is a case where a liability can be turned into an advantage as BMW and Benz try to work for more numbers with lower end cars in North America. 

 

This because its sales 101. This is a long overdue move by GM. If the small dealers can't keep up with the changes then it is better to just buy them off and put those resources into the larger dealerships. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Japan is a notorious market for American automakers to make a dent in. Ford called it quits last year, while GM sells a meager number of models; Cadillac sold 327 and Chevrolet moved 373 models last year. Critics say "nontariff barriers" are the key reason as to why Detroit hasn't been able to make any headway. Talk with people in Japan and it is a different story, there is still a perception of American models having poor quality and having to fork out a fair amount of cash to keep them maintained.
      But there is an exception. Jeep has been able to carve out a nice niche in Japan's marketplace. The brand is consistently in the top 10 of foreign automakers and sales have been climbing. 2017 is on track to be the eighth consecutive year of sales growth in the country. Through August, Jeep moved 6,344 models.
      But getting to this point took a lot of work and money.
      "We have to spend money and engineering hours to do it, but we think it's worth it," said FCA Japan CEO Pontus Haggstrom to Automotive News.
      "They are things that make our jobs harder and make it more expensive and time consuming to bring cars to Japan. But are they trade barriers? My honest opinion is, no. Are they excuses for why I can't sell or succeed in Japan? No."
      Jeep has been making efforts to make their models more appealing to Japanese customers.
      Tweaking drivetrains to qualify for Japan's eco-car incentives Offering right-hand drive models Equipping models with folding side mirrors and factory-installed Japanese navigation systems. Doubling their marketing budget since 2010 Refurbishing or redesigning more than 50 showrooms by 2018 The last one is important as previous Jeep dealers in the country were basically what you find in dealers in the U.S.
      "It's more about the brand and less about the origin," says Haggstrom.
      Jeep also has an ace up its sleeve that many automakers wished they had, brand equity.
      "The image of American cars as low-quality still persists here, even though a bit underserved. But Jeep has the most brand equity of any American brand. Japan shows it has a global following," said Christopher Richter, an auto analyst with CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets in Tokyo.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      Japan is a notorious market for American automakers to make a dent in. Ford called it quits last year, while GM sells a meager number of models; Cadillac sold 327 and Chevrolet moved 373 models last year. Critics say "nontariff barriers" are the key reason as to why Detroit hasn't been able to make any headway. Talk with people in Japan and it is a different story, there is still a perception of American models having poor quality and having to fork out a fair amount of cash to keep them maintained.
      But there is an exception. Jeep has been able to carve out a nice niche in Japan's marketplace. The brand is consistently in the top 10 of foreign automakers and sales have been climbing. 2017 is on track to be the eighth consecutive year of sales growth in the country. Through August, Jeep moved 6,344 models.
      But getting to this point took a lot of work and money.
      "We have to spend money and engineering hours to do it, but we think it's worth it," said FCA Japan CEO Pontus Haggstrom to Automotive News.
      "They are things that make our jobs harder and make it more expensive and time consuming to bring cars to Japan. But are they trade barriers? My honest opinion is, no. Are they excuses for why I can't sell or succeed in Japan? No."
      Jeep has been making efforts to make their models more appealing to Japanese customers.
      Tweaking drivetrains to qualify for Japan's eco-car incentives Offering right-hand drive models Equipping models with folding side mirrors and factory-installed Japanese navigation systems. Doubling their marketing budget since 2010 Refurbishing or redesigning more than 50 showrooms by 2018 The last one is important as previous Jeep dealers in the country were basically what you find in dealers in the U.S.
      "It's more about the brand and less about the origin," says Haggstrom.
      Jeep also has an ace up its sleeve that many automakers wished they had, brand equity.
      "The image of American cars as low-quality still persists here, even though a bit underserved. But Jeep has the most brand equity of any American brand. Japan shows it has a global following," said Christopher Richter, an auto analyst with CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets in Tokyo.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Volkswagen of America - Up 33.2% (32,112 Vehicles Sold This Month, 252,456 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mitsubishi Motors North America - Up 17.2% (8,430 Vehicles Sold This Month, 79,195 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - Up 17% (9,703 Vehicles Sold This Month, 84,709 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Toyota Motor North America - Up 14.9% (226,632 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,831,479 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      General Motors Co. - Up 11.9% (279,397 Vehicles Sold This Month, 2,195,502 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Audi of America - Up 9.6% (19,308 Vehicles Sold This Month, 160,914 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Nissan North America - Up 9.5% (139,932 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,196,241 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Ford Motor Company -  Up 8.7% (222,248 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,933,459 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      American Honda Motor Co. - Up 6.8% (142,722 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,231,603 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Kia Motors America - Up 6.6% (52,468 Vehicles Sold This Month, 457,930 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mazda North American Operations - Up 3.4% (25,738 Vehicles Sold This Month, 220,297 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 0.4% (55,120 Vehicles Sold This Month, 478,848 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      BMW Group U.S. - Down 0.4% (29,307 Vehicles Sold This Month, 254,962 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 2.2% (32,337 Vehicles Sold This Month, 270,112 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      FCA US LLC - Down 10% (174,266 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,579,138 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Hyundai Motor America - Down 14% (57,007 Vehicles Sold This Month, 511,740 Vehicles Sold This Year)

      Maserati North America, Inc. - 
      Porsche Cars North America, Inc. - 
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - 

      Brands:
      Acura - Down 2.8% (12,946 Vehicles Sold This Month, 114,126 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Alfa Romeo - Up 2,993% (1,268 Vehicles Sold This Month, 7,352 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Audi - Up 9.6% (19,308 Vehicles Sold This Month, 160,914 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      BMW - Up 0.7% (25,571 Vehicles Sold This Month, 220,175 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Buick - Down 20% (16,137 Vehicles Sold This Month, 159,830 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Cadillac - Up 1.1% (15,530 Vehicles Sold This Month, 113,846 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Chevrolet - Up 17.4% (199,801 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,516,192 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Chrysler - Down 16% (15,759 Vehicles Sold This Month, 143,809 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Dodge - Down 30% (29,938 Vehicles Sold This Month, 365,790 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Fiat - Down 24% (2,206 Vehicles Sold This Month, 21,252 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Ford - Up 9.1% (213,446 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,850,737 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Genesis - Up 43.5% (1,736 Vehicles Sold This Month, 15,102 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      GMC - Up 9.4% (47,329 Vehicles Sold This Month, 405,634 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Honda - Up 7.4% (129,776 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,117,477 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Hyundai - Down 15.49% (55,271 Vehicles Sold This Month, 496,638 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Infiniti - Up 11.7% (12,745 Vehicles Sold This Month, 113,714 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Jaguar - Up 24% (3,296 Vehicles Sold This Month, 30,228 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Jeep - Down 4% (73,409 Vehicles Sold This Month, 622,242 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Kia - Up 6.6% (52,468 Vehicles Sold This Month, 457,930 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Land Rover - Up 14% (6,407 Vehicles Sold This Month, 54,481 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Lexus - Up 1.5% (26,196 Vehicles Sold This Month, 219,659 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Lincoln - Up 0.1% (8,802 Vehicles Sold This Month, 82,722 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Maserati - 
      Mazda - Up 3.4% (25,738 Vehicles Sold This Month, 220,297 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mercedes-Benz - Down 1.7% (29,008 Vehicles Sold This Month, 242,250 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      MINI - Down 7.2% (3.736 Vehicles Sold This Month, 34,787 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mitsubishi - Up 17.2% (8,430 Vehicles Sold This Month, 79,195 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Nissan - Up 9.3% (127,187 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,082,527 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Porsche - 
      Ram Trucks - 0% (51,686 Vehicles Sold This Month, 418,693 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Smart - Down 60.2% (241 Vehicles Sold This Month, 2,635 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Subaru - Up 0.4% (55,120 Vehicles Sold This Month, 478,848 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Toyota - Up 16.9% (200,436 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,611,820 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Volkswagen - Up 33.2% (32,112 Vehicles Sold This Month, 252,456 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Volvo - 
      *Mercedes-Benz's sales numbers include Mercedes-Benz vans.
    • By William Maley
      Volkswagen of America - Up 33.2% (32,112 Vehicles Sold This Month, 252,456 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mitsubishi Motors North America - Up 17.2% (8,430 Vehicles Sold This Month, 79,195 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - Up 17% (9,703 Vehicles Sold This Month, 84,709 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Toyota Motor North America - Up 14.9% (226,632 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,831,479 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      General Motors Co. - Up 11.9% (279,397 Vehicles Sold This Month, 2,195,502 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Audi of America - Up 9.6% (19,308 Vehicles Sold This Month, 160,914 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Nissan North America - Up 9.5% (139,932 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,196,241 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Ford Motor Company -  Up 8.7% (222,248 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,933,459 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      American Honda Motor Co. - Up 6.8% (142,722 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,231,603 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Kia Motors America - Up 6.6% (52,468 Vehicles Sold This Month, 457,930 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mazda North American Operations - Up 3.4% (25,738 Vehicles Sold This Month, 220,297 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 0.4% (55,120 Vehicles Sold This Month, 478,848 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      BMW Group U.S. - Down 0.4% (29,307 Vehicles Sold This Month, 254,962 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 2.2% (32,337 Vehicles Sold This Month, 270,112 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      FCA US LLC - Down 10% (174,266 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,579,138 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Hyundai Motor America - Down 14% (57,007 Vehicles Sold This Month, 511,740 Vehicles Sold This Year)

      Maserati North America, Inc. - 
      Porsche Cars North America, Inc. - 
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - 

      Brands:
      Acura - Down 2.8% (12,946 Vehicles Sold This Month, 114,126 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Alfa Romeo - Up 2,993% (1,268 Vehicles Sold This Month, 7,352 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Audi - Up 9.6% (19,308 Vehicles Sold This Month, 160,914 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      BMW - Up 0.7% (25,571 Vehicles Sold This Month, 220,175 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Buick - Down 20% (16,137 Vehicles Sold This Month, 159,830 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Cadillac - Up 1.1% (15,530 Vehicles Sold This Month, 113,846 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Chevrolet - Up 17.4% (199,801 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,516,192 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Chrysler - Down 16% (15,759 Vehicles Sold This Month, 143,809 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Dodge - Down 30% (29,938 Vehicles Sold This Month, 365,790 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Fiat - Down 24% (2,206 Vehicles Sold This Month, 21,252 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Ford - Up 9.1% (213,446 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,850,737 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Genesis - Up 43.5% (1,736 Vehicles Sold This Month, 15,102 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      GMC - Up 9.4% (47,329 Vehicles Sold This Month, 405,634 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Honda - Up 7.4% (129,776 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,117,477 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Hyundai - Down 15.49% (55,271 Vehicles Sold This Month, 496,638 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Infiniti - Up 11.7% (12,745 Vehicles Sold This Month, 113,714 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Jaguar - Up 24% (3,296 Vehicles Sold This Month, 30,228 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Jeep - Down 4% (73,409 Vehicles Sold This Month, 622,242 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Kia - Up 6.6% (52,468 Vehicles Sold This Month, 457,930 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Land Rover - Up 14% (6,407 Vehicles Sold This Month, 54,481 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Lexus - Up 1.5% (26,196 Vehicles Sold This Month, 219,659 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Lincoln - Up 0.1% (8,802 Vehicles Sold This Month, 82,722 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Maserati - 
      Mazda - Up 3.4% (25,738 Vehicles Sold This Month, 220,297 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mercedes-Benz - Down 1.7% (29,008 Vehicles Sold This Month, 242,250 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      MINI - Down 7.2% (3.736 Vehicles Sold This Month, 34,787 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Mitsubishi - Up 17.2% (8,430 Vehicles Sold This Month, 79,195 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Nissan - Up 9.3% (127,187 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,082,527 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Porsche - 
      Ram Trucks - 0% (51,686 Vehicles Sold This Month, 418,693 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Smart - Down 60.2% (241 Vehicles Sold This Month, 2,635 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Subaru - Up 0.4% (55,120 Vehicles Sold This Month, 478,848 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Toyota - Up 16.9% (200,436 Vehicles Sold This Month, 1,611,820 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Volkswagen - Up 33.2% (32,112 Vehicles Sold This Month, 252,456 Vehicles Sold This Year)
      Volvo - 
      *Mercedes-Benz's sales numbers include Mercedes-Benz vans.

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      GM Leads Industry on Strength of Chevrolet and GMC
      Total, Retail, Commercial and Government sales rise on strong truck and crossover demand Best September U.S. retail performance since 2007 DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) today reported a 12 percent year-over-year increase in total sales in September to 279,397 units, driven by a 17 percent increase at Chevrolet and an 9 percent increase at GMC.
      Crossover deliveries were up 43 percent, trucks were up 10 percent and passenger cars were down 11 percent. Retail deliveries, which accounted for about 80 percent of sales, were up 8 percent for GM’s best September retail performance since 2007. GM’s U.S. retail share is estimated to be up 0.6 percentage points. Commercial and Government deliveries were up 25 percent and 38 percent, respectively. GM has gained U.S. Commercial market share for 14 consecutive months. “Our new crossovers from Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac have been very well-received and Chevrolet had an outstanding month with the Silverado and Colorado,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president of Sales Operations. “We are entering the fourth quarter with strong momentum, great products and a healthy economy.”
      GM Chief Economist Mustafa Mohatarem said all the key U.S. economic indicators point toward continued economic growth and stability. In addition, regions devastated by the recent hurricanes will continue to recover, helping spur new and used vehicle sales.
      “The overall strength of the U.S. economy is the main force driving the market,” he said. “With the U.S. economy strengthening, retail sales should remain strong for the foreseeable future.”
      September Retail Highlights (vs. September 2016 unless noted)
      Chevrolet
      Best September since 2004. Silverado was up 14 percent. Equinox and Traverse, Chevrolet’s newest crossovers, were up 69 percent and 104 percent, respectively, the best September ever for Equinox and the best month ever for Traverse.  Bolt EV had its best month ever with 2,505 retail deliveries and 2,632 total deliveries. Best month ever for Chevrolet electrified vehicles (Bolt EV and Volt), with 3,929 retail deliveries. Trax was up 8 percent for its best September ever. Impala was up 7 percent. Buick
      Enclave, Encore and Envision were up 41 percent, 12 percent and 44 percent, respectively. Encore had its best month ever. Highest ever SUV/crossover mix at 87 percent. LaCrosse ATP up 10 percent year to date. Buick maintained its retail focus with more than a 50 percent reduction in fleet deliveries year to date. GMC
      Terrain was up 66 percent for its best September ever. Overall Denali penetration was 33 percent, the highest monthly rate ever. Denali penetration on Sierra reached 38 percent in September. Year-to-date ATP is highest in GMC history at $43,210. Sierra had the highest ATP in its segment for 12th straight month. Cadillac
      XT5 was up 36 percent. Combined XT5 and SRX deliveries were up 12 percent year to date. Year-to-date ATP was up $260 to $53,748, higher than many German luxury brands Supplemental Data
      U.S. inventory levels are down about 160,000 vehicles in the third quarter. The company’s inventory target is unchanged, which is to end the year with stocks at or below last year’s level of about 850,000 vehicles, with fewer cars and more trucks, crossovers and utilities in the mix. According to JD Power PIN estimates, GM’s September incentive spending as a percent of ATP was 14.6 percent, which reflects special programs that support disaster relief. Year to date, GM’s incentive spend is below its domestic and many Asian competitors.  Year to date, GM has the lowest daily rental mix of any full-line automaker at 8.7 percent of total sales. GM remains committed to decrease daily rental sales by 50,000 units in 2017.
  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)