Jump to content
William Maley

Cadillac News: Cadillac and Endurance Racing, Take Two!

Recommended Posts

It has been 14 years since Cadillac competed in endurance racing with the Northstar LMP at the 24 Hours of Lemans. But next year at the 24 Hours of Daytona, Cadillac will once again compete.

The automaker announced today that it will take part in the new Daytona Prototype international (DPi) class in the 2017 IMSA WeatherTech Sports Car Championship with the Cadillac DPi-V.R. Cadillac's DPi is based on the Dallara LMP2 chassis. Thanks to new regulations, Cadillac and other manufacturers are able to make changes to certain exterior parts to help make their vehicle stand out.

Power comes from a naturally-aspirated 6.2L dry-sump V8 with 600 horsepower. This engine was used in the Corvette Daytona Prototypes. Curb weight is a light 2,050 pounds.

"Cadillac’s V-Performance production models – the ATS-V and CTS-V – are transforming our brand’s product substance, earning a place among the world’s elite high-performance marques. The Cadillac DPi-V.R further strengthened our V-Performance portfolio, placing Cadillac into the highest series of sports car racing in North America," said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen.

Action Express Racing and Wayne Taylor Racing will field the Cadillac DPi-V.R.

Source: IMSA


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You see...this is where I think Cadillac is spinning its wheels stupidly going nowhere fast!

MONEY WASTED BIG TIME!!!

1. Cadillac's image woes have nothing to do with having a racing heritage...

First of all, Cadillac hardly has a racing heritage. What? Once or twice in their 100 plus year history Cadillac raced in maybe 5-6 races?

2. Cadillac's image woes have something to do with an award that was won by them 100 years ago and them not meeting those standards for quite some time...

The Dewar award...and how Cadillac aint the Standard of the World anymore...

THAT is what plagues Cadillac...not for the lack of racing cars in 2016...

They build a Ciel and build it right...people will come back...

V Series Cadillacs have torn the 'Ring all right...people aren't exactly breaking down the door to own a Cadillac...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for them. I wish them luck.

 

Maybe this new class will make the IMSA WeatherTech series exciting. The last few years have been a snore. They've catered to the ugly Daytona Prototypes and they organize the races poorly in many cases. They need to condense GTD and GTLM, keep Prototype Challenge, and put all 3 classes on every venue, rather than splitting some of them up.

 

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

You see...this is where I think Cadillac is spinning its wheels stupidly going nowhere fast!

MONEY WASTED BIG TIME!!!

1. Cadillac's image woes have nothing to do with having a racing heritage...

First of all, Cadillac hardly has a racing heritage. What? Once or twice in their 100 plus year history Cadillac raced in maybe 5-6 races?

2. Cadillac's image woes have something to do with an award that was won by them 100 years ago and them not meeting those standards for quite some time...

The Dewar award...and how Cadillac aint the Standard of the World anymore...

THAT is what plagues Cadillac...not for the lack of racing cars in 2016...

They build a Ciel and build it right...people will come back...

V Series Cadillacs have torn the 'Ring all right...people aren't exactly breaking down the door to own a Cadillac...

 

I see your point but i think these endeavors are good for brand image and awareness.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Racing is the wrong place to invest money. 

Start with the Snooze marketing program they have, the idiot choices to not commit to the higher end auto price points. The needs to make the existing product lines best in class so that subject BS like MT review of the CT6 is ignored by most everyone.

Time to focus on the auto's you sell and the message that goes along with it not wasted on racing a prototype that will have no connection to the selling inventory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

Aaaaaaagreeed.

Nobody would have said anything if it was a Chevy. But because it's a Caddy...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

Aaaaaaagreeed.

Nobody would have said anything if it was a Chevy. But because it's a Caddy...

 

17 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

If it was Chevy with it's long history of Corvette racing, fine. But Caddy, should be focusing every dollar on the auto's they sell and a way better marketing message. The money spent on racing could have gone for a new CUE system to upgrade the existing one.

Focus should be at this time on marketing, sales and quality of product. Leave racing to Chevy which has a superior racing history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frisky Dingo said:

Guys, relax. Chevy was already competing in IMSA, and this body is on an established chassis. It also uses the engine it has been for several years. GM was going to race anyway, there's no harm in them rebadging their effort as a Cadillac. The development costs for this were very low in the world of sports car racing.

OK....I read the article fast and kinda misinterpreted the existing established chassis part of this whole equation.

I still stand by my rant though, minus the waste of money part as really it wont cost Cadillac that much money.

I stand by what I said about racing will not cure what is ailing Cadillac even if racing does indeed bring exposure.

People that might one day buy a Cadillac TODAY and in the NEAR FUTURE dont  care about racing....irony as this whole RWD Arts and Science project when it began almost 2 decades ago was what people wanted THEN for cars and for Cadillac..maybe.

That ship has sailed...that was 20 years ago.

Today, my guy feeling tells me rich folk are aching to buy a modern Cadillac Land Yacht. Not necessarily a wobbly floaty Cadillac and not necessarily a speed demon either...

Escalade SUV extra premium luxury  and Ciel convertible and El Miraj personal coupe and 4 door sedan in my opinion is what is missing from Cadillac rather than an NSX or LFA or SLS type halo car.

The sports cars they have in the V Series cars

The pedigree to legitimize these V Series cars through this racing endeavor wont do too much to bring people into the showrooms...a sexy long sleek 4 door convertible will....and a dealership experience that is akin to a boutique car maker to  complete the package....

Instead of going racing, maybe they should go to a beauty salon for a dealership experience make-over...

 

WITH 1 HUGE EXCEPTION...

 

if Cadillac went ELECTRIC MOTOR racing...THEN it would be beneficial to its image going forward....

TECHNOLOGY.....THAT is what got them the Dewar award a 100 years ago....

Precision engineering was a breakthrough then and was part of technological advancement...

 

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dfelt said:

 

If it was Chevy with it's long history of Corvette racing, fine. But Caddy, should be focusing every dollar on the auto's they sell and a way better marketing message. The money spent on racing could have gone for a new CUE system to upgrade the existing one.

Focus should be at this time on marketing, sales and quality of product. Leave racing to Chevy which has a superior racing history.

But it's just a badge change in this case. This is a form of marketing.. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think racing is a good idea, it helps from an engineering and marketing standpoint.  However they are in a racing series that hardly anyone has heard of, so there isn't that much marketing exposure, and I don't know how much entering benefit there is using a Corvette racing engine.  

They should step up to prime time and join Formula 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

I think racing is a good idea, it helps from an engineering and marketing standpoint.  However they are in a racing series that hardly anyone has heard of, so there isn't that much marketing exposure, and I don't know how much entering benefit there is using a Corvette racing engine.  

They should step up to prime time and join Formula 1.

 

Joining F1 would be a terrible decision. It's hideously expensive and is being greatly restricted from an engineering advancement perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

I think racing is a good idea, it helps from an engineering and marketing standpoint.  However they are in a racing series that hardly anyone has heard of, so there isn't that much marketing exposure, and I don't know how much entering benefit there is using a Corvette racing engine.  

They should step up to prime time and join Formula 1.

F1 is an absolute money pit from what I've read. The only reasons teams still do it is pride or some sh!t. At least the technology is finally coming down from them(KERS, small turbo motors). But that's about it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how you do and how much you can get from sponsorship.  And it depends on what you want to spend.  Mercedes and Ferrari spend $400-500 million a year on F1, a team like Sauber spends $100 million.   Ferrari gets a payout from F1 every year, that with their prize money is $150-200 million, Mercedes made about $170 million in winnings this year.  So it comes down to sponsorships to make up the difference.  I read the Williams F1 team posted a small profit.   I found a story that Daimler lost $30 million last year on the F1 program, but they think the advertising value more than makes up for it. 

I would imagine any factory backed racing team in any league isn't really in it to make money.  I doubt Audi made any profit in prize money for winning Le Mans all those years, but they got advertising out of it.  So it is really in how you weigh the exposure and the bragging rights that come from racing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with the comment that Cadillac needs an even higher level of Escalade and having an Escalade V would be a benefit also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Frisky Dingo said:

 

Joining F1 would be a terrible decision. It's hideously expensive and is being greatly restricted from an engineering advancement perspective.

Agree completely.  Would more likely be an expensive embarrassment....

8 hours ago, dfelt said:

Agree with the comment that Cadillac needs an even higher level of Escalade and having an Escalade V would be a benefit also.

This would be good....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Would more likely be an expensive embarrassment....

Sadly.. I agree.

US teams aren't known to be winning teams and it would be GREAT if GM/Ford could collaborate and send the best America has but the way F1 is ran... it would be insanity to try and field a team. There seems to be too many politics involved. That and the sport itself just isn't a great sport to watch. I used to love it but the competition just isn't there anymore. It seems every year there is 1 team that will win it all from week 1 and a second team trying to knock them down some. Basically, who spends the most in R&D in the of season, wins.

For what it's worth though, HAAS F1 was very successful for their first season in F1 as an American team. They scored points in their first race ever, which is a very rare feat.

Just look at how the teams are so close to each other and you can see where they consistently run every week. Mercedes 1-2, Ferrari/Redbull for 3-6, Ford India/Williams for 7-9, 11. They just need better competition when it comes to racing..like NASCAR. A lot of people think NASCAR is a lame and boring sport but it's the most competitive form of auto racing there is.

2016 F1 Standings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Depends on how you do and how much you can get from sponsorship.  And it depends on what you want to spend.  Mercedes and Ferrari spend $400-500 million a year on F1, a team like Sauber spends $100 million.   Ferrari gets a payout from F1 every year, that with their prize money is $150-200 million, Mercedes made about $170 million in winnings this year.  So it comes down to sponsorships to make up the difference.  I read the Williams F1 team posted a small profit.   I found a story that Daimler lost $30 million last year on the F1 program, but they think the advertising value more than makes up for it. 

I would imagine any factory backed racing team in any league isn't really in it to make money.  I doubt Audi made any profit in prize money for winning Le Mans all those years, but they got advertising out of it.  So it is really in how you weigh the exposure and the bragging rights that come from racing.

I agree that there isn't a set monetary value to advertising your brand through F1 but of all forms of racing F1 is the most costly with likely the least amount of return on said investment. It would definitely be a way to get their name out there in likely a great way but I don't think they are really set out to lose money when even the best teams still aren't making money.

I don't know for fact but it just seems the way F1 is run that there are other forms of racing that Cadillac could benefit from entering.

You're right, likely Audi didn't profit a dime from winning Le Mans but with a rich history in racing they still have a well known race program and can advertise their winnings even if it is just on pamphlets and signage. That alone just gives companies a little more cache and prestige in their products which Cadillac is greatly missing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here is what I see going on here.

JDN is playing the Audi card here getting into prototype racing.  Audi entered prototypes here and in Europe to promote their Diesel engines.

With that said I expect GM will enter IMSA with this car from Dallara a proven chassis builder and compete using the bullet proof Chevy engine while they sort out the car. They then will move to use a Cadillac based engine to promote their new engines once they arrive in about 2-3 years. to do a Chassis and engine would prove to be a disaster as it was the first time they tried this with the LMP.

Cadillac jumped in the last time way over their head. They had a new chassis and used the N star engine and both proved to be a problem. They never really sorted this out.

Now this car will be able to not only run Daytona and Sebring but also Lemans. This should prove to be a good combination that they could not do before with the Daytona prototype cars.

Chevy is already well established with the GTLM program and they will embark on new C8 Mid Engine in about a year and a half. Being based on a stock platform for the Corvette is very important. Not so much at Cadillac. Making the prototype for Chevy would really have little added value.

F1 is such a mess now and has been for a while. Cost are off the charts and to get results is even more difficult unless you have been at it for a while.  GM really has little need or use for F1.

As for now F1 needs to get their house in order.

Might note two things. The car from the side resembles the Audi prototypes. The nose and tail hints as a little of the styling of the headlamps and tail lamps we may see in the future Cadillac products.

But if Cadillac joins IMSA with this prototype it will be a way to promote the brand globally. Also I see a future with their own powertrains and possibly a hybrid system much like Porsche uses today.

They just need to avoid doing this as the past LMP car as while it was neat they were way in over their heads on that deal. That would have been a major challenge even to the most established teams from Germany.

If you look at many of the Porsche and Audi programs they take proven cars or engines and advance them not blow them up and starting over. The early 917 begat the later 917, Also what they learned carried over to the 936 and 962. Even what they learned there has been applied to the cars they race today.

Cadillac is smart to go to Dallara and use the Chevy engine that has a proven record. Once the car is a winner then drop in the new Cadillac engine when ready.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could see Cadillac once they sort out the proper EV Engine going with an F1 EV team.

I wonder if NASCAR will ever consider an EV program?

Honestly, Electric would be the way to go of showing true leadership and innovation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NASCAR will only consider EV when they absolutely HAVE to. I just can't see them considering it before they need to just because the sport has always been around simplification and basic engine on a street car(I know it is nothing like that today as they have standardized bodies and engines so much for competition's sake) but in general, they are the most simple cars racing today. Yes, there are millions into R&D and testing to tweak suspensions and bodywork that they are allowed to. I'm not trying to say that it's cheap and easy for anybody to just field a car but I'm saying that in the grand scheme of racing, they are still the most simplistic cars out there(On the national/international level).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 67impss
      67impss
      Age: 58
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      It has finally happened, the first spy shots of the upcoming 2020 Cadillac CT5 have been released.
      The first item that jumps out is the hood scoop. No, we don't think this will make it into production as it is likely part of the camouflage to disguise the vehicle. Moving past that, the CT5 takes a fair amount of inspiration from the Escala concept. This is evident along the side where there is a fastback design for the roof and extra rear quarter window.
      We're expecting an engine lineup similar to the CTS - a turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder, 3.6L V6, and twin-turbo 3.0L V6.
      The CT5 will replace the ATS, CTS, and XTS when it goes into production in 2019. 
      Source: Autoblog, CarScoops

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      It has finally happened, the first spy shots of the upcoming 2020 Cadillac CT5 have been released.
      The first item that jumps out is the hood scoop. No, we don't think this will make it into production as it is likely part of the camouflage to disguise the vehicle. Moving past that, the CT5 takes a fair amount of inspiration from the Escala concept. This is evident along the side where there is a fastback design for the roof and extra rear quarter window.
      We're expecting an engine lineup similar to the CTS - a turbocharged 2.0L four-cylinder, 3.6L V6, and twin-turbo 3.0L V6.
      The CT5 will replace the ATS, CTS, and XTS when it goes into production in 2019. 
      Source: Autoblog, CarScoops
    • By William Maley
      The Cadillac XT4 is an important model for the brand as it will give them a competitor in the lucrative compact luxury crossover class. It might also give one of GM's assembly plants some much needed good news.
      Bloomberg has learned from sources that General Motors has started producing test versions of the Cadillac XT4 at their Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City. This possibly hints that production of the XT4 could take place here. A GM spokesman declined to comment when asked about this.
      The Fairfax plant has been hit hard by the decline in sales for midsize sedans. Home to the Chevrolet Malibu, the plant has seen the third shift cut last year as Malibu sales dropped 18 percent. 
      Source: Bloomberg

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      The Cadillac XT4 is an important model for the brand as it will give them a competitor in the lucrative compact luxury crossover class. It might also give one of GM's assembly plants some much needed good news.
      Bloomberg has learned from sources that General Motors has started producing test versions of the Cadillac XT4 at their Fairfax Assembly plant in Kansas City. This possibly hints that production of the XT4 could take place here. A GM spokesman declined to comment when asked about this.
      The Fairfax plant has been hit hard by the decline in sales for midsize sedans. Home to the Chevrolet Malibu, the plant has seen the third shift cut last year as Malibu sales dropped 18 percent. 
      Source: Bloomberg
    • By William Maley
      Three-peat: Chevrolet’s Retail Share Grows for Third Consecutive Year – up 1 point since 2015
      Buick and GMC Buck the Industry to Post Double-digit Retail Sales Gains in December GM December retail sales up 2 percent; retail share tops 18 percent Best Commercial and Government deliveries since 2008 and largest 2017 share gain of any automaker DETROIT — General Motors (NYSE: GM) delivered 3,002,241 vehicles in the United States in 2017, including more than 1.3 million trucks and 965,090 crossovers. In the process, GM set new annual sales records for pickup and crossover deliveries, electric vehicles sales, average transaction prices and more. GM also reduced year-end inventories more than its target. Inventories were 752,554 units, down 90,000 from a year ago. Days supply was 63 days.
      Chevrolet Momentum
      Chevrolet has been GM’s most powerful growth engine. The brand delivered year-over-year retail market share increases in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Since the end of 2014, Chevrolet’s retail share has grown from 10.2 percent, according to Polk registration data, to an estimated 11.2 percent. The Fastest Growing Crossover Company
      GM crossover deliveries were up 17 percent year over year, driven by record sales of the Chevrolet Equinox, Traverse and Trax, as well as the Buick Envision, Buick Encore and GMC Acadia. GM grew its retail share of the crossover market more than any other automaker, according to the latest J.D. Power PIN estimates. GM’s retail share grew 1.6 percentage points to 13.1 percent. The only other major automaker to gain retail share was up less than one point. Chevrolet became the industry’s fastest-growing crossover brand in 2017 based on retail market share, with the all-new Equinox and Traverse gaining more than one point of share in their respective segments. Equinox retail deliveries were up 21 percent and Traverse was up 31 percent. The Trax was up 5 percent. Crossovers helped Buick deliver its best calendar year sales since 2004. The Buick Encore delivered its best year ever. It has been Buick’s volume leader for three straight years. Crossovers now account for more than 80 percent of Buick’s retail deliveries, compared with about two-thirds last year. Retail crossover sales for the brand were up 26 percent year over year, with the Enclave up 14 percent, the Encore up 8 percent and Envision up 167 percent. Cadillac’s retail crossover deliveries were up 9 percent, driven by the new XT5. The Industry’s Best-selling Trucks
      GM sold more pickup trucks in the United States than any other automaker for the fourth year in a row – a record 948,909 units – thanks to its unique three-truck strategy. Since 2014, Chevrolet and GMC have been the only brands to offer mid-size, light- and heavy-duty pickups. GM sold 239,719 full-size SUVs and has led the segment since the launch of the Chevrolet Suburban in 1935. Combined, the Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban, and the GMC Yukon and Yukon XL, have earned more than 75 percent retail market share for the fourth consecutive year. At GMC, more than half of Sierra HD customers and more than 70 percent of Yukon customers purchase premium Denali models. The Cadillac Escalade has earned at least 30 percent of the retail market for large luxury SUVs for four consecutive years, with ATPs that are more than $20,000 above its closest domestic competitor. The Leader in Affordable, Long-range EVs
      Chevrolet delivered more than 43,669 electric vehicles in 2017, including 23,297 Bolt EV crossovers and 20,349 Volt sedans. In December, the Bolt EV had its best month since launch. Record ATPs
      GM’s average transaction prices (ATPs), which are net of incentive spending estimates, were more than $35,400 for the year and they surpassed $38,000 in December. Both are records, and significantly above the industry average of $31,600 for the calendar year. Best Commercial and Government Deliveries Since 2008
      Total Commercial and Government deliveries were more than 296,000 units, the most since 2008. Commercial and Government deliveries are now the largest component of GM’s fleet deliveries, following a cumulative reduction of 170,000 rental deliveries since 2014. 2017 marked the first year that GM Commercial and Government deliveries have been greater than daily rental deliveries in the last quarter century. Based on Polk registration data through October, GM has gained more Commercial and Government market share in 2017 than any other automaker. Total and Retail Sales
      GM’s total sales in 2017 were down 1 percent year over year, outperforming the industry, which is expected to be down 2 percent. GM’s retail deliveries, which are more than 80 percent of total sales, were down 1 percent year over year, in line with the industry’s expected performance.  December Highlights (vs. a year ago)
      Corporate
      Industry sales and retail sales are all expected to be down about 4 percent. Fleet sales are expected to be down 5 percent. There was one less selling day. GM’s retail market share is expected to surpass 18 percent, up one percentage point for the company’s best month of the year. Retail sales totaled 254,449 units, up 2 percent.   GM’s Commercial and Government deliveries were up a combined 7 percent and daily rental deliveries were down 40 percent. Total fleet sales were down 22 percent. GM’s incentives as a percentage of ATP in the fourth quarter of 2017 averaged 13.3 percent, in line with the fourth quarter of 2016, according to J.D. Power PIN estimates. GM incentives during the month of December averaged 14.8 percent. Chevrolet
      Chevrolet’s retail market share increased 0.2 percentage points to an estimated 11.5 percent and ATPs for the month were the best-ever at more than $34,000. The Equinox and Traverse had their best December total sales ever with increases of 21 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Silverado total sales were up 25 percent. The Silverado light-duty crew cab had its best month ever. Buick
      Buick total sales were up 5 percent and retail deliveries were up 15 percent. On a retail basis, the Enclave was up 46 percent, the Envision up 93 percent and the Encore was up 2 percent. Retail market share increased an estimated 0.2 percentage points to 1.6 percent. GMC
      GMC total sales were up 1 percent for the brand’s best sales month in more than 12 years. Retail deliveries were up 14 percent and share increased an estimated 0.6 percentage points to 4.1 percent. December ATPs were the highest on record at approximately $47,500. Calendar year ATPs of $43,700 also set a new record. Retail deliveries of the Sierra were up 18 percent, the Yukon was up 54 percent, and the Yukon XL was up 51 percent. The Acadia was up 1 percent. Denali deliveries set a monthly and full-year record, with penetration approaching 40 percent in December and 30 percent for the year. Full-year Denali deliveries were approximately 140,000 units. Denali ATPs are about 25 percent higher than overall GMC ATPs. Cadillac
      Cadillac ATPs set a new monthly record of $58,300. 2018 Outlook 
      Mustafa Mohatarem, GM’s chief economist, forecasts 2018 total vehicle sales (including medium and heavy trucks) to exceed 17 million units for the fourth year in a row. Light vehicle sales are forecasted to be in the high 16 million-unit range.
      “In 2017, we had solid GDP growth and good news on employment, wages and consumer sentiment, which helped deliver very strong retail sales for the auto industry,” he said. “This year, many consumers will see their take-home pay rise because of tax reform. That will keep the broad economy growing, and help keep sales at very healthy levels even as the Fed increases interest rates.” 

      GM is well positioned heading into the new year because of its low inventories and multi-year strategy to redesign and expand its truck and crossover portfolio. On a retail basis, 78 percent of GM sales are now trucks and crossovers, compared with an industry average of 65 percent.
      “We are winning customers in the fastest-growing parts of the market, and our momentum continues to grow because we have strengthened our brands, grown our Commercial and Government business, sharply reduced rental sales and successfully transitioned to a crossover- and truck-focused business,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president of Sales Operations. “We are starting 2018 with very lean inventories for such a strong industry, and we see more room to grow because Chevrolet, Buick and GMC will have a full year of sales of their all-new crossovers, and we are going to launch the industry’s best full-size pickups.”

  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×