Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, balthazar said:

^ Except internal combustion vehicles took off FAR faster than EVs have done over the last, well to be honest; efforts go back to the 1970s [if you push the whole early 1900s EV market off to one side].

What EVs were sold commercially at scale in the 1970s?

It took a long time for cars to scale and they were for the 1%ers

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

What EVs were sold commercially at scale in the 1970s?

That's precisely the point. And at 2% of the market today, one can argue they still aren't at scale.

>>"It took a long time for cars to scale and they were for the 1%ers"<<
Most still are. $75K is not a mainstream-price product. There's only 3 in the meat of the price range (Model 3, leaf, Bolt), and most of the proposed models seem to also be skewed toward the upper end too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, balthazar said:

That's precisely the point. And at 2% of the market today, one can argue they still aren't at scale.

>>"It took a long time for cars to scale and they were for the 1%ers"<<
Most still are. $75K is not a mainstream-price product. There's only 3 in the meat of the price range (Model 3, leaf, Bolt), and most of the proposed models seem to also be skewed toward the upper end too.

So we're still looking for the Model-T of the EV world.  It'll happen.

I still maintain that the Bolt's relatively poor sales are largely due to its dorky shape.  Had they built some SA into it or made it more of a crossover (mutually exclusive, I know) it would have sold a lot better.  It's not a bad car to drive at all and in reality could satisfy the needs of most small and mid-size sedan drivers. 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, balthazar said:

^ Except internal combustion vehicles took off FAR faster than EVs have done over the last, well to be honest; efforts go back to the 1970s [if you push the whole early 1900s EV market off to one side].

RE the Tesla Roadster : I'm not seeing it on the Tesla site; available to build & price. Perhaps those vids were taken before Elon shot it into space. ;)

Roadster 1.0 is not in production any longer. 2.0 reservations are available.

https://www.tesla.com/roadster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, balthazar said:

^ Except internal combustion vehicles took off FAR faster than EVs have done over the last, well to be honest; efforts go back to the 1970s [if you push the whole early 1900s EV market off to one side].

RE the Tesla Roadster : I'm not seeing it on the Tesla site; available to build & price. Perhaps those vids were taken before Elon shot it into space. ;)

Fair point but you are forgetting that it was the old guard who held EVs back more than the “new tech” level of it. See GMs EV debacle of the 90s as the most recent example. Competing industries and corrupt politicians (bought and sold by the lobbyists of said industries) held the tech back. It is only in the last 15 years or so that the tech has been allowed to finally catch up to the real world, i.e. more range between charges. My point about the reluctance of some people to accept simple progress and changes in technology stands. The arguments against EVs are getting weaker and weaker every year. Just my opinion though. 

Edited by surreal1272
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

So we're still looking for the Model-T of the EV world.  It'll happen.

I still maintain that the Bolt's relatively poor sales are largely due to its dorky shape.  Had they built some SA into it or made it more of a crossover (mutually exclusive, I know) it would have sold a lot better.  It's not a bad car to drive at all and in reality could satisfy the needs of most small and mid-size sedan drivers. 

I agree with you on the Bolt. I get the gripe about it’s looks but it is a solid and surprisingly quick little car (thank you endless torque). I drove one across town (when I was working at a Chevy dealership last year) and I actually liked the way it drove but the outside is a bit “odd” and yes it should have been a true CUV to better fit in to current buying trends. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I still maintain that the Bolt's relatively poor sales are largely due to its dorky shape.  Had they built some SA into it or made it more of a crossover (mutually exclusive, I know) it would have sold a lot better.

100% agree. 

I don't understand why companies try and force EVs to have a funky look to them. 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the Bolt kinda cute, if I had to apply a general adjective. It's more generic/utilitarian than 'dorky'. At least it's not origami-esque like the horrible prius.

Bolt is selling well…… for an EV. So far this year, it's #2 in sales. But there's a weird disconnect here where 'poorly selling' is commonly attached to 'the Bolt', when other than one Tesla, ALL EVs sell poorly. 
 

2 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

Fair point but you are forgetting that it was the old guard who held EVs back more than the “new tech” level of it. See GMs EV debacle of the 90s as the most recent example. Competing industries and corrupt politicians (bought and sold by the lobbyists of said industries) held the tech back. It is only in the last 15 years or so that the tech has been allowed to finally catch up to the real world, i.e. more range between charges. 

I don't know that I buy that theory- there were dozens upon dozens of mainstream OEM, small company & private enterprise (read backyard efforts) at designing & marketing EVs over the decades- there just weren't buyers for them. From what I've read on the EV1, the bottom line is it wasn't viable from a business case, and that's eminently believable. I JUST read the finance report that Tesla reported "it's first quarterly loss since" 9 months ago

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason EVs are poor selling is because they can be better but they are obviously not cheap enough for anyone to take a risk on a true BEV yet.  When a Crossover BEV is less than a base model Civic/Corolla, then the sales will come.  People will not change unless there is a giant incentive for them to do so.  Right now a true BEV is simply too expensive for most people to experiment.  Charging stations are already here or are forthcoming but the price must be low enough to effectively replace large chunks of the used car market in order for BEVs to completely win the marketplace.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

I agree with you on the Bolt. I get the gripe about it’s looks but it is a solid and surprisingly quick little car (thank you endless torque). I drove one across town (when I was working at a Chevy dealership last year) and I actually liked the way it drove but the outside is a bit “odd” and yes it should have been a true CUV to better fit in to current buying trends. 

Poppycock.  Looks aren't everything.  If it really were the panacea that some here like to preach, it would be selling in much higher numbers DESPITE its looks.  It just ain't all that and a bag of chips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

Poppycock.  Looks aren't everything.  If it really were the panacea that some here like to preach, it would be selling in much higher numbers DESPITE its looks.  It just ain't all that and a bag of chips.

Looks matter. Put the powertrain in the Lacrosse or Regal and I'd drive it. 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^

Agree that the Bolt is not bad looking, would have sold better if it was a CUV. GM missed reading the tea leaves for the current auto trend.

Also agree that the Asian auto's do follow a very popular Origami type design. Yet while that sells well in the Asian rim and in Europe, they seem to have not realized that Americans are not huge Origami fans.

Leaf and Prius would have sold better if a more Butch style was used I think.

53 minutes ago, ocnblu said:

Poppycock.  Looks aren't everything.  If it really were the panacea that some here like to preach, it would be selling in much higher numbers DESPITE its looks.  It just ain't all that and a bag of chips.

I call your BULLSHIT OF NARROW VIEW!

People who drive EVs tend to buy them unless you have a wife who has an input and your huge like me. Then a much larger one would be better. 

BOLT is an excellent drive, if they had done a CUV rather than a hatch back I bet it would be selling even more. 
Just because you want to breath toxic fumes and coal dust not everyone does on the planet and before you know it as Solid state batteries hit in EV late this year and next year with many more CUV EV options, sales are going to jump up much faster.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, dfelt said:

sales are going to jump up much faster

Dream on

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, balthazar said:

I find the Bolt kinda cute, if I had to apply a general adjective. It's more generic/utilitarian than 'dorky'. At least it's not origami-esque like the horrible prius.

Bolt is selling well…… for an EV. So far this year, it's #2 in sales. But there's a weird disconnect here where 'poorly selling' is commonly attached to 'the Bolt', when other than one Tesla, ALL EVs sell poorly. 
 

I don't know that I buy that theory- there were dozens upon dozens of mainstream OEM, small company & private enterprise (read backyard efforts) at designing & marketing EVs over the decades- there just weren't buyers for them. From what I've read on the EV1, the bottom line is it wasn't viable from a business case, and that's eminently believable. I JUST read the finance report that Tesla reported "it's first quarterly loss since" 9 months ago

None of those startups had the backing and a few of those got swallowed by the big boys before anything could even hit the market. Like I said, the technology had roadblocks that went beyond the limits of the tech itself. It is clear that those hurdles and obstructionists of the past have been sent to the sidelines. Tesla opened the door and others are slowly getting the hint and making the investment like what Ford is doing with Rivian. 

1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

Poppycock.  Looks aren't everything.  If it really were the panacea that some here like to preach, it would be selling in much higher numbers DESPITE its looks.  It just ain't all that and a bag of chips.

Not “poppycock”. Fact. If it was put into a CUV, the sales would be much higher and that is not even a debatable point. Whether you choose to accept it or not is 100% irrelevant. It sure as hell isn’t like you’ve had any real time in one so your opinion on this is taken with a grain of salt. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

Fact. If it was put into a CUV, the sales would be much higher and that is not even a debatable point

:roflmao:

1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Lacrosse

??? What is a "LaCrosse"?  Is that a Canadian word?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

:roflmao:

??? What is a "LaCrosse"?  Is that a Canadian word?

What I'm saying is the Bolt lacks the visual Allure.

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of you crying out in agony over the Bolt's looks... the manufacturer calls it a Crossover.  In every OEM reference to the vehicle, it is grouped and classified as a Chevrolet CUV.  So I don't have a clue why all the crying and excuses saying it would sell better as a CUV... it already is.  And a puny selling one at that.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had an EV the size of an Equinox or Traverse, sales would be much better.  That eventually will come.

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

If you had an EV the size of an Equinox or Traverse, sales would be much better.  That eventually will come.

Yes, if they had a decent sized EV CUV that looks like a normal CUV (the Bolt is a humpy tall hatchback), sales would be better. 

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, dfelt said:

Solid state batteries hit in EV late this year and next year with many more CUV EV options,

There are solid state batteries ready for the market? Who's using them first? What're they going in? 

56 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

If you had an EV the size of an Equinox or Traverse, sales would be much better.  That eventually will come.

After a smallish sedan, that size should have been next. I feel like there is no reason there shouldn't be more of those out already instead of funky styling and odd sizing in the Bolt. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ccap41 said:

There are solid state batteries ready for the market? Who's using them first? What're they going in? 

They're going into phones first, but I would imagine that cars aren't far behind. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

They're going into phones first, but I would imagine that cars aren't far behind. 

What kind of improvement in phone batteries will that bring? Could it take my one charge per day(overnight) to one charge per two days? That would be pretty amazing. 

Since I got my XR, I have only used my phone so much throughout a single day that I felt the need to charge it before bed once. It will easily last 24hrs before getting under 20%. I stretched it to 28hrs once to see about how long it'll go on a charge and I think that was around 5% battery remaining. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ccap41 said:

What kind of improvement in phone batteries will that bring? Could it take my one charge per day(overnight) to one charge per two days? That would be pretty amazing. 

Since I got my XR, I have only used my phone so much throughout a single day that I felt the need to charge it before bed once. It will easily last 24hrs before getting under 20%. I stretched it to 28hrs once to see about how long it'll go on a charge and I think that was around 5% battery remaining. 

My guess is that they'll likely use the tech to make phones thinner and lighter rather than extending the time it can go without charging... but you never know. It could be a combination of both. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, ocnblu said:

:roflmao:

??? What is a "LaCrosse"?  Is that a Canadian word?

Funny how you laugh at the truth. Show us on the doll where the EV touched you. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ocnblu said:

All of you crying out in agony over the Bolt's looks... the manufacturer calls it a Crossover.  In every OEM reference to the vehicle, it is grouped and classified as a Chevrolet CUV.  So I don't have a clue why all the crying and excuses saying it would sell better as a CUV... it already is.  And a puny selling one at that.

I want you pay special close attention to the first paragraph describing the Bolt on CHEVY’s own page. Nowhere does it say CUV but it sure does mention the word “car” a lot. And no one is crying but you because you’re the only one here who gets their underwear in a knot over any positive attention directed at EVs. We get it. You hate them so maybe staying out of the conversation and not trolling at every EV turn would be better here. 

 

BF8009F6-B4FF-40B7-8CB3-B0686BB0272D.png

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Cadillac CT6 has been in the news a lot lately.  First it was potentially canceled as its home factory in the U.S. is slated for closure. Then there was the Cadillac Blackwing V8.  Most recently it has dropped both the base 2.0T 4-cylinder and the mid-range (now that there is a V8) 3.0 twin-turbo V6. 
      With all of those changes, there is bound to be some price changes to accompany them.
      For 2020, the CT6 will see a base price rise of $8,500 over the 2019 model to $59,900. With that rise, the base engine becomes the 3.6 liter V6 and AWD standard. It is also adding about $3,500 worth of active safety equipment as standard. 
      Moving up to the Premium Luxury model will add $12,000 to the price tag but comes with Cadillac's famous Super Cruise automated driving system, the rear seat package, the Comfort and Technology package, and the 34-speaker Panaray sound system. At $75,490, that's actually a $2,500 discount on those packages over the 2019 model. 
      The top model, the CT6 Platinum will come standard with the Blackwing V8, replacing the 3.0 twin-turbo on the spec sheet. It also gains 20-inch wheels that were optional last year. 
      While the future of the CT6 is murky, the fact that GM continues to make improvements to the model gives us hope that it will live on. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Cadillac CT6 has been in the news a lot lately.  First it was potentially canceled as its home factory in the U.S. is slated for closure. Then there was the Cadillac Blackwing V8.  Most recently it has dropped both the base 2.0T 4-cylinder and the mid-range (now that there is a V8) 3.0 twin-turbo V6. 
      With all of those changes, there is bound to be some price changes to accompany them.
      For 2020, the CT6 will see a base price rise of $8,500 over the 2019 model to $59,900. With that rise, the base engine becomes the 3.6 liter V6 and AWD standard. It is also adding about $3,500 worth of active safety equipment as standard. 
      Moving up to the Premium Luxury model will add $12,000 to the price tag but comes with Cadillac's famous Super Cruise automated driving system, the rear seat package, the Comfort and Technology package, and the 34-speaker Panaray sound system. At $75,490, that's actually a $2,500 discount on those packages over the 2019 model. 
      The top model, the CT6 Platinum will come standard with the Blackwing V8, replacing the 3.0 twin-turbo on the spec sheet. It also gains 20-inch wheels that were optional last year. 
      While the future of the CT6 is murky, the fact that GM continues to make improvements to the model gives us hope that it will live on. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Mercedes unveiled the Mercedes-Benz GLB at an event in Salt Lake City yesterday.   The GLB joins the GLA in the small crossover space, however it can be configured with seating for up to seven passengers.   Built on the compact, front wheel drive, transverse engine platform that is shared with the GLA, the boxy shape makes the most of its 111.4 inch wheelbase (5.1 inches longer than the GLA). The GLB can be purchased as a 5-seater or 7-seater with a second row that can slide fore and aft up to 6 inches. 
      Mercedes says the boxy shape gives the GLB powerful off-road proportions, and short front and rear overhangs help with approach and departure angles. Front-wheel drive is the default, and Mercedes 4Matic all-wheel drive is optional and comes with various modes for comfort, sport, and off-road. Hill-Start assist and downhill speed regulation contribute to the GLB's off-road chops.
      Powering the GLB is a 2.0 liter transverse 4-cylinder with an 8-speed automatic transmission. The engine produces 221 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque from 1800 rpm - 4,000 rpm. It is likely that we will later see AMG engine variants join the lineup like the 416 hp 4-cylinder that AMG just debuted. 
      The 2020 Mercedes-Benz GLB will be in dealerships by the end of 2019. 
      At a glance:
       
      GLB 250
      4MATIC
      Transmission
      8G-DCT
      (automatic)
      Displacement (cc)
      1991
      Output (hp)
      221
      at rpm
      5,500
      Max. torque (lb-ft)
      258
      at rpm
      1800 - 4000
      Acceleration 0-60 mph (s)
      6.9
      Top speed (mph)
      130
      *Spec for load compartment capacity calculated according to VDA standards.
       
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Mercedes unveiled the Mercedes-Benz GLB at an event in Salt Lake City yesterday.   The GLB joins the GLA in the small crossover space, however it can be configured with seating for up to seven passengers.   Built on the compact, front wheel drive, transverse engine platform that is shared with the GLA, the boxy shape makes the most of its 111.4 inch wheelbase (5.1 inches longer than the GLA). The GLB can be purchased as a 5-seater or 7-seater with a second row that can slide fore and aft up to 6 inches. 
      Mercedes says the boxy shape gives the GLB powerful off-road proportions, and short front and rear overhangs help with approach and departure angles. Front-wheel drive is the default, and Mercedes 4Matic all-wheel drive is optional and comes with various modes for comfort, sport, and off-road. Hill-Start assist and downhill speed regulation contribute to the GLB's off-road chops.
      Powering the GLB is a 2.0 liter transverse 4-cylinder with an 8-speed automatic transmission. The engine produces 221 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque from 1800 rpm - 4,000 rpm. It is likely that we will later see AMG engine variants join the lineup like the 416 hp 4-cylinder that AMG just debuted. 
      The 2020 Mercedes-Benz GLB will be in dealerships by the end of 2019. 
      At a glance:
       
      GLB 250
      4MATIC
      Transmission
      8G-DCT
      (automatic)
      Displacement (cc)
      1991
      Output (hp)
      221
      at rpm
      5,500
      Max. torque (lb-ft)
      258
      at rpm
      1800 - 4000
      Acceleration 0-60 mph (s)
      6.9
      Top speed (mph)
      130
      *Spec for load compartment capacity calculated according to VDA standards.
       
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac SuperCruise will be available on over 200,000 miles of North American roadways later this year.  Cadillac is adding an additional 70,000 miles to the existing 130,000 miles already in the system by the 4th quarter 2019.  Cadillac owners will receive an over-the-air update once the system upgrade is completed. 
      On top of the increase in SuperCruise map availability, Cadillac will also make system adjustments to improve performance and enhancements to the Driver Attention system.   Last year Cadillac updated the system so that the car would automatically adjust lane centering if a large vehicle was passing close by and also added additional messages in the driver cluster to give more detail as to why SuperCruise may not be available at the moment. 
      Cadillac says that CT6 owners have driven more than 2.5 million miles with SuperCruise active since it was introduced on 2018 model year vehicles. 


      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...