Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ccap41

New Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,768

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    87

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ccap41

  1. ccap41
    Ahhhh I should have known the XT5. I did think the Grand Cherokee but I figured that was more along the lines of the Edge. Isn't the Enclave much larger and 3 row? They're priced similarly though.
  2. ccap41
    Hahaha, Which MB did this remind you the most of? Yeah it is VERY quickly becoming a thing across every brand, if it hasn't already. i liked it a lot at first and I bet that was due in large part to me having a love for the original CLS but now that it is a thing on everything they're all making each other look more and more bland. Hatchbacks FTW!
  3. ccap41
    Ohhh I gotcha. From just those three(I'm not sure if there is another competitor in the low end luxury group and I realize the Edge isn't in that group) I'd favor the Nautilus first, MDX then Edge. The empty space in the Edge just looks off. they didn't utilize it well, or at all.
  4. ccap41
    Yeah that coupe styling for a small car will make for a cramped back seat. It looks pretty good but it won't be all that useful.
  5. ccap41
    I think it's a pretty good looking vehicle. Nothing crazy good but I don't think anything is offensive either. You say MB but I think you meant Malibu.
  6. ccap41
    So you think the MDX looks clearly better?
  7. ccap41
    That Edge center stack is...bad. If they just made those buttons larger I think it would look better. There's so much empty space and it isn't utilized very well. The Lincoln one looks much better, imo. It isn't great but it looks like they at least tried. For, 60-70k I think looks "meh" at best. But if you don't click all of the options it starts at $39,035, add a few small things to bring it up to 45k and it is still a respectable interior at that price. I don't really think it looks any worse or better than what's probably its closest rival, the MDX. I actually thought some of the lines were similar, that's what actually caught my eye. That sounds like a really stupid design. I can't imagine they thought that was "correct".
  8. ccap41
    That 2016 Chinese Taurus is basically the Ford version of the Continental, isn't it? I just looked at a picture of it and it's a pretty good looking car. Nothing special, just clean looking.
  9. ccap41
    So over here the Fusion/MKZ, Edge/MKX/Nautilus, and Continental, right?
  10. ccap41
    There has to be.. What is all on the CD4?
  11. ccap41
    So buy the Lincoln then. That solves your problem. lol Why is there an 8spd being used in Fords? Isn't this the second vehicle that has an 8spd since the 9spd has been plugged into some Chevys, which they co-developed?
  12. ccap41
    EcoTech is the first one that came to my head as well. ..Leaf.. lol But that's about it with the clever naming.
  13. ccap41
    I always find that somewhat ironic because you do get both but you have to choose which at which instance. You can have boost if you want/need boost. You cna have f/e if you want/need f/e. FWIW, my EcoBoost got sh!t economy 70mph and above. It seemed to drop significantly once you get to 70mph.
  14. ccap41
    EcoSport or Edge?? C'mon! I'd love an ST Escape!
  15. ccap41
    I've never been in one but to think they're more spacious than a SCrew F150 is insane. I think those cabs are huge. lol 8 months later from BMW then another 10 months from Audi.
  16. ccap41
    They're different. They have 3 different cabs on Silverados and F150's. Ram has a 4th, Mega Cab. That's actually super cool looking but it doesn't look like what I would imagine a 4 door coupe truck would look like in 2018..which would be crap.
  17. ccap41
    It's easy to mix Crew Cab and Double Cab from Chevy and Ram because they have four doors opening up "regularly" where Ford's middle cab configuration doesn't have exposed door handles and are more of a "suicide door" style.
  18. ccap41
    I'd agree but I think the 80/20 would include both Crew Cab and Double Cab.
  19. ccap41
  20. ccap41
    A lot of enthusiasts hate it because it's a Kia but I think it is a damn good looking car and it's a sport sedan, what's really not to like about it?
  21. ccap41
    Why is this news?
  22. ccap41
    That's only cars...
  23. ccap41
    The hatch is part of the vehicle. Why wouldn't that be included? I'll give you this is the best looking "coupe" CUV but... no.
  24. ccap41
    I, too, have a difficult time believing this is on a GM platform.
  25. ccap41
    As far as looks go, I would buy this over a Bolt. Easily. As far as likely execution... Bolt still.. I'm glad Kia didn't try and make an awkward tall hatch car CUV like thing though. They just lifted it enough to make it look like a "real CUV" (Hahaha).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search