-
Posts
11,263 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
67
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Gallery
Events
Store
Collections
Everything posted by ccap41
-
I've always wanted to get a set of winter/snow tires but I can't justify the cost where I live. Plus, now that I have an AWD Escape as long as I take it easy we don't get enough snow to justify 1100 in tires.
-
But what does a screen name change change about the person behind the keyboard?
-
Very good looking car
-
Where are these rules you speak of anyhow? What is the rule on screen names?
-
I guess I've just been curious for awhile now on what it costs to build one Silverado, one Sierra, and two F150's and two Rams. I ask because obviously there are pieces on the GM twins that are and are not shared(cosmetic). And seeing 1,000,000 sales of the GM twins split across two vehicles has to cost more for those extra pieces made but I have absolutely no clue how much it costs to reengineer and produce mostly just cosmetic pieces.
- 27 replies
-
Sales: Sales Figure Ticker: November 2015
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in 2015 Sales Archive
Hell, that's probably the ONLY exception to their incentives because it's the only vehicle worth buying from VW. Lol- 20 replies
-
Sales: Sales Figure Ticker: November 2015
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in 2015 Sales Archive
I always appreciate how well organized this thread is. You make it easy to read. Good job.- 20 replies
-
- 2
-
Does anybody know what difference in costs for making both the GM twins vs the F150 or Ram?
- 27 replies
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
The Mustang is the new 2.3 Ecoboost, not the 3.5 I thought we were talking about 3.5EB reactions to different gas. As far as the Mustang 2.3EB, that's the most aggressive power tune for that engine's applications, isn't it? Other vehicles with the 2.3T make less power. Stands to reason that a more aggressive tune would lose the most power on cheap gas. That makes more sense. The more aggressive the tune the greater difference from 87 to 93. Also, Wings, I didn't realize the 2.3 had such high compression. That's high for a boosted engine. What kind of boost does it utilize in its applications?- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
Buuuuuut the 2.3 is supposedly like that, at least with power and assuming fuel economy suffers as well if hp does.- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
I know that but why do some not have the performance drops like others? Like the aformentioned 2.0 EcoBoost and 2.3 Ecoboost. Why does one only loose about 3% and the other 10+% power and economy?- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
^ Would the variance have to do with the tunes? Like a very conservative vs agressive tunes for different octanes? Or just just as much effort to tune everthing overall? Or I guess, what would cause such a veraiance from 93 to 87 in these average cars. I know perormance tuning is a different story so we can ignore that part.- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
I have to beg to differ on the cost of premium fuel. Most places around me at $0.20/gal difference per grade so that's $0.40/gal differece. I've seen places as high as $0.30/gal difference per grade. For my car with a smaller 15 gallon tank(lets say it empties for argument's sake) that's 6 dollars a fillup more. I drive right around 12,000 miles per year. At 24mpg that's 500 gallons at 26mpg that's 461 gallons. Let's just say regular unleaded is $2.00/gallon(it's been hovering right around it for awhile now, here at least). So premium would be $2.40/gallon. 500x2.0= 1000 461x2.4= 1106. You're not actually saving any money using the premium fuel you're just getting better mileage. So it's useless. Exactly! It's just hype and hoopla for the most part. If you're buying the truck for the Eco, you're not doing the planet any favors because FE gains are negligible. If you're buying it because you're a tightwad then you're gonna hate buying 91 Octane. If you're buying it for any other reason then you have no reason not to look elsewhere. Based on my personal experience and circumstances, a small diesel is the best way to be cheap and eco-friendly. Once again. The F-150, with either 2.7EB or 3.5 EB, does not need premium, nor is it the recommended fuel needed. One of the problems is... Every vehicle on the road is tested with premium fuel. I believe 93 octane. "The EPA has a specialized company manufacture small batches of consistent fuel, which is 93 octane (cars running 50-state certifications get a slightly different, 91-octane “California” blend)." http://www.caranddriver.com/features/the-truth-about-epa-city-highway-mpg-estimates- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
I have to beg to differ on the cost of premium fuel. Most places around me at $0.20/gal difference per grade so that's $0.40/gal differece. I've seen places as high as $0.30/gal difference per grade. For my car with a smaller 15 gallon tank(lets say it empties for argument's sake) that's 6 dollars a fillup more. I drive right around 12,000 miles per year. At 24mpg that's 500 gallons at 26mpg that's 461 gallons. Let's just say regular unleaded is $2.00/gallon(it's been hovering right around it for awhile now, here at least). So premium would be $2.40/gallon. 500x2.0= 1000 461x2.4= 1106. You're not actually saving any money using the premium fuel you're just getting better mileage. So it's useless. Exactly! It's just hype and hoopla for the most part. If you're buying the truck for the Eco, you're not doing the planet any favors because FE gains are negligible. If you're buying it because you're a tightwad then you're gonna hate buying 91 Octane. If you're buying it for any other reason then you have no reason not to look elsewhere. Based on my personal experience and circumstances, a small diesel is the best way to be cheap and eco-friendly. I won't completely agree with that ONLY because not all of the EcoBoost engines are as drastic as the above mentioned 2.3 and 3.5. Like my Escape is, and the Fusion, and rated 240hp with premium and 231 with regular. From my experiences of running different octanes of fuels there is nothing measurable so best and worst are both done on 87(others will dispute this on the Escape forums though). Reardless, I still run 89 to make myself feel good and the price really isn't that bad where prices are right now. There is nothing wrong with a small diesel and they are GREAT if you're putting on a lot of miles but they just don't have the "fun" a gasoline counerpart would have or the big diesels. Great engine, just doesn't really strike my enthusiast side so much.- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
Yeah, it's a fact that price per mile goes up using a premium fuel. They are advertised as both economic and powerful and it seems some of the motors are one or the other. Spend more money, get power and mileage. Spend normal amount of money, normal power and sub par economy.- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
I have to beg to differ on the cost of premium fuel. Most places around me at $0.20/gal difference per grade so that's $0.40/gal differece. I've seen places as high as $0.30/gal difference per grade. For my car with a smaller 15 gallon tank(lets say it empties for argument's sake) that's 6 dollars a fillup more. I drive right around 12,000 miles per year. At 24mpg that's 500 gallons at 26mpg that's 461 gallons. Let's just say regular unleaded is $2.00/gallon(it's been hovering right around it for awhile now, here at least). So premium would be $2.40/gallon. 500x2.0= 1000 461x2.4= 1106. You're not actually saving any money using the premium fuel you're just getting better mileage. So it's useless.- 171 replies
-
- 1
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well yes, there is no way of posting a Ford vs GM thread without bitching across the board.. It's going to happen.. Yeah didn't you post this on Thanksgiving or something though? It's inevitable that people are busy with family and not the internet for a day. Agreed. 90% was bickering and not even discussing the two track cars on track..sales? really? I'm surprised fuel economy never came up. lol The one thing I don't understand is margain of victory. What is considered a good win and what is a bad win? Would a 2 second win around the given track be considered a "beat down"? 3 second? 4 second? Where is the line drawn for a victory that would be acceptable? And with that, people are downplaying how great the Z/28 is just because it is out of production. Just because it isn't being produced anymore doesn't make it all of a sudden a lesser car. Yes, there will be a few gnarly Alphas to come down the line but if we play the "wait till XXX comes out" that's just a childish game that can be played by anyone at any time and there is no real basis there. Just "what if's". Also, I commented on the dynos but just no response. I'm not sure if you were posting to get under other people's skin or to have a legitimate conversation but I tried twice to talk about the dynos.
-
Ooooooor it could be worded that it beat a great track star and overall a badass car which won Besr Driver's Car just last year. Both of which are true.
-
Lincoln News: Lincoln's Primary Focus: Core Segments
ccap41 replied to William Maley's topic in Lincoln
Yeah that's too much if you ask me. I assume 90% of buyers will only put 87 in too because it's just that much cheaper.- 171 replies
-
- Core Models
- Core Segments
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Just start thread banning people who talk about irrelevant [/size]crap for 5 pages in every thread. Throw that hammer 'round. <- That, that hammer. But then Ford fans would never be able to post. I kid, I kid folks. Honestly, that'd be fine. Do what ya gotta do.
-
If one honestly thins they can change how somebody acts by forcing them to change their name they're just plain wrong. Look at the posts following said name change for proof. No, one didn't have to deal with it because they cried like a little baby till they got their bottle. I never thought they would have been one of "those people". "You can take the person out of the ghetto but you can't take the ghetto out of the person."
-
Just start thread banning people who talk about irrelevant crap for 5 pages in every thread. Throw that hammer 'round. <- That, that hammer.
-
To force somebody to change their user name because somebody "didn't like it" is stupid and the said individual should just grow a set instead of complaining about somebody's friggin screen name. There are a million better and more worthy things to worry about. You're the kind of person who will bitch and complain at Wal*Mart to get more than your money back because they left you "unsatisfied" and you "deserve" to be treated differently. Grow up, Grow a set, and stop feeling entitled. Funny story, not everything can go your way in life. Sometimes...you just have to deal with it.
-
http://www.cargurus.com/Cars/l-Used-2015-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-t54892#listing=127987798 http://www.cargurus.com/Cars/l-Used-2015-Chevrolet-Camaro-Z28-t54892#listing=101678439 This is a stupid argument at this point...