Jump to content
Server Move In Progress - Read More ×
Create New...

Random Thoughts Thread


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, balthazar said:

How are you supposed to know if a given automotive consideration is comfortable for you, or has good vision, or you like the sound system, or you can FIT in it, if OEMs move to primarily online sales??

I know quite a few automakers who want to do this, but I do not think they could handle the undertaking, including Nissan.  Requires ..

- requires more of a built on demand model. Not helpful to your labor workforce. (Possibly unionized) Everything would have to be built by robots. Kinda pricey there.....

-If someone’s car happens to do poopy in sales, it makes it very hard to discount a given model. It’s not like they could do an Prime day to fix the lag....

 

As far as dealerships go, I’ve already heard that they would simply pay folks to bring the cars to you. Though getting rid of dealerships gets rid of the service experience for automakers, as even EVs will need some kinds of services........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2020 at 9:08 AM, A Horse With No Name said:

115857702_764448727629185_61455875646752

115876436_764448824295842_78851570866745

109622510_764448897629168_54050683296020

115879899_764448920962499_86151427668772

115876120_764448960962495_20378670648845

123916245_852105405530183_91886598849118

The black F-bird:

Says 4.9, if I'm reading it correctly.  So, that's a 301 c.i. Pontiac V8, it has no air (look at all that space under the hood ... and pull tabs for interior venting!), manual windows, and cloth seats.  I'd happily own it, but not in that color.

The maroon F-bird:

My favorite year for this car; just need to get rid of the hood intake scoops, the white vinyl interior, and the aftermarket wheels

Edited by trinacriabob
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, trinacriabob said:

The black F-bird:

Says 4.9, if I'm reading it correctly.  So, that's a 301 c.i. Pontiac V8, it has no air (look at all that space under the hood ... and pull tabs for interior venting!), manual windows, and cloth seats.  I'd happily own it, but not in that color.

The maroon F-bird:

My favorite year for this car; just need to get rid of the hood intake scoops, the white vinyl interior, and the aftermarket wheels

The black Trans Am is an '80-81 w/ the 301 and automatic...pretty weak sauce, compared to the nearly-identical looking '79 which was still available w/ the 400 and a 4 spd manual IIRC.  (some '79 T/As came w/ the Olds 403 and an automatic, IIRC). 

The maroon '75 has the Formula hood, would be a 350 or 400..not sure if the 455 was still available in '75.   This one is very similar to one my brother had in the late 70s--his was a '75 Formula 400, dark blue w/ the white interior.   He had wide Cragar SS wheels on it.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

The black Trans Am is an '80-81 w/ the 301 and automatic...pretty weak sauce, compared to the nearly-identical looking '79 which was still available w/ the 400 and a 4 spd manual IIRC.  (some '79 T/As came w/ the Olds 403 and an automatic, IIRC). 

The maroon '75 has the Formula hood, would be a 350 or 400..not sure if the 455 was still available in '75.   This one is very similar to one my brother had in the late 70s--his was a '75 Formula 400, dark blue w/ the white interior.   He had wide Cragar SS wheels on it.

I can do without the Cragar part.  I can almost hear some of the low riders in SoCal describing how neat they thought their cars were with those wheels and sounding like Cheech Marin while doing so.  Hard pass.

21 minutes ago, balthazar said:

I believe the 455 went thru '76 in the Firedbirds (unlike Chevy- who killed their big block after '73 or '74 in the 'maro).

301 N/A is lethargic, but the 4.9L Turbo moves well for '80-81. No; it's no Super Duty.

Did they even offer Formulas and TAs with 301 N/As at any time?  If I recall, the 301 had bore and stroke dimensions with no fractions, which I may remember because it's so unusual.  It would probably last a long time, with more room for its cooling jackets than a Pontiac 350.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, trinacriabob said:

I can do without the Cragar part.  I can almost hear some of the low riders in SoCal describing how neat they thought their cars were with those wheels and sounding like Cheech Marin while doing so.  Hard pass.

Did they even offer Formulas and TAs with 301 N/As at any time?  If I recall, the 301 had bore and stroke dimensions with no fractions, which I may remember because it's so unusual.  It would probably last a long time, with more room for its cooling jackets than a Pontiac 350.

The Cragars were definitely a thing on muscle cars and pony cars in the 60s-70s... still popular on those types of cars today for the retro Day 2 look.  I'm not a Baby Boomer, but I do like the period muscle car look.

The 301 N/A was available in '80-81 in all trim levels I've read..155hp..not quite the low point, but pretty close.  there was a Turbo 301 available (210 hp) n the T/A and a Chevy 305 (150hp) also, and apparently in '81 the Pontiac 4.3 (265) V8 w/ 140hp.   '80-81 were pretty dreadful years for Pontiac performance...and for performance in general.

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, balthazar said:

301 came out in ‘77 at PMD, but would have to look up availability in the Firebirds.

Supposedly available as a 'credit option' in the Firebird in '79.    Apparently in '78 the Chevy 305 was available in a Formula LT Sport Edition (which I'd not heard of).   

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

The 301 N/A was available in '80-81 in all trim levels I've read..155hp..not quite the low point, but pretty close.  there was a Turbo 301 available (210 hp) n the T/A and a Chevy 305 (150hp) also, and apparently in '81 the Pontiac 4.3 (265) V8 w/ 140hp.   '80-81 were pretty dreadful years for Pontiac performance...and for performance in general.

Had a teacher who had the Pontiac 4.3 V8 in an '81 Grand Prix Brougham coupe - metallic navy blue, lighter blue landau top, honeycomb wheels.  Very attractive coupe.  And much nicer than the '78 to '80 equivalents with that clean-up of the sheet metal - the quadruplets were nicely freshened up in 1981.  I think that CCC was the weak link on those early '80s GM coupes more so than the lower horsepower of their engines.  On a stand-alone basis, the engines themselves were strong.

9 hours ago, balthazar said:

301 came out in ‘77 at PMD, but would have to look up availability in the Firebirds.

Indeed it did.

9 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

Supposedly available as a 'credit option' in the Firebird in '79.    Apparently in '78 the Chevy 305 was available in a Formula LT Sport Edition (which I'd not heard of).   

I've never heard of that model.  Having had a 305 V8 in a low mileage, second hand Camaro I had for a while as a second car that, most likely due to not being broken in correctly, had issues, it has taken me a while to forget that and a time when Chevy produced batches of V8s with problems.  Our family had incredibly good luck with Chevy's 250 c.i. inline 6 but, then, what could possibly go wrong with those units ... 7 main bearing crank, cast iron head and block, and a simple, proven design?  If talking about that span of years of F-bird, I'll readily take the Pontiac 301 (4.9) over the Chevy 305 (5.0).

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proud little moment. My neighbor somehow found a 1986 Escort wagon for a winter beater .  Car is in great shape, with 118k on it. And rust free. His son is almost 15, and likes cars like his Dad (who is in to Camaros, has an 80s Iroc Z in the garage) So while talking to him and his son, the kid decided he would really like it for his “classic” car. Told his dad about the radwood scene- now the little Escort sits nexts to the Chevy in the garage. 🙂  And the winter beater is now a 17 year old civic.......

People might laugh that is just and Escort, but it will bring us another person with a love for cars......

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For every car, there are enthusiastic fans.   I sort of enjoyed my Dad's '84 Ford Escort diesel--5dr, 5spd manual, 52 horsepower.   It was the car I did my driving test in as a teenager, my first taste of mobility and freedom...and it did get 55 mpg on the highway, long before the hype about hybrids... it was my first road trip car....Ohio to the Florida Keys and back.. between my Dad and I, we put 140k on it...it never let us down, took many a family road trip with it on the back of the Winnebago...

The mid 80s Escort was definitely a more modern, refined product than the ancient Chevette that GM was still peddling then.

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but the Chevette was a proper longitudinal-oriented, RWD Scooter ( see what I did there, ocn?), whereas the escort was a disposable appliance.;)
 

I understand sentimentality; occasionally I think back to the family Safari I started driving on... but I think there’s a clear line between sentiment and enthusiasm.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, balthazar said:

Yeah, but the Chevette was a proper longitudinal-oriented, RWD Scooter ( see what I did there, ocn?), whereas the escort was a disposable appliance.;)
 

I understand sentimentality; occasionally I think back to the family Safari I started driving on... but I think there’s a clear line between sentiment and enthusiasm.

On one FB car group I’m in, there is a guy w/ 3 diesel Escorts, restoring one.  And this is a Millennial, someone that wasn’t even alive when they were new.  I don’t get it, but there are so many angles to the old car hobby...

Speaking of Scooters, before the getting the Escort as the dinghy for the RV, my Dad had an ‘81 Chevette Scooter for a couple years as the dinghy.  It was a real shitbox..I remember shutting the door and the glass falling off the track.  Another time the shifter came off in my Dad’s hand, leaving it stuck in 2nd..

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very disappointed with spec and trim choices for vehicles ...

Would like to avoid the following:

- lack of a remote release for the fuel filler door (capless nozzle system is fine)

- vertical and fragile "laptop left open" look of infotainment system

- black as the only cloth interior choice for seats

- urethane steering wheel 2 or 3 trim levels up (Chevy LT trims have urethane steering wheels as standard)

- 3 cylinder engines ($29K Buicks with THREE cylinders, not for me)

Would rather not have:

- turbocharger, prefer naturally aspirated

- CVT type transmission

Come on, GM and automakers, get your act together.

  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, trinacriabob said:

Very disappointed with spec and trim choices for vehicles ...

Would like to avoid the following:

- lack of a remote release for the fuel filler door (capless nozzle system is fine)

- vertical and fragile "laptop left open" look of infotainment system

- black as the only cloth interior choice for seats

- urethane steering wheel 2 or 3 trim levels up (Chevy LT trims have urethane steering wheels as standard)

- 3 cylinder engines ($29K Buicks with THREE cylinders, not for me)

Would rather not have:

- turbocharger, prefer naturally aspirated

- CVT type transmission

Come on, GM and automakers, get your act together.

 

Yeah, it seems like less choices too. I was told starting this year we will see much less of the lower trim levels than before. I was more than happy with what my Equinox LS has, plus it has a nice buyout option at the end of the lease. (Thanks to Covid I will up up taking) My local GM dealership only has 1 LS trimmed Equinox, as that is pretty much all the choice they had to order.  And this seems to be holding true with order models as well. Sucks, as i like having different from everybody else. 🙂 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, trinacriabob said:

Very disappointed with spec and trim choices for vehicles ...

Would like to avoid the following:

- lack of a remote release for the fuel filler door (capless nozzle system is fine)

- vertical and fragile "laptop left open" look of infotainment system

- black as the only cloth interior choice for seats

- urethane steering wheel 2 or 3 trim levels up (Chevy LT trims have urethane steering wheels as standard)

- 3 cylinder engines ($29K Buicks with THREE cylinders, not for me)

Would rather not have:

- turbocharger, prefer naturally aspirated

- CVT type transmission

Come on, GM and automakers, get your act together.

Sad but true

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2020 at 4:31 PM, balthazar said:

How are you supposed to know if a given automotive consideration is comfortable for you, or has good vision, or you like the sound system, or you can FIT in it, if OEMs move to primarily online sales??

Having sold cars at a dealership, those are THE questions 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, balthazar said:

Yeah, but the Chevette was a proper longitudinal-oriented, RWD Scooter ( see what I did there, ocn?), whereas the escort was a disposable appliance.;)
 

I understand sentimentality; occasionally I think back to the family Safari I started driving on... but I think there’s a clear line between sentiment and enthusiasm.

My high school car was a chevette scooter. Performance machine!!

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a30468937/toyota-gr-yaris-photos-info/?utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=socialflowFBCD&src=socialflowFBCAD&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR2GgAt126IdedS2dNe4t8qKKjDkYJh6TdI5kf-5HlnAFlfq7itW6nKCtFQ
 

ocnblu’s next ride !!!!

Edited by regfootball
  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

Tesla put up it's 20,000th supercharging station. The times are a changing....

Now they just need to produce the unicorn $35k Model 3 for the masses...but they don't wanna.  Current production already can't keep up.

1 hour ago, balthazar said:

 

Thing has quite the stall converter, must be a 3,500 rpm stall. Took forever for it to build momentum off the tree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, regfootball said:

Actually leaning toward one of these.  It's got everything a citizen of colonial China deserves!

k23-kandi.jpg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ocnblu said:

Actually leaning toward one of these.  It's got everything a citizen of colonial China deserves!

k23-kandi.jpg

Given how dependent we are becoming on China you should be writing repair quotes on these before your morning coffee gets cold.

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when you think its safge to travel again...

 

https://samchui.com/2020/11/16/alaska-airlines-b737-hits-bear-on-runway/#.X7J1HmhKiUl

 

Alaska Airlines Bear Crash

 

If that bear had only been driving one of those crappy electric Chinese Cars, rather than trying to fly economy, we wouldn't have these kinds of problems. 

 

 

 

And also sadly....  

 

https://samchui.com/2020/11/11/china-airlines-to-retire-last-built-boeing-747-400-in-early-2021/#.X7J1v2hKiUl

China_Airlines_B747_02-759x500.jpg

Space X carried four astronauts into orbit...

 

From left, Shannon Walker, Victor Glover, Mike Hopkins and Soichi Noguchi, the four astronauts who launched toward the space station on Sunday.

Edited by A Horse With No Name
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cactus grey right around the one minute mark, I think the Bronco looks fabulous in this color. 

 

 

 

From my wife's morning run in  our subdivision...

 

GetAttachmentThumbnail?id=AQMkAGE0YTZiOW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having switched to driving a pickup truck...I still love nimble lightweight cars. I think this was posted here before, hell I may have even posted it. 

However, I can't get enough of it. 

 

Edited by A Horse With No Name
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One last note, for 'Blu....I think ICE in this case would be badass if you are doing small...

 

Edited by A Horse With No Name
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the latest interview with Jeep leadership, Jeep wants to be the Greenest SUV company in the world. As such the plans to go hybrid and EV are being put into place. 

Yet with that said, Jeep is also moving forward with giving Jeep Lovers of all things ICE another monster to desire and enjoy.

Jeep Wrangler 392 which is a 6.4L V8 Monster motor.

image.png

To quote the story:

Jeep EPA combined figures are better than you probably thought.

  • For the 2021 Cherokee, depending on engine type and size, 21 to 26.
  • The 2021 Compass, 25.
  • The 2021 Gladiator, 16-24.
  • The 2021 Grand Cherokee, 15-21, with the 5.7-liter V-8 being 17, the 6.4-liter V-8 coming in at 15.
  • The 2021 Renegade, 24-27.
  • And for the 2021 Wrangler, 19-25, the top number being the 3.0-liter EcoDiesel.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/37645/jeep-wants-to-become-the-greenest-suv-brand-in-the-world

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings