Jump to content
Create New...

August 2019: Toyota North America


Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

It is simply astounding that the RAV4 is putting out full size pick up type numbers. 

It's outselling the Tacoma and Tundra combined, and ahead of the Camry and Corolla.. wowza

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, dfelt said:

Such an underwhelming product, true Lemming mobile.

How is it underwhelming?  

It seems it compares very favorably against the rest of the segment.

According to fuelly, people seem to get around 35mpg average,

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ykX said:

How is it underwhelming?  

It seems it compares very favorably against the rest of the segment.

According to fuelly, people seem to get around 35mpg average,

To me there is nothing inspiring about Toyota's product line. From Style to interior layout, materials used, just a lemming mobile that does nothing to make me want to buy. This is built for those that just want to fit in and follow everyone else.

Yes that is not a bad thing from a business that is all about making billions, but I like something that makes more of a statement. Hence the reason I own an AWD Trailblazer SS, Durango RT, Hummer, Escalade ESV Platinum, etc. I choose my own path and that is not to follow the herd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, dfelt said:

To me there is nothing inspiring about Toyota's product line. From Style to interior layout, materials used, just a lemming mobile that does nothing to make me want to buy. This is built for those that just want to fit in and follow everyone else.

Really?  And current Chevrolet vehicles for example are much different?

To me this looks as bland and uninspired as anything, generic as they come

2019_chevrolet_equinox_f34_td_517181_717

At least Toyota tried to put some style into the new RAV4

2019%20Toyota%20RAV4%20(1).jpg

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

The Rav4 has some very Jeep styling cues in the squared off wheel wells w/ raised black edging and the overall profile.  It looks pretty good for the segment.  Though the CR-V has sexier taillights. 

From the rear they look almost identical

cq5dam.web.1280.1280.jpeg

2019-Jeep-Cherokee-rear-three-quarter-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ykX said:

Really?  And current Chevrolet vehicles for example are much different?

To me this looks as bland and uninspired as anything, generic as they come

2019_chevrolet_equinox_f34_td_517181_717

At least Toyota tried to put some style into the new RAV4

2019%20Toyota%20RAV4%20(1).jpg

 

Sadly, NOTHING Chevrolet builds right now inspires me to want to own something except one which I have never fit into as an adult. The Corvette is the only thing I still Love, Wish Corvette had a Performance SUV as I would go for that, but the current style of all their auto's SUCK excluding the corvette which as I stated, I CANNOT FIT INTO! 😢

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RAV4 is better than most small crossovers, they also market it a fair amount, have Toyota reputation and I bet they have awesome lease deals due to the Toyota resale value.   If there was better competition they might take some sales from it.  I don't like the RAV4, but it is better value than the others in the segment.

 

Corolla, Camry and Avalon all up, so cars aren't dead yet, at least not at Toyota who is probably capitalizing on Ford and Chevy not making sedans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, balthazar said:

RAV 4 is a stylistic disaster. Wheelwell cladding cut short from reaching the rockers is comical, and the front looks like broken shale; too jagged. Dint find the exaggerated underbite attractive either. 

RAV 4 is a stylistic disaster, but the 4 runner has a huge following and enormous resale. 

4 Runner is the only thing they build, other than Supra, that I would really want to own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

RAV 4 is a stylistic disaster, but the 4 runner has a huge following and enormous resale. 

4 Runner is the only thing they build, other than Supra, that I would really want to own. 

The New Supera is a Nightmare of style. That would be a Hard Pass Ghost Rider!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

I actually kind of like it...

Glad you do, that at least means that some diverse style is being made to appeal to folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2019 at 9:50 AM, dfelt said:

To me there is nothing inspiring about Toyota's product line. From Style to interior layout, materials used, just a lemming mobile that does nothing to make me want to buy. This is built for those that just want to fit in and follow everyone else.

Yes that is not a bad thing from a business that is all about making billions, but I like something that makes more of a statement. Hence the reason I own an AWD Trailblazer SS, Durango RT, Hummer, Escalade ESV Platinum, etc. I choose my own path and that is not to follow the herd.

I think it’s only fair to point out that those SUVs you mention were part of the lemming herd 10-15 years ago (the everything SUV craze). Just sayin’.

1 hour ago, Robert Hall said:

The 4Runner is quite capable off-road, but is a decade old now and the styling is rather homely, IMO.

And I would still take it over any SUV or wannabe SUV out there today. Absolutely bulletproof. 

17 hours ago, dfelt said:

Current Deals on this ugly little CUV in the PNW.

image.png

Which falls in line with the competition while managing to outsell said competition. I get the hate for it but clearly Toyota is doing something right here. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@surreal1272 I get the point you making, yet keep in mind the Trailblazer SS was limited production so not the millions of lemming trailblazers that were built. It is wider far more custom since it is an SUV body on a Corvette. 

Platinum ESV also were not that common in 2006 compared to all the other standard non esv Escalades.

Hummer got a bad rap by the eco nuts, but while they were a in your face SUV, you still did not see many and even today, very rare to find them.

Durango was a mass produced SUV, but most people did not know that the RT in 2000 was a limited production AWD, only AWD Durango at that time with the big 5.9L V8. 

THat is the difference is that yes those names have plenty of mass produced versions, but there were specific trim levels that were limited or people for the most part did not buy due to MPG / Price.

To me my friend, those are far rarer than the lemmings auto's of the era I bought them in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, dfelt said:

@surreal1272 I get the point you making, yet keep in mind the Trailblazer SS was limited production so not the millions of lemming trailblazers that were built. It is wider far more custom since it is an SUV body on a Corvette. 

Platinum ESV also were not that common in 2006 compared to all the other standard non esv Escalades.

Hummer got a bad rap by the eco nuts, but while they were a in your face SUV, you still did not see many and even today, very rare to find them.

Durango was a mass produced SUV, but most people did not know that the RT in 2000 was a limited production AWD, only AWD Durango at that time with the big 5.9L V8. 

THat is the difference is that yes those names have plenty of mass produced versions, but there were specific trim levels that were limited or people for the most part did not buy due to MPG / Price.

To me my friend, those are far rarer than the lemmings auto's of the era I bought them in.

Those being limited trim models are irrelevant. They were all part of the same craze of getting the biggest gas hogging SUV out there until gas went through the roof. Just a different breed of lemmings IMO. 

Edited by surreal1272
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford, Chevy and FCA are giving up on sedans to focus just on crossovers, and yet the  RAV4 is dominating them all.   I think they are in dangerous territory when you pull out of a lot of segments to focus on SUV and pickups and it is only a matter of time before the Asians take all the SUV market too just like they did cars.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

Ford, Chevy and FCA are giving up on sedans to focus just on crossovers, and yet the  RAV4 is dominating them all.   I think they are in dangerous territory when you pull out of a lot of segments to focus on SUV and pickups and it is only a matter of time before the Asians take all the SUV market too just like they did cars.

If the Big Two (plus FCA) "focus" on SUVs, how are the Asians 'going to take the SUV market'?
Seems much more likely they'll lose market share.

Edited by balthazar
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, balthazar said:

If the Big Two (plus FCA) "focus" on SUVs, how are the Asians 'going to take the SUV market'?
Seems much more likely they'll lose market share.

I mean Ford is going all in on SUVs and GM is going pretty hard there too, but I could see Ford and GM cutting stuff like Escape, Ecosport, Traxx and Equinox when they can't compete with the Asians, same way they cut minivans and sedans when they couldn't compete with the Asians.  

Ford and GM can "focus" on SUVs, doesn't mean they will build good ones.  They didn't build good sedans, they don't build good crossovers  now with the exception of the Explorer/Aviator seem to be on point.  And the body on frame trucks don't have any outside competition.

  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

toyoter/nissan hasn't cut their tundra/titan when they failed to compete with the Americans.
And cut models don't automatically mean they 'don't compete'. Did Mercedes cut the 300SL because it 'didn't compete' with the Corvette?

But by your specific claim; if Ford & GM focus on CUVs / SUVs, they're not going to cut a number of CUV / SUV segments out. I mean, that's counter-intuitive on your part (despite your obvious desire to see all American brands completely discontinued).

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think weak brands that build lousy product should be discontinued.  If GM and Ford put out class leading product then there is no problem.  But their crossovers are no more competitive than the Cruze, Focus, Fusion, Impala, etc that all got discontinued.  

Lincoln seems to be trying, we’ll see how they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

I think weak brands that build lousy product should be discontinued.  If GM and Ford put out class leading product then there is no problem.  But their crossovers are no more competitive than the Cruze, Focus, Fusion, Impala, etc that all got discontinued.  

Lincoln seems to be trying, we’ll see how they do.

Then that would remove 1/3rd of MB product line since they have many products that do not compete except as a badge snob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, balthazar said:

Buh-by Range Rover!! 

Sadly people will continue to spend big bucks for these, they have a cult following just like the 4 runner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2019 at 8:35 PM, smk4565 said:

Ford, Chevy and FCA are giving up on sedans to focus just on crossovers, and yet the  RAV4 is dominating them all.   I think they are in dangerous territory when you pull out of a lot of segments to focus on SUV and pickups and it is only a matter of time before the Asians take all the SUV market too just like they did cars.

 

But they're not giving up on sedans entirely. Cruze is still in production south of the border.  Almost all of Ford's car lineup is still available in Europe and China... heck they still make a next generation Taurus for China.  If GM needs to, the Cruze can be imported from south America tomorrow. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings