Jump to content
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    New 3-Row Jeep to Get New Name

      The 7-seater will play in the same segment as the Grand Cherokee.

    During an announcement that FCA will be building a new manufacturing plant in Detroit, FCA let it known that in addition to the forthcoming full-size Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer SUVs, another new 3-row SUV was in the works for Jeep.   Auto Express UK reports today that this new SUV will technically be a 3-row version of the Grand Cherokee, but Jeep President and FCA Boss Mike Manley thinks it will not wear the Grand Cherokee name, instead taking on an new moniker.  His reasoning for not re-using the name is that the Grand Cherokee is such an iconic name and image. It would be like if Jeep dramatically changed the Wrangler, he'd face a customer revolt. 

    The last 3-row SUV Jeep sold was the 2006 - 2010 Jeep Commander. Jeep currently uses the Commander name on the Grand Commander, based on the smaller Cherokee, as a China-Only model. 

    Manley says that the segment the Grand Cherokee plays in covers both 2-row and 3-row SUVs, so the Grand Cherokee has only been covering about 40% of the potential market. Moving into this segment would allow Jeep to compete more directly with the Ford Explorer, Toyota Highlander, and Honda Pilot.

    FCA already sells a vehicle in the 3-row segment with the Dodge Durango which also rides on the same platform as the Jeep Grand Cherokee.  No future plans have been announced for the Dodge Durango, so it could be that this Jeep will take over for the Durango in the FCA lineup.

    FCA hopes to break ground on it's new facility by the end of 2nd quarter 2019 and have the first of the new 3-row SUVs rolling off the line by the end of 2020 as 2021 models.

    Related:
    Quick Drive: 2018 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT Trackhawk

    Source: AutoExpress UK



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Good idea..Grand Cherokee has always been a 2-row SUV, 3-row needs its own identity.    

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cool, but if the Grand Wagoneer is a 3 row, why have another one under another name.

    Me thinking that maybe a bit of over kill in the CUV/SUV segment.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    33 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Cool, but if the Grand Wagoneer is a 3 row, why have another one under another name.

    Me thinking that maybe a bit of over kill in the CUV/SUV segment.

    Well, Ford, GM, Toyota, etc each have multiple 3 row models, so there is precedent.. Explorer and two lengths of Expedition, Traverse, Tahoe, and Suburban, etc.

    So it sounds like GC will remain two row, then the new 3 row, then the full size BOF Wagoneer (SWB like the Tahoe) and Grand Wagoneer (LWB like the Suburban). 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Again, I will believe it once we see it. We’ve been waiting on the Wagoneer for years 😢

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    59 minutes ago, Matt 967 said:

    Again, I will believe it once we see it. We’ve been waiting on the Wagoneer for years 😢

    They're building a whole new plant to be able to build it.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't get why they need to have three 3-row SUVs.  I think a Wagoneer priced in the 30s to compete with Highlander, Pilot and Traverse and a luxury Grand Wagoneer 3- row in the $50k range makes a lot of sense.  They can cover a mainstream and an upscale with that strategy, much like how they have Cherokee and Grand Cherokee 2-row SUVs.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I don't get why they need to have three 3-row SUVs.  I think a Wagoneer priced in the 30s to compete with Highlander, Pilot and Traverse and a luxury Grand Wagoneer 3- row in the $50k range makes a lot of sense.  They can cover a mainstream and an upscale with that strategy, much like how they have Cherokee and Grand Cherokee 2-row SUVs.  

    The GC is already in the 40s-50s in most trim levels--the GC-based 3-row will likely be in the same range, so the full size Ram-based models would be above that.

    I'd assume a full size BOF Wagoneer/Grand Wagoneer would start in at least the Expedition/Tahoe/Yukon price range.. I can see the Wagoneer/Grand Wagoneer targeting a broad spectrum of the full size market from Expedition/Tahoe/Suburban up to Navigator/Denali/Escalade but with off road capable versions (ala Ram Power Wagon) available.. Jeep likes having a lot of trims on their models across a price range.  I recall a while back talk of a potential version at Range Rover price levels..Jeep is ambitious.  

    Can FCA pull it off?  Time will tell, but in recent years they seem to be hitting home runs w/ Jeep and Ram..

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    45 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I don't get why they need to have three 3-row SUVs.  I think a Wagoneer priced in the 30s to compete with Highlander, Pilot and Traverse and a luxury Grand Wagoneer 3- row in the $50k range makes a lot of sense.  They can cover a mainstream and an upscale with that strategy, much like how they have Cherokee and Grand Cherokee 2-row SUVs.  

    Traverse, Tahoe, Suburban = Acadia, Enclave, Yukon, Yukon XL = XT6, Escalade, Escalade ESV = Explorer, Expedition, Expedition Max = Highlander, Sequoia, Land Cruiser

    =

    Grand Cherokee XL, Wagoneer, Grand Wagoneer

    Even Nissan has it, though down a size class each with Rogue, Pathfinder, Armada

    Edited by Drew Dowdell
    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    While the market is hot, they need to be in there.  I don't know if Dodge or Ram will get mid size or full size also, but Jeep is THE SUV brand at FCA..everything else is secondary. 

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Like 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jeep needs a unibody SUV starting around 30k with 3 rows.  You have Palisade, Tulluride, Atlas, Ascent, Highlander, Pilot, Traverse, Enclave, Explorer, Pathfinder all in that segment, I don't know if I forgot anyone there are so many, I just named ten 3-row SUVs.    Jeep who are the SUV people somehow are missing, so that is a must be in segment.  

    A luxury 3 row whether it be based on a Grand Cherokee or some other platform would be in that higher end, like Tahoe, Aviator, XT6 sort of money I'd think.  If Jeep thinks they can go up into Range Rover money they are delusional.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    26 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    Jeep needs a unibody SUV starting around 30k with 3 rows.  You have Palisade, Tulluride, Atlas, Ascent, Highlander, Pilot, Traverse, Enclave, Explorer, Pathfinder all in that segment, I don't know if I forgot anyone there are so many, I just named ten 3-row SUVs.    Jeep who are the SUV people somehow are missing, so that is a must be in segment.  

    A luxury 3 row whether it be based on a Grand Cherokee or some other platform would be in that higher end, like Tahoe, Aviator, XT6 sort of money I'd think.  If Jeep thinks they can go up into Range Rover money they are delusional.

    Are you intentionally not understanding?

    • Upvote 3

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    14 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Are you intentionally not understanding?

    I don't get how you make three 3-row Jeeps.  A 3-row Grand Cherokee is your Grand Wagoneer, why would you make both?  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    5 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

    Well, Ford, GM, Toyota, etc each have multiple 3 row models, so there is precedent.. Explorer and two lengths of Expedition, Traverse, Tahoe, and Suburban, etc.

    So it sounds like GC will remain two row, then the new 3 row, then the full size BOF Wagoneer (SWB like the Tahoe) and Grand Wagoneer (LWB like the Suburban). 

    Sounds right to me. Honestly, they could being back the Commander name....

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I don't get how you make three 3-row Jeeps.  A 3-row Grand Cherokee is your Grand Wagoneer, why would you make both?  

    No, the Grand Wagoneer is going to be the BOF Suburban/Escalade ESV type vehicle.  Go back and look at the 5 yr plan slides from last year.   The 3 row GC is a unibody Durango sized vehicle (E-segment 3 row).  It’s all there in the slides.  Time will tell how they execute that plan. 

    Screen Shot 2019-03-12 at 8.59.55 AM.png

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Durango is retired and replaced with a "Jeep" vehicle, it is more proof that FCA's plan all along was to take Dodge out behind the woodshed, and kill it dead.  Given their completely nonexistent attempts at broadening Chryslers's model range,  that has surely been the plan for Chrysler brand too.

    Just like Daimler Chrysler, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is pronounced with the "Chrysler" part silent.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    I don't get how you make three 3-row Jeeps.  A 3-row Grand Cherokee is your Grand Wagoneer, why would you make both?  

    3-Row Grand Cherokee = Traverse/Explorer/Acadia/XT6
    3-Row Wagoneer = Tahoe/Expedition/Yukon/Escalade
    3-Row Grand Wagoneer = Suburban/Expedition Max/Yukon XL/Escalade ESV

    What don't you understand?

    The Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer are going to be made on the Ram 1500 frame.

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What happened to the Jeep Commander?  That seems like a perfect name for this 3-row CUV.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, riviera74 said:

    What happened to the Jeep Commander?  That seems like a perfect name for this 3-row CUV.

    The Jeep Commander was based on the prior generation Grand Cherokee. When they went to the current generation, they decided to give the 3-row to Dodge instead of Jeep in order to build a replacement Durango.  When the 2011 Cherokee was being developed, Chrysler was in turmoil, there was not enough money to do a GC, and Durango, and Commander. The Dakota, Aspen, old Durango, and Pacifica also died in this time-frame.  So in order to cover both Dodge and Jeep, the Commander was axed and Dodge got the 3-row.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Commander was odd in that it had the same wheelbase as the WK GC.    I assume the 3rd row on the Commander was pretty cramped... (WK wheelbase was 109.x, WK2 GC wheelbase is 114.8, 3rd gen Durango wheelbase is 119.9). 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    5 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    The Commander was odd in that it had the same wheelbase as the WK GC.    I assume the 3rd row on the Commander was pretty cramped... (WK wheelbase was 109.x, WK2 GC wheelbase is 114.8, 3rd gen Durango wheelbase is 119.9). 

    Yeah, children only and with the seats up, there was virtually zero cargo space. 

    maxresdefault.jpg

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I never liked the WK generation of GCs, as with most everything Chrysler built in the mid 00s, the interiors were cheap and nasty..wasn't a good period for them.   I remember back in '05 checking out the new WK (my WJ was 5 years old then) and thinking the interior was garbage and the exterior styling was bland and weird (those headlight humps in the hood--ick). ..not as bad as the Liberty or Nitro, though.  

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    just what the market needs... 3 more huge suvs  we ddidn't have enough before.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 minutes ago, Potluck said:

    just what the market needs... 3 more huge suvs  we didn't have enough before.

    Roomy for us big people and better than cars in most cases which are even more cramped.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 row SUVs are the station wagons/minivans of today..as long as there are families in the US, there are going to be family wagons of some form. 

    Edited by Robert Hall
    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Jeep is said to be working on a tiny crossover that will slot below the Renegade in size and will likely launch in 2022. The estimated size would be around 4-meters in length which puts it slightly shorter than a Nissan Juke. The primary competitive target is the Suzuki Jimny, a model not sold in the United States, but a segment important to Jeep globally. 
      Jeep says that the new model would offer day-to-day practicality but still have the off-road prowess that people expect from a Jeep. As FCA is in a big push to electrify its vehicles these days, some form of electrification is likely with even a fully electric model possible. Though not offered in the U.S., FCA does build PHEV versions of the Jeep Renegade and Jeep Compass for the European market. 
      With FCA's merger with PSA looming, the possibility of using one of Peugeot-Citroen's platforms as a base for the new model emerges. Could we potentially see a Jeep on the Opel Corsa platform?  Time will tell. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Jeep is said to be working on a tiny crossover that will slot below the Renegade in size and will likely launch in 2022. The estimated size would be around 4-meters in length which puts it slightly shorter than a Nissan Juke. The primary competitive target is the Suzuki Jimny, a model not sold in the United States, but a segment important to Jeep globally. 
      Jeep says that the new model would offer day-to-day practicality but still have the off-road prowess that people expect from a Jeep. As FCA is in a big push to electrify its vehicles these days, some form of electrification is likely with even a fully electric model possible. Though not offered in the U.S., FCA does build PHEV versions of the Jeep Renegade and Jeep Compass for the European market. 
      With FCA's merger with PSA looming, the possibility of using one of Peugeot-Citroen's platforms as a base for the new model emerges. Could we potentially see a Jeep on the Opel Corsa platform?  Time will tell. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      As we reported last month, Jeep is adding a diesel to the Wrangler lineup.  The 3.0-liter diesel will produce 260 horsepower and 442 lb-ft of torque and be paired only with the 8-speed automatic. Electronic Start-Stop is also standard issue. 
      As for how much it is going to cost, be prepared to shell out up to an additional $6,000 over the base model.  It breaks down like this:  $4,000 for the diesel engine + $2,000 for the automatic transmission.  All in all, it ends up being a $3,250 upgrade over a Wrangler with a Pentastar V6 and 8-speed automatic.   The diesel will only be offered in 4-door trims of Sport, Sahara, and Rubicon.  In the RAM 1500 with the same powertrain, highway fuel economy is rated for 30mpg. Expect the lighter but less aerodynamic Wrangler to match that once EPA numbers are finalized.
      Diesel Wranglers start down the production line in late November, but the order books are already open if you want to head down to the dealer and put your order in. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      As we reported last month, Jeep is adding a diesel to the Wrangler lineup.  The 3.0-liter diesel will produce 260 horsepower and 442 lb-ft of torque and be paired only with the 8-speed automatic. Electronic Start-Stop is also standard issue. 
      As for how much it is going to cost, be prepared to shell out up to an additional $6,000 over the base model.  It breaks down like this:  $4,000 for the diesel engine + $2,000 for the automatic transmission.  All in all, it ends up being a $3,250 upgrade over a Wrangler with a Pentastar V6 and 8-speed automatic.   The diesel will only be offered in 4-door trims of Sport, Sahara, and Rubicon.  In the RAM 1500 with the same powertrain, highway fuel economy is rated for 30mpg. Expect the lighter but less aerodynamic Wrangler to match that once EPA numbers are finalized.
      Diesel Wranglers start down the production line in late November, but the order books are already open if you want to head down to the dealer and put your order in. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The JL Generation of the Jeep Wrangler may have improper frame welds according to an investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).  The investigation started after a Wrangler owner complained about a frame that had been improperly welded at the factory. As a result of that improper weld, the owner found a number of other problems stemming from the original issue. 
      While no findings have been released, there is enough evidence for the NHTSA to warrant further investigation and the agency has asked FCA for more information regarding the issue.  The NHTSA seemed to think that FCA's explanation "did not adequately address whether the frame weld quality deficiencies compromise the structure integrity of the vehicles, and therefor may pose an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety."
      The investigation further aims to determine if the earlier reported 'death wobble' is related to the frame welding issues. FCA issued a fix for the 'death wobble' last month, but did not turn it into a full recall. Jeep will install a new steering damper, free of charge, to anyone who wishes to have the work completed. 

      View full article
  • Posts

  • Social Stream

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...