Jump to content
Create New...

GM to end production of Buick Rainier


SoCalCTS

Recommended Posts

GM will end production of Buick Rainier

Division down to handful of models

February 7, 2007

Detroit Press

BY GREG BENSINGER

BLOOMBERG NEWS

General Motors Corp. will end production of the Buick Rainier SUV in the second quarter to trim the division's product line and spend more to develop and sell its remaining models.

The Rainier represents about 2.5% of the daily output at GM's Moraine, Ohio, plant, the only place it's made, spokesman Tom Wickham said Tuesday. It isn't clear yet what effect the change might have on employment, he said.

Advertisement

GM CEO Rick Wagoner is paring Buick to three or four models, about half as many as in 2005. The world's largest automaker slowed production after U.S. sales fell 8.7% last year. Buick sales slid 15%, and Rainier's sales were down 17%, to 12,691.

"GM is trying to position Buick as a luxury brand, and I think the Rainier just didn't fit that mold," Dennis Virag, president of Automotive Consulting Group in Ann Arbor, said. "It's not selling well, and it looks more like a down-market SUV than a luxury one."

By turning to new models such as the Enclave crossover SUV, GM hopes to lift Buick sales and help reverse $13 billion in losses in the seven quarters through Sept. 30. It has said about 40% of sales this year will come from new models.

The automaker will increase production of GMC Envoy, Chevrolet TrailBlazer, Isuzu Ascender and Saab 9-7X SUVs made at the plant near Dayton, Wickham said.

Shares of Detroit-based GM rose 72 cents, or 2.2%, to $33.43 in New York Stock Exchange trading. They have gained 43% in the past year.

"There has been no determination on what impact the decision might have" on the workforce, Wickham said. GM employs about 2,700 at the plant, represented by the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers-Communication Workers of America.

GM began notifying plant workers and dealers of its decision Monday, Wickham said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good riddance! GM needs to stop bending to the will of outsiders who think it's best to pump out more and more cars for the sake of inventory. They need to learn they are the ones in charge of the brands. And they need to learn what a brand represents. What they should be shooting for is a collection of ideas and art. Not the crap that's there now. The Rainier is a piss-poor example of what GM product thinking used to be like. Hopefully, this kind of thing will never come close to happening, and every product will have thought and thorough relation to its brand, and what the brand stands for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, when they say they're moving Buick upmarket to be a luxury brand, that's fine with me, but they better get Cadillac movin' on up a little faster too, so as to limit any market cannibalization as much as possible.

Besides, I've always wanted to see Caddy give Rolls-Royce and Bentley a run for their money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a Buick Rainier?!

Seriously, I've seen 3 since it came out. 3.

Other than seeing the Rainier at the Denver Auto Show last year, I can't recall the last time I saw one...or an Ascender..or a 9-X. And this is an area with a very high concentration of SUVs (probably one of the highest of any metro area).

Edited by moltar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rainier is extremely rare, and it turns out they depreciate like crazy (all of the GMT-360s do) so they're pretty cheap a year or two old. The Ascender is the best used value, if you can find one. They've got a much longer warranty than the rest. The 9-7x barely registers, I saw one yesterday and it took me a second to realize what it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason there was a Rainier was that the orphaned Bravada had to go somewhere. The GMT-360's were somewhat competitive when they were introduced for model year 2002, aside from the quality issues, but they needed an update a couple of years ago, especially to fix the downmarket interiors. Now with the planned update canceled, these things will just linger on in a sad state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rainier is extremely rare, and it turns out they depreciate like crazy (all of the GMT-360s do) so they're pretty cheap a year or two old. The Ascender is the best used value, if you can find one. They've got a much longer warranty than the rest. The 9-7x barely registers, I saw one yesterday and it took me a second to realize what it was.

I'll be interested to see how cheap they go.

If they start dropping into Blazer territory (sub-10k), I would consider a used one.

The engine is solid, and I could tow stuff...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In defense of the Rainier it is very common around Western New York, I see them all the time. It's not as glib (at least around here) as others seem to make it. I don't think the Rainier sold under what was expected. It was what it was which was a Bravada reliever so GM didn't lose that share of the market. It wasn't mean to go crazy with sales nor keep Buick afloat

Edited by Cananopie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings