Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Drew Dowdell

Interactive Review: 2011 Cadillac SRX Turbo Premium

44 posts in this topic

Cadillac drops the 2.8T in the SRX, leaving the 3.0 V6 as the only engine for now..

Do they leave it as the only engine or add the 3.6 or something else?

Questions, questions

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting they cancelled the turbo. I know someone who had the engine replaced in his turbo SRX a couple days after he got it (with like 100 miles on it).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting they cancelled the turbo. I know someone who had the engine replaced in his turbo SRX a couple days after he got it (with like 100 miles on it).

There were some teething problems early on, where people, and one or two reviewers, who did not use Premium fuel ended up with terrible engine knock.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were some teething problems early on, where people, and one or two reviewers, who did not use Premium fuel ended up with terrible engine knock.

This guy's engine simply blew up basically. Had to have the whole engine replaced. I doubt it was a gas issue unless the dealership cheaped out and put regular in it, because it only took 3 days for it to blow up, IIRC.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could have been an unknowing car jockey that put regular in it. It only takes one time to blow up an engine if you use the wrong fuel and push it hard.

They were supposed to get an ECU flash to prevent that though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the one site that I remove links to when I can.

But I've also sent an email to Cadillac to get some more information about this announcement.

sorry forgot i can not post links like that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a post on the 1st on a cadillac forum that a member had gotten a call from his Caddy dealer telling him that Dec. 18th was the last day to order a Turbo.

Nobody else confirmed it.

I went on a gm forum and posted in their section where you can suggest a news article and a couple of hours later it was confirmed by a GM source(who knew the worked on New Year's Day?) and posted on their home page that the Turbo was axed.

I don't know why it took so long to get out publically since it was apparently removed from the Order Guide on Dec. 20th.

....But am willing to take at least partial credit for getting this story out.

Perhaps the fact that nobody really cared about the Turbo is why it took so long for the story to make the rounds on the internet?

let's hope the new LFX 3.6L goes into the SRX.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is a combination of both lack of demand because of the fuel economy and the expense the option puts on the SRX and the problems GM has continually had with this engine. I wouldn't be surprised to see a turbo engine come back to the SRX eventually.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I traded a few emails with Robyn at Cadillac today and everything we already knew was confirmed. Also, unspoken but naturally, the Aisen 6-Speed auto is gone along with the turbo.

I took a drive up to the dealer where I bought my '04 CTS to take an SRX 3.0 out for a spin, so my impressions of that will be included in the review.

I also got a little bit of insider information on upcoming engines that I just want to confirm.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

probably the updated 3.6 the camaro is getting and then eventually a tt 3.0.

or hey maybe they will throw some leftover 3.9's in it....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is real wood or fake wood?

Cadillac is using all real accents in its new cars. I can't comment on the seats though.

Does the trim on the door and dash line up nicely? I sat in one the other day and the fit and finish wasn't too great, and there was a large gap between the trim on the dash and the trim on the door. Specifically the air vent on the dash and wood trim on the door.

This comment really makes me torn. I'm super happy it's not perfect because it's our competitor's interior, but not at all happy because it's a Cadillac.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it is a combination of both lack of demand because of the fuel economy and the expense the option puts on the SRX and the problems GM has continually had with this engine. I wouldn't be surprised to see a turbo engine come back to the SRX eventually.

The expense bit worries me: a vehicle that sells for $50K and is based entirely on existing architectures and engine families sold at far lower pricepoints is not profitable? Its profitability is all dependent on the USD/AUD exchange rate? How on Earth does GM allocate costs? =/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2.8 Turbo sure didn't last long, but isn't very fuel efficient given it's displacement or power output. And that engine was already sort of dated when the SRX came out.

So now if you get it optioned up, it is $50k for a Cadillac Vue with a platform/engine/transmission of a Malibu and Equinox. Sign me up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It probably didn't help that the SRX Turbo was slower (and thirstier) than most of its naturally-aspirated competitors. Likewise, the Regal Turbo is only on par with most naturally-aspirated I4s, with the fuel consumption of a V6.

GM doesn't seem to be having the same success with turbocharging and downsizing as Ford and VW are. Perhaps its the weight of their vehicles.

Edited by pow
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oldsmoboi, the trick to making a 3.0L SRX fun and drivable is to leave it in the "Sport" setting all the time.

In drive it feels very sluggish especially pulling away from a stop sign slowly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oldsmoboi, the trick to making a 3.0L SRX fun and drivable is to leave it in the "Sport" setting all the time.

In drive it feels very sluggish especially pulling away from a stop sign slowly.

Which means that the problem is not the engine itself but most likely the transmission's software calibration...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edmunds recently track tested the Q5 with the new 2.0T and eight-speed automatic: 0-60 in 6.8 seconds, quicker than SRX Turbo, and 20/27 MPG compared to 15/22 for the Caddy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edmunds recently track tested the Q5 with the new 2.0T and eight-speed automatic: 0-60 in 6.8 seconds, quicker than SRX Turbo, and 20/27 MPG compared to 15/22 for the Caddy.

Sheesh. I suspect Cadillac is working on replacing the 2.8t with something else.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received the same "suggestion" about what engine is going into the SRX from two completely separate sources now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online