Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

ccap41

New Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,593

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    82

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ccap41

  1. ccap41
    Well, I think it is well known that the "real" V-Series is yet to show itself. So ti isn't exactly like putting a turbo 4 in place of the SS's V8. If they priced it at 30k, why would anybody consider an A Class? Smaller car, much weaker engine, and it costs almost 3k more?
  2. ccap41
    Everybody look at @surreal1272 He's at it again. No chill from that keyboard. i'M gOoD. sOrRy fOr AnY eScAlAtiOn oN mY pArT.
  3. ccap41
    Your opinion on "cheap ass version auto's" is a starting price of $32,500? Our opinion on "cheap" is vastly different. The average transaction price of "entry level luxury cars" is over 42k. I know we all have varying opinions on things but I don't know anybody who things a $40,000 compact car is considered "cheap". https://finance.yahoo.com/news/average-car-prices-more-1-110000010.html Isn't it a little larger? If it were to be the same price but offer more room and better engines(save for whatever the "real" V-Series comes out as), how isn't that better than the ATS?
  4. ccap41
    Ahhh it was just the intentional troll comment.
  5. ccap41
    Yeah, it would have to be better than using the mobile site. I'm not a huge fan of that and thus why I only post when on a computer(desktop/laptop).
  6. ccap41
    Jesus, dude.. simmer down. You're over thinking this waaaaay too much. My initial response was to @dfelt anyway. My mental note is you go nuts over the smallest of things.
  7. ccap41
    Read my edit comment.
  8. ccap41
    Use a better source.
  9. ccap41
    100%. It looks like a sporty hot hatch.
  10. ccap41
    Yeah the difference between premium and regular is quite significant itself. It's ~$0.60/gallon here. That would be almost $8 more per fill up for me(roughly 13 gallons). Give or take some, that alone is about $400/year.
  11. ccap41
    ^ yeah, for the price difference in vehicle(owned vs buying) $600/year will never pay itself off. Then again, that can be said for almost every single purchase where somebody justifies it by saying it gets better fuel economy. Even 20mpg vs 40mpg probably doesn't pay for itself unless you're driving 25,000 miles per year when comparing to already owning a vehicle.
  12. ccap41
    What do you mean alleged examples? Scroll back to the 2nd page. Those are copy and pasted. They're 100% wrong and trolling though. I'm not actually harping on him for doing it. I get it, we all knock on brands and things here and there. I assume he was joking and my response was also sarcastic. No harm, no foul.
  13. ccap41
    Well, i'm not going to pick through everything you said. It was about 2 pages worth of comments between everybody. You asked a pretty simple question and I simply responded to it. Uhhh.. No it isn't.
  14. ccap41
    It looks better.
  15. ccap41
    I have read the entire conversation.
  16. ccap41
    It would be rough but I think I'd hang on to what I have. I don't know what I would get that I'd actually want that gets enough better mileage to spend the money buying something else. I think I would be seriously looking into the plug-in hybrids though, that's for sure. I think I would look more into driving less and combining more trips rather than buying something else. My current running average since buying my MKC is 24.4mpg on 87 octane. For something I'd want to replace the MKC, I don't see something getting significantly better mpg unless it's a plug-in or hybrid.
  17. ccap41
    There was ONE thing people REALLY harped on and they only made it worse...
  18. ccap41
    It's hilarious that their renderings only emphasized the blank window piece to look even worse as a one square foot blank now.
  19. ccap41
    GM and Ford need to get out of these unions. Toyota and Honda aren't using union labor and you don't see them with labor issues.
  20. ccap41
    Mercedes > Cadillac.
  21. ccap41
    The same reason most anybody sells a cheap car with terrible margins, to get somebody into your brand and hopefully sell them a step up later because they had a good experience with the first car.
  22. ccap41
    "Just accept that Mercedes is NOT a Luxury auto only company, but have changed into the Toyota/GM" "You cannot be a luxury auto maker only when you are making JCPenny's prices products too." They will not have a lower insurance premium as the car still cost 2-3 times more.
  23. ccap41
    I know. They built a brand we engine.. with a considerable amount less output.
  24. ccap41
    And to think GM has moved backwards on output on that engine... Is trolling allowed all of a sudden?
  25. ccap41
    I don't care about the number but the advancing technology to get there is what I care about.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search