ccap41

I think they're in a couple of things now, maybe Malibu and Cruze with their 1.5T's.

Oh I've complained about it elsewhere how a 1.2 + CVT sounds like the worst possible scenario on the market.

bUt ThEy oNlY mAkE cArS

This is a neat thing here. I knew they needed to be on a fixed panel but I've never seen this workaround for that.

You mean... exactly like Rivian in which you are in full support of?

Tesla also has more range, payload, towing capacity, approach angle, more seats, and higher ground clearance. Not just a bigger bed.

The Navigator is also considerably larger than a GLS. In short form, the Lincoln is 5 inches longer, 9 inches wider, and almost 5 inches taller. In long form, it's 17 inches longer. https://www.motortrend.com/news/auto-showdown-2020-mercedes-benz-gls-vs-2019-lincoln-navigator-comparison/

The cladding is most certainly too much. If they cut it down by 30-50% it would look much cleaner/better.

Yeah, those two really are head and shoulders above the field.

I think that looks really good but I like the looks of this more.

This... This is one ugly truck.

That's probably the best looking sub-compact SUV.

I understand that. But, he isn't anti-GM.

...@surreal1272 isn't anti-GM by any means...

I don't see copying.

I'm definitely in the minority here. I think the grille could be about 10-15% smaller but the rest just looks really classy. I'd drive one of these.

That new, little Trailblazer is hands-down the best looking sub-compact SUV, in my opinion. The pair of 3-cylinder engines is subject to questioning but I think they look really sharp for its respective segment.

If the only thing people are complaining about is the name of the vehicle, they did a good job. They created conversation and headlines all over the place and the only negative is the name.

31 mpg highway? That seems like super weak sauce.

They were but they were 100% sports car brands just like the "Mustang" brand has always been. People shall not fear that the 2-door car will not be going away. This is just an addition. I think it would have to be well into the millions to have even the slightest impact on Ford.

The people who are pissed are absolutely NOT EV SUV customers though so it's a moot point they're upset. How about Aston Martin making an SUV, Lamborghini making an SUV, Rolls Royce making an SUV, Maserati making an SUV, Ferrari making an SUV, Porsche making an SUV... all companies that were 100% cars and sports cars all the way(minus probably Rolls) and now they're making or have plans to make SUVs.

I assume this is it as it was posted in the press release of the charger/network.

Absolutely. If you're committing to a full blown EV, you might as well commit to the proper charging setup.

"New Ford all-electric vehicles, including the Mustang-inspired SUV arriving next year, will come standard with a Ford Mobile Charger that can charge regardless of outlet power (120- and 240-volt outlets); for those with longer commutes or who want greater peace of mind, a Ford Connected Charge Station can fully power a vehicle overnight while they sleep. Ford is collaborating with Amazon in the U.S. for all your installation services – from 240V outlets to the Ford Connected Charge Station"

No worries there. https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2019/10/17/ford-introduces-north-americas-largest-electric-vehicle-charting-network.html https://electrek.co/2019/11/18/ford-mustang-mach-e-home-charging-on-par-with-tesla/ "The Ford Mobile Charger with its 14-50 plug, on a dedicated 40/50amp circuit (so, an electric-oven outlet), will pull 32 amps, giving the Ford Mach-E Mustang RWD 22 miles of range per hour. That’s 264 miles of range over a 12 hour period, surely enough for 99%+ of drivers. BUT, if you really need more, Ford is also offering a hardwired, 48 amp wall box, which will get you 32 miles of range per hour."