Jump to content
William Maley

Buick News: GM Seeks An Exemption To Exclude Buick Envision from Tariffs

Recommended Posts

The Buick Envision finds itself in a tough spot. General Motors has been exporting the model to the U.S. since 2016. But with the on-going trade-war between the U.S. and China, it means the Envision could smacked with a 25% percent tariff. That is why GM is asking for exemption on the model.

In a statement provided to Reuters, GM said that it filed the exemption request on July 30th to the U.S. Trade Representative. In the request, GM makes some sound arguments as to why the Envision should be excluded.

Price is major factor. If the vehicle is hit with a 25 percent tariff, GM would be forced to pull it from the U.S. unless it wants to a take serious loss on each model.

Why not build it here? The Envision has been a target of critics of Chinese-made goods, including leaders of UAW. GM explains that the sales volume of the Envision doesn't justify moving it to the U.S. Last year, Buick only sold 41,040 Envisions in the U.S. In China, Buick moved about 210,000 models. In addition, the current Envision is reaching the end of its current lifecycle before the company could make the preparations to build the model here.

GM also makes the argument that the loss of the Envision would put them in a distinct disadvantage against foreign competitors such as Acura and Volvo.

You can check out GM's request on regulations.gov website, which is tracking requests for exclusions from the Section 301 tariff.

If the Envision does get hit with a 25 percent tariff, GM has already taken some steps to relieve some of the pain. Before the higher import tariffs went into affect, GM shipped in a six-month supply of Envisions that would be hit with the much smaller 2.5 percent tariff. This should keep dealers happy in terms of stock and not having to deal with a higher price. 

Source: ReutersRegulations.gov


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Thank you GM for thinking ahead and bringing in a supply while this stupidity of Tariffs gets sorted out. 

Edited by Drew Dowdell
Removed political comments
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, No, No.  If there are 25% tariffs then it should punish GM just as much as it punishes Toyota or Honda.  First off I believe there should be no tariffs on anything, but if there is a 25% tariff then everyone should get screwed.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This same company got bailed out by taxpayers, is now rewarded with the Trump tax cuts.

 

The Envision is pathetic and the competition is light years ahead. I know what you would say to that @dfelt

 

Tax that thing out of existence I say, it’s a burden on our society and here’s the case where an import tax will ensure that the domestic make isn’t being incentivized to be mediocre cause it’s protected.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Stupidity of our ruling class grows by the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Suaviloquent said:

This same company got bailed out by taxpayers, is now rewarded with the Trump tax cuts.

 

The Envision is pathetic and the competition is light years ahead. I know what you would say to that @dfelt

 

Tax that thing out of existence I say, it’s a burden on our society and here’s the case where an import tax will ensure that the domestic make isn’t being incentivized to be mediocre cause it’s protected.

WOW, You make me have to question if you have really ever been in an Envision. They are NOT mediocre to the competition. Way better than most.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody needs to tell @Suaviloquent that without China, Buick is as dead as Olsdmobile since 2004. 

While imposing a 25% tariff on Chinese goods is bad policy, China is NOT going to defend America's IP with any consistency.  An open market for any particular good ensures competition actually improves product, as opposed to protectionism which maximizes mediocrity.  Why would China ever change its policies to compete in a global market based of accepted rules rather than pursue the mercantilism that has pulled them from the abject poverty of 40 years ago?  The only mistake GM made is to build the Envision and the Encore in or near their largest market.  No one anticipated the tariff escalation tit-for-tat that has come from this president.

If you wish to buy a midsize (now compact) crossover NOT made in China, buy an Equinox or a Terrain (made in CANADA), or better still a Cadillac XT5 (Spring Hill, TN).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually have nothing against Buick, it’s just that the Envision is class average at best. It’s comparable to a Lexus NX. That’s faint praise if any. 

I’d much rather get an XT5. Not that much more expensive but you just get a much better auto.

but it truly is nowhere in the league of GLC 300 or RDx or XT5. But yeah you can crow how at 25% off MSRP or 84 month notes it’s a steal. That’s fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

GM is getting what it deserves.  Build it here, you morons.  The only thing "idiotic" is the idea that a Buick should be built anywhere else but the USA.  Or at least North America... at the VERY LEAST.

Yes, the Buick Envision is a completely invisible product with no design flair, nothing at all special to distinguish it as a Buick... it is a cheap Chinese knock-off of a "Buick" and I said that from the moment I saw it.

Also I GUARANTEE you that between its forgettable design and execution, PLUS the fact it is widely known to be an "All-American" Buick made in CHINA are YUGE reasons why it is not selling well.  Duh.

Edited by ocnblu
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

GM is getting what it deserves.  Build it here, you morons.  The only thing "idiotic" is the idea that a Buick should be built anywhere else but the USA.  Or at least North America... at the VERY LEAST.

Yes, the Buick Envision is a completely invisible product with no design flair, nothing at all special to distinguish it as a Buick... it is a cheap Chinese knock-off of a "Buick" and I said that from the moment I saw it.

Also I GUARANTEE you that between its forgettable design and execution, PLUS the fact it is widely known to be an "All-American" Buick made in CHINA are YUGE reasons why it is not selling well.  Duh.

That ignores reality. Three out of every four Buicks sold are sold in China. It makes more sense to build all of them there and import them to the US. That's the basic premise of build it where you sell it.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

That ignores reality. Three out of every four Buicks sold are sold in China. It makes more sense to build all of them there and import them to the US. That's the basic premise of build it where you sell it.

Well then, Obama's team should have "leveraged" GM to kill Buick and let Pontiac live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ocnblu said:

Also I GUARANTEE you that between its forgettable design and execution, PLUS the fact it is widely known to be an "All-American" Buick made in CHINA are YUGE reasons why it is not selling well.  Duh.

There is actually a bigger reason. Allow me to pull some quotes from Reuters.

Quote

“The previous price point was too high” on the 2018 Envision, said Casey Clark, sales manager at Serra Buick GMC Cadillac in Washington, Michigan, in an interview. “That put off some customers.”

Quote

GM had lowered prices by as much as $2,500 on the 2019 models, which it started shipping in late April. That means Buick’s 2,000 U.S. dealers should have lower-priced Envisions to sell well into the fall.

 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, ocnblu said:

Well then, Obama's team should have "leveraged" GM to kill Buick and let Pontiac live.

And right there is the reason you're not CEO.

Pontiac, at the time, was not global. It offered little to nothing over a Chevy or Toyota. It was entirely GMs fault for letting it get there, but that was still the reality of the situation at the time. There totally should have been a new Bonneville, Grand Prix, Grand Am, heck even a new Vibe, Torrent, and a real honest to goodness crossover Montana... But there was no money. 

Buick had sales both here and in China, Pontiac did not and the sales here just weren't profitable.  

Trust me, I know how you feel. Olds was the most technically advanced division outside of Cadillac at the time of its demise. But if sales and profitability aren't there, gotta be a businessman and make the tough call. 

 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 8/3/2018 at 6:07 PM, dfelt said:

WOW, You make me have to question if you have really ever been in an Envision. They are NOT mediocre to the competition. Way better than most.

The Envision is a good vehicle, the MSRP's are far too ambitious, but just if you judge it as a Buick its pretty good.

Buick has been kept alive here because of China, and GM benefits from selling mondo vehicles in China.  It's not unrealistic to expect them here to import something from China....

IF

they export from the US to China too.....

Buick doesn't need to sell more than 40,000 Envisions because they shouldn't be playing so much in the compact class anyways with the Terrain in the showroom and the Enclave being what most Buick buyers are really looking for anyways.  Buick should have an Edge competitor, like the Enspire concept to compete with Lexus RX etc.  Buick needs to add models to gain US volume more than it needs to have more than 40,000 Envisions.

I'm not one for big auto tariffs but overall China benefits a lot more from our trade than we do from theirs.  That's not any kind of endorsement for anyone's trade strategy.  It should be noted that GM is more and more shifting their production of a lot of US sold vehicles to be made across the world.  Gradually and sneakily since the 2009 era they keep moving production to other countries.

Biggest challenge for the Buick products is to determine global design.  The Envision looks like a 2012 retread (the 2019 updates do clean it up some) and with the Opel deal gone, Buick may have to decide if they are committed to producing any of these white space vehicles in the US the next model cycles...... IMO for example the Regal should be revised to be made on the same line as the Malibu since they are bed buddies.

What else is kind of interesting, the Envision doesn't seem like it's been here long, and there are not many of them out there.  But already now they have established 4 separate model years of the vehicle here in the states.  Pretty crazy.  That is how the import brands establish a model, sneak it into the market and build the nameplate brand.  So now it is becoming an established nameplate for Buick and building the Envision brand name.  Shoppers now will be more confident buying the nameplate because its been around 'for awhile'.

Edited by regfootball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, ocnblu said:

Well then, Obama's team should have "leveraged" GM to kill Buick and let Pontiac live.

Then Pontiac would have also been selling 1.4 and 1.5 litre turbo cars too, to bow to the gods of CAFE like Chevy has had to.  Lots of CVT equipped next ever G6's......

May have been best that Pontiac was let to die rather than the 'first ever G2' crossover....... or more Vibes

Edited by regfootball
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, William Maley said:

There is actually a bigger reason. Allow me to pull some quotes from Reuters.

 

GM's strategy on everything the last few years and surely for awhile back even now is to pump up the MSRP's to ridiculous levels compared to the competition and incentivize the hell out of them.  Gives the marketing types a reason to keep their jobs, keep changing the incentives twice a month, between regions.  They can sit and look at sales spreadsheets on their office computer screens while they sip their mochas.  "Oh this month we need to move the GMC Sierras!". and then 'all Sierras 22% off MSRP!'  And the other models sit and rot on the lots until they get their turn at special month of incentives.

 

3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

And right there is the reason you're not CEO.

Pontiac, at the time, was not global. It offered little to nothing over a Chevy or Toyota. It was entirely GMs fault for letting it get there, but that was still the reality of the situation at the time. There totally should have been a new Bonneville, Grand Prix, Grand Am, heck even a new Vibe, Torrent, and a real honest to goodness crossover Montana... But there was no money. 

Buick had sales both here and in China, Pontiac did not and the sales here just weren't profitable.  

Trust me, I know how you feel. Olds was the most technically advanced division outside of Cadillac at the time of its demise. But if sales and profitability aren't there, gotta be a businessman and make the tough call. 

 

The way Cadillac is going, it may be the next to go, and then we will be glad that Buick is the last remaining premium GM car brand.....because of how well Buick does in China.

 

Edited by regfootball
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, regfootball said:

GM's strategy on everything the last few years and surely for awhile back even now is to pump up the MSRP's to ridiculous levels compared to the competition and incentivize the hell out of them.  Gives the marketing types a reason to keep their jobs, keep changing the incentives twice a month, between regions.  They can sit and look at sales spreadsheets on their office computer screens while they sip their mochas.  "Oh this month we need to move the GMC Sierras!". and then 'all Sierras 22% off MSRP!'  And the other models sit and rot on the lots until they get their turn at special month of incentives.

Pretty wild theory- have a list handy that illustrates that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally doubt that Cadillac will actually disappear at all, unless GM itself goes under.  Only exception to that rule would probably be the Corvette.

As for raising MSRPs and then creating incentives, GM has not backslid to the "move the metal" era that led to BK nine years ago.  I agree that the whole "incentive a month" plan is long-term stupid and that needs to actually end, especially since we have reached peak auto sales in the last two years.  As long as ATPs are up and stay up, profits and cash flow will follow.  Of course, GM will have to trim back production somewhat so that the specter of "move the metal" does not return with a vengeance.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, William Maley said:

There is actually a bigger reason. Allow me to pull some quotes from Reuters.

 

OK your point is taken.  We will see if this pricing strategy makes the Envision suddenly appear on customer radar despite its hypocritical manufacturing point and its entirely boring design.  They did the same thing with the South Korea made Encore (South Korea being a bit less scary than China).  Did Encore sales discernibly uptick at the moment the prices were dropped, or have they been on a steady uptick that cannot be attributed to a price drop?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pricing on the Envision is still too high.  It's hard to make a good case for it when the Terrain sits in the same lot and has a better base powertrain while feeling roomier.  I'm a Buick guy and I'd still probably pick a Terrain Denali over an Envision due to the pricing of Envision.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, ocnblu said:

OK your point is taken.  We will see if this pricing strategy makes the Envision suddenly appear on customer radar despite its hypocritical manufacturing point and its entirely boring design.  They did the same thing with the South Korea made Encore (South Korea being a bit less scary than China).  Did Encore sales discernibly uptick at the moment the prices were dropped, or have they been on a steady uptick that cannot be attributed to a price drop?

The last 2-3 years the Encore has been Buick's entry model and often is sold at prices around the 20 grand mark....more optioned at 20-25k.  I don't have numbers for Buick as a whole but the salesguy I talked to recently at a BGMC dealer said the Encore is by far the most popular (Buick) seller at their dealership.  Pricing is the big reason.  What that says to me, Buicks cannot support European level pricing.  So that's why we have 52,000 LaCrosses that they can't even mark down to 40k and move.  So to Balthazar's point go look at just about any Buick dealer website anywhere, the ones that post their prices if they have to mark it off 10 grand off sticker, that's an overpriced sticker.  GM's tendency the last few years is then advertise 15, 18, 20, 22, 30% off MSRP in national and regional ads and on their own websites.  What the hell more proof do you need.  It's ridiculous to say they don't have the incentives they used to.  That's wrong, they have just as many or more.  They haven't blasted the incentives on the Envision as much on the Buicks until about the last 9-12 months or so. Buick has a huge problem with not selling through their model year inventories.  There is always a lot of dealers that have still 2017's that are new.  By this time next year there will still be tons of 2018 new Buicks rotting on lots everywhere.  Why?  TOO HIGH MSRP vs what people willingly pay.  Buick's terrible at leasing too.  2018 Regal comes out of the gate with a 24 month residual of less than 50%.  What does that tell you.  People that analyze the market say the MSRP is too high too!

So partially the Encore takes some of Envision's sales if the pricing is too close.  When the Encore is cheap, why step up to the Envision if it's 10-15 grand more?  Unless you like horrible dash PLOOD.

Buick's sales would explode if they created great leasing for all their vehicle lines.  Buick is perhaps among the most lease averse brands out there.  The Encore and Enclave are the only ones that get good lease support, that's why they sell so well.  Admittedly the Enclave is such a good product in such a hot segment that it may not need incentives as much as the rest of Buick.  But the Encores are heavily subsidized.

Edited by regfootball
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Pricing on the Envision is still too high.  It's hard to make a good case for it when the Terrain sits in the same lot and has a better base powertrain while feeling roomier.  I'm a Buick guy and I'd still probably pick a Terrain Denali over an Envision due to the pricing of Envision.

I like the Envision a lot, but the terrible plood on the dash might even be a deal breaker for me on that, even if it were a steal on pricing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So that's why we have 52,000 LaCrosses that they can't even mark down to 40k and move.  So to Balthazar's point go look at just about any Buick dealer website anywhere, the ones that post their prices if they have to mark it off 10 grand off sticker, that's an overpriced sticker.


I might value anecdotal over hyperbole, tho ultimately I'd prefer empirical.

My local Buick dealer current has (1) '18 La Crosse. It's sticker is $50,985 and its advertised price is $48,690, a difference of $2295. Guessing that would slot it under "well priced".
They also show a brand new '17, MSRP: 48,995, advertised price: 45,390, a diff of $3605.

I mean, I'd LIKE to believe 🙄 Buick has thousands of unsold LaCrosse's sitting there at $10K off sticker, I just am not finding anything close to that with a random cursory glance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

this is random with a little time on autotrader and google and not at all uncommon from what i see browsing from time to time

http://www.everettbgmc.com/VehicleSearchResults?offer=76455410&search=new&year=2017&make=Buick&model=LaCrosse&trim=all&cs:o=76455410

even without the stupid 'dealer trade discount' that is still fairly typical of what you see if you look around at competitive dealerships

 

 

Edited by regfootball
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

this was back from 6 months ago when i emailed my mom regarding regals.  you walk into the dealership and not at all shy about it.  Now that Regal body was newly outgoing, but the point is why did they need to move 2017's in the first place.  and its not atypical for this to go on on any Buick at any time depending on how the mocha sippers behind the screen in the Buick marketing department like to selectively stockpile seen and unseen incentives at will.  That particular month they had a slew of Regal Sport tourings all were MSRP 32k and above and they were selling them starting at 18 grand. 

 

image.png

still sucks my mom didn't take advantage of this.  Regal Sport Touring with moonroof nice tan leather, 18 grand.

 

Edited by regfootball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      Manufacturing Revamp?

      GM spoke out a week ago about a national electric vehicle mandate that they were in favor of. Tesla has reported a bigger than expected profitable quarter and if you Bing or Google National electric vehicle mandate, the stories covering this is huge with more auto companies in favor than against. 
      GM, Honda and the State of California have all as of 10-26-2018 officially pushed back on Trump and his administration in regards to the U.S. fuel economy standards. The short story of what you can read at the bottom in the links is that they are saying the federal government should embrace a zero emission vehicle sales mandate nationwide with a program start date of 2021. Honda took it a step forward and said a nominal steady increase should continue on all auto's and not a freeze. To quote Mark Reuss, GM's executive vice president of global product development, "We know that we can do better than the Trump proposal. We know that the industry can do better than that." GM states that a nationwide program would put 7 million long-range electric cars on the road and slash 375 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 compared with existing zero-emission mandates in this country.
      For details read the automotive news story as if really digs into the details of what is being called Faulty Modeling by the current administration and EPA. The story does quote the free-market Institute for Energy Research who says the existing standards are too aggressive penalizing suburban and rural consumers who are concerned about driving range and reliability. Industry uncertainty is very clear with some taking a big wait and see like FCA on one end and then GM, Honda and California on the other end saying the current administrations plan for revoking California's rule-making authority is flawed  and should be scrapped.
      To quote Reuss in regards to a national electric car program: "It will facilitate more makers to be able to really focus on development of electric vehicles more efficiently, and take the guesswork out of what we think may or may not happen. We're making bets on a lot of uncertainty, which is highly destructive to capital."
      So what does this have to do with the title of "Fast Lane to EVs for GM? Some Think So!"
      Green car report got a no comment from GM when asked about a number of changes going on including upcoming announcements in regards to the Hamtramck plant which currently builds the Volt and is under utilized. The potential spin-off of Cruise Automation and or Maven, their profitable third quarter report and more according to multiple sources they say.
      To achieve the executive plan of Mary Barra of 20 new EVs by 2023 announced last fall GM is planning to make a series of manufacturing-location and development changes in motion to electrify it's fleet according to sources the story says. UAW and GM were in a give and take negotiations last year where the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6 and Chevrolet Impala were all on the possible kill off list as large sedans have struggled to sell in the current market lately. Some of these we know will continue on.
      GM has been cagey about the role of Plug-in hybrids with the slow selling of the Volt especially compared to the Toyota Prius Prime with a lower plug-in range, yet demand for the BOLT on the other hand has been very strong as GM has announced plans to expand production at the plant this year. GM's plan to unveil new long range electric CUVs also show that major changes in manufacturing will have to happen. GM is pushing ahead with a all new electric vehicle platform that will cover compact to full size electric long range auto's including family-sized crossovers. They have announced their all-new battery pack that will go into generation 2 EVs that will break the $100 / kWh barrier for lithium-ion packs allowing for a range of scale for both the China and US market along with the rest of the global market.
      This all comes on GM showing off their eCOPO Camaro that has an 800 volt battery pack very similar it would seem to the 800 volt pack that Porsche is using. This supports 700HP / 600 lb-ft of torque motors. Fast Charging that is 80% range in 15 min. it would appear that GM is embracing the future of automotive driving. Remember the Buick Enspire EV that has a 370 mile range battery pack, AWD with 550 HP with a 0 to 60 in 4 seconds.

      Then keep in mind while these are for China only, it would not be totally out of line for GM to change their mind and bring the Buick Velite 6 plug-in hybrid and long-range electric auto to the US after manufacturing starts in China. The Velite name used in China for all Hybrid and electric Buicks is currently on the Volt 2.0 platform, but the Velite 6 will be based on GMs new Modular compact to full size platform according to the Fool story. Buick Velite plug-in Hybrid will have a 435 mile range with battery pack / generator combo as it will use the new high-performance ternary lithium-ion battery pack built in the new GM battery plant in Shanghai. GM currently will not say much more about the new generation battery packs only they will release more info at a later date, possibly at an American auto show.



      Long story short, Motley Fool has a rare Double Down buy on GM stock with 20 new EV models for the global and US market, GM is showing true forward thinking that should place them well above other auto OEMs.
      GM has a $10,000 award for naming of their new $1,000 electric bike they are putting into production for sale across the U.S.


      According to GM the person responsible for naming this new foldable eBike will win $10,000 and all one needs to do is go to https://ebikebrandchallenge.com/call-for-entries to enter. You have till November 26th to enter. Nine finalist will win $1,000 each also. With the largest bike market being China, this totally makes sense for GM to get into and the U.S. as well as other markets will benefit from a bike that is assisted with electric drive to go nice and fast.
      So with so much electrification going on, why would one not expect GM to do a massive change in their manufacturing of auto's as they move to embrace a 36 month revolutionary role out or electric vehicles, bikes and who knows what else.
      Green Car Report Story Chicago Tribune Story on Mandate CNN National ZEV Mandate Story Automotive News story on Mandate Bing Search on Mandate Motley Fool story on Battery packs from GM U.S. Department of Energy PDF on GM's Li-Ion battery pack manufacturing eCOPO Camaro Media Release from GM GM eBike for Sale
    • By William Maley
      General Motors took a page out Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' playbook by continuing the build the outgoing-generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra alongside the next-generation models in an effort to keep sales up. But sooner or later, the previous-generation models will end production. When is that?
      During GM's third-quarter earnings call, CFO Dhivya Suryadevarat said the automaker would begin winding down production the K2 crew cab models early next year, followed by double cab and regular cab models beginning in "the early second half of next year." 
      GM's Oshawa, Ontario plant has been helping with the production of the outgoing models. According to Automotive News, Oshawa receives unfinished Silverado and Sierra double cab bodies from the Fort Wayne, Indiana plant. Models are painted and undergo final assembly. Known as the "Oshawa shuttle," it started at the beginning of the year and would add heavy-duty pickups and a second production shift in the summer. GM spokeswoman Kim Carpenter told AN the program is expected to "run into late 2019 based on market demand."
      Production of the next-generation (T1) pickups began in July at Fort Wayne, followed by double cab models last month. GM's Silao, Mexico plant will begin production of the regular and crew cab models in January. Unlike FCA, which experienced a number of problems with the launch of the next-generation Ram 1500, GM was able to deliver 45,000 next-generation pickups in the third-quarter.
      The big question is what happens to the hourly workers building the trucks at Oshawa. GM declined to comment, but AN speculates they could be laid off or moved to other positions.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      General Motors took a page out Fiat Chrysler Automobiles' playbook by continuing the build the outgoing-generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra alongside the next-generation models in an effort to keep sales up. But sooner or later, the previous-generation models will end production. When is that?
      During GM's third-quarter earnings call, CFO Dhivya Suryadevarat said the automaker would begin winding down production the K2 crew cab models early next year, followed by double cab and regular cab models beginning in "the early second half of next year." 
      GM's Oshawa, Ontario plant has been helping with the production of the outgoing models. According to Automotive News, Oshawa receives unfinished Silverado and Sierra double cab bodies from the Fort Wayne, Indiana plant. Models are painted and undergo final assembly. Known as the "Oshawa shuttle," it started at the beginning of the year and would add heavy-duty pickups and a second production shift in the summer. GM spokeswoman Kim Carpenter told AN the program is expected to "run into late 2019 based on market demand."
      Production of the next-generation (T1) pickups began in July at Fort Wayne, followed by double cab models last month. GM's Silao, Mexico plant will begin production of the regular and crew cab models in January. Unlike FCA, which experienced a number of problems with the launch of the next-generation Ram 1500, GM was able to deliver 45,000 next-generation pickups in the third-quarter.
      The big question is what happens to the hourly workers building the trucks at Oshawa. GM declined to comment, but AN speculates they could be laid off or moved to other positions.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
    • By William Maley
      By the end of next year, GM's self-driving car unit was planning to have a fleet of self-driving taxis available those in San Fransisco, California. But a new report from Reuters casts some serious doubts on this goal.
      Speaking to a number of current and former GM and Cruise Automation employees, and autonomous vehicle technology experts, Reuters' report paints a picture of various issues that could derail Cruise's goal.
      The driverless Cruise vehicles (Chevrolet Bolt EVs) have struggled to determine whether objects on the road are moving or stationary. Example: Vehicles have stopped or hesitated when driving past a group of parked bicycles or motorcycles. Software has failed to identify pedestrians, "and has mistakenly seen phantom bicycles, causing the cars to brake erratically" Sources claim that software also slows the messages between the car’s sensors and computers Cruise doesn't have a data-sharing collaboration with the San Francisco Fire Department - necessary to train the cars when a fire truck is responding to an emergency. Numerous milestones have been missed such as logging a million miles a month by early 2018. Cruise is aware of the various issues. CEO Kyle Vogt told Reuters said the next-generation of hardware and software would solve various issues. 
      General Motors' President Dan Ammann said that the 2019 goal would only move forward "if the Cruise system achieves the safety standards the automaker has established, and shown to regulators."
      At the current moment, that goal seems quite far away.
      Source: Reuters

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×