Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

Confirmed NYIAS Debuts

Chris_Doane
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chris_Doane Newbie

Chris_Doane

Posted
Posted

So just to review, GM has annouced there will be 6 new production cars and 1 never before seen concept. Here is what's confirmed.

Production cars

1: H2 MCE

2: H3 Alpha

3: Lacrosse Super

4: Lucerne Super

5: STS MCE

6: ...

Concept

7: ...probably the Hummer H4 concept

Update: Or no, probably not a Hummer. Seems it will be a Chevy now.

As for #6, the most likely car seems to be the regular LaCrosse MCE or the Saab 9-3 MCE.

The Cobalt MCE or the HHR SS are possible also...however there now seems to be a chance Chevy won't have an NYC debut at all. Can't confirm that one way or the other yet.

**MCE = Mid-cycle Enhancement. AKA: Facelift or refresh.**

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cadillacfan Newbie

Cadillacfan

Posted
Posted (edited)

mid-cycle enhancement. We just call them updates.

EDIT: Oops. Northstar beat me to the punch.... well, you get the idea.

The H4 is a good bet since there were rumors that GM was going to show it during either the Detroit or Chicago shows but for some reason, didn't. Most likely, it wouldn't have helped GM show off its new eco-friendly image with the new Volt at NAIAS or it would've taken the emphasis off of the growing Saturn brand at Chicago. Those are, of course, rumors and pure speculation.

Edited by Cadillacfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
caddycruiser Newbie

caddycruiser

Posted
Posted (edited)

'bout time the H3 got a V8

EDIT: and I wonder what will happen to the H2's mileage with the 6.2.

Very likely better, just as people with 6.2L/6-spd Denalis and Escalades are consistently and/or more frequently and easily getting better MPG numbers than people with either 2wd or 4wd 5.3L/4-spd and 6.0L/4-spd other GMT-900's. SO, I think, a great move. It seems like they're best truck powertrain combo right now, and the H2 certainly will benefit from it.

Edited by caddycruiser
Link to comment
Share on other sites
caddycruiser Newbie

caddycruiser

Posted
Posted

Well, the difference with the H2 and the GMT900 trucks that offer the 6.2 litre is that they don't have full-time 4wd, which significantly reduces fuel economy no matter what. I wouldn't expect a huge increase.

Me either, because it is still a big, blocky, and heavy pig with bad aerodynamics, but as is, with the extra power and updates of the 6.2L plus the 6-spd that helps it better use every bit of that power, there should still be a small increase. And with an H2, anything is better than nothing.

As for the H3, I've always wondered what it could do with a 5.3L, as previously and even now it's still a case of revving the 5-cyl's guts out, which doesn't help any mpg matter, so we'll see what the DOD 5.3L does. It's still not that astounding with mileage in a lot of the GMT-900's so far, but maybe with a different trans and the different vehicle dynamics, it will be here, at least again marginally like the H2. If not, power will at least get a strong boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scharmer05 Newbie

scharmer05

Posted
Posted

Full time means you can't turn it off. Which was a mistake on GM's part considering how heavy the vehicle is. The 4WD on the GM900 vehicles can be turned off so you're not using up more gas then you need to.

Not on the Denali and the Escalade I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pow Newbie

pow

Posted
Posted (edited)

What exactly is the difference between full time 4WD in the H2 and AWD in Escalade and Denali?

The full-time AWD systems in the Escalade and Denali lack a low range and locking differentials, and they're "fully automatic" in that there are no levers to pull or buttons to push. Power automatically goes to the wheel with the least traction, unless Stabilitrak brakes the slipping wheel, which in theory should redistribute power, albeit jerkily.

The 4WD system in the H2 can be manually switched into high/low-ranges with or without locking diffs.

Edited by empowah
Link to comment
Share on other sites
regfootball Community Regular

regfootball

Posted
Posted (edited)

Harder than Reg at a Maxim photo shoot.

LOL. Can you arrange that for me? If not, how bout a dozen femme coworkers and 12 boxes of white zin?

is anyone else REALLY tired of the same steering wheel and climate controls across the ENTIRE GM LINEUP?

DO THEY REALLY SAVE THAT MUCH FRICKIN UNION MONEY BY USING THOSE PARTS IN EVERY GDDAMN CAR?

Edited by regfootball
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Drew Dowdell Grand Master

Drew Dowdell

Posted
Posted

The full-time AWD systems in the Escalade and Denali lack a low range and locking differentials, and they're "fully automatic" in that there are no levers to pull or buttons to push. Power automatically goes to the wheel with the most traction, unless Stabilitrak brakes the slipping wheel, which in theory should redistribute power, albeit jerkily.

fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pow Newbie

pow

Posted
Posted (edited)

fixed

Without a limited slip or locking diff (open diff), power naturally goes to the wheel that spins easiest.

Edit: Nevermind... the Escalade/Yukon Denali have a viscous center differential.

Edit #2: Actually, it doesn't. The previous Escalades had it, but not the GMT900s.

Edited by empowah
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bcjohnso99 Newbie

bcjohnso99

Posted
Posted

As for the H3, I've always wondered what it could do with a 5.3L, as previously and even now it's still a case of revving the 5-cyl's guts out, which doesn't help any mpg matter, so we'll see what the DOD 5.3L does. It's still not that astounding with mileage in a lot of the GMT-900's so far, but maybe with a different trans and the different vehicle dynamics, it will be here, at least again marginally like the H2. If not, power will at least get a strong boost.

There's a few articles out now that seem to say that DOD is a DUD. Truck Trend has the 5.3 DOD returning less than the city rating and the 381hp Tundra returning 1mpg better - not good.

With the Hummer's aerodynamics, I wonder if DOD will ever kick in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chris_Doane Newbie

Chris_Doane

Posted
  • Author
Posted

:blink:

maybe i was right about the impala?

or is it going to be more along the lines of "here's all of the gas guzzlers... and a new compact pickup!"

Nah..I think it was Ed Welburn who went on record saying the Impala concept would be at NAIAS 2008.

or would a silverado ss with a giant v8 be more fitting with theme? :D

maybe they'll finally announce the 6-speed for the avalanche :o

Doubt they would do the 427 concept truck from SEMA and then a seperate Silvy SS concept.

Heh, dont think they would do a concept for the Avy getting a 6 speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigPontiac Newbie

BigPontiac

Posted
Posted

Nah..I think it was Ed Welburn who went on record saying the Impala concept would be at NAIAS 2008.

Doubt they would do the 427 concept truck from SEMA and then a seperate Silvy SS concept.

Heh, dont think they would do a concept for the Avy getting a 6 speed.

Edmunds had an article on a Chevy lamda possibly being called Nomad...could that be the concept? link
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings