Jump to content
Drew Dowdell

New York 2019: Cadillac CT5 to Debut: Comments

Recommended Posts

Parts sourcing aside, how are they going to get this to sell when the CTS, ATS, XTS and CT6 all have pretty lousy sales numbers.

Obviously the shape a a bit different this time around with the fastback/GT rear end, but only 2 sedans sell in this segment in the USA, and 3 in this segment do well in China, so what is the selling point of the CT5 going to be to break the sales decline?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I look at that C-pillar, the worse it gets. They completely botched it. It lets the entire design down. They should have made the Escala the way it was. They always do this. Make a jaw-dropping concept, and then make a production version that is more like a Chinese knockoff. What a shame. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

The more I look at that C-pillar, the worse it gets. They completely botched it. It lets the entire design down. They should have made the Escala the way it was. They always do this. Make a jaw-dropping concept, and then make a production version that is more like a Chinese knockoff. What a shame. 

To be fair, the Escala is NOT the new CT5. The Escala is to come...

But yeah, although I dont feel let down for the same reasons you feel down about the CT5, I do feel let down. But a tiny bit, not as fully down you feel about it.

Im just perplexed on why Cadillac felt the need to look like a FWD Honda Accord.

And the FWD Accord looks to be longer and sleeker to boot.  Which SHOULD be a Cadillac trait. 

*Sigh*

Still waiting for that long, sleek, slick black Cadillac car to arrive.

Well, the CT6 Blackwing is certainly that.  But 1 model aint enough...

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does have an Accord shape.  I am not a fan of the new Accord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Parts sourcing aside, how are they going to get this to sell when the CTS, ATS, XTS and CT6 all have pretty lousy sales numbers.

Obviously the shape a a bit different this time around with the fastback/GT rear end, but only 2 sedans sell in this segment in the USA, and 3 in this segment do well in China, so what is the selling point of the CT5 going to be to break the sales decline?

For one.. Americans seeking a better vehicle than those asswipes in Germany can provide.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the new CT5 has solved a few issues: engine choice, replace two slow sellers with one seller (sales TBD), new(ish) platform that fixes the old platform issues.  Back window and coupe profile aside, I like it.  I really like the CT6 and maybe the CT5 should have cribbed from the larger model a little more.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

So why not a 4.2 NA V8 as a choice with the same horsepower and torque as the turbo V6?  Choice for the sake of choice doesn't make any sense.  The 3.6 is a torqueless engine that isn't competitive with other luxury V6s with the exception of maybe whatever is in a Lincoln MKZ or Lexus ES.  The could put the 3.6 V6 in the Escalade as a choice, or in the Corvette, doesn't mean it makes sense to.

Plus, CT5 is a low volume car, the turbo 4 is for the rental spec and old folks, who don't care about performance, and BMW, Jaguar, Mercedes all offer that too, because they all have old folks that buy those cars also. Turbo V6 is your sport trim, turbo V8 for the hardcore buyer.  

Lincoln doesn’t even use a N/A V6 in the MKZ. It’s a 2.0T, 3.0T or 2.0T hybrid. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/18/2019 at 6:44 AM, dfelt said:

I actually like it better in the red than the silver, but I have two big issues with this car:

image.png

First is the STUPID COUPE style which kills rear head room and to have headroom the rear passengers have to sit in a hole.

Second is the weird funky 3rd window or whatever the black section in the smaller box above represents. Even the smaller stationary glass piece sucks due to how the door is cut. From the B pillar forward I am very happy with the car.

Best View of the car IMHO.

image.png

I was about to say the same EXACT thing regarding the two problems. From a profile angle, that rear pillar just kills the flow. The front and grill look super sharp but the coupe look is getting way too played out (priotizing form over function).

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to bet they cover that black triangle in carbon fiber on the V-series version? 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, ccap41 said:

Lincoln doesn’t even use a N/A V6 in the MKZ. It’s a 2.0T, 3.0T or 2.0T hybrid. 

Maybe Cadillac should copy that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't mind the coupe-styling on 4 door cars but maybe this is just too short or the design language doesn't match it. Maybe it would look better longer? I think it looks great looking at the front. I think it looks great looking from the rear. But, I think it looks a little awkward at most any other angle. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

Want to bet they cover that black triangle in carbon fiber on the V-series version? 

That spot just gets worse the more I look at it. And now that someone mentioned earlier, the profile does look a little too much like this...

 

F951DDD9-899D-4C45-8BB2-09D5F20C1524.jpeg

38E4B61B-5FCF-43E5-A672-F264329070D7.jpeg

Edited by surreal1272
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, smk4565 said:

Maybe Cadillac should copy that.

Don't all the major luxury brands pretty much have that same exact setup? 

Turbo-4

Hybrid

Turbo-6

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, surreal1272 said:

That spot just gets worse the more I look at it. And now that someone mentioned earlier, the profile does look a little too much like this...

 

F951DDD9-899D-4C45-8BB2-09D5F20C1524.jpeg

The Accord profile looks better, though, because it has a window there and not a pointless piece of black plastic.  And the rear door window frame trailing edge leans forward, rather than being vertical. 

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, surreal1272 said:

That spot just gets worse the more I look at it. And now that someone mentioned earlier, the profile does look a little too much like this...

 

F951DDD9-899D-4C45-8BB2-09D5F20C1524.jpeg

It's like they mashed up the Accord and Infiniti Q60's window but it jsut didn't work that well. 

2017-infiniti-q60_100542093_h.jpg

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

The Accord profile looks better, though, because it has a window there and not a pointless piece of black plastic.  And the rear door window frame trailing edge leans forward, rather than being vertical. 

And that’s the sad part. The mainstream brand car should not look better than a luxury car, in any way IMO.

7 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

It's like they mashed up the Accord and Infiniti Q60's window but it jsut didn't work that well. 

2017-infiniti-q60_100542093_h.jpg

I actually like how Infiniti did theirs though. At least they put some effort into the actual design aspect whereas it looks like the bean counters at Cadillac took over when it came to CT5s.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

And that’s the sad part. The mainstream brand car should not look better than a luxury car, in any way IMO.

I actually like how Infiniti did theirs though. At least they put some effort into the actual design aspect whereas it looks like the bean counters at Cadillac took over when it came to CT5s.

The Infiniti Q70 has a nice take on a 6 light greenhouse w/ a curvy body below...

b1e2163f-4d58-4522-838c-092b94209150.png

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

I don't mind the coupe-styling on 4 door cars but maybe this is just too short or the design language doesn't match it. Maybe it would look better longer? I think it looks great looking at the front. I think it looks great looking from the rear. But, I think it looks a little awkward at most any other angle. 

That’s my bad with it. From the rear doors to the front, it looks nice. But that C pillar window treatment kills the rest of it. I do look forward to what they will do with the interior but I just hope it’s not the same rehash of the “slab dash” look that exists in cars like the CT6 and their smal CUVs. It looks clean but it also just looks too plain for the brand IMO>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Personally, I think Cadillac should have kept the angular C-pillar and forward angled rear door upper frame of the CTS..that's a strong design cue with Cadillac sedans going back 15+ years to the first gen CTS.    Pointy and angular.  Or commit to a 6 light greenhouse like the CT6.  But instead, they go with weird pillar trim that serves no purpose. 

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

I actually like how Infiniti did theirs though. At least they put some effort into the actual design aspect whereas it looks like the bean counters at Cadillac took over when it came to CT5s.

Oh I definitely agree. It's a small difference but it's a make or break difference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Cmicasa the Great said:

For one.. Americans seeking a better vehicle than those asswipes in Germany can provide.

 

Better? Haha, that's a good one. Better at what, exactly? Looking a mashup mix of a Chinese knockoff of a Caddy concept and a Genesis G80? You're ate up. 🤣

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

The Infiniti Q70 has a nice take on a 6 light greenhouse w/ a curvy body below...

b1e2163f-4d58-4522-838c-092b94209150.png

What do you mean by "6 light greenhouse"? 3 windows per side? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ccap41 said:

What do you mean by "6 light greenhouse"? 3 windows per side? 

Yes...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

And that’s the sad part. The mainstream brand car should not look better than a luxury car, in any way IMO.

I actually like how Infiniti did theirs though. At least they put some effort into the actual design aspect whereas it looks like the bean counters at Cadillac took over when it came to CT5s.

I would say they were building a scaled down Escala and then the Bean Counters showed up at the point of the B Pillar and said you have X amount of cash left, finished the car with X dollars and we ended up with that back end mess.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

Yes...

Thanks, I had just never heard it described like that before. I don't keep up on my design language language.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac's newest V-series, the CT4-V and CT5-V, disappointed fans when they debuted on May 30th by being substantially less powerful than their predecessors. The CT4-V gets a 2.7-liter turbo four cylinder producing 320 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque, that's a 130 horsepower deficit compared to the ATS-V.   The story for the CT5-V is similar with a 3.0-liter twin-turbo making 355 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque compared to the 640 horsepower of the CTS-V.  GM President Mark Reuss called the previous cars "hammer" and that they intimidated customers. Thus, Cadillac responded by extending the V-series badge down to be more accessible to more customers. 
      Cadillac fans wouldn't have it, and Cadillac was quick to respond saying that more powerful versions of the CT4-V and CT5-V would be on the way, even bringing out higher potency test cars for the Detroit Grand Prix. The CT5-V was rumored to be running with the Blackwing V8, and that car getting the 4.2 Twin-Turbo V8 is not a new rumor. 
      The controversy comes down to what to call the higher powered models when they do arrive. Some fans felt that the models already shown should be V-Sports and the more powerful versions get the V moniker. However, it seems that Cadillac has settled on Blackwing as the name for the high power versions of their V-series, and that name may not be limited to just models with the Blackwing V8, making Blackwing more of a sub-brand for Cadillac like Denali is for GMC.
      What do you think? Is Blackwing a good name for the true high-performance versions of the V-series cars?
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Cadillac's newest V-series, the CT4-V and CT5-V, disappointed fans when they debuted on May 30th by being substantially less powerful than their predecessors. The CT4-V gets a 2.7-liter turbo four cylinder producing 320 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque, that's a 130 horsepower deficit compared to the ATS-V.   The story for the CT5-V is similar with a 3.0-liter twin-turbo making 355 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque compared to the 640 horsepower of the CTS-V.  GM President Mark Reuss called the previous cars "hammer" and that they intimidated customers. Thus, Cadillac responded by extending the V-series badge down to be more accessible to more customers. 
      Cadillac fans wouldn't have it, and Cadillac was quick to respond saying that more powerful versions of the CT4-V and CT5-V would be on the way, even bringing out higher potency test cars for the Detroit Grand Prix. The CT5-V was rumored to be running with the Blackwing V8, and that car getting the 4.2 Twin-Turbo V8 is not a new rumor. 
      The controversy comes down to what to call the higher powered models when they do arrive. Some fans felt that the models already shown should be V-Sports and the more powerful versions get the V moniker. However, it seems that Cadillac has settled on Blackwing as the name for the high power versions of their V-series, and that name may not be limited to just models with the Blackwing V8, making Blackwing more of a sub-brand for Cadillac like Denali is for GMC.
      What do you think? Is Blackwing a good name for the true high-performance versions of the V-series cars?
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Cadillac CT6 has been in the news a lot lately.  First it was potentially canceled as its home factory in the U.S. is slated for closure. Then there was the Cadillac Blackwing V8.  Most recently it has dropped both the base 2.0T 4-cylinder and the mid-range (now that there is a V8) 3.0 twin-turbo V6. 
      With all of those changes, there is bound to be some price changes to accompany them.
      For 2020, the CT6 will see a base price rise of $8,500 over the 2019 model to $59,900. With that rise, the base engine becomes the 3.6 liter V6 and AWD standard. It is also adding about $3,500 worth of active safety equipment as standard. 
      Moving up to the Premium Luxury model will add $12,000 to the price tag but comes with Cadillac's famous Super Cruise automated driving system, the rear seat package, the Comfort and Technology package, and the 34-speaker Panaray sound system. At $75,490, that's actually a $2,500 discount on those packages over the 2019 model. 
      The top model, the CT6 Platinum will come standard with the Blackwing V8, replacing the 3.0 twin-turbo on the spec sheet. It also gains 20-inch wheels that were optional last year. 
      While the future of the CT6 is murky, the fact that GM continues to make improvements to the model gives us hope that it will live on. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Cadillac CT6 has been in the news a lot lately.  First it was potentially canceled as its home factory in the U.S. is slated for closure. Then there was the Cadillac Blackwing V8.  Most recently it has dropped both the base 2.0T 4-cylinder and the mid-range (now that there is a V8) 3.0 twin-turbo V6. 
      With all of those changes, there is bound to be some price changes to accompany them.
      For 2020, the CT6 will see a base price rise of $8,500 over the 2019 model to $59,900. With that rise, the base engine becomes the 3.6 liter V6 and AWD standard. It is also adding about $3,500 worth of active safety equipment as standard. 
      Moving up to the Premium Luxury model will add $12,000 to the price tag but comes with Cadillac's famous Super Cruise automated driving system, the rear seat package, the Comfort and Technology package, and the 34-speaker Panaray sound system. At $75,490, that's actually a $2,500 discount on those packages over the 2019 model. 
      The top model, the CT6 Platinum will come standard with the Blackwing V8, replacing the 3.0 twin-turbo on the spec sheet. It also gains 20-inch wheels that were optional last year. 
      While the future of the CT6 is murky, the fact that GM continues to make improvements to the model gives us hope that it will live on. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Mercedes unveiled the Mercedes-Benz GLB at an event in Salt Lake City yesterday.   The GLB joins the GLA in the small crossover space, however it can be configured with seating for up to seven passengers.   Built on the compact, front wheel drive, transverse engine platform that is shared with the GLA, the boxy shape makes the most of its 111.4 inch wheelbase (5.1 inches longer than the GLA). The GLB can be purchased as a 5-seater or 7-seater with a second row that can slide fore and aft up to 6 inches. 
      Mercedes says the boxy shape gives the GLB powerful off-road proportions, and short front and rear overhangs help with approach and departure angles. Front-wheel drive is the default, and Mercedes 4Matic all-wheel drive is optional and comes with various modes for comfort, sport, and off-road. Hill-Start assist and downhill speed regulation contribute to the GLB's off-road chops.
      Powering the GLB is a 2.0 liter transverse 4-cylinder with an 8-speed automatic transmission. The engine produces 221 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque from 1800 rpm - 4,000 rpm. It is likely that we will later see AMG engine variants join the lineup like the 416 hp 4-cylinder that AMG just debuted. 
      The 2020 Mercedes-Benz GLB will be in dealerships by the end of 2019. 
      At a glance:
       
      GLB 250
      4MATIC
      Transmission
      8G-DCT
      (automatic)
      Displacement (cc)
      1991
      Output (hp)
      221
      at rpm
      5,500
      Max. torque (lb-ft)
      258
      at rpm
      1800 - 4000
      Acceleration 0-60 mph (s)
      6.9
      Top speed (mph)
      130
      *Spec for load compartment capacity calculated according to VDA standards.
       
       

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...