Jump to content
William Maley

Industry News: Luxury Automakers Are Having Headaches With Selling Lease-Return Sedans

Recommended Posts

Luxury automakers have been taking full advantage of the high-demand for SUVs and crossovers and raking in the dough. But as Neuton's third law of physics tells us, "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." In the case of luxury automakers, they have a number of sedans and coupes from lease turn-ins that they cannot sell.

“It’s not necessarily the overwhelming amount of vehicles, it’s the mix of those flood of vehicles. You’re throwing all these cars into the marketplace a couple years after it has evaporated and jumped into SUVs,” said Scott Keogh, president of Audi of America to Bloomberg.

This puts a lot of strain on luxury automakers as there is too much supply and not much demand, causing the value on used cars to fall. In turn, automakers have to raise the prices on leases to make up for the amount of depreciation over the term of the lease. It will cause consumers to be priced out of marketplace or automakers to offer generous incentives on leases. For luxury automakers, this is a big problem as they rely on leasing more than mainstream brands. According to Autodata, most luxury brands have increased incentives on their cars through the first nine months of the year.

  • Audi: $4,696 (up $314)
  • Lexus: $5,323 (up $296)
  • Mercedes-Benz: $6,732 (up $289)

So if you find yourself wanting a luxury sedan or coupe, now might be the best time to score a really good deal.

Source: Bloomberg


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercedes-Benz has been living for years on leases rather than sales. As such so many badge snobs have leased the MB auto to pretend to have money and as such MB is about to feel the pinch of having a glut of low mileage used cars sitting around that will cause car buyers to get great deals as they move to unload and dump them.

This makes me wonder how the next few years will play out as we go into a depression as I suspect many people are going to wait for the EV auto's to hit the market and then reduce maintenance cost, fuel cost, etc. at they change from ICE to EV auto's.

For those that have to buy an auto, if you shop right I bet you can get a good deal, for the rest of us, we will wait a couple more years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

That's fine Benz or Cadillac.... lower the prices of the CPO models and send me the links.

 

Agreed, I hate SUVs and want a car, and I like used cars because the depreciation hit is gone. 

This isn't just for luxury brands, any car lease at any brand is probably taking a hit.  What is a 3 year old Taurus worth?  The $99 a month leases I have seen on the Cruze, they have to be taking a bath on those, a 2015 Cruze is probably worth $10k now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

CPO 3.0TT CT6 look really attractive right now.

Agreed, when you see new current Premium at $80K and Luxury at $70K then you look at CPO and I find 3 at my local Cadillac dealer:

2017 CT6 2.0T Luxury, 2,561 miles for $54,299

2017 CT6 2.0T Luxury 11,880 miles for $53,244

2016 CT6 3.0T Premium, 13,997 miles for $49,283

Amazing deals found on Autotrader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Agreed, I hate SUVs and want a car, and I like used cars because the depreciation hit is gone. 

This isn't just for luxury brands, any car lease at any brand is probably taking a hit.  What is a 3 year old Taurus worth?  The $99 a month leases I have seen on the Cruze, they have to be taking a bath on those, a 2015 Cruze is probably worth $10k now.

Your last paragraph is pure deflection since the percentage of leased Benz models is much higher than anything from Chevy or any other mainstream maker. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

Your last paragraph is pure deflection since the percentage of leased Benz models is much higher than anything from Chevy or any other mainstream maker. 

It is, and all the off lease SUVs they have are probably getting a good return since SUVs are in high demand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

It is, and all the off lease SUVs they have are probably getting a good return since SUVs are in high demand.

Again deflection as they now have cars that are filling up their used lots and going nowhere. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dfelt said:

Agreed, when you see new current Premium at $80K and Luxury at $70K then you look at CPO and I find 3 at my local Cadillac dealer:

2017 CT6 2.0T Luxury, 2,561 miles for $54,299

2017 CT6 2.0T Luxury 11,880 miles for $53,244

2016 CT6 3.0T Premium, 13,997 miles for $49,283

Amazing deals found on Autotrader.

those will be 10 grand cheaper in six months

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

Your last paragraph is pure deflection since the percentage of leased Benz models is much higher than anything from Chevy or any other mainstream maker. 

when i leased our malibu (i never wanted to lease again) the dealership told me 65% of their new business was leasing now.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, regfootball said:

when i leased our malibu (i never wanted to lease again) the dealership told me 65% of their new business was leasing now.  

It's the only way most people can get the car they want these days. Note, I didn't say afford... because if they could afford it, they wouldn't be leasing. 

The problem is that so many people have E-class tastes but a Cruze LT budget, so even if they split the difference and get Accord V6, it's still a big stretch for them financially and they end up leasing.

The only reason we leased our Buick is that at the time we had different life plans and expected to need to be out of it in 2 years.  The next vehicle will be a CPO or used.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, regfootball said:

when i leased our malibu (i never wanted to lease again) the dealership told me 65% of their new business was leasing now.  

See Drew’s response and add in the fact that it has been a staple of Benz and BMW for decades now whereas the domestic trend is much more recent. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

It's the only way most people can get the car they want these days. Note, I didn't say afford... because if they could afford it, they wouldn't be leasing. 

The problem is that so many people have E-class tastes but a Cruze LT budget, so even if they split the difference and get Accord V6, it's still a big stretch for them financially and they end up leasing.

The only reason we leased our Buick is that at the time we had different life plans and expected to need to be out of it in 2 years.  The next vehicle will be a CPO or used.

Agreed with this and REG.  People want a new car, they have a $300 or so a month budget, they look at the cost to buy a Camry, are shocked that is $30,000 and the options are low mileage lease, or take out and 75 month car loan.  So either they have no car after 3 years and probably owe mileage overage on mileage or they have a car loan in which they pay the car off much slower than it depreciates.

And both reasons are why a used or CPO is a good option.  And I think the desire to have a crossover only amplifies it, people want a crossover, and even an Escape or Rogue is $30,000 now, on a traditional 4 year car loan is $540 a month, so they go to to those 75 month loans.  People need to shop more within their means.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

Agreed with this and REG.  People want a new car, they have a $300 or so a month budget, they look at the cost to buy a Camry, are shocked that is $30,000 and the options are low mileage lease, or take out and 75 month car loan.  So either they have no car after 3 years and probably owe mileage overage on mileage or they have a car loan in which they pay the car off much slower than it depreciates.

And both reasons are why a used or CPO is a good option.  And I think the desire to have a crossover only amplifies it, people want a crossover, and even an Escape or Rogue is $30,000 now, on a traditional 4 year car loan is $540 a month, so they go to to those 75 month loans.  People need to shop more within their means.

“People need to shop within their means”

 

While true, here’s the other side of that coin. 

 

“Car prices are too damn high to begin with”. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

“People need to shop within their means”

 

While true, here’s the other side of that coin. 

 

“Car prices are too damn high to begin with”. 

Car prices are really high, but consumers keep finding a way to pay for them, so car companies like the high prices.

This is why I hate how every car company wants to move up market and put on more content.  Nothing wrong with a car selling a basic model if you are a Chevy or Kia sort of brand.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

Car prices are really high, but consumers keep finding a way to pay for them, so car companies like the high prices.

This is why I hate how every car company wants to move up market and put on more content.  Nothing wrong with a car selling a basic model if you are a Chevy or Kia sort of brand.

Who wants to BUY a base model anything these days, let alone lease a base model?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Who wants to BUY a base model anything these days, let alone lease a base model?

 

That's the problem, people have tastes higher than their budget of affordability.  Add to that people are unwilling to buy used or CPO. They'd rather lease, which is usually a bad financial decision.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

 

That's the problem, people have tastes higher than their budget of affordability.  Add to that people are unwilling to buy used or CPO. They'd rather lease, which is usually a bad financial decision.

Correct.  I imagine a lot of these 3 row crossovers fall into that category.  Because the average family probably can't afford a $45,000 Traverse or Pilot, unless in a lease or 75 month loan, and are they going to own that car in 7 years after purchase to see that loan through?

I work in a bank, I just refinanced a car loan for a 2016 Chevy Sonic that was a $19,500 loan and the car is currently worth $10,100 (we use 125% of NADA wholesale), so we had to use a personal loan to pay the rest off.  The guy was so far under water because he rolled an underwater loan (form a Ford focus he bought new with a defective transmission) into the Sonic, put no money down, took the loan out for 6 years at a high rate and took out an extended warranty and financed it in too.   And this is a sort of common occurrence. 

And to boot, his payment was $110 a month more on his Chevy Sonic than I pay on my Mercedes E550.  I was able to save him $25 a month, not a lot but that's $300 a year, for 5 years, adds up.

1 hour ago, riviera74 said:

Who wants to BUY a base model anything these days, let alone lease a base model?

Well I am not talking about crank windows and 1999 Chevy Cavalier build quality.  But what is wrong with the Cruze being $16k base and like $22k loaded?  Why are there $28,000 Cruze's ?  Why are they trying to make it like the Jetta TDI premium, what is wrong with just being a basic simple car?  Doesn't mean it has to be crap.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i had never wanted to lease again but i have 2 leases now.  My Malibu lease is 235 a month for 15,000 miles so i look at that as a rental.  I would have had to finance 25 grand plus (500-550 payment) for the same car.  It was not a car as a second family car that i want to keep long term.  I view it as a go to work expense.  If i financed, i'd be underwater until year 4 probably.  After 5 years i probably don't want the car anymore.  By then I might be able to trade it in for 4,000.  that becomes a pretty expensive savings account.  In the meantime i take the per month difference and pay down other debts i need to work on.  I probably could have bought a Ford Fusion S or SE and been able to stay within 100 bucks a month of that 235 on a purchase.  But at some point i'd want a little nicer car than those price leader trims that are actually well priced but really do remind you of what you paid with the basic cloth seats and lack of power seats etc.

The van lease was a little bit different.  It was partially due to shocking prices.  I didn't think i would want to own a Chrysler long term.  I feel like i spent a lot of money for no return but at the same time i am not stuck with something i did not want to own.  I sort of want to just ride it hard and put it away wet.  If the kids were out of the house i might want to buy something like a Ford Edge SE or SEL, something that will hold value a bit more.  Or, i don't like pickups but generally if you buy a pickup at model year end prices, they will hold value pretty well too.  Or some three row crossovers do.  I kind of wanted to drive a van once but i didn't really have interest in being a 'van owner'.

Right now trying to decide if lease or buy on something new and will look at CPO too.  Before the last couple leases I always tried to find 1-3 years old and under 15-20k miles.

Edited by regfootball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My next purchase is one for me and will be something that went out of production after 2013.  Albert gets his Encore replacement after I get my new to me car. I've suffered long enough with the CR-V..... though neither of us drive much anymore. He takes the bus to work and I work from home. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, riviera74 said:

Who wants to BUY a base model anything these days, let alone lease a base model?

Me!!!:)

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

My next purchase is one for me and will be something that went out of production after 2013.  Albert gets his Encore replacement after I get my new to me car. I've suffered long enough with the CR-V..... though neither of us drive much anymore. He takes the bus to work and I work from home. 

One of the reasons we want to add to our fleet...been driving my Cobalt since 2008.....something newer would be nice. Though it is hard to own something long term here-as the salt eats these cars alive here. Both of our cars...no matter how much washing and prepping they get-are rusting up. (granted , my other car spends winter in the garage-no rust there) So you almost need a winter beater here in order to have a nice car....

I figure either an out of state used car or a left over new Cruze could be a good choice...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

One of the reasons we want to add to our fleet...been driving my Cobalt since 2008.....something newer would be nice. Though it is hard to own something long term here-as the salt eats these cars alive here. Both of our cars...no matter how much washing and prepping they get-are rusting up. (granted , my other car spends winter in the garage-no rust there) So you almost need a winter beater here in order to have a nice car....

I figure either an out of state used car or a left over new Cruze could be a good choice...

Compare lease rates on various auto's or CPO as right now plenty of good deals to be had.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

Car prices are really high, but consumers keep finding a way to pay for them, so car companies like the high prices.

This is why I hate how every car company wants to move up market and put on more content.  Nothing wrong with a car selling a basic model if you are a Chevy or Kia sort of brand.

People are leasing is why they are “finding a way”. We just established that. Why finance a car that can touch the same monthly price as my mortgage when I can lease it and be done with it after three years? 

 

This is why I will never buy another brand new car ever again. This nonsense has to come to a head at some point. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 144 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      At FCA, amid the backdrop of a proposed merger and its subsequent collapse,  a lawsuit has been filed by Reid Bigland, head of the RAM brand and CEO of FCA Canada alleging that FCA has retaliated against Bigland for cooperating in a Federal prob of FCA's sales reporting process. 
      Bigland joined Chrysler in 2006 and in turn took over the reigns of Alfa Romeo, Maserati, and Dodge, eventually serving as CEO of FCA Canada.  The lawsuit filed Wednesday accuses FCA of retaliation for not taking the fall for the sales reporting prob.  Bigland claims his compensation has fallen by more than 90% and that the sales reporting process under scrutiny was one that he inherited. 
      The probe of FCA's sales reporting started after two dealerships in Illinois filed a lawsuit alleging they were offered cash in return for reporting falsely inflated sales numbers. From that lawsuit, FCA was forced to recount and re-report its previous sales reports.  The Security and Exchange Commission continued its investigation and Bigland cooperated. 
      Bigland's position is that the sales reporting methods existed well before he assumed his roles, and he did nothing to change the reporting process already in place.  Bigland claims that the SEC tried to settle with some admission of wrong-doing by the company and Bigland. Bigland declined to admit wrong doing and later sent a letter detailing the sales reporting practices to the SEC.
      Bigland sold his shares in the company in 2018 and he claims that FCA is withholding bonuses to pay for SEC fines if and when they come. 
      For FCA's part they say via Detroit News:
      We'll have more information as it comes out. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      At FCA, amid the backdrop of a proposed merger and its subsequent collapse,  a lawsuit has been filed by Reid Bigland, head of the RAM brand and CEO of FCA Canada alleging that FCA has retaliated against Bigland for cooperating in a Federal prob of FCA's sales reporting process. 
      Bigland joined Chrysler in 2006 and in turn took over the reigns of Alfa Romeo, Maserati, and Dodge, eventually serving as CEO of FCA Canada.  The lawsuit filed Wednesday accuses FCA of retaliation for not taking the fall for the sales reporting prob.  Bigland claims his compensation has fallen by more than 90% and that the sales reporting process under scrutiny was one that he inherited. 
      The probe of FCA's sales reporting started after two dealerships in Illinois filed a lawsuit alleging they were offered cash in return for reporting falsely inflated sales numbers. From that lawsuit, FCA was forced to recount and re-report its previous sales reports.  The Security and Exchange Commission continued its investigation and Bigland cooperated. 
      Bigland's position is that the sales reporting methods existed well before he assumed his roles, and he did nothing to change the reporting process already in place.  Bigland claims that the SEC tried to settle with some admission of wrong-doing by the company and Bigland. Bigland declined to admit wrong doing and later sent a letter detailing the sales reporting practices to the SEC.
      Bigland sold his shares in the company in 2018 and he claims that FCA is withholding bonuses to pay for SEC fines if and when they come. 
      For FCA's part they say via Detroit News:
      We'll have more information as it comes out. 
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Quarterly:
      Ford Motor Company - Not reported
      General Motors Co. - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported
      FCA has announced that beginning October 2019, they will be reporting sales quarterly
      Monthly:
      Audi of America -  Down 2.2% for the month, Down 7.3% for the year
      BMW of North America -  Down 3.1% for the month, Down 2.3% for the year
      FCA US LLC -  Up 2% for the month, Down 3% for the year
      Genesis Motor America - Not Reported
      Honda Motor Co. -  Down 4.9% for the month,  Flat 0.0% for the year
      Hyundai Motor America -  Up 1.8% for the month, Up 1.74% for the year
      Infiniti USA - Down 10.4% for the month, Down 13.4% for the year
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - Down 1.2% for the month, Up 7.3% for the year
      Kia Motors America - Up 1.0% for the month, Up 4.7% for the year
      Mazda North American Operations - Down 16.0%  for the month, Down 15.5% for the year
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 0.5% for the month, Down 8.6% for the year
      Mitsubishi Motors North America -  Down 21.5% for the month, Up 4.6% for the year
      Nissan Group - Up 0.1% for the month, Down 6.6% for the year
      Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 0.1% for the month, Up 2.1% for the year
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 6.4% for the month, Up 5.7% for the year
      Toyota Motor North America - Up 3.2% for the month, Down 3.1% for the year
      Volkswagen of America -  Up 14% for the month, Up 6.2% for the year
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - Up 4.5% for the month, Up 12.7% for the year

      Brands (Quarterly):
      Buick -  Not Reported
      Cadillac -  Not Reported
      Chevrolet - Not Reported
      GMC - Not Reported
      Ford - Not Reported
      Lincoln - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported

      Brands (Monthly):
      Acura - Up 5.7% - 13,547 MTD / 61,619 YTD
      Alfa Romeo - Down 34% - 1,572 MTD / 7,442 YTD
      Audi - Down 2.2% 18,892 MTD / 82,031 YTD
      BMW - Up 1.7% - 27,109 MTD / 124,813 YTD
      Chrysler - Down 26% - 10,903 MTD / 51,481 YTD
      Dodge - Up 3% - 47,759 MTD / 204,546 YTD
      Fiat - Down 29% - 1,025 MTD / 4,170 YTD
      Genesis - Not reported
      Honda - Down 5.9% - 131,985 MTD / 579,475 YTD
      Hyundai - Up 1.8% - 66,121 MTD / 269,126 YTD
      Infiniti - Down 10.4% - 10,413 MTD / 53,219 YTD
      Jaguar - Down 14.6% - 2,021 MTD
      Jeep - Down 7% - 90,326 MTD / 379,455 YTD
      Kia - Up 1.0% - 60,062 MTD / 248,043 YTD
      Land Rover -  Up 3.3% 7,337 MTD
      Lexus - Down 3.4% - 24,537 MTD  / 112,688 YTD
      Mazda - Down 16% - 25,192 MTD / 115,727 YTD
      Mercedes-Benz - Up 0.4% 27,080 MTD / 121,200 YTD
      Mercedes-Benz Vans - Down 7.7% - 2,862 MTD / 13,020 YTD
      MINI - Down 33.2% - 2,822 MTD / 14,348 YTD
      Mitsubishi - Down 21.5% - 9,750 MTD / 58,780 YTD
      Nissan - Up 1.1% - 121,570 MTD / 540,313 YTD
      Porsche - Up 0.1% - 5,010 MTD / 25,052 YTD
      Ram Trucks - Up 29% - 67,117 MTD / 257,941 YTD
      Smart - Down 3.6% - 106 MTD / 422 YTD
      Subaru - Up 6.4% - 63,972 MTD / 278,014 YTD
      Toyota - Up 4.1% - 197,637 MTD / 837,068 YTD
      Volkswagen - Up 14% - 35,702 MTD / 152,883 YTD
      Volvo - Up 4.5% - 9,338 MTD / 37,754 YTD

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Quarterly:
      Ford Motor Company - Not reported
      General Motors Co. - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported
      FCA has announced that beginning October 2019, they will be reporting sales quarterly
      Monthly:
      Audi of America -  Down 2.2% for the month, Down 7.3% for the year
      BMW of North America -  Down 3.1% for the month, Down 2.3% for the year
      FCA US LLC -  Up 2% for the month, Down 3% for the year
      Genesis Motor America - Not Reported
      Honda Motor Co. -  Down 4.9% for the month,  Flat 0.0% for the year
      Hyundai Motor America -  Up 1.8% for the month, Up 1.74% for the year
      Infiniti USA - Down 10.4% for the month, Down 13.4% for the year
      Jaguar Land Rover North America - Down 1.2% for the month, Up 7.3% for the year
      Kia Motors America - Up 1.0% for the month, Up 4.7% for the year
      Mazda North American Operations - Down 16.0%  for the month, Down 15.5% for the year
      Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 0.5% for the month, Down 8.6% for the year
      Mitsubishi Motors North America -  Down 21.5% for the month, Up 4.6% for the year
      Nissan Group - Up 0.1% for the month, Down 6.6% for the year
      Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 0.1% for the month, Up 2.1% for the year
      Subaru of America, Inc. - Up 6.4% for the month, Up 5.7% for the year
      Toyota Motor North America - Up 3.2% for the month, Down 3.1% for the year
      Volkswagen of America -  Up 14% for the month, Up 6.2% for the year
      Volvo Cars of North America, LLC - Up 4.5% for the month, Up 12.7% for the year

      Brands (Quarterly):
      Buick -  Not Reported
      Cadillac -  Not Reported
      Chevrolet - Not Reported
      GMC - Not Reported
      Ford - Not Reported
      Lincoln - Not Reported
      Tesla - Not Reported

      Brands (Monthly):
      Acura - Up 5.7% - 13,547 MTD / 61,619 YTD
      Alfa Romeo - Down 34% - 1,572 MTD / 7,442 YTD
      Audi - Down 2.2% 18,892 MTD / 82,031 YTD
      BMW - Up 1.7% - 27,109 MTD / 124,813 YTD
      Chrysler - Down 26% - 10,903 MTD / 51,481 YTD
      Dodge - Up 3% - 47,759 MTD / 204,546 YTD
      Fiat - Down 29% - 1,025 MTD / 4,170 YTD
      Genesis - Not reported
      Honda - Down 5.9% - 131,985 MTD / 579,475 YTD
      Hyundai - Up 1.8% - 66,121 MTD / 269,126 YTD
      Infiniti - Down 10.4% - 10,413 MTD / 53,219 YTD
      Jaguar - Down 14.6% - 2,021 MTD
      Jeep - Down 7% - 90,326 MTD / 379,455 YTD
      Kia - Up 1.0% - 60,062 MTD / 248,043 YTD
      Land Rover -  Up 3.3% 7,337 MTD
      Lexus - Down 3.4% - 24,537 MTD  / 112,688 YTD
      Mazda - Down 16% - 25,192 MTD / 115,727 YTD
      Mercedes-Benz - Up 0.4% 27,080 MTD / 121,200 YTD
      Mercedes-Benz Vans - Down 7.7% - 2,862 MTD / 13,020 YTD
      MINI - Down 33.2% - 2,822 MTD / 14,348 YTD
      Mitsubishi - Down 21.5% - 9,750 MTD / 58,780 YTD
      Nissan - Up 1.1% - 121,570 MTD / 540,313 YTD
      Porsche - Up 0.1% - 5,010 MTD / 25,052 YTD
      Ram Trucks - Up 29% - 67,117 MTD / 257,941 YTD
      Smart - Down 3.6% - 106 MTD / 422 YTD
      Subaru - Up 6.4% - 63,972 MTD / 278,014 YTD
      Toyota - Up 4.1% - 197,637 MTD / 837,068 YTD
      Volkswagen - Up 14% - 35,702 MTD / 152,883 YTD
      Volvo - Up 4.5% - 9,338 MTD / 37,754 YTD
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Volvo Cars posted strong sales in May, with volumes up 12.4 per cent compared with the same period last year.
      The company sold 60,196 cars during the month, as China, Europe and the US all reported a growth in sales compared with the same period last year.
      The double digit volume growth in May was led by the continued strong demand for Volvo’s award-winning SUV range led by the XC60, and followed by the XC40 and XC90. Volvo’s latest models, the V60 estate and the US-built S60 sedan, also contributed to the strong performance.
      In the January to May period, Volvo sold a total of 278,051 cars – up 9.6 per cent, compared with the same period last year.
      China reported a strong sales growth of 17.4 per cent in May compared with the same period last year. Total sales in the region reached 12,425 cars during the month. The growth came on the back of high demand for the locally assembled XC60 and S90 models.
      European sales in May grew 16.9 per cent to 29,681 cars, led by strong demand for the XC60, followed by the XC40 and the V60 estate.
      US sales reached 9,761 cars in May, up 4.5 per cent compared with the same period last year. XC90 was the best selling car in the region followed by the XC60.
      A detailed break-up of regional sales is given below:
       
        May
          January-May
          2018
      2019
      Change
      2018
      2019
      Change
      Europe
      25,395
      29,681
      16.9%
      131,267
      144,164
      9.8%
      China
      10,582
      12,425
      17.4%
      49,792
      54,503
      9.5%
      US
      9,338
      9,761
      4.5%
      37,754
      40,186
      6.4%
      Other
      8,224
      8,329
      1.3%
      34,768
      39,198
      12.7%
      Total
      53,539
      60,196
      12.4%
      253,581
      278,051
      9.6%

      In May, the XC60 was the top selling model with sales reaching 17,510 cars (2018: 16,171), followed by the XC40, with total sales at 10,574 cars (2018: 5,413 units), and the Volvo XC90 at 8,621 cars (2018: 7,979 units).
  • My Clubs

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...