Jump to content
Create New...

GM News: Rumorpile: GM Considers Dropping Six Passenger Vehicles (UPDATED)


William Maley

Recommended Posts

General Motors has been seeing sales of their passenger cars take a sharp drop as buyers latch on to crossovers, SUVs, and trucks. The first half of 2017 has seen GM's passenger car sales drop 19 percent. In June, passenger cars went into freefall with a 36 percent drop. This has General Motors making some drastic decisions in terms of products and production sites.

"We are talking to (GM) right now about the products that they currently have" at underused car plants such as Hamtramck in Michigan and Lordstown in Ohio, and whether they might be replaced with newer, more popular vehicles such as crossovers, said Dennis Williams, president of the UAW.

According to sources, GM is considering dropping six models after 2020. The models include,

  • Buick LaCrosse
  • Cadillac CT6  (See Update Below)
  • Cadillac XTS
  • Chevrolet Impala
  • Chevrolet Sonic
  • Chevrolet Volt

Four of the vehicles listed (LaCrosse, CT6, Impala, and Volt) are built GM’s Hamtramck plant in Detroit. According to suppliers, Hamtramack's production output for the first half of 2017 is less than 35,000 vehicles, down 32 percent when compared to the same time last year. Other GM plants are able to produce 200,000 - 300,000 vehicles in a year, putting Hamtramck in a dangerous spot.

GM must "create some innovative new products" to replace slow-selling sedans "or start closing plants," said Sam Fiorani, vice president of AutoForecast Solutions.

A possibility of a new product is replacing the Volt with some sort of utility vehicle boasting a plug-in hybrid powertrain according to sources.

Source: Reuters

UPDATE: “There is absolutely, if I could speak all capitals now, they’d be coming out of my mouth. There is absolutely no plan, at all, to cancel the CT6,” said Cadillac president Johan de Nysschen to Jalopnik when asked about this report from Reuters.

“That report came as a surprise to me, too.”

de Nysschen said the brand is planning to invest more into the CT6 in the coming years as it will play an important role in the coming years.

“The [CT6] forms a very important part of our product strategy going forward for the brand,” de Nysschen said. “The car also has a very major contribution to make to the shaping of brand perceptions, and the transformational process that Cadillac is undergoing as far as that is concerned.”

Source: Jalopnik


View full article

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been saying it since day one, that a Volt Powertrain CUV would do much better than a 4 door car. The rest are pretty much understandable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sonic, Impala, Lacrosse, and CT6 would all be a damn shame to lose. I hate crossover culture. This is how the second renaissance of performance will die.

The most painful loss is the CT6 because of the massive investment in the Omega platform and the sheer missed potential of a more dramatically styled sedan flagship. I'm still hoping a refreshed CT6 can help it shine. The Impala and Lacrosse are simply the finest big sedans for the money. They get 30+ mpg highway with great V6 engines and sit 4 people plus abundant luggage very comfortably. Totally underappreciated cars in favor of less efficient, bulky crossovers with crap dynamics.

I'm actually surprised the Sonic is already out the door. The model was a major success long after it was introduced, and owes at least some of the dwindling sales to its age losing competitiveness. A second generation could have been a truly outstanding car, especially if we saw a genuine performance model.

The Volt can easily be transitioned into a compact crossover. It's silly that a electric/hybrid car that good is a losing proposition for GM when an inferior car like the Prius rakes in endless sales volume.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, cp-the-nerd said:

Sonic, Impala, Lacrosse, and CT6 would all be a damn shame to lose. I hate crossover culture. This is how the second renaissance of performance will die.

The most painful loss is the CT6 because of the massive investment in the Omega platform and the sheer missed potential of a more dramatically styled sedan flagship. I'm still hoping a refreshed CT6 can help it shine. The Impala and Lacrosse are simply the finest big sedans for the money. They get 30+ mpg highway with great V6 engines and sit 4 people plus abundant luggage very comfortably. Totally underappreciated cars in favor of less efficient, bulky crossovers with crap dynamics.

I'm actually surprised the Sonic is already out the door. The model was a major success long after it was introduced, and owes at least some of the dwindling sales to its age losing competitiveness. A second generation could have been a truly outstanding car, especially if we saw a genuine performance model.

The Volt can easily be transitioned into a compact crossover. It's silly that a electric/hybrid car that good is a losing proposition for GM when an inferior car like the Prius rakes in endless sales volume.

Quoted in its entirety for truth...especially the big Buick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sonic is a lame duck, the Malibu is better than the Impala, the Lacrosse is redundant, the XTS is even more redundant, the Volt is the right powertrain in the wrong car, and the CT6 is what the CTS should have been.

Nothing surprising here. I would argue nothing of real value, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually it would make more sense to replace the Sonic with a made in Korea piece and get rid of the Spark.

I still don't get the anti-Impala ness.  It sells very well here and many folks want a v6 sedan.  I get that sedans are decreasing but i would actually enlarge the Impala and make it v6 unique.  Believe me, I drive a Malibu and there is still room for a plush, more solid larger sedan like the Impala.

As long as Buick has the chinese Lacrosse there is no point to not offer it here.  the problem is they screwed the pooch on the design.

The opportunity here is for the next Impala and 'Avenir' to be on a better platform.

I don't think they will get rid of the CT6 but i think they may repackage it and rename it.  Cadillac still badly needs a king size car.  They are dragging out the XTS because its cheaper to build, but there will be some point where it does become obsolete.

What's at work here is 3 things.  one is stupid unbearable govt and its noose tightening CAFE keeps putting pressure on weeding out large vehicles with bigger engines.  Two, for plant manufacturing planning, and to make anything here, the costs keep going up and they have to find vehicle configs and pricing that allow us to keep making SOME of our vehicles here.  They have to be vehicles that have big margins and not very small production numbers.  Third is I think they are trying to kill off a large sedan platform to save development costs.  But that doesn't wash for me because the LaCrosse is a stretched Regal / malibu now anyways.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going one by one here:

The Impala/LaCrosse/XTS trio are dropping now, that market isn't coming back, by 2019 sales will be so small on that trio there will be no reason to continue with any of them.  And they are all related, so they all die together.

The Sonic is another hurting car in a hurting segment.  With the Spark at the bottom, they can import from Korea for the few that they sell.  Cruze and Malibu can eat the volume just as Honda gets by with Civic and Accord.  

The Volt they can drop, because post 2020, many cars will be a hybrid or plug-in hybrid.  So the technology stays, but they can put that tech in a Malibu, Equinox, Traverse, etc.

CT6 could be dropped, but I'd be surprised to see them drop the Omega platform.   Unless Omega can't support a crossover, then even with CTS moving to it and CT6, that isn't enough volume to make the platform viable, and they can just keep building the CTS off the Alpha chassis with Camaro and ATS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I suspect that the CT6 will survive.  Until further notice, the Escalade is NOT the flagship for Cadillac.  Few would ever accept that as a possibility.

The underlying technology of the Volt will survive and spread, even if the Volt does not.  Why there is no Volt crossover puzzles me.

As for Epsilon 2XXX (i.e. the Impala, Lacrosse and the XTS), one will certainly go and probably two.  The XTS is a little too backwards looking and not quite Cadillac enough anymore.  The Impala for some reason is being rejected for Traverses and Equinoxes.  And the Lacrosse may end up suffering the same fate as the Lucerne did in 2011.  No more large sedans is in my view rather sad, but time marches on.  It wasn't that long ago wagons were everywhere, only to be supplanted by minivans in the '90s.

As for the Sonic, I have no idea why Chevy has a Spark AND a Sonic.  One of them will go soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, balthazar said:

I can't see a business case for a $13K Spark AND a $15K Sonic.
But the Spark is hideous in & out, I would dump it for the Sonic anyday (I've driven a Spark, but not a Sonic).
There's serious overlap there.

Could merge into one product, but they need a cheap entry level car to compete with Versa, Accent, Fiesta, whatever Mitsubishi there is.  The Versa starts at like $11,800.  So they keep the cheap Spark, it is made in South Korea with cheaper labor.  Then the Cruze becomes the middle, Malibu the top.  3 Sedan/Hatch type cars is enough, because they have the Camaro too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...got this one on the nose!

As much as it breaks my heart to say that-GM doesn't need any of these models anymore....(good bye, Impy.:cry: )

With cars now on the forever slide, better keep the most popular ones now. Though they could bring them back if they needed to (like the colorado)

I'm going to miss the days of all the choices we had, but with the market on the downward trend- they are trying to keep their best choices around....

Maybe I'll look into GM's last american made compact before it heads to mexico....:(

Though I say after looking at the hatch, quality won't suffer though....

Also figure this will only be the first round of model cuts.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, balthazar said:

I can't see a business case for a $13K Spark AND a $15K Sonic.
But the Spark is hideous in & out, I would dump it for the Sonic anyday (I've driven a Spark, but not a Sonic).
There's serious overlap there.

Eh, they're both toast at some point.

In the near future, I really think we are looking at 30k as the new entry level.......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite honestly, the XTS should have died 3 years ago.  So that is not a big loss. Its a NECESSITY actually to finally break free of a certain era that Cadillac itself is struggling with itself to shed.  

Yes. No.

Either go full on performance luxury or go full on quiet luxury. DO NOT do both. Its confusing for the would be customer.  The CT6 is in the middle of this mess.

Clowns to the left of it (CTS), jokers to the right (XTS)...here it is stuck in the middle with you!

The CTS should have been STS which should have been the CT6. Or should the XTS be reincarnated as the CT6?

Is the CT6 a quiet luxury car like the ΧΤS or is the CT6 a performance luxury car like the CTS?

Is the CTS the CT6? The so called name sounds the same...

Is the CT8 Omega based? Is it still on?

Is the CT5 Alpha based? Its not as if the CTS is setting world records for sales either!!!

The ATS morphing into the CT3....and Cadillac wants to go smaller???!!

Crossovers are selling....yeah....I see several Cadillac sedans getting the axe here not only the CT6 and the XTS....

But in all honesty, I think the CT5 will never make off the ground. I think the CT6 will get better marketing and therefore stay. After all, a TTV8 is scheduled for it .

The Escala will be the CT8.

The CT3 will never get off the ground either methinks.

The CT3 and the CT5 will get axed in favour of CUVs. The XT5 is here already and doing well.

The XTS V powertrain should have made it unto the Lacrosse to distance itself away from the Impala AND the Regal because in 2018, even the Regal is too close to the Lacrosse. 

The Impala never really took off like it should have. The 2nd generation Equinox should have been a bloody clue that big sedans were dead men walking as the Equinox exploded in sales year after year and its highest being 5 years AFTER its introduction almost doubling its first year sales while the Impala had a fraction of those sales...

Ditto for the Lamba SUVs. Those just continued on selling and those were as old as the 1st generation Theta SUVs.

The Malibu grew bigger on the inside to almost Impala levels of interior space, designed to look like the Impala all for a cheaper price than the Impala.

All that is sealing the Impala's fate. Ditto for the Lacrosse because all that applies to the Lacrosse. The Lacrosse also has its own Malibu scenario in the Regal. Not too mention that the Impala and the Lacrosse are cannibalizing each other with the little sales that are left for each other.

The Volt....

I dont think it will get the axe. At the very least, the Volt's tech will find its way into a SUV type body. The name Volt does not necessarily mean it has to go away either....

The Chevy Trax takes care of the Sonic. No big loss there!

If cheap entry level car is needed. The Trax could be decontented to be sold on the cheap. It has the the Buick version selling like hot cakes to balance out the profit margins.

Heck, give a version to Cadillac (obviously NOT as a badge engineered model!) to sell at a higher still price and voila!

 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442
Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>...a quiet luxury car... or a performance luxury car?<<

EVERY luxury brand does degrees of both. Some folk seem to want to hold Cadillac to a one-dimensional point in space AFA 'definition' goes, whereas the competition generally has a far wider range of product by 'definition' than Cadillac.

>>.DO NOT do both. Its confusing for the would be customer.<<
Absolutely do both. It's NOT confusing. Tastes & trends ebb & flow, diversity is key to anticipating that. With lambo/ferrari/porsche becoming truck manufacturers, there is no one dimensionality in the auto industry... not if you want to survive.

CT6 is the spearhead going into the future. It's EASY to use another supplier and upgrade -say- your leather upholstery. Nailing class-leading chassis dynamics/technology AND weight in one move is what's hard. That's the foundation for a vehicle's success right there- everything else beyond that & powertrain is icing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Omega chassis doesn't have enough global volume.  The profit margins probably aren't so high on the CT6 when other big sedans sell for $30,000 more.  So if there isn't a change in the formula the CT6 and that chassis are dead.

They need an Omega based crossover to get the volume.  But when Cadillac can rebadge and Enclave and sell it for $60k and they have the Escalade, will product planners want to spend money on an Omega crossover?

Chevy and GMC could each take on 2 more crossovers, that is 4 products that they could build in Hamtramck.  But you also have to wonder if you even need more styles of crossovers?  Crossovers are so homogeneous between brands and buyers don't care, car companies can limit choices and the people will still buy them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, balthazar said:

>>...a quiet luxury car... or a performance luxury car?<<

EVERY luxury brand does degrees of both. Some folk seem to want to hold Cadillac to a one-dimensional point in space AFA 'definition' goes, whereas the competition generally has a far wider range of product by 'definition' than Cadillac.

>>.DO NOT do both. Its confusing for the would be customer.<<
Absolutely do both. It's NOT confusing. Tastes & trends ebb & flow, diversity is key to anticipating that. With lambo/ferrari/porsche becoming truck manufacturers, there is no one dimensionality in the auto industry... not if you want to survive.

CT6 is the spearhead going into the future. It's EASY to use another supplier and upgrade -say- your leather upholstery. Nailing class-leading chassis dynamics/technology AND weight in one move is what's hard. That's the foundation for a vehicle's success right there- everything else beyond that & powertrain is icing.

Yeah...that is why Cadillac sedans sales are through the roof...

What little sales gains they have...are of the SUV  variety....and in China...

So yeah...do both...for China....

In the USA....well...a tad more FOCUSED strategy is in order....

Its fine if we both dont agree on this....

But....take a look at US sales...on this path...Cadillac will just be a crossover seller...

PS: Please dont tell me with a straight face that  what Cadillac is doing is anything but confusing...

If it wasnt confusing...then month by  month sales of ALL its sedans would NOT be down in the USA...

If it wasnt confusing....then the CT6 would have had SUBSTANTIAL sales gains...like the ΧT5...

PSS: Cadillac is selling a ton of vehicles in...CHINA.

For the first time in history....Cadillac sells  more outside its home base.

I think we are letting that bit of good news clout our judgement about what really is going on in the USA...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well oldshurst, it is not that we do not care what GM is doing in China.  It is that most of us care about what is sold here. 

Sure, Cadillac could use some clarity here.  They ultimately need to decide whether the standard is defeating BMW or Lexus.  The XTS is a dead car walking at this point.  An Omega crossover would work wonders for Cadillac and keep the CT6 on dealer lots and make the platform $$$ case better.  Cadillac does NOT need an Enclave clone; it needs an upgraded CUV to take care of the large luxury CUV segment.  The XT5 is doing well in its midsize luxury CUV segment, especially against the Lexus RX.  The ATS seems to be doing OK but can do better.  Historically, Cadillac has been the smooth ride luxury leader for decades, but the market switched to the Germans back in the '80s and especially after Lexus debuted in 1990.  I wish I had an answer for Cadillac's situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Well oldshurst, it is not that we do not care what GM is doing in China.  It is that most of us care about what is sold here. 

Sure, Cadillac could use some clarity here.  They ultimately need to decide whether the standard is defeating BMW or Lexus.  The XTS is a dead car walking at this point.  An Omega crossover would work wonders for Cadillac and keep the CT6 on dealer lots and make the platform $$$ case better.  Cadillac does NOT need an Enclave clone; it needs an upgraded CUV to take care of the large luxury CUV segment.  The XT5 is doing well in its midsize luxury CUV segment, especially against the Lexus RX.  The ATS seems to be doing OK but can do better.  Historically, Cadillac has been the smooth ride luxury leader for decades, but the market switched to the Germans back in the '80s and especially after Lexus debuted in 1990.  I wish I had an answer for Cadillac's situation. 

 

9 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Well oldshurst, it is not that we do not care what GM is doing in China.  It is that most of us care about what is sold here. 

Well...yes!

What Cadillac is doing here!

And what is that?

http://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-data/cadillac/

The ATS is in free fall...

 

 
Cadillac
ATS
2016 21.505
2015 26.873
2014 29.890
2013 38.319
2012 7.008

 

Month to month in 2017 does not seem promising

 
Cadillac
ATS
2014
Cadillac
ATS
2015
Cadillac
ATS
2016
Cadillac
ATS
2017
January 1.909 1.757 1.067 974
February 2.427 2.028 1.591 1.005
March 2.982 2.039 1.859 1.367
April 2.737 2.119 1.737 1.405
May 2.497 2.353 1.630 1.273
June 2.358 2.211 1.880 1.185
July 2.582 1.588 2.119  
August 2.804 2.449 2.477  
September 2.239 2.295 1.770  
October 2.608 2.528 1.593  
November 2.282 2.055 1.490  
December 2.465 3.451 2.292  

 

The CTS also in decline...a joke is more like it!!!

 
Cadillac
CTS
2016 15.911
2015 19.485
2014 31.115
2013 32.343
2012 46.979
2011 55.042
2010 45.656
2009 38.817
2008 58.774
2007 57.029
2006 54.846
2005 61.512
2004 57.211
2003 49.392
2002 37.976

 

In 2017...its presence is ghost like....

 

 
Cadillac
CTS
2014
Cadillac
CTS
2015
Cadillac
CTS
2016
Cadillac
CTS
2017
January 2.232 1.698 1.013 691
February 2.509 1.438 1.461 913
March 2.918 1.500 1.499 882
April 3.270 1.726 1.335 873
May 2.905 1.792 1.082 854
June 2.174 1.535 1.516 846
July 2.039 1.515 1.313  
August 2.592 1.730 1.426  
September 2.282 1.319 1.503  
October 3.096 1.567 1.024  
November 2.446 1.224 1.042  
December 2.652 2.441 1.697  

 

The CT6...for a brand new model is pathetic...

 
Cadillac
CT6
2016
Cadillac
CT6
2017
January 0 634
February 0 802
March 35 968
April 285 978
May 697 1.001
June 962 1.014
July 827  
August 1.242  
September 1.343  
October 1.316  
November 1.169  
December 1.293  

 

But at least its sales are on the up....

So....please dont tell me the marketing in the US is NOT confusing....

17 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

The XTS is a dead car walking at this point.  An Omega crossover would work wonders for Cadillac and keep the CT6

Sure....but like I said....Cadillac is heading to be EXACTLY just that in the USA....a crossover seller.

 

18 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Cadillac does NOT need an Enclave clone; it needs an upgraded CUV to take care of the large luxury CUV segment.  The XT5 is doing well in its midsize luxury CUV segment, especially against the Lexus RX. 

You better believe it needs an Enclave clone in the USA.

Yes....just like the SRX before it...the XT5 is doing awesome. And THAT is why Cadillac needs an Enclave lone as its sedans are non-existent States side...

20 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

The ATS seems to be doing OK but can do better.

My link suggests otherwise....

21 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

Historically, Cadillac has been the smooth ride luxury leader for decades, but the market switched to the Germans back in the '80s and especially after Lexus debuted in 1990.  I wish I had an answer for Cadillac's situation. 

Yes....but that all changed in the early 1990s when they realized what was up with the Germans with the FWD STS Northstar . Its just that Cadillac half assed that strategy. It continued to half-ass that strategy with the Cadillac that was suppose to Zig and Zag with the Opel Omega based Catera thing. 1st generation and 2nd generation CTS was a good direction but 3rd gen RWD STS was a strategy that was half-assed again...

1st generation ATS and 3rd generation CTS along with the name change with the CT6 just confused the shyte out of potential buyers...

27 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

I wish I had an answer for Cadillac's situation. 

I do too,, buddy!

I do too!

But I am NOT afraid to call a spade a spade.

Some of us are though!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>Yeah...that is why Cadillac sedans sales are through the roof...
Please dont tell me with a straight face that  what Cadillac is doing is anything but confusing...
If it wasnt confusing...then month by  month sales of ALL its sedans would NOT be down in the USA...<<

"Confusion" is not the causation behind sales. If you disagree, please post your data.
I'm not remotely confused by Cadillac's catalog (and I've never owned one).
Or perhaps you are right and 'confusion' is more widespread than you think :

AUDI ~
A3 : down 29% (1904 units/June)
A6 : down 4% (1425 units)
A7 : down 25% (224 units)
A8 : down 18% (301 units)
Only the 'non-confusing' A4 & A5 are up.

Look up the other segment sedans- are they also 'confusing'?

>>PSS: Cadillac is selling a ton of vehicles in...CHINA.<<
They use the same names there- why aren't the Chinese 'confused'?

>>For the first time in history....Cadillac sells  more outside its home base.<<
That's actually a very GOOD track record - the Germans crossed that line DECADES ago.
Haven't many people lamented Cadillac is a 'U.S. market only' vehicle, to it's detriment?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, balthazar said:

>>Yeah...that is why Cadillac sedans sales are through the roof...
Please dont tell me with a straight face that  what Cadillac is doing is anything but confusing...
If it wasnt confusing...then month by  month sales of ALL its sedans would NOT be down in the USA...<<

"Confusion" is not the causation behind sales. If you disagree, please post your data.
I'm not remotely confused by Cadillac's catalog (and I've never owned one).
Or perhaps you are right and 'confusion' is more widespread than you think :

AUDI ~
A3 : down 29% (1904 units/June)
A6 : down 4% (1425 units)
A7 : down 25% (224 units)
A8 : down 18% (301 units)
Only the 'non-confusing' A4 & A5 are up.

Look up the other segment sedans- are they also 'confusing'?

>>PSS: Cadillac is selling a ton of vehicles in...CHINA.<<
They use the same names there- why aren't the Chinese 'confused'?

>>For the first time in history....Cadillac sells  more outside its home base.<<
That's actually a very GOOD track record - the Germans crossed that line DECADES ago.
Haven't many people lamented Cadillac is a 'U.S. market only' vehicle, to it's detriment?

 

46 minutes ago, balthazar said:

I'm not remotely confused by Cadillac's catalog (and I've never owned one).
Or perhaps you are right and 'confusion' is more widespread than you think :

AUDI ~
A3 : down 29% (1904 units/June)
A6 : down 4% (1425 units)
A7 : down 25% (224 units)
A8 : down 18% (301 units)
Only the 'non-confusing' A4 & A5 are up.

Look up the other segment sedans- are they also 'confusing'?

The average Joe is confused....put blinders on. I dont care.

But Ill show you how Audi and BMW wipe the floor with Cadillac...confusion or not...it dont matter.  Cadillac sedan sales are in the dumpster.

Is it confusion? It dont matter. You could use semantics to try to dismiss Cadillac sales mediocrity...

The ATS MAIN competition

http://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-data/bmw/bmw-3-series-4-series/

 

 
BMW
3-series / 4-series
2014
BMW
3-series / 4-series
2015
BMW
3-series / 4-series
2016
BMW
3-series / 4-series
2017
January 6.494 7.348 5.119 5.976
February 7.791 8.748 7.278 7.220
March 10.120 14.835 10.928 9.521
April 9.794 10.374 7.907 7.376
May 10.915 12.868 11.017 8.348
June 11.543 13.516 10.003 9.617
July 12.497 10.919 8.985  
August 12.477 13.103 8.170  
September 12.814 11.871 9.721  
October 13.621 14.307 8.068  
November 14.702 11.857 8.651  
December 19.464 10.863 10.374  

 

 
BMW
3-series / 4-series
2016 106.221
2015 140.609
2014 142.232
2013 119.521
2012 99.602
2011 94.371
2010 100.910
2009 90.960
2008 112.464
2007 142.490
2006 120.180
2005 106.950
2004 106.549
2003 111.944
2002 115.428
2001 103.227
2000 89.681
1999 77.138
1998 57.520
1997 52.472
1996 50.248
1995 50.146
1994 46.287
1993 45.594
1992 38.040
1991 29.002
1990 22.825
1989 21.738
1988 34.914
1987 58.897
1986 61.822
1985 53.927
1984 30.868
1983 33.602
1982 35.190
1981 28.927
1980 25.771

 

http://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-data/audi/audi-a4/

 

 
Audi
A4 / S4
2014
Audi
A4 / S4
2015
Audi
A4 / S4
2016
Audi
A4 / S4
2017
January 2.194 1.563 1.325 1.737
February 2.216 1.743 1.827 2.377
March 3.334 2.266 3.226 3.876
April 3.167 2.327 2.983 3.246
May 3.123 2.785 2.756 3.011
June 3.365 2.863 2.802 3.022
July 2.717 2.433 2.612  
August 3.233 2.743 2.965  
September 2.480 2.221 3.175  
October 2.268 2.896 3.864  
November 2.699 2.418 3.143  
December 3.197 3.426 4.009  

 

 
Audi
A4 / S4
2016 34.687
2015 29.013
2014 33.993
2013 36.744
2012 35.415
2011 35.234
2010 34.672
2009 37.070
2008 43.343
2007 45.411
2006 49.862
2005 48.922
2004 47.168
2003 51.043
2002 44.319
2001 35.739
2000 34.460
1999 32.137
1998 26.635
1997 20.871
1996 15.288
1995 0

 

 

Im not even gonna try to prove how  crappy the  CTS sales are  compared to the Audi A6 and the BMW 5 Series....you know...the  CTS' MAIN competition.

 

Arent you a main believer of who cares what is happening OUTSIDE the US?

Well...maybe its the semantics argument that you care about mostly...

What is bugging you the most is the confusion argument...

Hey...

You may be right
I may be crazy
But it just may be a lunatic you're looking for
Turn out the light
Don't try to save me
You may be wrong for all I know
Im probably right!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search