Jump to content
William Maley

GM News: GM to Unifor: End CAMI Strike Or We Begin Winding Down Equinox Production

Recommended Posts

The news isn't getting any better at General Motors' CAMI plant where workers have been on strike for a month after the automaker and Canadian union Unifor were unable to reach an agreement. Already, the strike has caused GM to make adjustments and idle some of their plants in North America, and there are concerns about the shrinking stock of Chevrolet Equinoxes. 

But now the stakes have been raised. According to Reuters and Automotive News, General Motors issued a warning to leaders at Unifor that it will start winding down production of the Equinox at CAMI unless the strike is called off. Unifor leader Jerry Dias was told by GM officials that the automaker would begin ramping up Equinox production at the San Luis Potosi and Ramos Arizpe, Mexico plants if the strike was not called off.

"GM just told us today that they are going to ramp up production in Mexico. They have declared war on Canada," Diaz told Reuters.

GM had no immediate comment on Dias' statement when reached by Reuters.

According to a source at GM, the discussions between them and Unifor have been going nowhere and there is "a high degree of frustration." Because of this, GM is planning to study how quickly key suppliers for the Equinox could move their operations down to Mexico. No final decision on CAMI's fate has been decided according to the source, but the time frame for getting a deal done is narrowing.

Mexico has been the dividing point between GM and Unifor. The union objected to GM's decision to lay off 600 workers at CAMI when it moved production of the GMC Terrain to Mexico. Unifor wants CAMI to be the lead plant for Equinox production by "giving it more production if Equinox sales rise and making it the last to scale back production if sales fall." But GM has invested $800 million into the plant for retooling to build the new Equinox. The automaker believes this should be enough commitment and putting it into writing isn't necessary. According to the source, there is no such language in any of the other union contracts.

The strike has gotten so bad that the Government of Ontario has stepped in, urging both groups to resolve this rift.

“I feel like we’re engaged in a poker game, but the interests of Ontario are sitting on the table right now,” said Brad Duguid, Ontario's Economic Development Minister.

“It’s an uncomfortable place to be, obviously, and we’d really like to urge the parties to find a resolution to this as quickly as possible before permanent damage is done.”

Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Reuters


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do settle this, I would avoid buying as I bet there will be some frustration issues and it could be taken out in quality on the auto's.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some historian correct me if I'm wrong.... didn't CAMI try this "preferential treatment on the production of a specific nameplate" stunt with the 5th Gen Camaro also?

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

It certainly bears a striking resemblance Drew. Act like a greedy little a-hole, get treated like a greedy little a-hole, seems to be lesson GM is trying to teach here. 

All of these damn auto unions need a little slap on the wrist letting them know they're employees and lucky to have a job. Manufacturing can be moved anywhere they please and other states would gladly accept the manufacturing jobs(I understand logistically it isn't that simple, at all). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

All of these damn auto unions need a little slap on the wrist letting them know they're employees and lucky to have a job. Manufacturing can be moved anywhere they please and other states would gladly accept the manufacturing jobs(I understand logistically it isn't that simple, at all). 

When there is already another line that is building the same product, it is a lot simpler to do.  Good on GM for not putting all their eggs in the CAMI basket like they did with 5th gen Camaro. 

The Union is trying to act powerful while negotiating from a position of weakness.  It's not going to work out in their favor. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

When there is already another line that is building the same product, it is a lot simpler to do.  Good on GM for not putting all their eggs in the CAMI basket like they did with 5th gen Camaro. 

The Union is trying to act powerful while negotiating from a position of weakness.  It's not going to work out in their favor. 

Good. Good on GM for not taking their crap. :thumbsup:

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Some historian correct me if I'm wrong.... didn't CAMI try this "preferential treatment on the production of a specific nameplate" stunt with the 5th Gen Camaro also?

It goes back to the 4th Gen Camaro and the St. Therese Quebec plant. GM figured they were free when they killed the nameplate after the F-Body died (they even tore down the plant), but I guess there were some rumblings so GM tossed them a bone with the 5th Gen. 

Edited by SS427
added a comma
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SS427 said:

It goes back to the 4th Gen Camaro and the St. Therese Quebec plant. GM figured they were free when they killed the nameplate after the F-Body died (they even tore down the plant) but I guess there were some rumblings so GM tossed them a bone with the 5th Gen. 

Thanks for clarifying for me... my memory was hazy.

And welcome back!

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My money is on GM ditching that CAMI plant.  This is not the 1980s anymore.  Mexico is more than able to produce enough Equinoxes the market will bear.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I kinda expected this. GM has no reason to stay. 

Little does CAMI know this just sealed their fate that much faster.

That plant was going to get shuttered anyways....kinda knew that years ago. GM simply wants out of Canada all together.

Nox will be built in Mexico for a while, though the plan was to move small car production down there, not so much the Nox-as they could trade a small car plant (like lordstown or Lansing) for the Nox, maybe Terrain as well.

Will be interesting to see what GM does now thanks to this strike, as they wanted to take their time moving stuff around first.

Wouldn't be surprised now to see GM ax a model or too sooner......

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words...

damned if you do....damned if you dont.

using another cliche, lose-lose situation.

Leave things alone and dont say a word...GM closes you down and you go quietly in the night.

Manifest and strike...GM gets mad...and closes you down.

Hey...GM has got to do what they got to do to ensure the health of the company...I aint disputing that.

What I am saying is that...due to circumstances...the fate of that plant was sealed a while ago...

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to be a lot of antipathy for the UAW on here...  And it isn't as if I have any particular 'love' for them either.  

However, maybe I have mellowed in my elder years.  I do think this is the move of a 'dying' enterprise.  The union is possibly using this as a tactic to garner the attention of the public of the plight of North American (in this case Canada) manufacturing.  

It won't work, but they will try nonetheless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, lengnert said:

Seems to be a lot of antipathy for the UAW on here...  And it isn't as if I have any particular 'love' for them either.  

However, maybe I have mellowed in my elder years.  I do think this is the move of a 'dying' enterprise.  The union is possibly using this as a tactic to garner the attention of the public of the plight of North American (in this case Canada) manufacturing.  

It won't work, but they will try nonetheless.

Unions did allot of good in the early days of the 1900's, now they are just a political ass kissing machine of special interests that have hurt more than helped the average worker.

Screwed once by the union, shame on them, screwed a second time by the union, shame on me, screwed a third time, time to die.

Unions have screwed many of us over more than they realize and in todays modern society with more and more people getting an education or at least tradeshow certified, many have come to wonder why do I need to pay a union to represent me when I can represent myself and keep my money to myself?

Especially in a socialist medicine country like Canada? I do not see the benefits of union representation.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea how to be civil, I have absolutely no love for the UAW or its Canadian equivalent.

Unreal.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

In other words...

damned if you do....damned if you dont.

using another cliche, lose-lose situation.

Leave things alone and dont say a word...GM closes you down and you go quietly in the night.

Manifest and strike...GM gets mad...and closes you down.

Hey...GM has got to do what they got to do to ensure the health of the company...I aint disputing that.

What I am saying is that...due to circumstances...the fate of that plant was sealed a while ago...

 

But it wasn't that way.... GM already put $800 million into re-tooling the plant for Equinox. The Union decided they wanted more than an $800m commitment for what is one of GM's best selling models. It wasn't lose - lose... it was win - lose... and the union picked lose.

43 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Unions did allot of good in the early days of the 1900's, now they are just a political ass kissing machine of special interests that have hurt more than helped the average worker.

Screwed once by the union, shame on them, screwed a second time by the union, shame on me, screwed a third time, time to die.

Unions have screwed many of us over more than they realize and in todays modern society with more and more people getting an education or at least tradeshow certified, many have come to wonder why do I need to pay a union to represent me when I can represent myself and keep my money to myself?

Especially in a socialist medicine country like Canada? I do not see the benefits of union representation.

I don't have a problem with unions that are reasonable... but insisting that a specific plant gets preferential treatment... that's not reasonable.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

But it wasn't that way.... GM already put $800 million into re-tooling the plant for Equinox. The Union decided they wanted more than an $800m commitment for what is one of GM's best selling models. It wasn't lose - lose... it was win - lose... and the union picked lose.

 

Yeah...and I was also going with the fact that cost to build cars in Ontario also rose.

The electricity costs rose...the taxes that GM had to pay in Ontario also rose in the last few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, frogger said:

With NAFTA seemingly being killed by the US protectionist administration, the auto industry is in for a big headache...

Good thing everything I want to own is either built in Mexico or Germany by German corporations or built in japan by Japanese corporations.  I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching this one unravel.

7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

 

I don't have a problem with unions that are reasonable... but insisting that a specific plant gets preferential treatment... that's not reasonable.

 

Hence my intense hatred for the UAW.  They have never been about reasonable.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, regfootball said:

would be nice if GM's volume models were factoried in the USA.  if considering Mexico or CHINA instead.

 

Sonic, Cruze, Malibu, Impala, Camaro, Traverse, Tahoe, Suburban, Colorado, Canyon, Acadia, Yukon, Yukon XL, Lacrosse, Enclave

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Sonic, Cruze, Malibu, Impala, Camaro, Traverse, Tahoe, Suburban, Colorado, Canyon, Acadia, Yukon, Yukon XL, Lacrosse, Enclave

 

Isn't the CTS built here also?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Today's Birthdays

    1. blue-bowtie
      blue-bowtie
      Age: 39
  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      About a month ago, we reported on a California Air Resources Board (CARB) document that revealed the 2019 Camaro could be getting a seven-speed manual for the 6.2L V8. At the time, speculation was that the manual transmission could come from the Corvette. But it appears this dream has been popped.
      Last week, Bozi Tatarevic on Twitter uncovered that the document listing the seven-speed manual for the Camaro was marked as a canceled. A new document uploaded on the same day shows the 'Trans Type' being a six-speed manual and 10-speed automatic. CarBuzz speculates that the seven-speed transmission has been pushed back to 2020. Our guesses as to why GM pulled the seven-speed off the CARB document could either be that GM ran into issues with fitting the Corvette's seven-speed in the Camaro - the transmission mounts on the rear-axle in the Corvette while the Camaro mounts it at the engine. There could also be the issue of transmission being slightly too expensive for the Camaro.
      Source: hoonable on Twitter, (2), CarBuzz
       

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      About a month ago, we reported on a California Air Resources Board (CARB) document that revealed the 2019 Camaro could be getting a seven-speed manual for the 6.2L V8. At the time, speculation was that the manual transmission could come from the Corvette. But it appears this dream has been popped.
      Last week, Bozi Tatarevic on Twitter uncovered that the document listing the seven-speed manual for the Camaro was marked as a canceled. A new document uploaded on the same day shows the 'Trans Type' being a six-speed manual and 10-speed automatic. CarBuzz speculates that the seven-speed transmission has been pushed back to 2020. Our guesses as to why GM pulled the seven-speed off the CARB document could either be that GM ran into issues with fitting the Corvette's seven-speed in the Camaro - the transmission mounts on the rear-axle in the Corvette while the Camaro mounts it at the engine. There could also be the issue of transmission being slightly too expensive for the Camaro.
      Source: hoonable on Twitter, (2), CarBuzz
       
    • By William Maley
      Tesla's production hell seems to be only getting worse than better. Various issues at their Freemont plant has caused the automaker to push back their goal of producing 5,000 Model 3s from late last year to June of this year. This, in turn, has caused some holders of Model 3 reservations to have their order pushed back to 2019.
      “As we work hard to meet demand, we wanted to let you know that your estimated delivery timing has been adjusted to a slightly later window,” Tesla said in an email to customers.
      According to Bloomberg, the new date depends on when the reservation was placed and what model was chosen. Tesla is trying to get the more expensive long-range battery model out first before starting production of the cheaper standard battery model. This has buyers of the latter model worried as they might not get the full $7,500 tax credit. The credit begins to phase out once an automaker has built 200,000, something Tesla expects to hit sometime this year.
      The move has caused some reservation holders to take to various forums and Twitter to complain. Others are deciding to jump ship and buy a Chevrolet Bolt. Reuters reports that Chevrolet dealers in California are seeing a noticeable increase of Tesla shoppers interested in the Bolt.
      “We’re getting the Tesla people who wanted their Model 3. We ask them, ‘What other cars are you interested in?’ They’re mostly Tesla. But they want the car now. They don’t want to wait,” said Yev Kaplinskiy of Stewart Chevrolet.
      Kaplinskiy said they sold 15 Bolts last weekend.
      Chevrolet is taking advantage of the delay by emailing some prospective buyers this week with the message of, “Bolt EV: Now available.”
      Source: Bloomberg, Reuters

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Tesla's production hell seems to be only getting worse than better. Various issues at their Freemont plant has caused the automaker to push back their goal of producing 5,000 Model 3s from late last year to June of this year. This, in turn, has caused some holders of Model 3 reservations to have their order pushed back to 2019.
      “As we work hard to meet demand, we wanted to let you know that your estimated delivery timing has been adjusted to a slightly later window,” Tesla said in an email to customers.
      According to Bloomberg, the new date depends on when the reservation was placed and what model was chosen. Tesla is trying to get the more expensive long-range battery model out first before starting production of the cheaper standard battery model. This has buyers of the latter model worried as they might not get the full $7,500 tax credit. The credit begins to phase out once an automaker has built 200,000, something Tesla expects to hit sometime this year.
      The move has caused some reservation holders to take to various forums and Twitter to complain. Others are deciding to jump ship and buy a Chevrolet Bolt. Reuters reports that Chevrolet dealers in California are seeing a noticeable increase of Tesla shoppers interested in the Bolt.
      “We’re getting the Tesla people who wanted their Model 3. We ask them, ‘What other cars are you interested in?’ They’re mostly Tesla. But they want the car now. They don’t want to wait,” said Yev Kaplinskiy of Stewart Chevrolet.
      Kaplinskiy said they sold 15 Bolts last weekend.
      Chevrolet is taking advantage of the delay by emailing some prospective buyers this week with the message of, “Bolt EV: Now available.”
      Source: Bloomberg, Reuters
    • By William Maley
      This past year has seen General Motors not be shy with scaling back operations in various international markets. The company sold off Opel/Vauxhall to PSA Group, ended sales of Chevrolet vehicles in India, and closed down their operations in South Africa. Now, GM's Korea operations are on the chopping block.
      Last week, GM CEO Mary Barra revealed that company officials were in discussion with minority owners and union officials that could lead to "some rationalization actions or restructuring."
      "We're going to have to take actions going forward to have a viable business," said Barra during a conference call talking about GM's 2017 financial results.
      Sales of GM vehicles in Korea have dropped 20 percent, while manufacturing costs have increased. This has made South Korea a poor place to export vehicles to other markets.
      This week, GM announced that it will shutter the Gunsan plant (one of the four plants operating in South Korea). The plant employs 2,000 out of the 16,000 workers employed at GM Korea. GM said the reason for the closure came down to high labor costs and low output. The plant only operated at 20 percent of its capacity last year according to Reuters. Unsurprisingly, the news angered the South Korean government and workers at the plant. 
      “The government expresses deep regret over GM’s one-sided decision to suspend and shut down” the plant, the finance ministry said in a statement.
      The ministry said it wants to conduct an audit of GM's operations help with the restructuring plan.
      As for workers at Gunsan plant, workers staged a protest yesterday, declaring the move a “death sentence”, and threatening a strike.
      “Let’s protect our right to live on our own,” said Kim Jae-hong, the leader of the workers’ union at the Gunsan branch.
      A GM Korea spokesman said the company "would continue discussions with the union and seek their understanding over the closure plan." Workers though aren't fully buying this.
      “We can’t accept this. The company informed us about the closure plan, not asking for our opinion. It was already the end of the discussions,” Dang Sung-geun, a senior official at the union of GM Korea told Reuters.
      “This is like a death sentence notice before the Lunar New Year holidays.”
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Bloomberg, Reuters (2)

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Who's Online (See full list)

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×