Jump to content
William Maley

GM News: GM to Unifor: End CAMI Strike Or We Begin Winding Down Equinox Production

Recommended Posts

The news isn't getting any better at General Motors' CAMI plant where workers have been on strike for a month after the automaker and Canadian union Unifor were unable to reach an agreement. Already, the strike has caused GM to make adjustments and idle some of their plants in North America, and there are concerns about the shrinking stock of Chevrolet Equinoxes. 

But now the stakes have been raised. According to Reuters and Automotive News, General Motors issued a warning to leaders at Unifor that it will start winding down production of the Equinox at CAMI unless the strike is called off. Unifor leader Jerry Dias was told by GM officials that the automaker would begin ramping up Equinox production at the San Luis Potosi and Ramos Arizpe, Mexico plants if the strike was not called off.

"GM just told us today that they are going to ramp up production in Mexico. They have declared war on Canada," Diaz told Reuters.

GM had no immediate comment on Dias' statement when reached by Reuters.

According to a source at GM, the discussions between them and Unifor have been going nowhere and there is "a high degree of frustration." Because of this, GM is planning to study how quickly key suppliers for the Equinox could move their operations down to Mexico. No final decision on CAMI's fate has been decided according to the source, but the time frame for getting a deal done is narrowing.

Mexico has been the dividing point between GM and Unifor. The union objected to GM's decision to lay off 600 workers at CAMI when it moved production of the GMC Terrain to Mexico. Unifor wants CAMI to be the lead plant for Equinox production by "giving it more production if Equinox sales rise and making it the last to scale back production if sales fall." But GM has invested $800 million into the plant for retooling to build the new Equinox. The automaker believes this should be enough commitment and putting it into writing isn't necessary. According to the source, there is no such language in any of the other union contracts.

The strike has gotten so bad that the Government of Ontario has stepped in, urging both groups to resolve this rift.

“I feel like we’re engaged in a poker game, but the interests of Ontario are sitting on the table right now,” said Brad Duguid, Ontario's Economic Development Minister.

“It’s an uncomfortable place to be, obviously, and we’d really like to urge the parties to find a resolution to this as quickly as possible before permanent damage is done.”

Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Reuters


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do settle this, I would avoid buying as I bet there will be some frustration issues and it could be taken out in quality on the auto's.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly bears a striking resemblance Drew. Act like a greedy little a-hole, get treated like a greedy little a-hole, seems to be lesson GM is trying to teach here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

It certainly bears a striking resemblance Drew. Act like a greedy little a-hole, get treated like a greedy little a-hole, seems to be lesson GM is trying to teach here. 

All of these damn auto unions need a little slap on the wrist letting them know they're employees and lucky to have a job. Manufacturing can be moved anywhere they please and other states would gladly accept the manufacturing jobs(I understand logistically it isn't that simple, at all). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

All of these damn auto unions need a little slap on the wrist letting them know they're employees and lucky to have a job. Manufacturing can be moved anywhere they please and other states would gladly accept the manufacturing jobs(I understand logistically it isn't that simple, at all). 

When there is already another line that is building the same product, it is a lot simpler to do.  Good on GM for not putting all their eggs in the CAMI basket like they did with 5th gen Camaro. 

The Union is trying to act powerful while negotiating from a position of weakness.  It's not going to work out in their favor. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

When there is already another line that is building the same product, it is a lot simpler to do.  Good on GM for not putting all their eggs in the CAMI basket like they did with 5th gen Camaro. 

The Union is trying to act powerful while negotiating from a position of weakness.  It's not going to work out in their favor. 

Good. Good on GM for not taking their crap. :thumbsup:

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Some historian correct me if I'm wrong.... didn't CAMI try this "preferential treatment on the production of a specific nameplate" stunt with the 5th Gen Camaro also?

It goes back to the 4th Gen Camaro and the St. Therese Quebec plant. GM figured they were free when they killed the nameplate after the F-Body died (they even tore down the plant), but I guess there were some rumblings so GM tossed them a bone with the 5th Gen. 

Edited by SS427
added a comma
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SS427 said:

It goes back to the 4th Gen Camaro and the St. Therese Quebec plant. GM figured they were free when they killed the nameplate after the F-Body died (they even tore down the plant) but I guess there were some rumblings so GM tossed them a bone with the 5th Gen. 

Thanks for clarifying for me... my memory was hazy.

And welcome back!

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My money is on GM ditching that CAMI plant.  This is not the 1980s anymore.  Mexico is more than able to produce enough Equinoxes the market will bear.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I kinda expected this. GM has no reason to stay. 

Little does CAMI know this just sealed their fate that much faster.

That plant was going to get shuttered anyways....kinda knew that years ago. GM simply wants out of Canada all together.

Nox will be built in Mexico for a while, though the plan was to move small car production down there, not so much the Nox-as they could trade a small car plant (like lordstown or Lansing) for the Nox, maybe Terrain as well.

Will be interesting to see what GM does now thanks to this strike, as they wanted to take their time moving stuff around first.

Wouldn't be surprised now to see GM ax a model or too sooner......

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words...

damned if you do....damned if you dont.

using another cliche, lose-lose situation.

Leave things alone and dont say a word...GM closes you down and you go quietly in the night.

Manifest and strike...GM gets mad...and closes you down.

Hey...GM has got to do what they got to do to ensure the health of the company...I aint disputing that.

What I am saying is that...due to circumstances...the fate of that plant was sealed a while ago...

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to be a lot of antipathy for the UAW on here...  And it isn't as if I have any particular 'love' for them either.  

However, maybe I have mellowed in my elder years.  I do think this is the move of a 'dying' enterprise.  The union is possibly using this as a tactic to garner the attention of the public of the plight of North American (in this case Canada) manufacturing.  

It won't work, but they will try nonetheless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, lengnert said:

Seems to be a lot of antipathy for the UAW on here...  And it isn't as if I have any particular 'love' for them either.  

However, maybe I have mellowed in my elder years.  I do think this is the move of a 'dying' enterprise.  The union is possibly using this as a tactic to garner the attention of the public of the plight of North American (in this case Canada) manufacturing.  

It won't work, but they will try nonetheless.

Unions did allot of good in the early days of the 1900's, now they are just a political ass kissing machine of special interests that have hurt more than helped the average worker.

Screwed once by the union, shame on them, screwed a second time by the union, shame on me, screwed a third time, time to die.

Unions have screwed many of us over more than they realize and in todays modern society with more and more people getting an education or at least tradeshow certified, many have come to wonder why do I need to pay a union to represent me when I can represent myself and keep my money to myself?

Especially in a socialist medicine country like Canada? I do not see the benefits of union representation.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea how to be civil, I have absolutely no love for the UAW or its Canadian equivalent.

Unreal.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With NAFTA seemingly being killed by the US protectionist administration, the auto industry is in for a big headache...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

In other words...

damned if you do....damned if you dont.

using another cliche, lose-lose situation.

Leave things alone and dont say a word...GM closes you down and you go quietly in the night.

Manifest and strike...GM gets mad...and closes you down.

Hey...GM has got to do what they got to do to ensure the health of the company...I aint disputing that.

What I am saying is that...due to circumstances...the fate of that plant was sealed a while ago...

 

But it wasn't that way.... GM already put $800 million into re-tooling the plant for Equinox. The Union decided they wanted more than an $800m commitment for what is one of GM's best selling models. It wasn't lose - lose... it was win - lose... and the union picked lose.

43 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Unions did allot of good in the early days of the 1900's, now they are just a political ass kissing machine of special interests that have hurt more than helped the average worker.

Screwed once by the union, shame on them, screwed a second time by the union, shame on me, screwed a third time, time to die.

Unions have screwed many of us over more than they realize and in todays modern society with more and more people getting an education or at least tradeshow certified, many have come to wonder why do I need to pay a union to represent me when I can represent myself and keep my money to myself?

Especially in a socialist medicine country like Canada? I do not see the benefits of union representation.

I don't have a problem with unions that are reasonable... but insisting that a specific plant gets preferential treatment... that's not reasonable.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

But it wasn't that way.... GM already put $800 million into re-tooling the plant for Equinox. The Union decided they wanted more than an $800m commitment for what is one of GM's best selling models. It wasn't lose - lose... it was win - lose... and the union picked lose.

 

Yeah...and I was also going with the fact that cost to build cars in Ontario also rose.

The electricity costs rose...the taxes that GM had to pay in Ontario also rose in the last few years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, frogger said:

With NAFTA seemingly being killed by the US protectionist administration, the auto industry is in for a big headache...

Good thing everything I want to own is either built in Mexico or Germany by German corporations or built in japan by Japanese corporations.  I am going to thoroughly enjoy watching this one unravel.

7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

 

I don't have a problem with unions that are reasonable... but insisting that a specific plant gets preferential treatment... that's not reasonable.

 

Hence my intense hatred for the UAW.  They have never been about reasonable.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, regfootball said:

would be nice if GM's volume models were factoried in the USA.  if considering Mexico or CHINA instead.

 

Sonic, Cruze, Malibu, Impala, Camaro, Traverse, Tahoe, Suburban, Colorado, Canyon, Acadia, Yukon, Yukon XL, Lacrosse, Enclave

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Sonic, Cruze, Malibu, Impala, Camaro, Traverse, Tahoe, Suburban, Colorado, Canyon, Acadia, Yukon, Yukon XL, Lacrosse, Enclave

 

Isn't the CTS built here also?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Al Oppenheiser is possibly one of the most important people working at General Motors being the chief engineer for the fifth and sixth-generation Chevrolet Camaro. He helped bring back one of the most iconic muscle cars and make into something quite special. But Oppenheiser will soon face a new challenge.
      Car and Driver reports that Oppenheiser will move over to GM's newly formed AV/EV organization to work on zero-emission-vehicle development. GM spokesman Michael Albano explained that they are moving "some of our best talent" to help work on their electrification efforts. Albano did acknowledge this was a lateral move, Oppenheiser would remain as a chief engineer.
      "We have launched the final variant of this generation of Camaro, so the time is right" for him to move, said Albano.
      What will be Oppenheiser's responsibility in this new position? Car and Driver says it will be "broader than one specific vehicle," meaning he'll be working on a number of vehicle styles.
      Source: Car and Driver

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Al Oppenheiser is possibly one of the most important people working at General Motors being the chief engineer for the fifth and sixth-generation Chevrolet Camaro. He helped bring back one of the most iconic muscle cars and make into something quite special. But Oppenheiser will soon face a new challenge.
      Car and Driver reports that Oppenheiser will move over to GM's newly formed AV/EV organization to work on zero-emission-vehicle development. GM spokesman Michael Albano explained that they are moving "some of our best talent" to help work on their electrification efforts. Albano did acknowledge this was a lateral move, Oppenheiser would remain as a chief engineer.
      "We have launched the final variant of this generation of Camaro, so the time is right" for him to move, said Albano.
      What will be Oppenheiser's responsibility in this new position? Car and Driver says it will be "broader than one specific vehicle," meaning he'll be working on a number of vehicle styles.
      Source: Car and Driver
    • By William Maley
      General Motors' upcoming restructuring plan where more than 10,000 jobs will be cut and five factories losing products has caused many politicians to become very upset. Yesterday, CEO Mary Barra traveled to Capitol Hill to try an mitigate the social damage by this announcement. Those expecting Barra to backpedal or balk under pressure from various lawmakers on moving production of certain vehicles out of Mexico to plants in the U.S. would come away disappointed. 
      “I want to make sure that the workforce knows that there are limitations and we do have an overcapacity across the country. I understand this is something that impacts the country and I understand that there is a lot of emotion and concern about it,” Barra told reporters in a press conference after meeting Senators Sherrod Brown (Democrat) and Rob Portman (Republican) of Ohio.
      The two senators have been critical about the plan and pushed Barra in their meeting to get a new product in Lordstown, whether that be one of the 20 new EVs GM is planning or move production of the Chevrolet Blazer from Mexico.
      “GM says it expects to build 20 new EVs in next five years. We want one or more of those vehicles to be built in Lordstown, Ohio. That’s where it belongs,” said Portman.
      Barra said during the meeting she'll "keep an open mind but she doesn't want to raise expectations."
      Speaking to Reuters, Barra said it would “very costly” to shift production from Mexico of the Chevrolet Blazer that will begin shortly. But she did mention "GM planned to add other products at U.S. plants next year." Whether that includes Lordstown or not remains to be seen as negotiations with the UAW kick off next year.
      President Donald Trump has been very critical of this plan, saying he could eliminate federal subsidies on electric cars - something that would hurt other automakers more than GM as it's close to 200,000 mark where the $7,500 subsidy begins to fade. When asked about this, Barra gave an indirect answer.
      “I understand this is something that impacts the country and I understand that there is a lot of emotion and concern about it,” said Barra.
      She continued by saying GM wanted to “do the right thing for our employees but also make sure General Motors is strong and lean in the future.”
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Detroit Free Press, Reuters
      GM Statement: Chairman and CEO Mary Barra on meetings with members of Congress from Ohio and Maryland

      “I had very constructive meetings with members of Congress from Ohio and Maryland. I share their concerns about the impact the actions we announced last week will have on our employees, their families and the communities. These were very difficult decisions -- decisions I take very personally. I informed the members that many hourly employees at the impacted U.S. plants will have the opportunity to work at other U.S. GM plants and that we are committed to working with them to minimize the impact on the communities. I also informed them that all salaried GM workers impacted by these actions are being offered outplacement services to help them transition to new jobs.”

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      General Motors' upcoming restructuring plan where more than 10,000 jobs will be cut and five factories losing products has caused many politicians to become very upset. Yesterday, CEO Mary Barra traveled to Capitol Hill to try an mitigate the social damage by this announcement. Those expecting Barra to backpedal or balk under pressure from various lawmakers on moving production of certain vehicles out of Mexico to plants in the U.S. would come away disappointed. 
      “I want to make sure that the workforce knows that there are limitations and we do have an overcapacity across the country. I understand this is something that impacts the country and I understand that there is a lot of emotion and concern about it,” Barra told reporters in a press conference after meeting Senators Sherrod Brown (Democrat) and Rob Portman (Republican) of Ohio.
      The two senators have been critical about the plan and pushed Barra in their meeting to get a new product in Lordstown, whether that be one of the 20 new EVs GM is planning or move production of the Chevrolet Blazer from Mexico.
      “GM says it expects to build 20 new EVs in next five years. We want one or more of those vehicles to be built in Lordstown, Ohio. That’s where it belongs,” said Portman.
      Barra said during the meeting she'll "keep an open mind but she doesn't want to raise expectations."
      Speaking to Reuters, Barra said it would “very costly” to shift production from Mexico of the Chevrolet Blazer that will begin shortly. But she did mention "GM planned to add other products at U.S. plants next year." Whether that includes Lordstown or not remains to be seen as negotiations with the UAW kick off next year.
      President Donald Trump has been very critical of this plan, saying he could eliminate federal subsidies on electric cars - something that would hurt other automakers more than GM as it's close to 200,000 mark where the $7,500 subsidy begins to fade. When asked about this, Barra gave an indirect answer.
      “I understand this is something that impacts the country and I understand that there is a lot of emotion and concern about it,” said Barra.
      She continued by saying GM wanted to “do the right thing for our employees but also make sure General Motors is strong and lean in the future.”
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Detroit Free Press, Reuters
      GM Statement: Chairman and CEO Mary Barra on meetings with members of Congress from Ohio and Maryland

      “I had very constructive meetings with members of Congress from Ohio and Maryland. I share their concerns about the impact the actions we announced last week will have on our employees, their families and the communities. These were very difficult decisions -- decisions I take very personally. I informed the members that many hourly employees at the impacted U.S. plants will have the opportunity to work at other U.S. GM plants and that we are committed to working with them to minimize the impact on the communities. I also informed them that all salaried GM workers impacted by these actions are being offered outplacement services to help them transition to new jobs.”
  • My Clubs

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×